PDA

View Full Version : German Minister Says World Must Prevent Iran From Building Nuke Weapons


Trish
01-18-2008, 12:20 PM
German Minister Says World Must Prevent Iran From Building Nuke Weapons

Thursday, January 17, 2008
Associated Press

VIENNA, Austria — Germany's foreign minister on Thursday said the international community remains determined to prevent Iran from developing technology for nuclear weapons despite U.S. assessments that it has stopped working on an arms program.

Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier spoke before a briefing by Mohamed ElBaradei, the chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, on ElBaradei's recent meeting with top Iranian leaders on the nuclear standoff.

Germany and the five permanent Security Council members plan to meet Tuesday in Berlin for talks that diplomats said will include attempts to iron out differences on the language and timing of a third set of U.N. sanctions for Tehran's refusal to freeze uranium enrichment and meet other council demands.

"The conflict over Iran's nuclear program remains ... on the agenda" despite last month's U.S. intelligence assessment that Tehran stopped active work on a nuclear weapons program in 2003, he said. "The problem is not solved."

Urging Iran to "resurrect international confidence" in its nuclear intentions, Steinmeier said the international community "cannot and will not allow that technology for nuclear weapons be developed in this region."

He was alluding primarily to uranium enrichment, which Iran says it wants to develop to be able to generate nuclear power, but which also can create the fissile core of nuclear warheads. Iran refuses to mothball the program despite two sets of U.N. sanctions.

Opposition from Russia and China to quick and harsh new sanctions has increased in the wake of the U.S. intelligence estimate. But Steinmeier papered over differences, saying the Berlin meeting will focus on making sure that international unity over the need for Iran to heed Security Council demands" will continue to be expressed in the future."

He said that he wanted ElBaradei's assessment of the talks in Tehran "so that we have a substantial discussion" at the Berlin meeting.

The U.S. State Department said Wednesday Washington had no plans to change its sanctions strategy in dealing with Iran.

"The whole strategy here is to use various kinds of diplomatic pressure at a gradually increasing rate to try to get a different set of decisions out of the Iranian leadership," spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters.

Officials commenting on ElBaradei's trip to Tehran last week said Iran had promised the U.N.'s chief nuclear inspector to answer all remaining questions about its past nuclear work within four weeks, including secret activities the U.S. suspects were linked to a weapons program.

The probe originally was slated to be completed in December, and the United States and its allies have been chafing at the delay, say diplomats accredited to the IAEA. But they are unlikely to object publicly if the extension allows ElBaradei to reveal details of such secret programs.

In agreeing to the IAEA probe last year, Iran agreed to answer all lingering questions about its past nuclear activities — including those it has evaded since 2003, when nearly 20 years of Iranian clandestine atomic work were revealed.

Diplomats have told The Associated Press that the IAEA probe is now using evidence provided by the U.S. and its close allies to back its allegations. One said Sunday that the IAEA recently shared some of the formerly classified information with Iran, with Washington's permission, to aid with the probe.

Among the material is data on a laptop computer reportedly smuggled out of Iran. In 2005, U.S. intelligence said that information suggested that the country had been working on details for nuclear weapons, including missile trajectories and ideal altitudes for exploding warheads.

U.S. intelligence was also shared with the agency regarding the "Green Salt Project" — a plan that the U.S. alleges links diverse components of a nuclear weapons program, including uranium enrichment, high explosives testing and a missile re-entry vehicle.

The IAEA is also interested in activities at a former research center at Lavizan-Shian, which Iran razed before allowing agency inspectors access. The center is believed to have been the repository of equipment bought by the Iranian military that could be used in a nuclear weapons program.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,323410,00.html

Pogo
01-18-2008, 10:12 PM
If the German minister is so concerned about the development of nuclear weapons in the region, why does he neglect to mention Israel?

Looks as though he is trying to suck up to the US, which is certainly his prerogative, but clearly it is not the region as a whole that he is concerned with.

Elrathin
01-18-2008, 10:18 PM
Good article, too bad Iran is not building nuclear weapons.

December
01-18-2008, 10:52 PM
What does German Minister say about Isreal's nukes?
Nothing?

Trish
01-19-2008, 01:21 AM
Seems to me that the German foreign minister recognizes that even with its nukes Israel is not a threat to the region. Israel just wants to be left alone. If you don't mess with them, they don't mess with you. Seems like a pretty good philosophy actually.

thistle
01-19-2008, 01:54 AM
Good article, too bad Iran is not building nuclear weapons.



I hope you are right for everybody's sake.

Pogo
01-19-2008, 03:02 AM
Seems to me that the German foreign minister recognizes that even with its nukes Israel is not a threat to the region. Israel just wants to be left alone. If you don't mess with them, they don't mess with you. Seems like a pretty good philosophy actually.

Well, perhaps Israel should quit messing with those who wish to follow in their footsteps. Something wrong with consistency, Trish?

Aidie
01-19-2008, 06:18 AM
I never agreed with isreal having nukes anyway and if Iran has them who knows what will happen.I worry about the middle east it seems to be always unsettling.
Aidie

Nono
01-19-2008, 10:12 AM
Can anyone tell me what could possibly be done at this point to prevent the Iranians from acquiring them?
It's like saying "We're all very concerned that the sun will go nova blablabla..."

Trish
01-19-2008, 02:40 PM
Seems to me that the German foreign minister recognizes that even with its nukes Israel is not a threat to the region. Israel just wants to be left alone. If you don't mess with them, they don't mess with you. Seems like a pretty good philosophy actually.

Well, perhaps Israel should quit messing with those who wish to follow in their footsteps. Something wrong with consistency, Trish?


You're going to have to elaborate a little further. I'm a little unclear as to what you're asking.

Pogo
01-19-2008, 05:00 PM
Seems to me that the German foreign minister recognizes that even with its nukes Israel is not a threat to the region. Israel just wants to be left alone. If you don't mess with them, they don't mess with you. Seems like a pretty good philosophy actually.

Well, perhaps Israel should quit messing with those who wish to follow in their footsteps. Something wrong with consistency, Trish?


You're going to have to elaborate a little further. I'm a little unclear as to what you're asking.

Footsteps meaning the development of nuclear weapons.

The proposition that Israel is somehow special and that it should be the only nation in the region with a nuclear arsenal is inconsistent with what is reasonable and just.

jafar00
01-19-2008, 07:20 PM
Seems to me that the German foreign minister recognizes that even with its nukes Israel is not a threat to the region. Israel just wants to be left alone. If you don't mess with them, they don't mess with you. Seems like a pretty good philosophy actually.


But Israel is not just sitting there wanting to be left alone. They have been attacking and killing everyone around them since their creation.[hr]
Can anyone tell me what could possibly be done at this point to prevent the Iranians from acquiring them?


Just let them develop nuclear power? Since they are not developing them, and their Supreme leader even forbid the country from obtaining them, and the IAEA has so far found no evidence for a weapons program, I think it's safe to say that preventing them from acquiring nuclear weapons is a waste of time and money.

Nono
01-19-2008, 07:38 PM
MY question -- to all those saying "What? We're supposed to just stand by and watch 'em .... ??" -- is: What, exactly, d'yall propose?

Whether Iran is (or isn't) in the process of developing nuclear weapons is a separate question.

Trish
01-20-2008, 12:29 AM
Seems to me that the German foreign minister recognizes that even with its nukes Israel is not a threat to the region. Israel just wants to be left alone. If you don't mess with them, they don't mess with you. Seems like a pretty good philosophy actually.

Well, perhaps Israel should quit messing with those who wish to follow in their footsteps. Something wrong with consistency, Trish?


You're going to have to elaborate a little further. I'm a little unclear as to what you're asking.

Footsteps meaning the development of nuclear weapons.

The proposition that Israel is somehow special and that it should be the only nation in the region with a nuclear arsenal is inconsistent with what is reasonable and just.



I guess I have a different view of what is reasonable. I consider it much more reasonable for Israel to have nukes than some of their neighbors. I am not concerned that Israel will use them indiscriminately - while I cannot say that about their neighbors.[hr]

Seems to me that the German foreign minister recognizes that even with its nukes Israel is not a threat to the region. Israel just wants to be left alone. If you don't mess with them, they don't mess with you. Seems like a pretty good philosophy actually.


But Israel is not just sitting there wanting to be left alone. They have been attacking and killing everyone around them since their creation.


They fight for their survival. If folks would stop strapping bombs on their backs and blowing them up and stop lobbing missiles at them the Israelis would leave them alone. What are they supposed to do? Wait til Iran or another of their enemies gets nukes and another 5+ million Jews are wiped off the face of the Earth? Who's going to fight for their survival then? You?

jafar00
01-20-2008, 10:01 AM
MY question -- to all those saying "What? We're supposed to just stand by and watch 'em .... ??" -- is: What, exactly, d'yall propose?

Whether Iran is (or isn't) in the process of developing nuclear weapons is a separate question.


Yes of course just stand and watch them achieve their objective of a nuclear power system. Then perhaps even give them a pat on the back and some congratulations.[hr]


Seems to me that the German foreign minister recognizes that even with its nukes Israel is not a threat to the region. Israel just wants to be left alone. If you don't mess with them, they don't mess with you. Seems like a pretty good philosophy actually.


But Israel is not just sitting there wanting to be left alone. They have been attacking and killing everyone around them since their creation.


They fight for their survival. If folks would stop strapping bombs on their backs and blowing them up and stop lobbing missiles at them the Israelis would leave them alone. What are they supposed to do? Wait til Iran or another of their enemies gets nukes and another 5+ million Jews are wiped off the face of the Earth? Who's going to fight for their survival then? You?


Is it right to condemn the reaction from people who are under siege and being regularly bombed, bulldozed or shot to death by Israel, and yet support what Israel does? A few people blowing themselves up or lobbing some home made rockets in the general direction of Israel is all they have to fight back. Just because they don't have billions in US aid to build a proper army doesn't make them into terrorists.

Israel sends in Bulldozers to demolish Palestinian houses (often with people still in them), destroys Olive and Citrus plantations. Israel has cut them off from water, power, access to schools, hospitals, and employment. There are checkpoints everywhere to ensure there is absolutely no freedom of movement between the small, walled off enclaves that is all that remains of Palestine.
The Israeli Army and even so called "settlers" evict Palestinians from their lands at gunpoint (and shooting children is of no concern to them either) to convert them into Israeli settlements, then build a wall around it to make it permanent.

Every time a UN resolution is tabled condemning Israel for it's inhumane actions, it is vetoed by the US and there are hundreds of them.

Bush calls Iran a sponsor of terror because they support Hamas and Hizbullah. Hamas and Hizbullah exist only because of Israeli aggression, when in pot meets kettle style, it is the US who is the biggest sponsor of terrorism, and thats even without mentioning the support of MEK, PKK, and Jundullah(Al Qaeda) terrorists in their attacks against Iran.

This nonsense about Iran is just a smokescreen. Disinformation to distract us from the real agenda and that is to remove all of the enemies Israel has made in the region during it's short, brutal life as a Zionist state.