PDA

View Full Version : Hillary (verbally) Slaps Iowa Voter


preservanation
10-08-2007, 09:20 PM
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=12131

Hillary Slaps Iowa Voter
By Philip Klein
Published 10/8/2007 12:17:53 AM
NEW HAMPTON, Iowa -- Hillary Clinton is working hard to counter her image as an arrogant Ice Queen. At campaign stops, she laughs at her own jokes and regales the audience with tales of herself as a little girl who stared into the sky with binoculars hoping to catch a glimpse of Sputnik as it passed by.

"Give me a fair reading as to who I am, not who somebody says I am," Clinton pleaded with a room full of Iowa voters as she wrapped up her remarks at a campaign stop here on Sunday.

But just moments later, in a rare stumble for her highly-choreographed campaign, Clinton demonstrated that people's long-standing impressions of her are right on target.

During the question and answer period, Randall Rolph, a retired Democratic voter from Nashua, Iowa, confronted Clinton on her recent vote in favor of a U.S. Senate resolution calling on the Bush administration to declare Iran's Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. The measure has been greeted with suspicion by war critics who view it as a document that President Bush could use as a pretext to launch an attack on Iran.

"Why should I support your candidacy if you haven't learned from the past?" Rolph asked, referring to her 2002 vote to authorize the use of military force in Iraq.

Clinton first thanked him and then countered that, "the premise of the question is wrong." So far, so good. But after offering a description of what was in the resolution, Clinton smugly and dismissively accused him of having been fed the information, saying "obviously somebody sent [it] to you."

Rolph didn't let it pass. "I take exception, this is my own research..."

"Well, then let me finish telling you..." Clinton screamed.

"Nobody sent that, and I am offended that you would suggest it," Rolph snapped at her.

Realizing she had committed a blunder, she backed off. "Then I apologize," she said. "I apologize, it's just that I've been asked the very same question at three other places."

Later, she patronizingly told him "I respect your research," but instructed him that there were two versions of the bill, and she opposed an earlier draft that had harsher language.

"We just have a disagreement," she concluded. "I know what I voted for, and I know what we intended to do with it."

The crowed filled with supporters may have applauded, but Rolph was turned off.

He said he came into the event uncommitted, but ruled out voting for Clinton after she insinuated that he was a patsy even though he had spent the morning on government websites looking into the question himself.

"It was an insult," he fumed following the event. "It was basically calling me stupid. That I can't think on my own. That I don't have the ability to research or come up with a coherent or concrete thought on my own. How dare she!"

He continued, "She never did answer the question. She just, what I say is, bitch-slapped me."

Whether this incident does any damage to the well-oiled Clinton machine remains to be seen. But one thing it does make clear is that no matter how scripted Hillary is, over the course of a long campaign, she will not be able to mask her contempt for average Americans who dare to challenge her.


Philip Klein is a reporter for The American Spectator.Hillary's skin so thin she can't even take a pointed question from a fellow dem. She has been so coddled by the media and over managed by her campaign, that she has no idea of how to deal with the real world of American politics.
She better test her wings before the general election or this poor little bird is going to plummet from the sky.

AlonzoMourning23
10-08-2007, 09:23 PM
If this is the best you got you might as well prepare for the inauguration.

preservanation
10-08-2007, 09:48 PM
I will wait for that edict from on high, until then, it stays.[hr]BTW, I probably can't change it myself now anyway.[hr]
If this is the best you got you might as well prepare for the inauguration.
With Hillary it will more resemble a coronation than an inauguration.
Fit her for her crown and scepter and sound the trumpet fanfare...
toot.

preservanation
10-08-2007, 10:28 PM
This is a piece on how thin Hillary's skin is.
This thread has turned into a perfect example of how maybe that trait doesn't stop just at Hillary.
It's the title of the artical for cry-eye!
How apropos[hr]
The title is problematic, but since it's the original titles of the article it's not an issue as far as I'm concerned.
Thank you Zo!

preservanation
10-08-2007, 10:44 PM
"It was an insult," he fumed following the event. "It was basically calling me stupid. That I can't think on my own. That I don't have the ability to research or come up with a coherent or concrete thought on my own. How dare she!"People have to get used to the fact that she does think we are stupid.
That's why we have to turn our lives over to them so they can tell us how to run them.
They do not trust people to make their own decisions.
They, and lib gov are smarter and better than the rest of us.
The sooner we figure this out the better.
Absolute elitism on parade and when the mask comes off, as it did in this fit of pique, we finally get the truth of how Hillary really feels and how she views the public as plebes and dolts. Pretty soon any one who sparks debate or questions her will be accused of being a conspirator as well as her fellow dems.
scary.

Buck Laser
10-08-2007, 10:49 PM
Well, I expect none of you to bitch next time someone posts an article titled "Idiot Chimp Boy Takes It In The Rear". After all, it would be the title of the article and not the poster's responsibility. ;)

Y'know, it's funny, but nearly all the vitriolic attacks on candidates seem to come from the republicans--even when they're eating their own. I wonder if anyone with a statistical bent would be interested in analyzing what candidates have been attacked and how many times--of course, Hillary would be the lead target, probably because the republicans fear her the most. Then maybe Giuliani, then McCain?

Pogo
10-08-2007, 11:00 PM
If this is the best you got you might as well prepare for the inauguration.

If Hilly doesn't have an energized base, she isn't going to win. She needs lefties to vote for her but why should they when she behaves like a moderate Republican?

crimzonsol
10-08-2007, 11:05 PM
I wonder if anyone with a statistical bent would be interested in analyzing what candidates have been attacked and how many times

Sounds interesting, I think I may find that out. I'll post my findings latter.

preservanation
10-08-2007, 11:08 PM
If this is the best you got you might as well prepare for the inauguration.

If Hilly doesn't have an energized base, she isn't going to win. She needs lefties to vote for her but why should they when she behaves like a moderate Republican?
I don't know.
If the DNC gives her the Fla delegates as they indicated they will do if the state moves up their primaries, your primary vote won't count for a hill of beans.
I think Hillary is in the process of railroading the Dem voters in this country.
Sorry, I don't think you have a choice.
Unfortunate for all of us.

Labrocca
10-09-2007, 12:31 AM
FP'd the irrelevant posts and added (verbally) to title.

PatrickHenry
10-09-2007, 12:41 AM
Hillary needs to rethink her foreign policy.

America is getting on the Peace Train. Candidates that don't get on too will be left behind.

Pogo
10-09-2007, 04:16 AM
If this is the best you got you might as well prepare for the inauguration.

If Hilly doesn't have an energized base, she isn't going to win. She needs lefties to vote for her but why should they when she behaves like a moderate Republican?
I don't know.
If the DNC gives her the Fla delegates as they indicated they will do if the state moves up their primaries, your primary vote won't count for a hill of beans.
I think Hillary is in the process of railroading the Dem voters in this country.
Sorry, I don't think you have a choice.
Unfortunate for all of us.

The Dems lost me years ago. They're frauds, just like H.L. Mencken said, as are the repubs. None of us peons really have an honest choice within our corrupt electoral political system. It's money that determines which candidates advance to the general election, so either way we end up getting screwed.

preservanation
10-10-2007, 09:22 AM
FP'd the irrelevant posts and added (verbally) to title.
Thank you Labrocca
sorry about the dust-up.[hr]
Hillary needs to rethink her foreign policy.

America is getting on the Peace Train. Candidates that don't get on too will be left behind.
I agree that this is what the Dem voter wants today, and I respect that view, though I may disagree. Anti-war is an admirable and honest position to take.
Hillary is not being honest with you, the Dem voter. She has no intention of ending the war, and said so in the last debate.
One of the things which I feel sorry for you about is that you don't seem to have a choice. It is Hillary's turn and the DNC and media has already fit her for her cape and scepter.
In Fla and Mich, the DNC is threatening not to even allow any of the other Dem candidates to campaign against the Queen. The fix is in.
There are anti-war candidates out there but they are being supressed and you, the voters, are being cheated.