PDA

View Full Version : What is a neocon?


Athena
07-02-2006, 08:45 AM
We need a forum labelled political philosophy. You notice people are aware of religion, but not many are aware of political philosophy, so it is difficult to really get into political discussions. Leo Strauss presents a political philosophy studied by Bush, and perhaps we all should study this philosophy. The following is a google site.

The Truth About George W. Bush But first, a question to the people who support the Bush administration and their policies: ... Machiavelli’s political doctrine serves as the foundation of ...
www.tvnewslies.org/html/ the_truth_about_george_w__bush.html - 94k - Cached - Similar pages

"The godfather of the Neocon movement was an intellectual disciple of Machiavelli named Leo Strauss. Straus was a German Zionist who immigrated to the US in the 1930s and mentored people like William Kristol and Paul Wolfowitz while advocating his philosophy of a dog-eat-dog world.

In essence, the Straussian philosophy and teachings are now known as Neo-Conservatism. Below are some of the more interesting and perhaps surprising or even disturbing aspects of Neo-Conservatism as taught by Strauss:

Nations cannot consider collective action and multilateralism unless it is 100 percent in line with their own selfish interests.
Strong leadership is required.
Military power is essential.
Leadership ought not be encumbered by human rights discourse or a moral conscience but nonetheless must "appear" to advocate such ideas.
Rulers need not observe the laws they impose on the ruled.
A ruler can cheat and lie and do all sorts of things but should at all time maintain the outside appearance of adherence to human rights and caring for people.
Leaders can use religion as one of many tools to ensure the nation keeps on course as formulated.
Outside threats help ensure social cohesion under domestic leadership
Altruism, environmental protection, justice etc, are not the concern of governments and ruling elites. They have no part to play in the equation of power
Strauss questioned how, and to what extent, freedom and excellence can coexist.
Strauss was very pre-occupied with secrecy because he was convinced that the truth is too harsh for any society to bear; and that the truth-bearers are likely to be persecuted by society, especially a liberal society because liberal democracy is about as far as one can get from the truth as Strauss understood it.
Secular society is the worst possible thing, because it leads to individualism, liberalism, and relativism, precisely those traits that may promote dissent that in turn could dangerously weaken society's ability to cope with external threats
Nazism was a nihilistic reaction to the ungodly and liberal nature of the Weimar Republic.
Religion should impose moral law on the masses who would otherwise be out of control.
Machiavelli’s political doctrine serves as the foundation of Neo-Conservatism and it denies the relevance of morality in political affairs. It states that that craft and deceit are justified in pursuing and maintaining political power. It implies that when it comes to achieving or maintaining power the end justifies the means. This is essentially the core of Machiavellianism and serves as the foundation for Neo-Conservatism: The priority for the power holder is to keep the security of the state regardless of the morality of the means. Machiavelli discusses frankly, the necessity of cruel actions to keep power. He was in the business of power preservation not piety. According to the originator of Neo-Conservative ideology the leader of the state must stick to the good so long as he can, but, being compelled by necessity, he must be ready to take the way of the evil."

Athena
07-17-2006, 01:23 PM
Time for an update on neoconservative activity. This is about what Israel's invassion of Lebanon has to do with the neoconservatives....


Neocons Rise From Mideast Ashes
by Robert Dreyfuss, TomPaine.com
Israel may be playing deliberately into the neoconservatives' bid to dominate global politics.
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/07/17/neocons_rise_from_mideast_ashes.php


The terrorist attacks of 9/11, the 21st century’s Pearl Harbor, allowed Vice President Dick Cheney—along with Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, John Bolton, et al. —to steer President George W. Bush and the U.S. government toward a global war, including the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq; the endless “war on terrorism” and the militarization of American foreign policy. Since then, and especially as the adventure in Iraq bogged down, the less adventurous realists in the American foreign policy establishment have begun to eclipse the previously hegemonic neoconservatives. For the past year or so, the Pollyannas amid the chattering classes have told us that the neoconservatives’ moment has passed, and that the adults are back in control in the nation’s capital. What they forgot—and what Israel’s criminal attacks on Gaza and Lebanon have reminded us—is that the neoconservative war party is global, not domestic. Outflanked, temporarily, in the United States, the neocons are now flexing their muscle outside the United States in a way that can give them added new leverage at home.