PDA

View Full Version : UPDATED! - Lunatic Left: "Lieberman loses, CODE RED, CODE RED, CODE RED"


BoogyMan
08-10-2006, 01:17 PM
Link Here (http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/08/lieberman-loses-code-red-code-red-code.html)

No, really.

Bush just invoked a Code Red terrorist emergency, our first ever.

And isn't it queer that the emergency is declared within a day of Republican party leader Ken Mehlman launching an all-out offensive against Democrats following Joe Lieberman's loss in Connecticut, an offensive in which Mehlman, the White House and Republican operatives are claiming that Democrats no longer care about national security or the war on terror.

And just at that moment we get our FIRST ever red alert. Beam me up, Scotty.

Do I sound as if I don't believe this alert? Why, yes, that would be correct. I just don't believe it. Read the article. They say the plot had an "Al Qaeda footprint." Ooh, are you scared yet? What that really means is that they found NO evidence whatsoever that the plot had anything to do at all with Al Qaeda, but the plot simply made them think "gosh, this is something Al Qaeda would do." That's what a footprint means. Nice, but no cigar.

Were these guys totally innocent? Probably not. But there's no reason to believe they were any more Osama's right-hand than Jose Padilla, the famed dirty-bomber who I think is now only being charged with jay-walking or something. Then there were the famous six Muslim-American guys in New York state, supposedly operating their own al Qaeda cell. Not so much. Or how about the Al Qaeda cell in Florida trying to blow up the Sears Tower? Oh that's right, they were just some demented friends squatting in a warehouse and "thinking" about it. And then there's the famous plot to blow up the Brooklyn Bridge - with a single blow torch.

Bottom line: Joe Lieberbush lost. The message is spreading across the land that incumbents who embrace the president are in serious trouble. And the Republicans needed to divert attention, to stop this meme in its tracks, and lo' and behold we have our first terror alert that I can recall since the last election, and it's our first ever Red Alert! What a coincidence!

Unhinged?Â*Â*Nuts?Â*Â*Moonbat loon with delusions of grandeur?Â*Â*I think so.

UPDATE - 12:32 pm cst 8/10/2006
Link Here (http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/08/bush-stayed-on-vacation-knowing-full.html)
We're upending civil aviation in the US today, freaking the hell out of the entire country, and what is our president doing? Giving speeches about... the economy!

Because what other topic would be more appropriate for a day when we learn that terrorists want to kill thousands of Americans on US airlines.

And even more interesting, according to press reports, Bush was briefed about the attack days ago while he was on vacation. And guess what? He stayed on vacation. Sound familiar?

And even better, they didn't even wake Bush up last night to let him know that the Brits had gone public and that, basically, everyone was freaking over the report:
Because Bush had been getting regular briefings on the developments, Snow said the president was not awakened overnight as action by British authorities was made public.
Then again, they thought someone was trying to kill Laura Bush and Nancy Reagan with an airplane headed to the White House a few years back, and no one told Bush because he was busy riding his bike in Maryland. So, what's a terrorist plot to destroy scores of American airplanes to the president who must never be disturbed.

Oh yeah, and now Bush is off to a Republican fundraiser. After all, if Bush doesn't ignore the current crisis, the terrorists win.

So the big question now, is whether Bush is still on vacation today or whether he called it off?

Egads this should embarrass the left!

PittsburghAfterDark
08-10-2006, 06:23 PM
You know, it's uncanny. I've seen this exact same theory on at least three moonbat websites. Hard to tell which one started it or repeated it.

You have to know that 21+ terrorists in Britian were just sitting around waiting for Lieberman to lose before they got the green light.

The left is so deluded it's just awe inspiring to watch. I think I said to newscaster not so long ago... let me find it.... We're awaiting new depths of abject stupidity that ensures continued minority existence and outright hilarity. (http://www.democracyforums.com/showthread.php?tid=660&page=2)

Yep, I should keep a diary of what I say. It turns out I'm right at an alarming rate.

Alonzo
08-10-2006, 06:41 PM
Egads this should embarrass the left!

Ya. I mean a no name poster on a blog is really going to embarrass me. :rolleyes:

BoogyMan
08-10-2006, 06:42 PM
Egads this should embarrass the left!

Ya. I mean a no name poster on a blog is really going to embarrass me. :rolleyes:


No name poster? This guy is a well known democratic political consultant who works on several current democratic political campaigns.

Try again 'Zo.

Alonzo
08-10-2006, 06:50 PM
I don't read blogs so I'm not familiar with these people. Either way, I didn't vote for him and I didn't write it, so I can't be embarrassed. From your statement it seems he has the same type of job as rove, rally the troops and win. If he serves that purpose then he did his job. Just like the hardcore right wingers. You wouldn't want to poster the contents of some right wing blogs all over the web, but they serve their purpose in that they rally the support of the base.

BoogyMan
08-10-2006, 08:37 PM
I don't read blogs so I'm not familiar with these people. Either way, I didn't vote for him and I didn't write it, so I can't be embarrassed. From your statement it seems he has the same type of job as rove, rally the troops and win. If he serves that purpose then he did his job. Just like the hardcore right wingers. You wouldn't want to poster the contents of some right wing blogs all over the web, but they serve their purpose in that they rally the support of the base.


Wouldn't want to step in any of that nasty truth stuff.

ECW
08-11-2006, 07:50 AM
When the news is all bad, the neo-cons turn to the blog world to demonize the Left. Typical rightwing manure.

PittsburghAfterDark
08-11-2006, 10:39 AM
Oh my poor boy. You don't realize that Newsweek recently did an entire cover story on the effectiveness of the blogs shaping political debate? Featuring the founder of the Daily Kosmunist? How 6 Democratic Presidential candidates went to seek king maker status from said groups annual convention?

Oh for shame. Obviously you're not aware that the blog world is being embraced by the Democrats and they're the ones taking credit and being given credit for "Better Dead With Ned".

We don't need to demonize the left with their blog world, they've done it themselves. We merely need point out the obvious.

ECW
08-11-2006, 03:52 PM
Is this article in the same "Liberal Media" that I so often hear your kind whining about all the time?

bobbylien
08-11-2006, 07:49 PM
Why do conservatives care so much about the Liberman race? I don't get it. Let the democratic party do as they please. I think Liberman saying that he would run as an independant if he lost really angered many democrats in Conneticut. Liberman made a huge mistake and he has paid for it dearly. Maybe it wasn't just his position on the war to many of the more informed democrats. But to the average democratic primary voter in Conneticut, the war was the defining issue and the only reason Liberman lost the primary. Mark my words, the republicans will use this in 2006 and 2008 to claim the democrats have been taken over by radical left anti-war groups. This will hurt the democratic party FAR more than leaving Liberman in office, he is pretty liberal on most other issues. He lost because of the war and the war only. I couldn't believe it when I saw that ad Lamont ran that showed Liberman's picture turning into Bush. Thats politics at its worst. That is the equivilant of Conservatives running an ad in which John Kerry's picture turned into Osama Bin Laden. Liberman didn't agree with Bush on anything really, he disagreed with the way the war has been run. He only believed that it would be a mistake to pull out right now, thats the only thing he agreed with Bush on.

Alonzo
08-11-2006, 08:03 PM
He only believed that it would be a mistake to pull out right now, thats the only thing he agreed with Bush on.

I saw an interview he did a few days ago. When asked if, in hindsight, he still thought the invasion of Iraq was a good thing he said yes and he would do it again. He just didn't like how some things were handled.

BoogyMan
08-11-2006, 08:19 PM
Why do conservatives care so much about the Liberman race? I don't get it. Let the democratic party do as they please. I think Liberman saying that he would run as an independant if he lost really angered many democrats in Conneticut. Liberman made a huge mistake and he has paid for it dearly. Maybe it wasn't just his position on the war to many of the more informed democrats. But to the average democratic primary voter in Conneticut, the war was the defining issue and the only reason Liberman lost the primary. Mark my words, the republicans will use this in 2006 and 2008 to claim the democrats have been taken over by radical left anti-war groups. This will hurt the democratic party FAR more than leaving Liberman in office, he is pretty liberal on most other issues. He lost because of the war and the war only. I couldn't believe it when I saw that ad Lamont ran that showed Liberman's picture turning into Bush. Thats politics at its worst. That is the equivilant of Conservatives running an ad in which John Kerry's picture turned into Osama Bin Laden. Liberman didn't agree with Bush on anything really, he disagreed with the way the war has been run. He only believed that it would be a mistake to pull out right now, thats the only thing he agreed with Bush on.


I think you be missing the point Bobby.Â*Â*The point is not one of support for Lieberman, but that radical lefties are saying that this recent terror announcement is a planned rollout in the wake of Lieberman's loss in the primaries in reaction to a hard left turn in the democratic party.

Not only are the radical lefties making such claims, but they are having online hissy fits about having to comply with the new TSA rules regarding liquids in carryon bags.Â*Â*Consider the screed on americablog.com today.

Link Here (http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/08/america-threatened-by-imminent-attack.html)

The horror the horror.

Just got the following email from my friend Cate:
"Yesterday, the TSA was confiscating MAKE UP at America's airports. Yes, MAKE UP. What kind of make up, you ask? LIP GLOSS. Yesterday, a friend of mine informed me that a girlfriend of hers waited in line for FIVE HOURS yesterday at National Airport.. and if you got out of line, to um, I don't know, TAKE A PISS, you had to go to the back of the line. Then the TSA made her hand over her Chanel lip gloss. Apparently Chanel Lip Gloss is a massive threat to national security. Let me show you this dire threat to our nation:

"And as women began to talk with each other about yesterday's debacle, we discover other things: women all over America were forced to take their lip gloss, foundation, and liquid eyeliner out of their purses and hand them over to the TSA. I'm sorry, but I find this ridiculous and grossly unfair. Let's be honest -- this is unfair to women, as men really don't go about their day to day lives with lip gloss in their pocket (unless they're a drag queen).

"I wonder if the NSA is going to start spying on Clinique, Chanel and Bobbi Brown. Apparently, the threat is massive."

Nathan Brazil
08-11-2006, 08:36 PM
I saw an interview he did a few days ago. When asked if, in hindsight, he still thought the invasion of Iraq was a good thing he said yes and he would do it again. He just didn't like how some things were handled.

Well that makes Lieberman totally unfit to be a Democrat. Democrats don't like honest people, even when they're only honest occasionally.

lily
08-11-2006, 09:08 PM
I have to laugh and also admit I am a little bit disappointed, in both this site and myself.

This site, because I thought it was different........yet on two different forums, these articles appear. One would think that the right has only one brain and are sharing it.

In myself, because I thought I was both a liberal and a democrat.......yet I've never heard of John Aravosis.

Cobra
08-12-2006, 01:31 AM
This site, because I thought it was different........yet on two different forums, these articles appear. One would think that the right has only one brain and are sharing it.
Well to be fair I've seen the exact same thing happen with leftist on certain select issues.
In myself, because I thought I was both a liberal and a
democrat.......yet I've never heard of John Aravosis.
Never heard of him either, he must not be that big or contravarsial a columnist.

ECW
08-12-2006, 06:25 AM
Democrats don't like honest people, even when they're only honest occasionally.

If that's true then Republicans don't like honest people at all. It makes them look bad. No wonder their party is full of that kind. We don't call them liars anymore because liars take offense. Instead we just call them neo-cons.

BoogyMan
08-12-2006, 04:43 PM
Democrats don't like honest people, even when they're only honest occasionally.

If that's true then Republicans don't like honest people at all. It makes them look bad. No wonder their party is full of that kind. We don't call them liars anymore because liars take offense. Instead we just call them neo-cons.


Is this like your false claim that Mr. Stillwell was a Republican ECW?

ECW
08-14-2006, 06:36 AM
See? You've proved my claim that Republicans don't like honest people at all because it makes them look bad. I made a mistake, owned up to it and you are still pissing and moaning about it a day later. It makes you look bad because your immaturity is showing everytime you bring it up. No one likes a whiner.

BoogyMan
08-14-2006, 01:26 PM
See? You've proved my claim that Republicans don't like honest people at all because it makes them look bad. I made a mistake, owned up to it and you are still pissing and moaning about it a day later. It makes you look bad because your immaturity is showing everytime you bring it up. No one likes a whiner.


If you look at the date of the posting you will see that it was most likely before I saw any comment from you as to your erroneous posting. Once again spoken like a true professional wrestler.