lily
09-14-2007, 04:12 AM
Thought I'd put this up in case anyone wanted to discuss. (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/13/washington/14text.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin)
Text of the President's Address
Published: September 13, 2007
Following is the prepared text of President Bush's address on Iraq, as
provided by the White House:
THE PRESIDENT: Good evening. In the life of all free nations, there come
moments that decide the direction of a country and reveal the character of
its people.
We are now at such a moment.
In Iraq, an ally of the United States is fighting for its survival.
Terrorists and extremists who are at war with us around the world are
seeking to topple Iraq's government, dominate the region, and attack us here
at home. If Iraq's young democracy can turn back these enemies, it will mean
a more hopeful Middle East and a more secure America. This ally has placed
its trust in the United States. And tonight, our moral and strategic
imperatives are one: We must help Iraq defeat those who threaten its future
and also threaten ours.
Eight months ago, we adopted a new strategy to meet that objective,
including a surge in U.S. forces that reached full strength in June. This
week, General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker testified before
Congress about how that strategy is progressing. In their testimony, these
men made clear that our challenge in Iraq is formidable. Yet they concluded
that conditions in Iraq are improving, that we are seizing the initiative
from the enemy, and that the troop surge is working.
The premise of our strategy is that securing the Iraqi population is the
foundation for all other progress. For Iraqis to bridge sectarian divides,
they need to feel safe in their homes and neighborhoods. For lasting
reconciliation to take root, Iraqis must feel confident that they do not
need sectarian gangs for security. The goal of the surge is to provide that
security and to help prepare Iraqi forces to maintain it. As I will explain
tonight, our success in meeting these objectives now allows us to begin
bringing some of our troops home.
Since the surge was announced in January, it has moved through several
phases. First was the flow of additional troops into Iraq, especially
Baghdad and Anbar Province. Once these forces were in place, our commanders
launched a series of offensive operations to drive terrorists and militias
out of their strongholds. Finally, in areas that have been cleared, we are
surging diplomatic and civilian resources to ensure that military progress
is quickly followed up with real improvements in daily life.
Anbar Province is a good example of how our strategy is working. Last year,
an intelligence report concluded that Anbar had been lost to Al Qaeda. Some
cited this report as evidence that we had failed in Iraq and should cut our
losses and pull out. Instead, we kept the pressure on the terrorists. The
local people were suffering under the Taliban-like rule of Al Qaeda, and
they were sick of it. So they asked us for help.
To take advantage of this opportunity, I sent an additional 4,000 marines to
Anbar as part of the surge. Together, local sheiks, Iraqi forces, and
coalition troops drove the terrorists from the capital of Ramadi and other
population centers. Today, a city where Al Qaeda once planted its flag is
beginning to return to normal. Anbar citizens who once feared beheading for
talking to an American or Iraqi soldier now come forward to tell us where
the terrorists are hiding. Young Sunnis who once joined the insurgency are
now joining the army and police. And with the help of our provincial
reconstruction teams, new jobs are being created and local governments are
meeting again.
These developments do not often make the headlines, but they do make a
difference. During my visit to Anbar on Labor Day, local Sunni leaders
thanked me for America's support. They pledged they would never allow Al
Qaeda to return. And they told me they now see a place for their people in a
democratic Iraq. The Sunni governor of Anbar Province put it this way: "Our
tomorrow starts today."
The changes in Anbar show all Iraqis what becomes possible when extremists
are driven out. They show Al Qaeda that it cannot count on popular support,
even in a province its leaders once declared their home base. And they show
the world that ordinary people in the Middle East want the same things for
their children that we want for ours - a decent life and a peaceful future.
In Anbar, the enemy remains active and deadly. Earlier today, one of the
brave tribal sheiks who helped lead the revolt against Al Qaeda was
murdered. In response, a fellow Sunni leader declared: "We are determined to
strike back and continue our work." And as they do, they can count on the
continued support of the United States.
Throughout Iraq, too many citizens are being killed by terrorists and death
squads. And for most Iraqis, the quality of life is far from where it should
be. Yet General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker report that the success in
Anbar is beginning to be replicated in other parts of the country.
One year ago, much of Baghdad was under siege. Schools were closed, markets
were shuttered, and sectarian violence was spiraling out of control. Today,
most of Baghdad's neighborhoods are being patrolled by coalition and Iraqi
forces who live among the people they protect. Many schools and markets are
reopening. Citizens are coming forward with vital intelligence. Sectarian
killings are down. And ordinary life is beginning to return.
One year ago, much of Diyala Province was a sanctuary for Al Qaeda and other
extremist groups, and its capital of Baquba was emerging as an Al Qaeda
stronghold. Today, Baquba is cleared. Diyala Province is the site of a
growing popular uprising against the extremists. And some local tribes are
working alongside coalition and Iraqi forces to clear out the enemy and
reclaim their communities.
One year ago, Shia extremists and Iranian-backed militants were gaining
strength and targeting Sunnis for assassination. Today, these groups are
being broken up, and many of their leaders are being captured or killed.
These gains are a tribute to our military, they are a tribute to the courage
of the Iraqi security forces, and they are a tribute to an Iraqi government
that has decided to take on the extremists.
Now the Iraqi government must bring the same determination to achieving
reconciliation. This is an enormous undertaking after more than three
decades of tyranny and division. The government has not met its own
legislative benchmarks - and in my meetings with Iraqi leaders, I have made
it clear that they must.
Yet Iraq's national leaders are getting some things done. For example, they
have passed a budget. They are sharing oil revenues with the provinces. They
are allowing former Baathists to rejoin Iraq's military or receive
government pensions. And local reconciliation is taking place. The key now
is to link this progress in the provinces to progress in Baghdad. As local
politics change, so will national politics.
Our troops in Iraq are performing brilliantly. Along with Iraqi forces, they
have captured or killed an average of more than 1,500 enemy fighters per
month since January. Yet ultimately, the way forward depends on the ability
of Iraqis to maintain security gains. According to General Petraeus and a
panel chaired by retired General Jim Jones, the Iraqi army is becoming more
capable, although there is still a great deal of work to be done to improve
the national police. Iraqi forces are receiving increased cooperation from
local populations. And this is improving their ability to hold areas that
have been cleared.
Because of this success, General Petraeus believes we have now reached the
point where we can maintain our security gains with fewer American forces.
He has recommended that we not replace about 2,200 marines scheduled to
leave Anbar Province later this month. In addition, he says it will soon be
possible to bring home an Army combat brigade, for a total force reduction
of 5,700 troops by Christmas.
And he expects that by July, we will be able to reduce our troop levels in
Iraq from 20 combat brigades to 15.
General Petraeus also recommends that in December, we begin transitioning to
the next phase of our strategy in Iraq. As terrorists are defeated, civil
society takes root, and the Iraqis assume more control over their own
security, our mission in Iraq will evolve. Over time, our troops will shift
from leading operations, to partnering with Iraqi forces, and eventually to
overwatching those forces. As this transition in our mission takes place,
our troops will focus on a more limited set of tasks, including
counterterrorism operations and training, equipping and supporting Iraqi
forces.
I have consulted with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, other members of my
national security team, Iraqi officials, and leaders of both parties in
Congress. I have benefited from their advice, and I have accepted General
Petraeus's recommendations. I have directed General Petraeus and Ambassador
Crocker to update their joint campaign plan for Iraq, so we can adjust our
military and civilian resources accordingly. I have also directed them to
deliver another report to Congress in March. At that time, they will provide
a fresh assessment of the situation in Iraq and of the troop levels and
resources we need to meet our national security objectives.
The principle guiding my decisions on troop levels in Iraq is "return on
success." The more successful we are, the more American troops can return
home. And in all we do, I will ensure that our commanders on the ground have
the troops and flexibility they need to defeat the enemy.
Americans want our country to be safe and our troops to begin coming home
from Iraq. Yet those of us who believe success in Iraq is essential to our
security, and those who believe we should bring our troops home, have been
at odds. Now, because of the measure of success we are seeing in Iraq, we
can begin seeing troops come home.
The way forward I have described tonight makes it possible, for the first
time in years, for people who have been on opposite sides of this difficult
debate to come together.
This vision for a reduced American presence also has the support of Iraqi
leaders from all communities. At the same time, they understand that their
success will require U.S. political, economic and security engagement that
extends beyond my Presidency. These Iraqi leaders have asked for an enduring
relationship with America. And we are ready to begin building that
relationship - in a way that protects our interests in the region and
requires many fewer American troops.
The success of a free Iraq is critical to the security of the United States.
A free Iraq will deny Al Qaeda a safe haven. A free Iraq will counter the
destructive ambitions of Iran. A free Iraq will marginalize extremists,
unleash the talent of its people, and be an anchor of stability in the
region. A free Iraq will set an example for people across the Middle East. A
free Iraq will be our partner in the fight against terror - and that will
make us safer here at home.
Realizing this vision will be difficult, but it is achievable. Our military
commanders believe we can succeed. Our diplomats believe we can succeed. And
for the safety of future generations of Americans, we must succeed.
If we were to be driven out of Iraq, extremists of all strains would be
emboldened. Al Qaeda could gain new recruits and new sanctuaries. Iran would
benefit from the chaos and would be encouraged in its efforts to gain
nuclear weapons and dominate the region. Extremists could control a key part
of the global energy supply. Iraq could face a humanitarian nightmare.
Democracy movements would be violently reversed. We would leave our children
to face a far more dangerous world. And as we saw on September the 11th,
2001, those dangers can reach our cities and kill our people.
Whatever political party you belong to, whatever your position on Iraq, we
should be able to agree that America has a vital interest in preventing
chaos and providing hope in the Middle East. We should be able to agree that
we must defeat Al Qaeda, counter Iran, help the Afghan government, work for
peace in the Holy Land, and strengthen our military so we can prevail in the
struggle against terrorists and extremists.
So tonight I want to speak to members of the United States Congress: Let us
come together on a policy of strength in the Middle East. I thank you for
providing crucial funds and resources for our military. And I ask you to
join me in supporting the recommendations General Petraeus has made and the
troop levels he has asked for.
To the Iraqi people: You have voted for freedom, and now you are liberating
your country from terrorists and death squads. You must demand that your
leaders make the tough choices needed to achieve reconciliation. As you do,
have confidence that America does not abandon our friends, and we will not
abandon you.
To Iraq's neighbors who seek peace: The violent extremists who target Iraq
are also targeting you. The best way to secure your interests and protect
your own people is to stand with the people of Iraq. That means using your
economic and diplomatic leverage to strengthen the government in Baghdad.
And it means the efforts by Iran and Syria to undermine that government must
end.
To the international community: The success of a free Iraq matters to every
civilized nation. We thank the 36 nations who have troops on the ground in
Iraq and the many others who are helping that young democracy. We encourage
all nations to help, by implementing the International Compact to revitalize
Iraq's economy, by participating in the Neighbors Conferences to boost
cooperation and overcome differences in the region, and by supporting the
new and expanded mission of the United Nations in Iraq.
To our military personnel, intelligence officers, diplomats, and civilians
on the front lines in Iraq: You have done everything America has asked of
you. And the progress I have reported tonight is in large part because of
your courage and hard effort. You are serving far from home. Our nation is
grateful for your sacrifices and the sacrifices of your families.
Earlier this year, I received an e-mail from the family of Army Specialist
Brandon Stout of Michigan. Brandon volunteered for the National Guard and
was killed while serving in Baghdad. His family has suffered greatly. Yet in
their sorrow, they see larger purpose. His wife, Audrey, says that Brandon
felt called to serve and knew what he was fighting for. And his parents,
Tracy and Jeff, wrote me this: "We believe this is a war of good and evil
and we must win ... even if it cost the life of our own son. Freedom is not
free."
This country is blessed to have Americans like Brandon Stout, who make
extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe from harm. They are doing so in a
fight that is just, and right, and necessary. And now it falls to us to
finish the work they have begun.
Some say the gains we are making in Iraq come too late. They are mistaken.
It is never too late to deal a blow to Al Qaeda. It is never too late to
advance freedom. And it is never too late to support our troops in a fight
they can win.
Good night, and God bless America.[hr]To the international community: The success of a free Iraq matters to every
civilized nation. We thank the 36 nations who have troops on the ground in
Iraq and the many others who are helping that young democracy.
HUH? Last I checked in 2006 it was down to 22, with those 22 countries having no more that 100 troops.....all in non-combat. If Bush doesn't know this.......then we're in more trouble than I thought.
Text of the President's Address
Published: September 13, 2007
Following is the prepared text of President Bush's address on Iraq, as
provided by the White House:
THE PRESIDENT: Good evening. In the life of all free nations, there come
moments that decide the direction of a country and reveal the character of
its people.
We are now at such a moment.
In Iraq, an ally of the United States is fighting for its survival.
Terrorists and extremists who are at war with us around the world are
seeking to topple Iraq's government, dominate the region, and attack us here
at home. If Iraq's young democracy can turn back these enemies, it will mean
a more hopeful Middle East and a more secure America. This ally has placed
its trust in the United States. And tonight, our moral and strategic
imperatives are one: We must help Iraq defeat those who threaten its future
and also threaten ours.
Eight months ago, we adopted a new strategy to meet that objective,
including a surge in U.S. forces that reached full strength in June. This
week, General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker testified before
Congress about how that strategy is progressing. In their testimony, these
men made clear that our challenge in Iraq is formidable. Yet they concluded
that conditions in Iraq are improving, that we are seizing the initiative
from the enemy, and that the troop surge is working.
The premise of our strategy is that securing the Iraqi population is the
foundation for all other progress. For Iraqis to bridge sectarian divides,
they need to feel safe in their homes and neighborhoods. For lasting
reconciliation to take root, Iraqis must feel confident that they do not
need sectarian gangs for security. The goal of the surge is to provide that
security and to help prepare Iraqi forces to maintain it. As I will explain
tonight, our success in meeting these objectives now allows us to begin
bringing some of our troops home.
Since the surge was announced in January, it has moved through several
phases. First was the flow of additional troops into Iraq, especially
Baghdad and Anbar Province. Once these forces were in place, our commanders
launched a series of offensive operations to drive terrorists and militias
out of their strongholds. Finally, in areas that have been cleared, we are
surging diplomatic and civilian resources to ensure that military progress
is quickly followed up with real improvements in daily life.
Anbar Province is a good example of how our strategy is working. Last year,
an intelligence report concluded that Anbar had been lost to Al Qaeda. Some
cited this report as evidence that we had failed in Iraq and should cut our
losses and pull out. Instead, we kept the pressure on the terrorists. The
local people were suffering under the Taliban-like rule of Al Qaeda, and
they were sick of it. So they asked us for help.
To take advantage of this opportunity, I sent an additional 4,000 marines to
Anbar as part of the surge. Together, local sheiks, Iraqi forces, and
coalition troops drove the terrorists from the capital of Ramadi and other
population centers. Today, a city where Al Qaeda once planted its flag is
beginning to return to normal. Anbar citizens who once feared beheading for
talking to an American or Iraqi soldier now come forward to tell us where
the terrorists are hiding. Young Sunnis who once joined the insurgency are
now joining the army and police. And with the help of our provincial
reconstruction teams, new jobs are being created and local governments are
meeting again.
These developments do not often make the headlines, but they do make a
difference. During my visit to Anbar on Labor Day, local Sunni leaders
thanked me for America's support. They pledged they would never allow Al
Qaeda to return. And they told me they now see a place for their people in a
democratic Iraq. The Sunni governor of Anbar Province put it this way: "Our
tomorrow starts today."
The changes in Anbar show all Iraqis what becomes possible when extremists
are driven out. They show Al Qaeda that it cannot count on popular support,
even in a province its leaders once declared their home base. And they show
the world that ordinary people in the Middle East want the same things for
their children that we want for ours - a decent life and a peaceful future.
In Anbar, the enemy remains active and deadly. Earlier today, one of the
brave tribal sheiks who helped lead the revolt against Al Qaeda was
murdered. In response, a fellow Sunni leader declared: "We are determined to
strike back and continue our work." And as they do, they can count on the
continued support of the United States.
Throughout Iraq, too many citizens are being killed by terrorists and death
squads. And for most Iraqis, the quality of life is far from where it should
be. Yet General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker report that the success in
Anbar is beginning to be replicated in other parts of the country.
One year ago, much of Baghdad was under siege. Schools were closed, markets
were shuttered, and sectarian violence was spiraling out of control. Today,
most of Baghdad's neighborhoods are being patrolled by coalition and Iraqi
forces who live among the people they protect. Many schools and markets are
reopening. Citizens are coming forward with vital intelligence. Sectarian
killings are down. And ordinary life is beginning to return.
One year ago, much of Diyala Province was a sanctuary for Al Qaeda and other
extremist groups, and its capital of Baquba was emerging as an Al Qaeda
stronghold. Today, Baquba is cleared. Diyala Province is the site of a
growing popular uprising against the extremists. And some local tribes are
working alongside coalition and Iraqi forces to clear out the enemy and
reclaim their communities.
One year ago, Shia extremists and Iranian-backed militants were gaining
strength and targeting Sunnis for assassination. Today, these groups are
being broken up, and many of their leaders are being captured or killed.
These gains are a tribute to our military, they are a tribute to the courage
of the Iraqi security forces, and they are a tribute to an Iraqi government
that has decided to take on the extremists.
Now the Iraqi government must bring the same determination to achieving
reconciliation. This is an enormous undertaking after more than three
decades of tyranny and division. The government has not met its own
legislative benchmarks - and in my meetings with Iraqi leaders, I have made
it clear that they must.
Yet Iraq's national leaders are getting some things done. For example, they
have passed a budget. They are sharing oil revenues with the provinces. They
are allowing former Baathists to rejoin Iraq's military or receive
government pensions. And local reconciliation is taking place. The key now
is to link this progress in the provinces to progress in Baghdad. As local
politics change, so will national politics.
Our troops in Iraq are performing brilliantly. Along with Iraqi forces, they
have captured or killed an average of more than 1,500 enemy fighters per
month since January. Yet ultimately, the way forward depends on the ability
of Iraqis to maintain security gains. According to General Petraeus and a
panel chaired by retired General Jim Jones, the Iraqi army is becoming more
capable, although there is still a great deal of work to be done to improve
the national police. Iraqi forces are receiving increased cooperation from
local populations. And this is improving their ability to hold areas that
have been cleared.
Because of this success, General Petraeus believes we have now reached the
point where we can maintain our security gains with fewer American forces.
He has recommended that we not replace about 2,200 marines scheduled to
leave Anbar Province later this month. In addition, he says it will soon be
possible to bring home an Army combat brigade, for a total force reduction
of 5,700 troops by Christmas.
And he expects that by July, we will be able to reduce our troop levels in
Iraq from 20 combat brigades to 15.
General Petraeus also recommends that in December, we begin transitioning to
the next phase of our strategy in Iraq. As terrorists are defeated, civil
society takes root, and the Iraqis assume more control over their own
security, our mission in Iraq will evolve. Over time, our troops will shift
from leading operations, to partnering with Iraqi forces, and eventually to
overwatching those forces. As this transition in our mission takes place,
our troops will focus on a more limited set of tasks, including
counterterrorism operations and training, equipping and supporting Iraqi
forces.
I have consulted with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, other members of my
national security team, Iraqi officials, and leaders of both parties in
Congress. I have benefited from their advice, and I have accepted General
Petraeus's recommendations. I have directed General Petraeus and Ambassador
Crocker to update their joint campaign plan for Iraq, so we can adjust our
military and civilian resources accordingly. I have also directed them to
deliver another report to Congress in March. At that time, they will provide
a fresh assessment of the situation in Iraq and of the troop levels and
resources we need to meet our national security objectives.
The principle guiding my decisions on troop levels in Iraq is "return on
success." The more successful we are, the more American troops can return
home. And in all we do, I will ensure that our commanders on the ground have
the troops and flexibility they need to defeat the enemy.
Americans want our country to be safe and our troops to begin coming home
from Iraq. Yet those of us who believe success in Iraq is essential to our
security, and those who believe we should bring our troops home, have been
at odds. Now, because of the measure of success we are seeing in Iraq, we
can begin seeing troops come home.
The way forward I have described tonight makes it possible, for the first
time in years, for people who have been on opposite sides of this difficult
debate to come together.
This vision for a reduced American presence also has the support of Iraqi
leaders from all communities. At the same time, they understand that their
success will require U.S. political, economic and security engagement that
extends beyond my Presidency. These Iraqi leaders have asked for an enduring
relationship with America. And we are ready to begin building that
relationship - in a way that protects our interests in the region and
requires many fewer American troops.
The success of a free Iraq is critical to the security of the United States.
A free Iraq will deny Al Qaeda a safe haven. A free Iraq will counter the
destructive ambitions of Iran. A free Iraq will marginalize extremists,
unleash the talent of its people, and be an anchor of stability in the
region. A free Iraq will set an example for people across the Middle East. A
free Iraq will be our partner in the fight against terror - and that will
make us safer here at home.
Realizing this vision will be difficult, but it is achievable. Our military
commanders believe we can succeed. Our diplomats believe we can succeed. And
for the safety of future generations of Americans, we must succeed.
If we were to be driven out of Iraq, extremists of all strains would be
emboldened. Al Qaeda could gain new recruits and new sanctuaries. Iran would
benefit from the chaos and would be encouraged in its efforts to gain
nuclear weapons and dominate the region. Extremists could control a key part
of the global energy supply. Iraq could face a humanitarian nightmare.
Democracy movements would be violently reversed. We would leave our children
to face a far more dangerous world. And as we saw on September the 11th,
2001, those dangers can reach our cities and kill our people.
Whatever political party you belong to, whatever your position on Iraq, we
should be able to agree that America has a vital interest in preventing
chaos and providing hope in the Middle East. We should be able to agree that
we must defeat Al Qaeda, counter Iran, help the Afghan government, work for
peace in the Holy Land, and strengthen our military so we can prevail in the
struggle against terrorists and extremists.
So tonight I want to speak to members of the United States Congress: Let us
come together on a policy of strength in the Middle East. I thank you for
providing crucial funds and resources for our military. And I ask you to
join me in supporting the recommendations General Petraeus has made and the
troop levels he has asked for.
To the Iraqi people: You have voted for freedom, and now you are liberating
your country from terrorists and death squads. You must demand that your
leaders make the tough choices needed to achieve reconciliation. As you do,
have confidence that America does not abandon our friends, and we will not
abandon you.
To Iraq's neighbors who seek peace: The violent extremists who target Iraq
are also targeting you. The best way to secure your interests and protect
your own people is to stand with the people of Iraq. That means using your
economic and diplomatic leverage to strengthen the government in Baghdad.
And it means the efforts by Iran and Syria to undermine that government must
end.
To the international community: The success of a free Iraq matters to every
civilized nation. We thank the 36 nations who have troops on the ground in
Iraq and the many others who are helping that young democracy. We encourage
all nations to help, by implementing the International Compact to revitalize
Iraq's economy, by participating in the Neighbors Conferences to boost
cooperation and overcome differences in the region, and by supporting the
new and expanded mission of the United Nations in Iraq.
To our military personnel, intelligence officers, diplomats, and civilians
on the front lines in Iraq: You have done everything America has asked of
you. And the progress I have reported tonight is in large part because of
your courage and hard effort. You are serving far from home. Our nation is
grateful for your sacrifices and the sacrifices of your families.
Earlier this year, I received an e-mail from the family of Army Specialist
Brandon Stout of Michigan. Brandon volunteered for the National Guard and
was killed while serving in Baghdad. His family has suffered greatly. Yet in
their sorrow, they see larger purpose. His wife, Audrey, says that Brandon
felt called to serve and knew what he was fighting for. And his parents,
Tracy and Jeff, wrote me this: "We believe this is a war of good and evil
and we must win ... even if it cost the life of our own son. Freedom is not
free."
This country is blessed to have Americans like Brandon Stout, who make
extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe from harm. They are doing so in a
fight that is just, and right, and necessary. And now it falls to us to
finish the work they have begun.
Some say the gains we are making in Iraq come too late. They are mistaken.
It is never too late to deal a blow to Al Qaeda. It is never too late to
advance freedom. And it is never too late to support our troops in a fight
they can win.
Good night, and God bless America.[hr]To the international community: The success of a free Iraq matters to every
civilized nation. We thank the 36 nations who have troops on the ground in
Iraq and the many others who are helping that young democracy.
HUH? Last I checked in 2006 it was down to 22, with those 22 countries having no more that 100 troops.....all in non-combat. If Bush doesn't know this.......then we're in more trouble than I thought.