"911 Didnt Happen" ~ American Airlines

[DANG]

First, a note on why I posted this here in Current Events. Wiki Scanner is new technology that allows us to search who has been editing Wikipedia entries. This is a BOMBSHELL! American Airlines; "9/11 Didn't Happen" (http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/8/25/92620/6237)

WikiScanner discovered that American Airlines (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=50132865)changed their Wikipedia entry to state that
Flights 11 and 77 never flew on 9/11.
Original entry was:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: American Airlines Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and American Airlines Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).

New entry is:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and Flight 11 (a Boeing 767). Although these flights were daily departures before and a month after September 11, 2001. Neither flight 11 nor 77 were scheduled on September 11, 2001. The records kept by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (www.bts.gov/gis/) do not list either flight that day.

A Google search of the IP address that made the change - 144.9.8.21 - is located at American Airlines.
Yes, I know this is from a blog. Now that we have that out of the way..... How about the facts?

What does American Airlines have to gain from denial of these flights?
If those flights never took off that morning.... Lawsuits?

It would explain why the plane that DID crash into the Pentagon that day.... had no luggage.

And why, before the facing of the Pentagon collapsed, the penetration was smaller than a 757.

It would help explain the missing frames from the Pentagon video (AA 77)

It would explain why the media HAD TO generate a fake list of passengers (http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/flight_11_passengers.html) for Flight 11. There was no real list.

It would also explain why 1/3 of the supposed hijackers are still alive and complaining about the false charges. They really werent on those planes. (Ahem, shouldnt they be dead?)
(See: At least 7 Hijackers Alive (http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html))

Planes other than scheduled passenger flights were used that day.

Most likely, planes that were being used for the NORAD war games.

NORAD didnt stand down that day..... they were actively involved in a false flag attack. The pilots who were flying those planes may have been unwittingly (euthanized?) immobilized while their planes were electronically hijacked.
The pilots of those disguised military planes are dead.

The only living suspects are in power.

We already know Flight 93 safely landed and the passengers were taken to a NASA wharehouse for "briefing".... thats another story though. That was United Airlines.

The official story of UA 93 and AA 77 have a common flaw (http://www.vialls.com/lies911/lies.htm) . Both rely on cell phones communicating with land lines at altitude and at high rate of speed,
Not.
Gonna.
Happen.
....to tell us that the perps are of mid-east descent.

The truth only takes a few seconds to tell.

[PatrickHenry]

Good one DANG...

[December]

Hijack 'suspects' alive and well

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm

[jafar00]

Something sure is screwy here.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. Same people say *The Holocaust* didn't happen.
2. I think maybe we need to find those who say 9/11 didn't happen and throw the bastards into jail!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[DANG]

Oh, it happened.

Just not the way we have been led to believe.

[quiet man]

First, a note on why I posted this here in Current Events. Wiki Scanner is new technology that allows us to search who has been editing Wikipedia entries. This is a BOMBSHELL! American Airlines; "9/11 Didn't Happen" (http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/8/25/92620/6237)

WikiScanner discovered that American Airlines (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=50132865)changed their Wikipedia entry to state that
Flights 11 and 77 never flew on 9/11.
Original entry was:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: American Airlines Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and American Airlines Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).

New entry is:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and Flight 11 (a Boeing 767). Although these flights were daily departures before and a month after September 11, 2001. Neither flight 11 nor 77 were scheduled on September 11, 2001. The records kept by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (www.bts.gov/gis/) do not list either flight that day.

A Google search of the IP address that made the change - 144.9.8.21 - is located at American Airlines.
Yes, I know this is from a blog. Now that we have that out of the way..... How about the facts?

What does American Airlines have to gain from denial of these flights?
If those flights never took off that morning.... Lawsuits?

It would explain why the plane that DID crash into the Pentagon that day.... had no luggage.

And why, before the facing of the Pentagon collapsed, the penetration was smaller than a 757.

It would help explain the missing frames from the Pentagon video (AA 77)

It would explain why the media HAD TO generate a fake list of passengers (http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/flight_11_passengers.html) for Flight 11. There was no real list.

It would also explain why 1/3 of the supposed hijackers are still alive and complaining about the false charges. They really werent on those planes. (Ahem, shouldnt they be dead?)
(See: At least 7 Hijackers Alive (http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html))

Planes other than scheduled passenger flights were used that day.

Most likely, planes that were being used for the NORAD war games.

NORAD didnt stand down that day..... they were actively involved in a false flag attack. The pilots who were flying those planes may have been unwittingly (euthanized?) immobilized while their planes were electronically hijacked.
The pilots of those disguised military planes are dead.

The only living suspects are in power.

We already know Flight 93 safely landed and the passengers were taken to a NASA wharehouse for "briefing".... thats another story though. That was United Airlines.

The official story of UA 93 and AA 77 have a common flaw (http://www.vialls.com/lies911/lies.htm) . Both rely on cell phones communicating with land lines at altitude and at high rate of speed,
Not.
Gonna.
Happen.
....to tell us that the perps are of mid-east descent.

The truth only takes a few seconds to tell.

so what you are saying is you believe a blog with no facts in it and discount all evidence to the contrary? this post has nothing but speculation in it. perhaps you should not believe all that you read on your pc. :dizzy: :shock:

[DANG]

Question the inconsistancies.

Blind trust is for suckers![hr]My last post was directed at CWN
so what you are saying is you believe a blog with no facts in it and discount all evidence to the contrary?

Wrong.

American Airlines editted the information on Wikipedia, about themselves.

The gubmint backed it up;
Those flights never took off that day.
See: http://www.bts.gov/gis/

[quiet man]

Question the inconsistancies.

Blind trust is for suckers![hr]My last post was directed at CWN
so what you are saying is you believe a blog with no facts in it and discount all evidence to the contrary?

Wrong.

American Airlines editted the information on Wikipedia, about themselves.

The gubmint backed it up;
Those flights never took off that day.
See: http://www.bts.gov/gis/



which gubmint are you quoting the iraqi gubmit? editing info on flights happens after those flights are involved in crashes. has been a common practice for years. wikipedia doesn't edit info on their own? is this another unreliable source using the Internet to spread untruths they derive from blogs and misinformation? you still have not stated any substantiated reasons for your misinformation.

[DANG]

That last link I offerred was not a direct link. Try this:

#### (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/message.php?messageid=429272&mpage=1&showdate=8/26/07&forum=1)

Evidence that Flights AA 11 and AA 77
Did Not Exist on September 11, 2001


According to the official story of what happened on September 11, 2001, four commercial jetliners were hijacked by Arab terrorists, two of them were flown into the North and South Towers of the World Trade Center and a third was flown into the Pentagon. This article presents evidence obtained from US-government-supplied records whose implication is that this cannot be true.

The four commerical jetliners allegedly departed from the airports, and with the flight numbers, shown below:


Airport location Name Flight no.
Newark, NJ Newark Liberty International UA 93
Boston, MA Logan International UA 175
Boston, MA Logan International AA 11
Washington, DC Dulles International AA 77

The U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics has a website at [link to www.bts.gov (Evidence that Flights AA 11 and AA 77)]

The Bureau has a page on "Departure Statistics (http://www.bts.gov/cgi-bin/ntda/oai/DetailedStatistics/OAI_B1.PL?DetSta=DepSta&FirLevSel=DetSta)"

Let us see what the original BTS webpages have to say. Click on the links below to see copies (saved in November 2003) of the "Departure Statistics" pages for September 11, 2001, for United Airlines flights and for American Airlines flights at the relevant airports:


UA: Newark, NJ — Newark International
UA: Boston, MA — Logan International
AA: Boston, MA — Logan International
AA: Washington, DC — Washington Dulles International

From which we obtain:


Date Flight no. Destination Scheduled
departure Tail no. Actual
departure
Sept. 11 UA 93 San Francisco 8:00 N591UA 8:01
Sept. 11 UA 175 Los Angeles 8:00 N612UA 7:58
Sept. 11 AA 11 No record exists
Sept. 11 AA 77 No record exists

Thus for September 11, 2001, and for Flights UA 93 and UA 175, the destination, tail number and departure time are the same as that given above. But for Flights AA 11 and AA 77 the situation is totally different — these flights are not scheduled at all. The implication is that Flights AA 11 and AA 77 did not exist on September 11, 2001.The links in this quote are accurate

This info is backed up at Airline On-Time Statistics (http://www.bts.gov/xml/ontimesummarystatistics/src/ddisp/OntimeSummarySelect.xml?tname=OntimeSummaryFlightD ata)

How hard can it be to paint a plane to LOOK like an AA commercial flight? I could do it in 2 days.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~Auto-merge~~~~~~~~~~~~
NEW POST: (Note: Automerge is bullsh!t, extra work!! and just plain crap.)
[hr]
which gubmint are you quoting the iraqi gubmit? The same government that says they "Dont have any hard evidence linking Osama Bin Laden to the events of 911" The FBI wants him only for crimes committed in 1998.

editing info on flights happens after those flights are involved in crashes.I dont believe you.

has been a common practice for years. wikipedia doesn't edit info on their own?In the OP, at the end of the quote Wiki Scanner found who edited the info: "The IP address that made the change - 144.9.8.21 - is located at American Airlines."

is this another unreliable source using the Internet to spread untruths they derive from blogs and misinformation? It looks like the truth is coming out. AA is covering its ass.

you still have not stated any substantiated reasons for your misinformation.What misinformation?

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. Pure Insanity.
2. Being a Neoliberal makes you feel strange things.
3. Because thinking isn't used by Neoliberals.
4. Maybe join a Mosque.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[DANG]

"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation." ~~ Herbert Spencer


You can view the side by side edit HERE (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=50132865)

[BoogyMan]

There have, as of late, been all kinds of claims of edits in wikipedia from registered company netblocks. What folks like DANG refuse to understand is that behind those IP addresses are people. The conspiracy theory garbage that you have posted here proves nothing more than your desire for your claim so to be. There are literally 10s of thousands of people working for American Airlines, who knows how many have access to the Internet from company systems. Among that host of employees, you cannot fathom the presence of a so called "truther?"

[Jaaaman]

I don't believe a word of it. Sorry Dang.

[December]

By the way, in 2001 ABC-NEWS reported that these the so-called "hijack suspects" wanted to sue the FBI for slander. :thumbsup:

Does anyone know if they got any money?

Hijack 'suspects' alive and well

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm

[Marley]

So who died?

Isn't it as simple as checking the passenger deaths?

Weren't a few hundred people BURIED by thier families?

I guess in all your paranoid brilliance you never considered the most elementary of tests to prove your hypothesis?

Out of these hundreds of passenger deaths, none of them had life insurance?

Or if any did, the insurance company just came off thousands or millions of dollars, just because?

There's a myriad of of ways to test the situation and see the truth, instead you;re desparately clinging to some departures/arrivals board data?

[Labrocca]

And exactly what proof do you offer that the change in the wiki page was from American Airlines and not a rogue employee or even a conspiracy theorist? That same IP has edited a LOT of other pages unrelated to American Airlines. Some are a baptist page. Why would AA bother to edit a wikipedia page?

[Stoner]

This thread has finally been put in it's rightful place.

[Jaaaman]

This thread has finally been put in it's rightful place.


Thank goodness. :dizzy:

[lawless168]

Oh, it happened.

Just not the way we have been led to believe.


Now I voted in another thread that I would vote yes in having Marijuana legalized, but now I'm starting to think I should vote NO....

[DANG]

There have, as of late, been all kinds of claims of edits in wikipedia from registered company netblocks. What folks like DANG refuse to understand is that behind those IP addresses are people. The conspiracy theory garbage that you have posted here proves nothing more than your desire for your claim so to be. There are literally 10s of thousands of people working for American Airlines, who knows how many have access to the Internet from company systems. Among that host of employees, you cannot fathom the presence of a so called "truther?"
I agree, it may be nothing. Or it could be a PR campaign to distance themselves from the disaster. I would need to know more, this is an article that also made the news (ABC, I believe) as well as The Stephanie Miller Show (which asserts no claim to self legitimacy :lmao:) Its just another weird happening about 911.


So who died?

Isn't it as simple as checking the passenger deaths?

Weren't a few hundred people BURIED by thier families?

I guess in all your paranoid brilliance you never considered the most elementary of tests to prove your hypothesis?

Out of these hundreds of passenger deaths, none of them had life insurance?

Or if any did, the insurance company just came off thousands or millions of dollars, just because?

There's a myriad of of ways to test the situation and see the truth, instead you;re desparately clinging to some departures/arrivals board data?
Killing passengers would be as easy for the deviants who did this.... I am not going to assume it was Arabs or Iraqis... like a lot of bozos.


And exactly what proof do you offer that the change in the wiki page was from American Airlines and not a rogue employee or even a conspiracy theorist? That same IP has edited a LOT of other pages unrelated to American Airlines. Some are a baptist page. Why would AA bother to edit a wikipedia page?
I dont have any more particulars than what I posted.


This thread has finally been put in it's rightful place.
Actually not. This is not a "Government Conspiracy Theories",, its an AA theory



Oh, it happened.

Just not the way we have been led to believe.


Now I voted in another thread that I would vote yes in having Marijuana legalized, but now I'm starting to think I should vote NO....
I dont follow your rationale.
I believe Pot should be decriminalized (even though I have been "Clean and Sober" for 13 years, and have a pot leaf tattoo)...... what does that have to do with this thread?