lily
12-18-2007, 09:54 PM
If there is one thing you don't do, it's piss off a judge. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22312848/)
Judge orders CIA interrogation video hearing
updated 1:09 p.m. ET, Tues., Dec. 18, 2007
WASHINGTON - A federal judge has ordered a hearing on whether the Bush
administration violated a court order by destroying CIA interrogation videos
of two al-Qaida suspects.
U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy rejected calls from the Justice
Department to stay out of the matter. He ordered lawyers to appear before
him Friday morning.
In June 2005, Kennedy ordered the administration to safeguard "all evidence
and information regarding the torture, mistreatment, and abuse of detainees
now at the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay."
Five months later, the CIA destroyed the interrogation videos. The
recordings involved suspected terrorists Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim
al-Nashiri. The Justice Department argued that the videos weren't covered by
the order because the two men were being held in secret CIA prisons
overseas, not at the Guantanamo Bay prison.
David Remes, a lawyer who represents Yemeni detainees at Guantanamo Bay,
asked for the court hearing. He said the government was obligated to keep
the tapes and he wants to be sure other evidence is not being destroyed.
"We want more than just the government's assurances. The government has
given these assurances in the past and they've proven unreliable," Remes
said. "The recent revelation of the CIA tape destruction indicates that the
government cannot be trusted to preserve evidence."
Kennedy did not say why he was ordering the hearing or what he planned to
ask. Even if the judge accepts the argument that government did not violate
his order, he still could raise questions about obstruction or spoliation, a
legal term for the destruction of evidence in "pending or reasonably
foreseeable litigation."
The Justice Department did not immediately comment. Its lawyers are working
with the CIA to investigate the destruction of the tapes and had urged
Kennedy to give them time to investigate.
Remes urged Kennedy not to comply.
"Plainly the government wants only foxes guarding this henhouse," Remes
wrote in court documents this week.
The Bush administration has taken a similar strategy in its dealings with
Congress on the issue. Last week, the Justice Department urged Congress to
hold off on questioning witnesses and demanding documents because that
evidence is part of the joint CIA-Justice Department investigation.
Attorney General Michael Mukasey also refused to give Congress details of
the government's investigation into the matter Friday, saying doing so could
raise questions about whether the inquiry was vulnerable to political
pressure.
Judge orders CIA interrogation video hearing
updated 1:09 p.m. ET, Tues., Dec. 18, 2007
WASHINGTON - A federal judge has ordered a hearing on whether the Bush
administration violated a court order by destroying CIA interrogation videos
of two al-Qaida suspects.
U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy rejected calls from the Justice
Department to stay out of the matter. He ordered lawyers to appear before
him Friday morning.
In June 2005, Kennedy ordered the administration to safeguard "all evidence
and information regarding the torture, mistreatment, and abuse of detainees
now at the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay."
Five months later, the CIA destroyed the interrogation videos. The
recordings involved suspected terrorists Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim
al-Nashiri. The Justice Department argued that the videos weren't covered by
the order because the two men were being held in secret CIA prisons
overseas, not at the Guantanamo Bay prison.
David Remes, a lawyer who represents Yemeni detainees at Guantanamo Bay,
asked for the court hearing. He said the government was obligated to keep
the tapes and he wants to be sure other evidence is not being destroyed.
"We want more than just the government's assurances. The government has
given these assurances in the past and they've proven unreliable," Remes
said. "The recent revelation of the CIA tape destruction indicates that the
government cannot be trusted to preserve evidence."
Kennedy did not say why he was ordering the hearing or what he planned to
ask. Even if the judge accepts the argument that government did not violate
his order, he still could raise questions about obstruction or spoliation, a
legal term for the destruction of evidence in "pending or reasonably
foreseeable litigation."
The Justice Department did not immediately comment. Its lawyers are working
with the CIA to investigate the destruction of the tapes and had urged
Kennedy to give them time to investigate.
Remes urged Kennedy not to comply.
"Plainly the government wants only foxes guarding this henhouse," Remes
wrote in court documents this week.
The Bush administration has taken a similar strategy in its dealings with
Congress on the issue. Last week, the Justice Department urged Congress to
hold off on questioning witnesses and demanding documents because that
evidence is part of the joint CIA-Justice Department investigation.
Attorney General Michael Mukasey also refused to give Congress details of
the government's investigation into the matter Friday, saying doing so could
raise questions about whether the inquiry was vulnerable to political
pressure.