PDA

View Full Version : Mukasey Rejects Call for CIA Tape Details


lily
12-15-2007, 12:18 AM
Link (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/14/AR2007121401269.html?hpid=topnews)
Mukasey Rejects Call for CIA Tape Details

By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 14, 2007; 2:27 PM

Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey today sharply rebuffed congressional
demands for details about the Justice Department's inquiry into the
destruction of CIA interrogation tapes, saying that providing such
information would make it appear that the department was "subject to
political influence."

In letters to the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee and others,
Mukasey also reiterated his opposition to appointing a special prosecutor to
the tapes investigation, saying he was "aware of no facts at present" that
would require such a step.



"At my confirmation hearing, I testified that I would act independently,
resist political pressure and ensure that politics plays no role in cases
brought by the Department of Justice," Mukasey wrote. "Consistent with that
testimony, the facts will be followed wherever they lead in this inquiry,
and the relevant law applied."

One letter was sent to Sens. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) and Arlen Specter
(R-Pa.), the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Similar
correspondence was sent to Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) and
to House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) and other House
Democrats.

The three letters represent an attempt by Mukasey to push back against
growing pressure from lawmakers, primarily Democrats, who have showered the
Justice Department with demands for investigations or information on topics
ranging from the baseball steroids scandal to allegations of rape by a
former military contractor employee.

The letters also are an assertive move by the new attorney general, who was
confirmed last month with the lowest level of Senate support in the past
half century because of his refusal to say whether a form of simulated
drowning known as waterboarding amounts to torture under U.S. law.

Buck Laser
12-15-2007, 01:31 AM
So Mukasey is living up to the stellar standard of integrity set by his predecessor? Why am I not surprised?

ViolaLee
12-15-2007, 01:37 AM
I had little hope he would be different. Let's see what he does about the contempt of congress charges if the House and Senate vote for it, for Rove and Bolton. I guess I still have a little hope. Maybe 1%. LOL!

lily
12-15-2007, 02:41 AM
So Mukasey is living up to the stellar standard of integrity set by his predecessor? Why am I not surprised?


Yep.......let them investigate themselves. It obviously worked so well in the past.

Shintao
12-15-2007, 09:45 AM
It will eventually surface and be delt with, whether Bush is in office or not. There is no statute of limitations on war crimes.

lily
12-15-2007, 04:10 PM
That may be true Shintao, but as we have seen already in this case the I don't recall defense has already been used. Also the sad part of all this is with an new scandle surfacing every day, the public also catches the I don't remember disease. Case in point......who even cares anymore about the attorney firings?

Mukasey was hired to do a job and so far it seems he's just Gonzales Light. Also, if I recall correctly the White House was going to do an internal investigation on who outed Plame.......seems they forgot about their promise there too. Letting them police themeselves is what got us into a lot of messes already.