PDA

View Full Version : UPDATED! Reuters and Photoshop?**Priceless


BoogyMan
08-05-2006, 11:40 PM
Smoke billows from burning buildings destroyed during an overnight Israeli air raid on Beirut's suburbs August 5, 2006. Many buildings were flattened during the attack. REUTERS/Adnan Hajj

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20060805/i/r3101797657.jpg

Checkout Reuters elite photoshopping skills in this image.**This one is so obvious its insulting!


UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE


Link Here (http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N07348592.htm)
LONDON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Reuters withdrew all 920 photographs by a freelance Lebanese photographer from its database on Monday after an urgent review of his work showed he had altered two images from the conflict between Israel and the armed group Hizbollah.

Global Picture Editor Tom Szlukovenyi called the measure precautionary but said the fact that two of the images by photographer Adnan Hajj had been manipulated undermined trust in his entire body of work.

"There is no graver breach of Reuters standards for our photographers than the deliberate manipulation of an image," Szlukovenyi said in a statement.

"Reuters has zero tolerance for any doctoring of pictures and constantly reminds its photographers, both staff and freelance, of this strict and unalterable policy."

The news and information agency announced the decision in an advisory note to its photo service subscribers. The note also said Reuters had tightened editing procedures for photographs from the conflict and apologised for the case.

Removing the images from the Reuters database excludes them from future sale.

Reuters ended its relationship with Hajj on Sunday after it found that a photograph he had taken of the aftermath of an Israeli air strike on suburban Beirut had been manipulated using Photoshop software to show more and darker smoke rising from buildings.

An immediate enquiry began into Hajj's other work.

It established on Monday that a photograph of an Israeli F-16 fighter over Nabatiyeh, southern Lebanon and dated Aug 2, had also been doctored to increase the number of flares dropped by the plane from one to three.

"Manipulating photographs in this way is entirely unacceptable and contrary to all the principles consistently held by Reuters throughout its long and distinguished history. It undermines not only our reputation but also the good name of all our photographers," Szlukovenyi said.

"This doesn't mean that every one of his 920 photographs in our database was altered. We know that not to be the case from the majority of images we have looked at so far but we need to act swiftly and in a precautionary manner."

The two altered photographs were among 43 that Hajj filed directly to the Reuters Global Pictures Desk since the start of the conflict on July 12 rather than through an editor in Beirut, as was the case with the great majority of his images.

Filing drills have been tightened in Lebanon and only senior staff will now edit pictures from the Middle East on the Global Pictures Desk, with the final check undertaken by the Editor-in-Charge, Reuters said.

Hajj worked for Reuters as a non-staff contributing photographer from 1993 until 2003 and again since April 2005. Most of his work was in sports photography, much of it outside Lebanon.

Hajj was not in Beirut on Monday and was not responding to calls. He told Reuters on Sunday that the image of the Israeli air strike on Beirut had dust marks which he had wanted to remove.

Questions about the accuracy of the photograph arose after it appeared on news Web sites on Saturday.

Several blogs, including a number which accuse the media of distorted coverage of the Middle East conflict, said the photograph had been doctored.

PittsburghAfterDark
08-05-2006, 11:47 PM
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/902/pictureclippingiy3.jpg

Surprisingly enough I was able to find an earlier edit of the same image.

They really should be careful what they leak on the web.

PittsburghAfterDark
08-06-2006, 03:46 PM
Reuters admits altering Beirut photo

Reuters withdraws photograph of Beirut after Air Force attack after US blogs, photographers point out 'blatant evidence of manipulation.' Reuters' head of PR says in response, 'Reuters has suspended photographer until investigations are completed into changes made to photograph.' Photographer who sent altered image is same Reuters photographer behind many of images from Qana, which have also been subject of suspicions for being staged
Yaakov Lappin

A Reuters photograph of smoke rising from buildings in Beirut has been withdrawn after coming under attack by American web logs. The blogs accused Reuters of distorting the photograph to include more smoke and damage.

The photograph showed two very heavy plumes of black smoke billowing from buildings in Beirut after an Air Force attack on the Lebanese capital. Reuters has since withdrawn the photograph from its website, along a message admitting that the image was distorted, and an apology to editors.

Reuters withdraws doctored image

In the message, Reuters said that "photo editing software was improperly used on this image. A corrected version will immediately follow this advisory. We are sorry for any inconvience."

Ignored

Israeli war deaths go largely unnoticed / Yaakov Lappin

Hours after mother and two daughters are killed in Hizbullah rocket attack, media outlets around world fail to report deaths; meanwhile, British press continues anti-Israel tirade

Reuters' head of PR Moira Whittle said in response: "Reuters has suspended a photographer until investigations are completed into changes made to a photograph showing smoke billowing from buildings following an air strike on Beirut. Reuters takes such matters extremely seriously as it is strictly against company editorial policy to alter pictures."

"As soon as the allegation came to light, the photograph, filed on Saturday 5 August, was removed from the file and a replacement, showing the same scene, was sent. The explanation for the removal was the improper use of photo-editing software," she added.

Earlier, Charles Johnson, of the Little Green Footballs blog , which has exposed a previous attempt at fraud by a major American news corporation, wrote : "This Reuters photograph shows blatant evidence of manipulation. Notice the repeating patterns in the smoke; this is almost certainly caused by using the Photoshop “clone” tool to add more smoke to the image."

Johnson added: "Smoke simply does not contain repeating symmetrical patterns like this, and you can see the repetition in both plumes of smoke. There’s really no question about it."

Speaking to Ynetnews, Johnson said: "This has to cast doubt not only on the photographer who did the alterations, but on Reuters' entire review process. If they could let such an obvious fake get through to publication, how many more faked or 'enhanced' photos have not been caught?"

A series of close ups are then posted on the blog, showing that "it’s not only the plumes of smoke that were 'enhanced.' There are also cloned buildings." The close ups do appear to show exact replicas of buildings appearing next to one another in the photograph.

The Sports Shooter web forum , used by professional photographers, also examined the photo, with many users concluding that the image has been doctored.

'Looks so obviously doctored'

"I'll second the cloned smoke...but it looks so obvious that I don't know how the photographer could have gotten away with it," wrote one user.

After further research, Johnson posted a photograph he says is the original image taken before distortions were made, showing much lighter smoke rising.

Other blogs have also analyzed the photographs, and reached similar conclusions, such as Left & Right , which states: "The photo has been doctored, quite badly."

The author of the Ace of Spades blog wrote: "Even I can see the very suspicious "clonings" of picture elements here. And I'm an idiot."

The Hot Air blog also looked at the photo, describing the image as "the worst Photoshop I have ever seen."

Adnan Hajj, the photographer who sent the altered image, was also the Reuters photographer behind many of the images from Qana – which have also been the subject of suspicions for being staged.

"A photographer who would blatantly falsify an entire 'news' image would certainly not be above posing and staging photographs of rescue workers," Johnson concluded.
Link (http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3286966,00.html)

But wait, there's MORE!

Reuters admits to doctoring Beirut photo
By JPOST.COM STAFF

Reuters news agency admitted on Sunday that one of its photographers had digitally altered a photograph of an Israeli attack on Lebanon on Saturday, showing more smoke than was actually present.

The photograph, as initially published, showed an aerial view of Beirut after an IAF attack, with two large pillars of smoke rising over the city. The caption read: Smoke billows from burning buildings destroyed during an overnight Israeli air raid on Beirut's suburbs.

The agency has since withdrawn the photograph, issued an apology and released the unaltered picture. Its public relations department said the photographer had been suspended until the investigation was completed.

Reuters was notified of the alteration by American bloggers who noticed repeating patterns within the smoke plumes, indicating that part of the image was duplicated several times.

The scene was photographed by Adnan Hajj, who had also photographed the aftermath of the Israeli attack on Kana last week, in which the Lebanese initially claimed 58 fatalities, but could later only confirm 28.
Link (http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1154525816599&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull)

Wow the mystery grows!

The same photographer that doctored photos that appeared in Western media why he, he, he.... he covered the Qana massacre as well!

Well doesn't that just beat all.

C'mon 'zo, we know you're lurking here. Come defend the "truthiness" of the facts you've defended so adamantly for a week.

Will you even try after the photographer responsible for many of the images you claim were legitimate was fired for staging news?

HMMMMMMMM!?!?!?!?

Alonzo
08-06-2006, 05:42 PM
Is there a reason you seem to only post things to get a response from me? The majority of your posts lately seem to be either an attack on me or a call for me to respond.

PittsburghAfterDark
08-06-2006, 05:53 PM
Yes.

Because you're the only one defending this propaganda and these lies as truth.

lily
08-06-2006, 07:32 PM
I'm not sure PAD, why you had to post two articles that said the same thing......I would think, with all your concern about too many posts being made about the bombing of Lebonon, at least one of those posts would have been about the bombing of Israel today........but that's your choice, I guess.

Oh my goodness!

Did Reuters make a mistake and publish these pictures? Yes

Did they take the proper action and suspend the photographer? Yes.

Have mistakes happened before? Yes.

Are newpapers %100 accurate? No.

Does it make the bombing not real? No.

Henny penny. The sky is falling.

Rider
08-06-2006, 07:37 PM
Henny penny? Are we dating ourselves?

lily
08-06-2006, 08:35 PM
No, that was my Rumsfailed impersonation........darn...........doing it live, gets me the same response

Old Corps Gunny
08-07-2006, 07:39 AM
I would have thought someone in Reuters would have caught this amateurish photo alteration before publication, but expecting unbiased reporting is a bit much to expect anymore. Has anyone wondered just what nationality or affiliation the photographer, Adnan Hajj, has; or whether he is staff or an free-lancer?

Rider
08-07-2006, 09:01 AM
The guy has been so discredited and disgraced that he'll probably end up with a show on CNN. Poor bastard.

PittsburghAfterDark
08-09-2006, 08:30 AM
The guy has been so discredited and disgraced that he'll probably end up with a show on CNN. Poor bastard.


They could pair him up with Baghdad Bob. I am really shocked that BB was never interviewed extensively by American media or talk radio. He would have been an awesome interview.