micfranklin
12-17-2007, 05:10 PM
Apparently so, according to this guy.
SAN DIEGO, California (CNN) -- Ever since Barack Obama began to pierce the inevitability that we were told surrounded the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, I've wondered how the Clintonistas would react. Now we know: not well.
For one thing, as we learned in the 1990s, the Clintons don't like to be challenged. And when they are, they don't just try to beat you. They set out to destroy you.
Which makes recent events even more poetic. The harder Team Clinton tries to destroy Obama, the more damage they wind up doing -- to Hillary and her campaign. Just when you thought that the former first lady couldn't come across any more unlikable, desperate, and vindictive, the floor collapses and we find ourselves on a new level.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/17/navarrette/index.html?eref=rss_topstories
Now it simply can't be said enough, Clinton is wasting so much time on attacking him that she's killing every bit of credibility and seriousness she has. I mean, calling Obama out for using drugs (way back when) is one thing...but trying to imply that he was a drug dealer?
Why this is borderline slandering. She can kiss some of her votes goodbye with that.
Oh, and isn't that cute, Clintonistas:innocent:
SAN DIEGO, California (CNN) -- Ever since Barack Obama began to pierce the inevitability that we were told surrounded the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, I've wondered how the Clintonistas would react. Now we know: not well.
For one thing, as we learned in the 1990s, the Clintons don't like to be challenged. And when they are, they don't just try to beat you. They set out to destroy you.
Which makes recent events even more poetic. The harder Team Clinton tries to destroy Obama, the more damage they wind up doing -- to Hillary and her campaign. Just when you thought that the former first lady couldn't come across any more unlikable, desperate, and vindictive, the floor collapses and we find ourselves on a new level.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/17/navarrette/index.html?eref=rss_topstories
Now it simply can't be said enough, Clinton is wasting so much time on attacking him that she's killing every bit of credibility and seriousness she has. I mean, calling Obama out for using drugs (way back when) is one thing...but trying to imply that he was a drug dealer?
Why this is borderline slandering. She can kiss some of her votes goodbye with that.
Oh, and isn't that cute, Clintonistas:innocent: