PDA

View Full Version : Assistant U.S. Attorney suspected of sex with five year old.


Survivor
09-19-2007, 12:30 AM
An application for a search warrant was filed in federal court in Pensacola for the home of a local assistant U.S. attorney accused of flying to Detroit to have sex with a 5-year-old girl.

The application for a search warrant was filed Monday before U.S. Magistrate Miles Davis in the Northern District of Florida. The listing on the court’s docket lists John David Roy Atchison’s Shoreline Drive address in Gulf Breeze.


http://www.pensacolanewsjournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070918/NEWS01/709180321/1006

lily
09-19-2007, 12:42 AM
From the article:

The Detroit Free Press reported that Atchison arrived at the airport Sunday
with a Dora the Explorer doll, hoop earrings and petroleum jelly.


From the Free Press (http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070917/NEWS04/70917039&imw=Y)

According to court records, Atchison, who described himself as "very much a
family man," initiated an online chat Aug. 29 with an undercover officer
posing as a mother interested in letting men have sex with her children.


During continuous conversations, he expressed a desire to engage in oral,
vaginal and anal sex with her fictitious daughter, records show.


At one point, he wrote: "I'm always gentle and loving; not to worry; no
damage ever; no rough stuff ever ever."


He assured the undercover officer that the girl would not need medical
attention, saying, "I can be absolutely sure; just gotta go slow and very
easy is how; I've done it plenty."

Kill him.

BoogyMan
09-19-2007, 12:51 AM
I cannot find words for how disgusting a human being this guy must be.

He needs to be fed to something very large and very hostile.

Cobra
09-19-2007, 01:03 AM
Yeah kill him sounds about right. How sick.

AnnEsthesia
09-19-2007, 01:47 AM
Well, I am all for killing child molesters, but he still deserves to be tried first.

Alonzo
09-19-2007, 01:58 AM
He assured the undercover officer that the girl would not need medical
attention, saying, "I can be absolutely sure; just gotta go slow and very
easy is how; I've done it plenty."

How many is plenty?

maineman
09-19-2007, 02:01 AM
this is how the Bush Department of Justice walks the walk on family values!

AnnEsthesia
09-19-2007, 02:04 AM
Try him, convict him and then cut his wiener off publicly. Then give him a lobotomy and send him to work in the Texas fields.

maineman
09-19-2007, 02:12 AM
or just stick him in a cell with a mat to sleep on, a hole to shit and piss in, a slot under the door to receive gruel through, and a pipe running up near the ceiling with a coil of rope hanging on the wall.

BoogyMan
09-19-2007, 02:14 AM
this is how the Bush Department of Justice walks the walk on family values!


Maineman, I will be handing you back this comment in the very near future, especially if your party takes the Whitehouse in the coming election. Can we not even agree that the guy is a dirtbag without someone trying to tar the president with something over which he had no control?

Alonzo
09-19-2007, 02:15 AM
I must have missed something, where did it say he was a republican? If it didn't I'm not sure what the comment on family values is about.

maineman
09-19-2007, 02:17 AM
where did I ever say he was a republican? I only said he was a member of the Bush administration's department of justice. Do you question that?

Labrocca
09-19-2007, 02:17 AM
this is how the Bush Department of Justice walks the walk on family values!


Wasn't too many posts before Bush got the blame for this one. :unreal:

I say we place this scumbag in genpop of a heavy security prison and let justice take it's course up his gentle arse.

Alonzo
09-19-2007, 02:19 AM
He's worked there since the 80's. If he did this 10 years ago would you blame Clinton?

dgun
09-19-2007, 02:24 AM
What a sick bastard. Death would be too good for him.

maineman
09-19-2007, 02:27 AM
this is how the Bush Department of Justice walks the walk on family values!


Maineman, I will be handing you back this comment in the very near future, especially if your party takes the Whitehouse in the coming election. Can we not even agree that the guy is a dirtbag without someone trying to tar the president with something over which he had no control?



since when does the president have "no control" over who serves in his administration?[hr]
He's worked there since the 80's. If he did this 10 years ago would you blame Clinton?


I am sure I would not need to....there would be more than enough blame piled on Clinton by the republicans.

BoogyMan
09-19-2007, 02:36 AM
this is how the Bush Department of Justice walks the walk on family values!


Maineman, I will be handing you back this comment in the very near future, especially if your party takes the Whitehouse in the coming election. Can we not even agree that the guy is a dirtbag without someone trying to tar the president with something over which he had no control?



since when does the president have "no control" over who serves in his administration?

Nice attempt to twist words mm, you know good and well that my commentary spoke of having no control over the hidden activities of an employee who is a pedophile.

Egads....

maineman
09-19-2007, 02:38 AM
if the president employs a pedophile, where does the buck stop?

Harry Truman knew the answer to that question.

You and Bush apparently do not.[hr]and you really need to stop asserting that you know what I know.

you don't.

BoogyMan
09-19-2007, 02:42 AM
Since the guy has been in office since the 80s, were you trouncing Clinton for his, by your own shiney new standard of truth, role in this debacle? No, this is silly mm.

Back to the real topic.....
The guy is a complete sicko and should be beaten with his own internal organs.

Labrocca
09-19-2007, 02:44 AM
I am sure I would not need to....there would be more than enough blame piled on Clinton by the republicans.

Oh I see...so your comments are based on partisanship. Good job then.

since when does the president have "no control" over who serves in his administration?

Since when does the president have "complete control" over those who serve in his
administration. Are you a totalitarian or authoritarian?

And does the Bush administration get credit for exposing this guy?

lily
09-19-2007, 03:10 AM
.........Well one would think while they were doing the US Attorney firings, this one should have went.:blah:

ViolaLee
09-19-2007, 03:23 AM
"I've done it plenty."

I think I'm going to be sick.

:(:(:(

BoogyMan
09-19-2007, 03:27 AM
"I've done it plenty."

I think I'm going to be sick.

:(:(:(


And rightly so Viola, this tells us the guy is a complete sicko with a history of this kind of activity. There is no telling how many kids this pervert has permanently scarred.

It does make you sick to your stomach doesn't it. :sick:

ViolaLee
09-19-2007, 03:32 AM
Yes, and so sad for those little children he's damaged for life.

Churchel
09-19-2007, 04:38 AM
hopefully this guy gets a cell mate that makes ron jeremy look like pewee herman.

I don't understand what goes on in the mind of these people. For all of the people of faith here, why does god do that?

dgun
09-19-2007, 05:39 AM
Well one would think while they were doing the US Attorney firings, this one should have went.

Only if he refused to specifically target dems for prosecution. Hey, maybe the imaginary 5 year old girl was a dem? (too much? sorry.)

Anti-Racism
09-19-2007, 05:41 AM
Kill him.


In a world of seven billion, losing one is no shame...

I can't think of anything he can offer this society without being a threat. He's a broken animal and needs to be put down.

I'm still baffled by:

a) the stupidity of it
b) he's done it before? parents sell their kids?
c) is it physically possible?

His poor wife. Since the kids are probably genetically screwed up, they should probably snuff those as well.

Marley
09-19-2007, 01:51 PM
U.S. Magistrate Miles Davis????

Is his bailiff named John Coltrane?

Whatever you do don;t fire the guy without LEahy signing off on it!

mammalicious
09-19-2007, 01:54 PM
Well, I am all for killing child molesters, but he still deserves to be tried first.


Yeah...tried by a large, hairy cellmate. :shock:

AnnEsthesia
09-19-2007, 02:00 PM
No, tried in a courtroom. Everyone deserves a fair trial. Then, when found guilty, off him.

mammalicious
09-19-2007, 02:10 PM
No, tried in a courtroom. Everyone deserves a fair trial. Then, when found guilty, off him.


Death is too kind for him...he should have done to him what he did to others (and according to appropriate proportions). He should be reassured that he will be treated gently, and they will go slow.

AnnEsthesia
09-19-2007, 02:11 PM
Nope, that costs us money. I say put them down as you would a violent dog and spend the money on rehabilitation programs for criminals that we can actually fix.

mammalicious
09-19-2007, 02:21 PM
What money? It wouldn't cost the taxpayer anything. He would be ''sold'' by his ''guardians'' for the pleasure of others with a certain sick fetish.

AnnEsthesia
09-19-2007, 02:23 PM
Sorry mamma, but I find that idea to be sickening. We do not serve our interests or the interests of the children by being as bad or worse than the offenders. And where do you find the sickos who would do the torturing? What do you do with them? I would not want THEM in society either.

Truth_and_Power
09-19-2007, 02:24 PM
LOL is this one of the replacements for the poor-performing attorneys that were fired?[hr]
Since the guy has been in office since the 80s, were you trouncing Clinton for his, by your own shiney new standard of truth, role in this debacle? No, this is silly mm.

Back to the real topic.....
The guy is a complete sicko and should be beaten with his own internal organs.


LOL Blame it on reagan!!! haha the republican doctrine of blame it on clinton comes full circle!

mammalicious
09-19-2007, 02:29 PM
Sorry mamma, but I find that idea to be sickening. We do not serve our interests or the interests of the children by being as bad or worse than the offenders. And where do you find the sickos who would do the torturing? What do you do with them? I would not want THEM in society either.



They are in prison. His ''guardians'' can get smokes or toilet wine for him. I realize it's sick...but there are others in prison who are just as sick, if not sicker, who we keep in prison. We don't kill everyone. Death is too good for him. He left a lot of kids with lifelong suffering, and he gets out of suffering anything himself? I say let him suffer...a far worse punnishment.

jafar00
09-19-2007, 02:42 PM
Anyone up for sending him to Iran for trial in front of a Shariah Court?

AnnEsthesia
09-19-2007, 04:17 PM
Sorry mamma, but I find that idea to be sickening. We do not serve our interests or the interests of the children by being as bad or worse than the offenders. And where do you find the sickos who would do the torturing? What do you do with them? I would not want THEM in society either.



They are in prison. His ''guardians'' can get smokes or toilet wine for him. I realize it's sick...but there are others in prison who are just as sick, if not sicker, who we keep in prison. We don't kill everyone. Death is too good for him. He left a lot of kids with lifelong suffering, and he gets out of suffering anything himself? I say let him suffer...a far worse punnishment.


And keeping them there costs money. So why not just put them down and rid the world of one more piece of trash? If you keep them alive, you do nothing for anyone. If they are alive, they have to be afforded all the rights to decent food, clean living conditions, health care, etc etc. No, you cannot just make them suffer for vengeance. That is not a world I would want to live in.

Nope, death is what they deserve. At least that way the kids know he will never get free and will never hurt anyone else.

ViolaLee
09-19-2007, 04:57 PM
Anne, cost is not a winning argument for the death penalty. In reality, the death penalty and all the mandatory appeals, to be sure we have the right killer, cost more than life in prison.

AnnEsthesia
09-19-2007, 05:00 PM
And yet, I would rather just put them down humanely. BTW, child molestation is different than murder, since the child can tell what was done and who did it.

ViolaLee
09-19-2007, 05:04 PM
I don't believe in the death penalty....I think it's wrong to kill.

But I do believe in life in prison. The sick thing is, child molesters don't get life, they get paroled and they live among us.

AnnEsthesia
09-19-2007, 05:07 PM
Hence why I think we should put down child molesters. We put down dogs if they bite, why not people if they ruin the lives of children?

ViolaLee
09-19-2007, 05:11 PM
I'm finding it hard to argue with your logic ;)

Deadshot
09-19-2007, 05:17 PM
To be honest I think that there's more logic behind killing sexual predators then murders. Many murders killed for money, or power or because they were mad at their spouse. A situation that just came about.

But the stats are leaning more and more to the fact that sexual predators can't be cured and WILL commit another sexual crime. Beyond the serial killers, many murders would NOT kill again.

So let's lock the majority of murders away for life, and kill ALL the sexual predators - child molesters AND rapists!:fight:

AnnEsthesia
09-19-2007, 05:20 PM
Yep DS. They will get out, they will learn in prison how to do it more on the sly and they will be out stalking our kids. Many 'murderers' were in a bad place at a bad time. You get them clean, you get them out of the gang, you get them a skill and many of them can clean up their lives and contribute something after they are released. Most child molesters view their activity as 'love' and feel it should be legal. It is a sickness and they should be put down.

Truth_and_Power
09-19-2007, 05:47 PM
Yep DS. They will get out, they will learn in prison how to do it more on the sly and they will be out stalking our kids. Many 'murderers' were in a bad place at a bad time. You get them clean, you get them out of the gang, you get them a skill and many of them can clean up their lives and contribute something after they are released. Most child molesters view their activity as 'love' and feel it should be legal. It is a sickness and they should be put down.


Sad but true.

Order of harshness:
Murder
Armed robbery
drug crimes
child molestation

Should be:
child molestation
murder
armed robbery

Deadshot
09-19-2007, 05:50 PM
Yep DS. They will get out, they will learn in prison how to do it more on the sly and they will be out stalking our kids. Many 'murderers' were in a bad place at a bad time. You get them clean, you get them out of the gang, you get them a skill and many of them can clean up their lives and contribute something after they are released. Most child molesters view their activity as 'love' and feel it should be legal. It is a sickness and they should be put down.


Sad but true.

Order of harshness:
Murder
Armed robbery
drug crimes
child molestation

Should be:
child molestation
murder
armed robbery


Agreed, but can I add just one little thing...
#1 Child molestation/Rape...

AnnEsthesia
09-19-2007, 05:55 PM
Yep, but rape is harder to 'prove' since often it is a stranger that has to be found. The child knows the molester. Hard to nail the wrong person.

potter
09-19-2007, 06:03 PM
He assured the undercover officer that the girl would not need medical
attention, saying, "I can be absolutely sure; just gotta go slow and very
easy is how; I've done it plenty."

How many is plenty?



I think I'm going to be sick.....

I think Lily has the right idea.

Deadshot
09-19-2007, 06:38 PM
Child molesters know just whom to pick on. They discover those kids who are vunerable and prey upon them. Many rationalize it because for the "love", attention and money that they give to that child they get back "a little" sex.

I took a couple of College courses on it, it's really sick how these people think. N.A.M.B.L.A. is right up there with the Nazis in my book.:sick::fight:

AnnEsthesia
09-19-2007, 06:45 PM
Yep. Should invade NAMBLA and arrest everyone who belongs.

Deadshot
09-19-2007, 06:50 PM
Yep. Should invade NAMBLA and arrest everyone who belongs.


Bullshit, let's nuke those bastards!

jafar00
09-19-2007, 09:36 PM
Yep. Should invade NAMBLA and arrest everyone who belongs.


Bullshit, let's nuke those bastards!


Well I don't know about nukes since it could kill innocent people, but I'm sure a little Plutonium in the right place (preferably anal rape with a spent fuel rod) should solve the problem.

lily
09-20-2007, 11:37 PM
You know.......I should just let this thread die a slow painfuld death, the same that I wish for Atchison, but living in the area our local news is full of articles. Now I honestly don't care what 2 consenting adults do.......but when you have picture of young adults in diapers on your my space and you are also a coach........ (http://www.macombdaily.com/stories/092007/loc_atchison001.shtml)

MySpace page suggests U.S. prosecutor had diaper fetish



By Christy Strawser
Macomb Daily Staff Writer


Before he was arrested on charges of trying to arrange sex with a 5-year-old
girl, federal prosecutor John David Roy Atchison, 53, had a MySpace page
where he listed his occupation as "daddy" and featured several photos of
young adults dressed in diapers.



Investigators said Atchison's online page uses abbreviations to say he wants
to meet adult baby/teen baby girls, and wants a diaper-loving girl to
"pamper, spoil, change, and take care of."

Atchison, of Gulf Breeze, Fla., last logged onto his page Sept. 10, six days
before he was arrested by Macomb County Sheriff's deputies in an undercover
sting.

And his page on online meeting place MySpace was not marked as private,
which means it was open for anyone to view.

"His employment status is being reviewed," said Alan Sprowls, an assistant
U.S. attorney in the northern district of Florida, on Wednesday.

Atchison was ordered held without bond Tuesday on charges of using the
Internet to seek illicit sex, and traveling interstate to engage in illicit
sexual contact. Both charges carry up to 30 years in prison. He was also
charged with crossing state lines with intent to have sex with someone under
12, which carries a minimum 30-year prison sentence and a maximum of life.

Calls to Atchison's attorney James Thomas of Detroit went unreturned
Wednesday.

Investigators said Atchison flew into Detroit Metropolitan Airport on Sunday
armed with a doll and earrings, allegedly intent on having sex with a
5-year-old girl after chatting online with an undercover deputy posing as a
mother who wanted to arrange sex with her child.

Atchison and a female deputy chatted online almost daily beginning Aug. 29,
investigators said. The prosecutor allegedly described in graphic detail
what he wanted to do to the girl, assured the person he thought was her
mother he "had done it plenty" and would be "gentle and loving."

Atchison has worked for the U.S. Attorney's office in northern Florida since
August 1987, and many said the married father of three was known as a family
man. He reportedly coached local youth sports in Florida.

"I had met him, I knew his name, but from what I've heard from people in his
office, they're saying 'this is not the guy we knew,'" Sprowls said.

Sprowls said Atchison had a brief stint as a criminal prosecutor, but spent
most of his career tending civil cases, representing the U.S. Post Office
and other federal entities.

"His caseload for years has all been civil," Sprowls said.

In his online profile, Atchison appears to be into infantilism, a fetish
where adults wear diapers and act child-like for sexual gratification.

Atchison accumulated seven online friends on his Myspace page, one known as
"teen baby boy." Three others are young women wearing diapers displayed
provocatively under short skirts, a negligee, and low-rise pants.

"I pretty much live as a baby all the time at home. I have never used the
potty in my apartment," one 24-year-old MySpace friend of Atchison's, from
California, wrote in her blog. "My bedroom is really a nursery."

Another of Atchison's online friends is listed as a distributor of adult
diapers for the "adult-baby-diaper-loving community."

TheStripey1
09-20-2007, 11:43 PM
An application for a search warrant was filed in federal court in Pensacola for the home of a local assistant U.S. attorney accused of flying to Detroit to have sex with a 5-year-old girl.

The application for a search warrant was filed Monday before U.S. Magistrate Miles Davis in the Northern District of Florida. The listing on the court’s docket lists John David Roy Atchison’s Shoreline Drive address in Gulf Breeze.


http://www.pensacolanewsjournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070918/NEWS01/709180321/1006



Another weird sex offender from Florida?? what is wrong with that state anyway?[hr]
I cannot find words for how disgusting a human being this guy must be.

He needs to be fed to something very large and very hostile.


He would probably give that large and hostile beast indigestion... so maybe we should use ants... cuz they take smaller bites... a little honey... some stakes... and an ant hill... yep... that'll do the trick...



[hr]
Well, I am all for killing child molesters, but he still deserves to be tried first.


ok... first he's tried and convicted, then we take him to the ant hill... how's that?

[hr]
this is how the Bush Department of Justice walks the walk on family values!


you mean he's a republican to boot? oy vey... have they no shame?

:ponder::shock::ponder:

hey, is this guy one of those federal prosecutors Gonzo approved keeping?



[hr]

this is how the Bush Department of Justice walks the walk on family values!


Maineman, I will be handing you back this comment in the very near future, especially if your party takes the Whitehouse in the coming election. Can we not even agree that the guy is a dirtbag without someone trying to tar the president with something over which he had no control?


no... it was a legitimate comment... and remember, boogy, Gonzales kept all the federal prosecutors on the payroll he wanted to keep... whether or not this guy was one of them is definitely a legitimate question...

and besides... maineman didn't say that about bush, heavens no... he tarred his entire administration...[hr]
He's worked there since the 80's. If he did this 10 years ago would you blame Clinton?


correct me if I'm wrong, but from 1981 through 1990, all the presidents were republican... correct?

did Jimmy "I have no big money ties" Carter appoint him? if no, then I'd say it was a pretty safe bet that he was a republican...

:ponder:

Labrocca
09-20-2007, 11:59 PM
Yep. Should invade NAMBLA and arrest everyone who belongs.


NAMBLA is good imho...one has to assume it's under constant survaillance. Even better if the authorities have a mole on the inside. If anything it's good intelligence.

TheStripey1
09-21-2007, 12:00 AM
this is how the Bush Department of Justice walks the walk on family values!


Maineman, I will be handing you back this comment in the very near future, especially if your party takes the Whitehouse in the coming election. Can we not even agree that the guy is a dirtbag without someone trying to tar the president with something over which he had no control?



since when does the president have "no control" over who serves in his administration?[hr

We heard time and time again, when Gonzales was busily not recalling his past, how these guys serve at the pleasure of the president, but now... they are saying bush isn't in charge of them...

sorry guys, you can't have it both ways...

:ecstatic::lmao::ecstatic:[hr]
Since the guy has been in office since the 80s, were you trouncing Clinton for his, by your own shiney new standard of truth, role in this debacle? No, this is silly mm.


no.. you should be trouncing Reagan for his appointment... Clinton didn't take office until 1993... do try to keep up, boogy... it was Reagan in the 80's, not Clinton...

:lmao:



[hr]
.........Well one would think while they were doing the US Attorney firings, this one should have went.:blah:


yep... but they didn't fire him... they kept him and fired good upstanding lawyers instead... so this doesn't say much for their judgement, does it?

potter
09-21-2007, 03:45 AM
hey, is this guy one of those federal prosecutors Gonzo approved keeping?


Yes, he is one of those authority figures you're not supposed to question...... :peace:

Do exactly as he says...you might enjoy it.....

BTW..he was appointed in 1985......

BoogyMan
09-21-2007, 03:49 AM
this is how the Bush Department of Justice walks the walk on family values!


Maineman, I will be handing you back this comment in the very near future, especially if your party takes the Whitehouse in the coming election. Can we not even agree that the guy is a dirtbag without someone trying to tar the president with something over which he had no control?



since when does the president have "no control" over who serves in his administration?[hr

We heard time and time again, when Gonzales was busily not recalling his past, how these guys serve at the pleasure of the president, but now... they are saying bush isn't in charge of them...

sorry guys, you can't have it both ways...

:ecstatic::lmao::ecstatic:[hr]
Since the guy has been in office since the 80s, were you trouncing Clinton for his, by your own shiney new standard of truth, role in this debacle? No, this is silly mm.


no.. you should be trouncing Reagan for his appointment... Clinton didn't take office until 1993... do try to keep up, boogy... it was Reagan in the 80's, not Clinton...

:lmao:


You are joking, right Stripey? You actually want to blame this sicko on the Bush administration?

You should be embarrassed, you know good and well no-one hired the guy thinking "oh joy, a pedophile, what a find."

Such hypocrisy does neither side of the political divide in the country any good.

heyjude
09-21-2007, 04:19 AM
I have to agree with that last comment, but it is so much fun to kick you guys around after all the preaching you've done. The claims of moral superiority. The lies that the Democrats are all immoral. I can't resist. Kick, kick.

BoogyMan
09-21-2007, 04:23 AM
I have to agree with that last comment, but it is so much fun to kick you guys around after all the preaching you've done. The claims of moral superiority. The lies that the Democrats are all immoral. I can't resist. Kick, kick.


I don't think you can show where I have made such commentary heyjude. I find portions of the left to be without morals just as I find portions of the right to be in the same sinking boat.

heyjude
09-21-2007, 04:33 AM
I don't think I claimed you said anything except that both Democrats and Republicans were guilty of reprehensible behavior. I agreed with that. The rest of what I said was about non-Republicans piling on Republicans when they are caught with their pants down. I'll bet you and I can find enough to disagree on without misunderstanding each other. We can each retire to our own corners and let the fun beging. Next round.