PDA

View Full Version : Bush defends Iraq optimism three years on.


sonyking
03-20-2006, 04:08 PM
Read this article.Bush is defending iraqs optimsim.For three
years now.


With the Iraq conflict entering its fourth year, US President George W. Bush took aim at critics who say his upbeat forecasts for that country are out of touch with the bloody reality.


With the Iraq conflict entering its fourth year, US President George W. Bush took aim at critics who say his upbeat forecasts for that country are out of touch with the bloody reality.
In the second of a series of speeches aimed at reversing the steep decline in US support for the war, Bush unapologetically defended his decision to remove Saddam Hussein by force as "the right decision."
But he acknowledged that the failure to find the unconventional weapons at the core of the public case for invading had hurt US credibility and said he had pushed reforms of the US intelligence community to restore eroded trust.
"The Iranian issue is a classic case where we've got to make sure that when we speak there's credibility," Bush said, adding that he hoped to resolve the tense standoff over Tehran's nuclear programs "diplomatically."

Much of his speech focused on defending his stay-the-course strategy and on reaching out to Americans who worry that his optimism about Iraq's future is unjustified amid grim predictions that the country is sliding into civil war.

"The situation on the ground remains tense. In the face of continued reports about killings and reprisals, I understand how some Americans have had their confidence shaken," he said.

"Others look at the violence they see each night on their television screens and they wonder how I can remain so optimistic about the prospects of success in Iraq. They wonder what I see that they don't," he said.

In an attempt to answer them, Bush cited progress in the northern Iraqi city of Tal Afar, where US-led forces have carried out repeated campaigns to break the hold of terrorist network Al-Qaeda and other insurgents in the city.

Once a stronghold for extremists, Tal Afar is now "a free city that gives reason for hope for a free Iraq," he said, citing the city of roughly 200,000 near the Syrian border as a success story for US counter-insurgency tactics.

In the past, US-led forces would clear a city like Tal Afar of extremists, but would move on, letting them regroup and terrorize local populations who learned to be wary of promises of a safer life, the president said.

US-led forces, backed by increasingly capable Iraqi security, now clear cities, hold them militarily, and build institutions and infrastructure to improve the lives of the residents, he explained.

Bush said progress "is not easy to capture in a short clip on the evening news" and "will never be as dramatic" as roadside bombs or other signs of a conflict that has killed more than 2,300 US soldiers.

"I wish I could tell you that the progress made in Tal Afar is the same in every single part of Iraq. It's not," he said, but "the example of Tal Afar gives me confidence in our strategy."

Bush has drawn fire in the past for offering upbeat, even rosy, assessments of the situation in Iraq, including the May 1, 2003 victory speech he gave in front of a "Mission Accomplished" banner.

In several more recent speeches, in late 2005 and early 2006, he has defended the flawed case for war but acknowledged "mistakes" in the post-invasion period while denying that the country is in the grips of civil war.

Some observers have challenged that assessment, with Democratic Senator Joseph Biden, a likely 2008 White House contender, calling the situation there "low-grade civil war" and urging Bush to seek more international help.

And former Iraq premier Iyad Allawi told the BBC on Sunday that an average of 50-60 Iraqis were being killed each day, adding:"If this is not civil war, then God knows what civil war is."

Bush's trip to the vote-rich state of Ohio came six months before November legislative elections in which his Republicans fear voter backlash over the war and other issues may cost them control of the US Congress.

bigboy
03-20-2006, 06:35 PM
I still support bush in invading. I think that with the information at hand that he did make the right decision. I know many people have doubts that he did know the information was false but I think that it was a action that needed to be taken.

Deacon
03-20-2006, 08:21 PM
I Agree, I think its our duty as the only Super Power to make sure dictators like Saddam are controlled

puffin
03-21-2006, 01:43 PM
But the point is Bombing hell outta those people [ while the invasion ] while telling them at we come to liberate u wont do much good. They hate Saddam No doubt about the but also they hate US Army ,that's also not a big secret.

IRoNiK
03-21-2006, 07:30 PM
it is my opinion that based on the intelligence given to him (which is right more than it is wrong usually) he acted with a good decision. I don't think the troops shoudl be removed unless we want to see how fast a government can actually fall apart. we just have to play with the cards we have been dealt for a while until things settle down.

puffin
03-21-2006, 09:06 PM
we just have to play with the cards we have been dealt for a while until things settle down.


Do u really think things would settle down ?Seems to me its getting worse by everyday.

bigboy
03-21-2006, 09:28 PM
I don't see things settling down for a while. I think that this will not be a short war for sure. After we get done with Iraq everybody knows we will still be hunting Bin Laden. And if we don't solve this issue with Iran this could get much worse.

IRoNiK
03-21-2006, 09:58 PM
puffin, how many soldiers have we lost? a couple thousand in 3 years? Tell me again in 10 years how many soldiers were lost in Vietnam? How bout world war 1 and 2. I would say, a couple thousand isnt too bad. And yes the news constantly says things are getting worse. The news is also full of liberals (except fox news) who want to swing the peoples opinions toward their own beliefs. Journalists no longer report the truth, they report the truth as portrayed through their beliefs.

DemocraticWoof
03-22-2006, 08:14 AM
I think the Iraq war was way too costly for US but maybe they will benefit from it as this region has stabilized a bit more than before

Nitrus
03-22-2006, 10:04 AM
I think there a few too many 3 year on threads, let's try to post in one or two threads, instead of lots. :)

FucangLong
03-22-2006, 03:40 PM
But next time remeber to state your source :P