PDA

View Full Version : what your average abortion looks like -- no baby

MizzyAndrea
10-28-2007, 04:07 AM
http://www.angelfire.com/pq/pepsii/nuva.html[hr]This is what illegal abortion looked like:
http://www.sapphireblue.com/25years/
underdawg
10-28-2007, 04:23 AM
Looks kinda like a goldfish or perhaps a betta.
davo
10-28-2007, 04:38 AM
I used to think exactly like this for quite a while, and I used to support abortion and mock religious arguments against it.

I now oppose abortion, but for completely different reasons than religion.
JohnnyAwake
10-28-2007, 05:26 AM
http://www.angelfire.com/pq/pepsii/nuva.html[hr]This is what illegal abortion looked like:
http://www.sapphireblue.com/25years/


That's the weirdest looking 'person' that I've ever seen, murdered!
preservanation
10-28-2007, 05:30 AM
http://www.angelfire.com/pq/pepsii/nuva.html[hr]This is what illegal abortion looked like:
http://www.sapphireblue.com/25years/


That's the weirdest looking 'person' that I've ever seen, murdered!
That's either not saying much... or revealing too much.
Hola, Jonny Bull Dog!
Elrathin
10-28-2007, 05:43 AM
Nice Aquarium there, hope you enjoy it.

Shall I show pictures from a Slaughter house to make you all feel better?
Labrocca
10-28-2007, 05:53 AM
Just keep in mind at one point that was all of us. What a disrespect you have for life. "oh it's small so it's worthless"...I bet you wouldn't say that if it was a rain forest frog that was about to be extinct.
Elrathin
10-28-2007, 05:55 AM
Just keep in mind at one point that was all of us. What a disrespect you have for life. "oh it's small so it's worthless"...I bet you wouldn't say that if it was a rain forest frog that was about to be extinct.


LOL Conservatives have about as much respect for the rain forest as polluting the atmosphere, they simply don't care. Nice try though.

{PERSONAL EDIT: DELETING COMMENT WAS UNCALLED FOR SORRY}
Lazarus
10-28-2007, 05:58 AM
Absent formal introductions to said fetus, this is a misplaced thread.
underdawg
10-28-2007, 10:15 AM
The thing is that people are no way going extinct yet.
BoogyMan
10-28-2007, 12:56 PM
Just keep in mind at one point that was all of us. What a disrespect you have for life. "oh it's small so it's worthless"...I bet you wouldn't say that if it was a rain forest frog that was about to be extinct.


LOL Conservatives have about as much respect for the rain forest as polluting the atmosphere, they simply don't care. Nice try though.


Another liberal making broad and sweeping statements that have nothing to do with the point being made? I think so.

How about trying to address Labrocca's point that you probably would care more about the frog than the human?
AlonzoMourning23
10-28-2007, 02:42 PM
Just keep in mind at one point that was all of us. What a disrespect you have for life. "oh it's small so it's worthless"...

It doesn't feel pain, it isn't aware and it doesn't have thoughts. It has absolutely no concern over its own survival. If the mother doesn't want it then it has no real value to her either.

I bet you wouldn't say that if it was a rain forest frog that was about to be extinct.


True, at least for me. But there's a reason. The population has no need for additional humans. There are over 6 billion of us and, if anything, the world is worse off with another billion.

At the same time that tree frog population really could use that additional tree frog.

One has a real benefit to the species and one doesn't. So at that point I look at other measures of value as I mentioned at the beginning.
AlonzoMourning23
10-28-2007, 02:44 PM
How about trying to address Labrocca's point that you probably would care more about the frog than the human?

It's not about caring more about a frog than a human. It's about caring more about something that is essential to the survival of a species vs. something that is unwanted by the mother and has absolutely no awareness or thought as to its own fate.

An aborted from isn't going to be anymore aware than the aborted human, but simply its potential for breeding in the future is much more important to that species of frog than humans.
JohnnyAwake
10-30-2007, 09:00 PM
Sweeping statement?


LOL Conservatives have about as much respect for the rain forest as polluting the atmosphere, they simply don't care. Nice try though.


Yea it is. What do you think Boogey?

Another liberal making broad and sweeping statements that have nothing to do with the point being made? I think so.


That's funny it sounded as if you just made a sweeping statement about "Another Liberal".


How about trying to address Labrocca's point that you probably would care more about the frog than the human?


The better question to ask here is, where do we draw the line? A fetus can't experience pain. It's life in that it is an anatomical predecessor to the homo sapian. But with that same logic an amoeba is a protist and predecessor to animal organisms that comprise the cellular make up of all biotic parts of the environment.
So are you a murderer if you spit on a hot sidewalk? That is subjective to where you want to draw that line. Practicality tells me the line sits somewhere between a beating heart and cognition. Of coarse that was a cognitive response; second opinion? Maybe we could ask a rock.