PDA

View Full Version : British Muslim woman convicted of penning poems about beheadings


preservanation
11-09-2007, 12:59 AM
ARTHUR MARTIN

An airport worker who wrote poems about beheadings is the first woman to be found guilty under new terror laws.


Samina Malik, who liked to call herself a "lyrical terrorist", called for attacks on the West and described "poisoned bullets" capable of killing an entire street in her poetry.

The 23-year-old Muslim wrote of her desire to become a martyr and listed her favourite videos as the "beheading ones".


Lyrical terrorist Samina Malik claims she was just a 'fan' of the terrorist music


Described as a "committed Islamic extremist", Malik, a shop assistant at Heathrow, hoarded an extensive collection of terrorism manuals, the Old Bailey heard.

She was a member of an extremist group linked to Omar Bakri Mohammed, a hate preacher who fled to Lebanon from Britain two years ago.

Yesterday a jury found her guilty of possessing documents likely to be used for terrorism under the Terrorism Act 2000, by a majority of ten to one, after deliberating for 19 hours.

Malik, who wore a black head scarf, wept as the verdict was read out.

Earlier she was cleared of the more serious offence of having articles for a terrorist purpose.

Judge Peter Beaumont told Malik that she was an enigma.

He granted her bail which amounted to a house arrest. But he warned her a custodial sentence was inevitable.

Jonathan Sharp, prosecuting, told the court the defendant liked to be known as the "lyrical terrorist" or "a stranger awaiting martyrdom".

"She is a committed Islamic extremist, who supports terrorism and terrorists.

"She had a library of material that she had collected for terrorist purposes.

"That collection would be extremely useful for someone planning terrorist activity."

The court heard how police raided her home in Southall, West London, after an email from her was found on the computer of a terror suspect in October last year.

She had a profile on the social networking website Hi-5, where she called for the execution of "depraved" Westerners .

The British-born Muslim listed her interests as helping the Mujahideen "in any way I can".

She also wrote of how she enjoyed video messages from Osama Bin Laden and "videos that showed massacres of the kuffars", or non-Muslims.

In one poem, called The Living Martyrs, she called for Muslims to rise up against the infidels.

In another, How To Behead, she warned that the victim should be bound and blindfolded.

Malik, who worked as a shop assistant airside in a branch of WHSmith at the airport, also owned an Al Qaeda encyclopaedia of Jihad, a Mujahideen poison handbook and a 'terrorist handbook' which explained how to make bombs.

On the hard drive of her computer police found a copy of a sniper rifle manual, a firearms manual, anti-tank weaponry, a document entitled How To Win Hand To Hand Fighting, and pictures of weapons.

Outside the court, Deputy Assistant Commissioner Peter Clarke, head of the Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command, said: "Malik held violent extremist views which she shared with other like-minded people over the internet.

"She also tried to donate money to a terrorist group. She had the ideology, ability and determination to access and download material which could have been useful to terrorists.

"Merely possessing this material is a serious criminal offence."

Malik is due to be sentenced on December 6. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=492460&in_page_id=1770

This is what happens when a nation can't, and refuses to assimilate their immigrants.
Welcome to the "Switzer" vision of America.

AlonzoMourning23
11-09-2007, 01:02 AM
I have no issue with the arrest. But how many white Brits write poems about killing muslims? Don't they have a white supremacist problem over there too?

preservanation
11-09-2007, 01:10 AM
I have no issue with the arrest. But how many white Brits write poems about killing muslims? I don't know ...Don't they have a white supremacist problem over there too?

and yes, I do believe they do.

AlonzoMourning23
11-09-2007, 01:38 AM
It just seems odd to me. It's more acceptable to criticize whites than it is to criticize muslims, which to an extent I agree with only because I think tolerance of criticizing the dominant group should be greater than criticizing minorities. For example, I'd keep tighter watch on Hindus criticizing the christian minority in India (outside a few parts of northern india where christians are the majority) than vice versa, since the majority can do more to harm the minority than the other way around.

At the same time, it seems that we are quicker to take action when a muslim advocates killing than when a non muslim does it.

preservanation
11-09-2007, 01:49 AM
Well..
Zo...
Welome to my world....

lawless168
11-09-2007, 01:27 PM
Well..
Zo...
Welome to my world....


LMAO :clapper:

Scorpion
11-09-2007, 03:44 PM
The obvious racial issues aside, what's troubling is that she passed a background check and was working in one of the world's major airports.

AlonzoMourning23
11-09-2007, 04:22 PM
Well..
Zo...
Welome to my world....


Not sure what you're getting at.

ViolaLee
11-09-2007, 04:37 PM
I just heard a story about the a similar sort of thing happening in the USA with the new anti-terrorist laws. A bunch of animal rights protesters are in jail for terror activities. All they did was have a website about animal abuse and speak out about it.

These new laws passed in fear are taking away the freedom of speech.

http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/2006/11/13/aeta-passes-house-recap/

Scorpion
11-09-2007, 04:44 PM
I just heard a story about the a similar sort of thing happening in the USA with the new anti-terrorist laws. A bunch of animal rights protesters are in jail for terror activities. All they did was have a website about animal abuse and speak out about it.

These new laws passed in fear are taking away the freedom of speech.

http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/2006/11/13/aeta-passes-house-recap/


As I understand it, it is now illegal to have an internet conversation about child pornography. No photos, just talk. I'm not suggesting that porn on the internet is a good thing, let alone child porn which is disgusting, but it is a bit frightening when conversation can be legislated as illegal.

George Orwell would be proud.

Truth_and_Power
11-09-2007, 08:05 PM
Disturbingly, Scott said in passing that civil disobedience would be covered in the bill– something other supporters of the bill have denied– but he tried to ease public fears by saying that the civil disobedience must cause disruption and loss of profits

Wow. Causing loss of profits is now illegal. In times past this law could easily have been used to those who opposed slavery or segregation.

1. Business puts up sign saying no gays allowed
2. Gays enter and stay
3. Other customers leave
4. Gays arrested for loss of profits


I agree that people who are openly in support of terrorism have to be gotten rid of somehow, but someone was seriously sleeping on the job when they drafted this law. Why do we need to protect "loss of profits" in order to stop terrorism? Jeez.. why not "loss of life" and leave it at that?????

AlonzoMourning23
11-09-2007, 08:37 PM
Disturbingly, Scott said in passing that civil disobedience would be covered in the bill– something other supporters of the bill have denied– but he tried to ease public fears by saying that the civil disobedience must cause disruption and loss of profits

Wow. Causing loss of profits is now illegal. In times past this law could easily have been used to those who opposed slavery or segregation.

1. Business puts up sign saying no gays allowed
2. Gays enter and stay
3. Other customers leave
4. Gays arrested for loss of profits


I agree that people who are openly in support of terrorism have to be gotten rid of somehow, but someone was seriously sleeping on the job when they drafted this law. Why do we need to protect "loss of profits" in order to stop terrorism? Jeez.. why not "loss of life" and leave it at that?????


The whole "loss of profit" thing I believe was directed at animal rights activists. Either that or I spend too much time on animal rights sites and they just viewed it that way.

Honestly, if your fur shop shuts down (an incident that occurred shortly before the bill was drafted) because protesters are keeping people away (and not by physically blocking or harassing them) then that's your problem. People should have a right to protest.

Maybe planned parenthood should sue the next time someone doesn't get an abortion because they want to avoid the pro lifers?

edit: just looked at it and realized the wording specifically directed it at animal rights protesters. I don't see why those who kill things for a living should get protection above and beyond what every other industry gets.

Maybe they should introduce a similar bill for those who protests clothing stores selling clothes that were made by kids in sweatshops?

stannis
11-13-2007, 12:17 PM
This is what happens when a nation can't, and refuses to assimilate their immigrants.

Fanatics like Malik don't want to assimilate.