PDA

View Full Version : *What Will Make Islam Unite?*


CheesyMuslim
08-05-2006, 07:07 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But it has come to my attention that Islam is weak.
2. And in order for them to pack a punch on us infidels, they are going to need to gang up on us.
3. I wonder how long it will be when they decide to try it?
4. Will the infidels just lay down, if they do?
5. What will Israel do about it?
6. Will Israel take out all the Islamic Countries by themselves?
7. Could they?
7. a) Yes.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Rider
08-06-2006, 03:36 PM
It would seem that Al Qaeda didn't need to do a whole lot of ganging up to deliver the gravest strike ever on our homeland.

BTW- Israel has approximately 300 fully deliverable nuclear warheads andÂ*Â*missiles capable of striking into Europe and Russia. Which brings up the question: Why is the world not in a dread panic over this capability when the possibility of Iran glomming together some sort of half assed nuclear device has everyone in an uproar?
Could it be that no one (even the Arab world) seriously believes that a free democracy is likely to use those weapons aggressively?

BoogyMan
08-06-2006, 04:21 PM
BTW- Israel has approximately 300 fully deliverable nuclear warheads andÂ*Â*missiles capable of striking into Europe and Russia. Which brings up the question: Why is the world not in a dread panic over this capability when the possibility of Iran glomming together some sort of half assed nuclear device has everyone in an uproar?
Could it be that no one (even the Arab world) seriously believes that a free democracy is likely to use those weapons aggressively?


Greetings Rider. I would imagine that the world is not in an uproar over Israeli nukes because Israel is not run by a flaming xenophobic genocidal lunatic, as are Iran and North Korea.

Just my take on the situation. :)

Rider
08-06-2006, 04:58 PM
Exactly!

CheesyMuslim
08-06-2006, 05:14 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But that 911 was just a love tap.
2. They will need to do far better to get our focused attention.
3. If they ever deliver a nuclear device here, then we WILL destroy all Islam.
4. In three days.
5. Israel will more than likely destroy all Islam before we in America ever get a chance to blow off some of our nukes.
6. The Goliath Response, take down all Islam with one whack.
7. Trust me they have the guts to do it too.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Rider
08-06-2006, 05:33 PM
Some of the Israelis have the guts to do just that but, they have a well developed left wing in their country now that is, of course dedicated to their own destruction.

Mayberry
08-06-2006, 06:42 PM
Why is the world not in a dread panic over this capability when the possibility of Iran glomming together some sort of half assed nuclear device has everyone in an uproar? I would imagine that the world is not in an uproar over Israeli nukes because Israel is not run by a flaming xenophobic genocidal lunatic, as are Iran and North Korea.
Pretty much. Some of the Israelis have the guts to do just that but, they have a well developed left wing in their country now that is, of course dedicated to their own destruction. If we could only amputate those left wings we'd be done with this mess.

AlonzoMourning23
08-06-2006, 06:44 PM
If we could only amputate those left wings we'd be done with this mess.



So nuking all muslims is the answer?

It's disturbing how many people have been advocating ethnic cleansing, and even genocide, lately.

Mayberry
08-06-2006, 06:48 PM
So nuking all muslims is the answer? Letting Israel do their job is part of the answer. Second part is us finishing the job in Iraq. Nuking them would be easy, but then there's that whole fallout thing;). Of course not nuking all of them. Just kill off the crazy ones. (and you who was talking about trolling:D)

AlonzoMourning23
08-06-2006, 06:53 PM
So nuking all muslims is the answer? Letting Israel do their job is part of the answer. Second part is us finishing the job in Iraq. Nuking them would be easy, but then there's that whole fallout thing;). Of course not nuking all of them. Just kill off the crazy ones. (and you who was talking about trolling:D)


Trolling would be if I made a comment with no intent other than to rile up another poster, and with no concern for its validity.

You, on the other hand, backed up rider's post, in which he was essentially stating his agreement with chess. Chess's post advocated genocide by nuking all muslims.

Did you get confused or do you agree with him?

CheesyMuslim
08-06-2006, 10:16 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But what do you think will rally all the Islamics?
2. Israel getting beat down might?
3. Can those in Lebanon beat down Israel?
4. What if Syria got into it as well?
5. What if Jordon jumped in?
6. Do I have anymore questions?
7. What if Egypt jumped in too?
8. Then would Israel have their hands full?
9. What if Iran made a move on Israel, could Israel handle that too?
10 What if every Islamic Country took a whack at Israel all at the same time, could Israel handle it?
11. All this and a bag of chips, right here on DF, I can answer all these questions, and more.
12. When you are me, these questions are to easy.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Rider
08-06-2006, 10:26 PM
'Zo says:
"You, on the other hand, backed up rider's post, in which he was essentially stating his agreement with chess. Chess's post advocated genocide by nuking all muslims. "

I assure you that I would never agree with genocidal slaughter of all Muslims and I don't think that was what chess was talking about. You lefties always try to build up a straw man to knock down.

What I believe that we should do is strike with massive bombing raids (B52's with iron bombs) on Syrian and Iranian military,governmental and infrastructure targets. Deep penetrating nuclear bunker busters for the nuclear facilities would be alright with me. It would not be difficult to utterly destroy the Iranian navy and air forces. We shouldn't make the mistake of trying to occupy those countries. We could effectively eliminate them as risks to our national security. Heavy bombing raids into Iranian/Shiite strongholds in Iraq might be useful, also. Limited, polite warfare hasn't worked.

AlonzoMourning23
08-06-2006, 10:35 PM
I assure you that I would never agree with genocidal slaughter of all Muslims and I don't think that was what chess was talking about. You lefties always try to build up a straw man to knock down.

Maybe you didn't mean that, but I'm pretty sure Chess did. He has called arab lives worthless, called for forced relocation and killing them if they complained, nuking random areas etc. Chess has a history where such calls are actually routine.

For example:

1. But I tell you plainly.
2. The GD Arabs will need their own personal Holocaust to get off the Jews back.
3. When they continue to launch sneak attacks on humanity.
4. There will be a breaking point for all humanity.
5. And then you Arabs better run and hide in the caves.
6. Cause all humanity will search you out, and snuff you out.

http://www.democracyforums.com/showthread.php?tid=943&pid=7480#pid7480

Maybe you didn't mean it, but chess did. Boogey has seen enough of chess to know he meant it as well.

lily
08-06-2006, 11:41 PM
Rider



What I believe that we should do is strike with massive bombing raids (B52's with iron bombs) on Syrian and Iranian military,governmental and infrastructure targets. Deep penetrating nuclear bunker busters for the nuclear facilities would be alright with me. It would not be difficult to utterly destroy the Iranian navy and air forces. We shouldn't make the mistake of trying to occupy those countries. We could effectively eliminate them as risks to our national security. Heavy bombing raids into Iranian/Shiite strongholds in Iraq might be useful, also. Limited, polite warfare hasn't worked.

Just curious, what do you expect Syria and Iran to do after we get done with our massive bombing........cuz it doesn't seem to be working that well with Israel and Hizbollah.
Also, you'd like heavy bombing in the strongholds of Iraq. If I remember correctly, we did that in the begining with shock and awe......and if we knew where these strongholds were, don't you think we'd get them? I mean we already bombed the hell out of them.......and they're still going like the energizer bunny.

lily
08-06-2006, 11:46 PM
chesswarsnow

6. The Goliath Response, take down all Islam with one whack.


I'm kind of curious how you're going to do this one.

Are you going to seperate the radical extremeists, or just kill them all?

How are you planning on getting them all with one whack, when there are Muslims all over the world? India, Africa, Australia, Europe, the Phillipines, Canada.........

CheesyMuslim
08-07-2006, 07:35 AM
Sorry bout that,

1. In a Arab Holocaust, its the Arabs, and their evil religion thats polluting the world.
2. Its they who the Jews will have to sort out, and let Gawd sort them out.
3. Its just a matter of time, before they all Unite against Israel.
4. Israel can beat the whole world if it ever came to that.
5. You see, you can not beat Gawd's Chosen Peoples.
6. Gawd will protect his own, never doubt it.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Rider
08-07-2006, 01:29 PM
No Lily,
Shock and awe was pinpoint bombing of specific military or infrastructure targets with smart weapons primarily. The bombardment in Southern Lebanon is peanuts in comparison with B52 bombing raids. I'm talking about leveling entire areas, not just picking out separate, wellÂ*Â*defined targets.
After an all out bombing campaign Sryia and Iran would do nothing. We never "bombed the hell" out of any given area that I know of in this war. In the first Iraq war we pulverized the Republican guard using the tactics I advocate.
Simply "staying the course" is a recipe for a Vietnam like debacle.