PDA

View Full Version : Are School Immunitations for Children Important?


AmericanDreamer
01-13-2008, 11:24 PM
How much of what we are told should we believe? I went to a website to get information on whether or not immunizations are required in order for my child to attend school in California This is what I read:

California School Law
"The California School Immunization Law requires that children be up-to-date on their immunizations (shots) to attend school or child care. Diseases like chickenpox, measles, and whooping cough spread quickly, so children need to be protected before they enter. Most children need booster shots before starting kindergarten. Seventh grade entry requirements went into effect July 1, 1999. A varicella (chickenpox) requirement for kindergarten entry and child care attendance went into effect July 1, 2001."

What You Will Need at Registration
"You will need your child’s Immunization Record. It must show the date your child was given each required shot. If you do not have an Immunization Record or your child has not received all required shots, call your doctor or local health department now for an appointment."

California Department of Health
http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/dcdc/izgroup/family/shared/school_law.htm
National Network for Immunization Information
http://www.immunizationinfo.org/immunization_policy.cfm

Reading this information about the laws at face value makes me think that it IS necessary to immunize a child before he/she can attend a school. Only when I looked more closely at the website did I find a link towards the bottom of the page pointing to certain exemptions to this rule. A bit misleading, I'd say.

I am questioning whether it is important for a child to be immunized. There has been controvery revolving around this subject.
Controversy Over Vaccine: http://social.jrank.org/pages/328/Immunization-Controversy-over-Vaccination.html
Medscape Today: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/433374

If you could give feedback on whether or not you think it should be required, it would be appreciated. What do you think?

DANG
01-13-2008, 11:40 PM
First of all, I have no kids (that I know of), but if I did...
Most immunizations are good.

Some are poison (contain mercury)

and others I dont trust at all.

Nowadays, who knows if you can trust your own government.

Rumsfeld owns a lot of stock in an unproven vaccine.

Back in the 30's, we had doctors who were sterilizing black children and appalacian children.

That was when gw bush's grand daddy (prescott bush) was a nazi sympathizer.
His own mother has proven to be a nazi cow.

His leave no child behind program proves that he hates kids.

Keith Hamburger
01-13-2008, 11:48 PM
Lots of money is spent on developing and distributing vaccines while there is quite a bit of supressed evidence that vaccines are not effective.

Knowledge of vectors and transmission of disease combined with careful sanitation has a far greater effect than vaccination at a much lower cost.

Mass vaccination is just another effort by the pharmaceutical industry to use the government to increase their profits at the cost of the citizens.

On another forum I ran through the numbers for the new meningitis vaccine. Even if it does as promised it will only save a few hundred per year from death or disfigurement. At a cost of billions.

But, the real goal, tens and hundreds of millions in profits for the drug industry.

Keith