Booker School Kids: "Hit Steel Plane Must"

[jafar00]

Conspiracy? Coincidence? or just plane weird?

The kids say "Hit", "Steel", "plane", and "must" just before the agent whispers in Bush's ear that the 9/11 attacks just happened.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=INg07O4rMkQ

[crimzonsol]

Is this serious? Nobody capable of planing 9/11(if it was an inside job) would be stupid enough to involve a bunch of kindergardeners in on the plan to hit the World Trade Center.

Plus, who would be stupid enough to film something like this except if they new about 9/11 and planed on using Bush as a scapegoat to take power.

[Labrocca]

If you listen without looking the kids are not saying HIT STEEL PLANE MUST. It's a deception because you are told this and then it's put home with large text so that's what you hear.

Listen to it...and don't watch the video.

[AlonzoMourning23]

Beyond that lab, what is the point here? Is bush having the kids make a cheer for the fall of the WTC? He was a cheerleader after all.

Do people actually think this is evidence? Or is this supposed to be a joke?

[Scorpion]

Nothing but far fetched conspiracy loving nonsense. It makes you really wonder about the people that buy into this Bush/Cheney/9-11
idiocy.[hr]
If you listen without looking the kids are not saying HIT STEEL PLANE MUST. It's a deception because you are told this and then it's put home with large text so that's what you hear.

Listen to it...and don't watch the video.


You're right. I hear Kick, Steel, Plane and Mud.

[AlanC]

I hear hit, feel, plane, mud...LOL..[hr]But it seems like the teacher must be holding up flash cards and asking them to read them, I don't know that Bush was anything other than an observer... so ... what is the point of this anyway?

[namguy]

Is this serious? Nobody capable of planing 9/11(if it was an inside job) would be stupid enough to involve a bunch of kindergardeners in on the plan to hit the World Trade Center.

Plus, who would be stupid enough to film something like this except if they new about 9/11 and planed on using Bush as a scapegoat to take power.


Oh, I don't know about that. There's alot of screw balls out here, demented screw balls.

Bush as a 'scapegoat:help:' Here's where we part company...I'm not going to say that 'Lil Bush had a part in the bombing on 9-11 but I find it awfully hard to believe that his advisors didn't notified him that something was in the works, jast as Rooselvelt had a strong idea about Pearl Harbor.

[crimzonsol]

I'm not going to say that 'Lil Bush had a part in the bombing on 9-11 but I find it awfully hard to believe that his advisors didn't notified him that something was in the works, jast as Rooselvelt had a strong idea about Pearl Harbor.

No arguement here, but not reacting to something is completly different to actively participating in something. The reason they are different is the intent of the individuals, by not doing something you are not trying to kill people, but by helping your intent is to cause harm, ultimately the end result is the same.

An analogy I can think of is the difference between Manslaughter and Murder, for it to be Murder 1 ther has to be present evidience of malicious intent and pre-planed, Murder 2 there has to be malicious intent, while for Manslaughter the intent does not have to be that you wished to kill them, for example you got in a fight and accidentaly killed someone. In the end someone is dead, but the intent of the killer is different.

[namguy]

I'm not going to say that 'Lil Bush had a part in the bombing on 9-11 but I find it awfully hard to believe that his advisors didn't notified him that something was in the works, jast as Rooselvelt had a strong idea about Pearl Harbor.

No arguement here, but not reacting to something is completly different to actively participating in something. The reason they are different is the intent of the individuals, by not doing something you are not trying to kill people, but by helping your intent is to cause harm, ultimately the end result is the same.

An analogy I can think of is the difference between Manslaughter and Murder, for it to be Murder 1 ther has to be present evidience of malicious intent and pre-planed, Murder 2 there has to be malicious intent, while for Manslaughter the intent does not have to be that you wished to kill them, for example you got in a fight and accidentaly killed someone. In the end someone is dead, but the intent of the killer is different.


I agree, you summed it up very well sir/ma'am:clapper: