PDA

View Full Version : Judge rules Plame can't publish classified dates of her CIA career


ViolaLee
08-04-2007, 04:51 AM
Ex-CIA agent Valerie Plame loses court decision

Judge rules that she can't reveal the dates she worked for the spy agency in her forthcoming book.
By Josh Getlin
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

Aug. 4, 2007 -- NEW YORK -- In a setback for Valerie Plame, a federal judge ruled today that the former CIA agent cannot divulge the dates she worked for the agency in her forthcoming book, "Fair Game: My Life as a Spy, My Betrayal by the White House." The decision by U.S. District Judge Barbara S. Jones was a victory for the CIA, which had argued that such information was classified and should not be made public.

Plame was at the heart of a controversial case in which administration officials were accused of leaking news about her covert status in 2003 to several reporters after her husband, former envoy Joseph C. Wilson IV, publicly raised questions about the intelligence used to justify the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

Simon & Schuster, which is publishing Plame's memoir, said it was "disappointed in the court's ruling, which we believe runs counter to the 1st Amendment, sets a dangerous precedent and creates an unreasonable standard by which the government can disappear public information and rewrite history," according to a statement by spokesman Adam Rothberg.

The ruling by Jones came as a result of a lawsuit that the publisher and author had filed in May seeking to bar the CIA from interfering with publication of her memoir.

Plame and Simon & Schuster had argued that the dates of her service before 2002 -- which the CIA was seeking to keep classified -- had already been made public on a federal website and should no longer be considered classified information. The publisher said it still plans to publish the book this fall but would not comment on whether it plans to appeal today's ruling.

In her ruling, Jones said that "the information at issue was properly classified and has not been officially acknowledged by the CIA." She did acknowledge, however, that it has appeared in the public domain.

Following the furor over news leaks about Plame's status, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice. His sentence of 30 months was commuted by President Bush last month, but his conviction on those charges was not erased.

Last month, a federal judge dismissed a separate lawsuit filed by Plame and her husband that sought to hold Cheney and others personally responsible for damages as a result of the disclosure of Plame's identity.

http://www.calendarlive.com/books/la-et-plameweb4aug04,0,4782854.story?coll=cl-books-features

What? It's classified information? But all these righties keep saying she wasn't a classified agent! LOL!!!!

And I'm sure they'll keep spreading that lie. They love the lies so much those rightie liar lovers.

;)

I look forward to reading her book.

Stoner
08-04-2007, 05:05 AM
What? It's classified information? But all these righties keep saying she wasn't a classified agent! LOL!!!!



No such thing as a "classified agent". I believe you were trying to say "covert" agent. And no, she wasn't covert. This has already been proven. The CIA said she was not covert.

And you don't have to be a covert agent to know classified information. In the USMC I knew classified information. Didn't mean I was a covert agent.

Not sure why you have a problem comprehending simple facts. Oh, wait, I know why.

ViolaLee
08-04-2007, 05:26 AM
The classified information that she knew, and wants to publish in her book are the dates of her CIA employment.

If she was not covert, why would the dates she worked at the CIA be classified?

Not sure why you have a problem comprehending simple facts. Oh, wait, I know why, you're one of them there liar lovers yourself aren't ya?

The CIA wants to keep her record of working for them classified. Please explain why they would do that if she were not covert.

I'll prepare to laugh. :D

CheesyMuslim
08-04-2007, 11:59 AM
Sorry bout that,

1. But more,*Lets Keep The Plame Lying Bitch* story in the news.
2. One word explains her whole reality, *Novak*.
3. Novak was behind the whole made up story, her and her low life husband followed up on it, as it was being written by Novak.
4. She is a nobody, trying to claw her way to being a somebody, she isn't, neither is her husband.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

lily
08-04-2007, 09:51 PM
Plame and Simon & Schuster had argued that the dates of her service before 2002 -- which the CIA was seeking to keep classified -- had already been made public on a federal website and should no longer be considered classified information. The publisher said it still plans to publish the book this fall but would not comment on whether it plans to appeal today's ruling.

In her ruling, Jones said that "the information at issue was properly classified and has not been officially acknowledged by the CIA." She did acknowledge, however, that it has appeared in the public domain.

Um...........if the dates have already been made public, then why wouldn't she be allowed to write them in her book?

ViolaLee
08-04-2007, 11:32 PM
It's a CIA secret. Even though the dates are out there, they don't want to confirm. Probably to save the lives of other agents that used to work with her. Probably to protect other ongoing undercover operations.