PDA

View Full Version : Jesus Was Pro Gun!


firefox
08-24-2007, 07:16 AM
From Lew Rockwell:

URL: http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/baldwin2.html


...America's founders spoke unanimously on the subject. Patrick Henry said, "The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun." Samuel Adams said, "The said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
And what did the Lord Jesus Christ tell His followers on this subject? Jesus said in Luke 11:21, "When a strong man armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace." Did you see that? Jesus said that in order for a man's goods to be "in peace" it was necessary that he be ARMED. Now, I don't know about you, but I will take the word of Jesus over the word of a DHS official anytime.
Furthermore, Jesus told his disciples in Luke 22:36, "[H]e that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one."
Upon hearing the words of Jesus, Simon Peter responded by saying, "Lord, behold, here are two swords." (vs. 38) That means at least two of Jesus' disciples were armed with swords (the 1st Century equivalent of a modern handgun, something used for personal protection), and Jesus did not rebuke them or ask them to surrender their swords. He merely said, "It is enough."
I realize that after Simon Peter used his sword to cut off the ear of the man as soldiers came to arrest Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus told him to "put up thy sword." But notice, He did not tell him to "give up" his sword; he merely told him it was not time to use it, because it was in the plan and providence of God that Jesus be taken to Pilate, that He might be crucified for our sins.
Don't tell me that the Bible teaches pacifism, because it doesn't. I am a Christian, and I am a pastor. And I agree with Charlton Heston who said that they could have his guns "over my cold, dead hands." If DHS believes that I will ask my congregation to give up their firearms, they are grossly mistaken...

I think this makes sense. Jesus was all about not initiating force on other people. As a result, he appears to have been pro self defense/anti offense. What would Jesus do? Get an AK, learn how to use it right, and never point it at anyone unless he or someone else was being attacked.

madbetcha2
08-24-2007, 09:40 AM
The problem is not gun or knife or bazukaa,the problem is who owns it,and what he use it for.Christian not just rights to own guns,and shall own nuke-missles in their backyard,because he will use to keep the peace and justice.But the pagan,even they have a wood-stick in hand,will be the danger to the inncents people.Because they are the hotbed to the steal,rob,rape....also,if they will preach their evil theory by their weapon.

jafar00
08-24-2007, 10:46 AM
That would fit in with the message of self defense in the Qur'aan. :D

edit: Was in reply to firefox ;)

Newscaster
10-29-2007, 11:15 PM
Er, you problem is that Jesus never heard of a gun nor did he ever see one and so, he could not have been for or against it. Other than spears and swords, there were no manufactured weapons of any sort. No guns, no rifles, hand grenades or the like.
Stop trying to guess what Jesus would like or dislike and what he would do or not do and what he would wear, drive or eat. Unless you are an historian, you will be wrong every time.