Video Proof: Al Gore and Democrats on Iraq and terrorism

[gene430]

Here is another clip from 1992 showing Al Gored denouncing the Bush Administration for not linking terrorism to Iraq!!!!

http://politibyte.com/modules.php?name=Video_Stream&page=watch&id=57&d=1

What I think is truly mindboggling is to realize that this was 1992, a few months before Clinton/Gore take office. So, here is Al Gore denouncing Bush for not doing anything about terrorism in Iraq. Now, realize that from that point forward, Gore and Democrats had 8 years in office. What did they do about terrorism/Iraq during those 8 years. You can clearly see that Gore was not only aware of the problem, but, was outraged that nothing was being done about it........what did he do about it over the next 8 years?

[Alonzo]

Why don't you show a picture of Churchill and compare his comments on Germany to Blair while you're at it.

Different times, time world events.

[bobbylien]

Want me to play the video of Cheney essentially saying invading Iraq would be a disaster?

[Deadshot]

...or the Video of Rummy shaking hand with Saddam?
.
http://www.craigcheslog.com/archives/rumsfeld%20saddam.jpg
.
Zo's right, different times = different reactions...

[Wndrtch]

Here is another clip from 1992 showing Al Gored denouncing the Bush Administration for not linking terrorism to Iraq!!!!

http://politibyte.com/modules.php?name=Video_Stream&page=watch&id=57&d=1

What I think is truly mindboggling is to realize that this was 1992, a few months before Clinton/Gore take office. So, here is Al Gore denouncing Bush for not doing anything about terrorism in Iraq. Now, realize that from that point forward, Gore and Democrats had 8 years in office. What did they do about terrorism/Iraq during those 8 years. You can clearly see that Gore was not only aware of the problem, but, was outraged that nothing was being done about it........what did he do about it over the next 8 years?


We do know what they did. Nothing!

When the 1993 World Trade Center bombing happened, they treated it as a simple "civil" act, and just prosecuted Ramsi Yousef & co. and threw him in jail, but never "interrogated" them. You do know, that Ramsi's uncle is Khaled Shaikh Mohammed, the "mastermind" behind the 911 attack, right? Don't you think that maybe, Ramsi may have had some useful information? In his statement, Ramsi specifically said to expect more attacks in the future if his demands were not met.

Gee, maybe if they waterboarded Ramsi & co. back in 1993, they may have been able to get Khalid Mohammed before 911 happened, and 6,000 (3,000 on 911, and roughly 3,000 soldiers) Americans, and all those Iraqis, would still be alive today. Gee, maybe if Billy had just taken OBL when he was offered, we would still have the towers standing.

This is why character matters. If Billy had been serious about his role as President, instead of playing "hide the cigar" with an intern, a lot of people would be alive today, and we'd all be making fun of G.W's ears, instead of bitching about Iraq.

[Deadshot]

I don't agree with your assessment at all. But let's, for shits and giggles, say that your right. Then wouldn't we have crushed Osama and co. by now?

Looks like Bush is playing "Hide a citizens rights" instead of hide the cigar while the greatest terrorist of the 21st century is going about getting his beard dyed!

[Wndrtch]

I don't agree with your assessment at all. But let's, for shits and giggles, say that your right. Then wouldn't we have crushed Osama and co. by now?

Looks like Bush is playing "Hide a citizens rights" instead of hide the cigar while the greatest terrorist of the 21st century is going about getting his beard dyed!


You wouldn't have had to crush anything, if Billy had simply taken customdy of OBL, when the Syrians offered him up. You Libs wouldn't be complaining about the Patriot Act, or our "occupation", or "an unjust war", or "torture", or "conspiracy theories", or "oil", or a do-nothing Congress.

Why can't Libs admit that Billy screwed-up? You foks were after Georgie to admit his mistakes, which he eventually did, but when it comes to Billy you guys go to the wall? For what? He gives good speaches? He crys and bites his lips? He bangs the help? Why is Billy, the "second-comming" to Liberals?