PDA

View Full Version : *I Met, Lee Harvey Oswald's Brother*


CheesyMuslim
07-29-2007, 01:57 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. I live in North Texas.
2. And as you know, or perhaps know, Lee Harvey Oswald was from this area.
3. He also is the one who murdered JFK.
4. One day after I had bought this house, me and my brother were doing a fix up on it.
5. At the time, we met Oswald's brother, we were taking a break on the porch.
6. As it were, a car pulled up to our house, and common little white car, and man stepped out, and walked around the front end of it, and began walking up the side walk towards where we were standing on the porch, this man looked just like an older version of Lee Harvey Oswald.
7. The man spoke very respectfully, saying, " I am a realtor, and am listing a house in the neighborhood, and am doing comps on what has sold in this area recently, do you mind if I ask what you paid for this house?"
8. I said, "Not at all" and told him I paid $22,000.00 for this house.
9. He asked, " Are you having to do a lot of work to it?"
10. I told him, " Yeah we put in central heating and ac, and are having to sheet rock half the house, because it had the original wall paper applied to planking boards, on one half."
11. He asked, "You mind if I look around?"
12. I said, " Not at all come on in."
13. He walked around the house just looking.
14. After he had looked around, he said, " Thank you very much for sharing the info on this house."
15. I never asked him if he was Lee Harvey Oswald's brother, but I knew he was.
16. Some years later, I saw him on a TV show about his brother.
17. He said, his brother denied killing the President, but he claimed he knew his brother, and knew without a shadow of a doubt, he lied.
18. What are you thoughts about the killing of, *The President JFK*?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Professor
07-29-2007, 11:04 PM
I admire him for not wallowing in his brother's shadow and trying to go on with his life. At the same point I feel bad for him.

Mayberry
07-29-2007, 11:20 PM
Interesting, and it is a small world. It's amazing some of the people I meet who know people I know from half way across the country.

lily
07-30-2007, 02:02 AM
18. What are you thoughts about the killing of, *The President JFK*?

I think that there are too many un-answered questions and just too many circumstances..........right up to Ruby killing Oswald and then dying before his trial.

CheesyMuslim
07-30-2007, 03:17 AM
Sorry bout that,

1. He had motive.
2. The gun he bought was left at the scene, and was proven to be the weapon used to kill JFK.
3. He was seen leaving the scene right after the shooting.
4. He tried to disappear, but was seen, he killed a cop who he saw approaching him on a Dallas street.
5. As the cop was coming down the street he spun around and started walking the other direction.
6. Cop approached, and was shot.
7. He was pretty much insane.
8. He had a Russian wife.
9. He was a real loser.
10. His fingerprints were on the gun, and was a trained sharp shooter, when he was in USA Military.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Stoner
07-30-2007, 03:43 AM
No one will ever convince me Oswald was alone. It's possible he wasn't even a shooter. He was, however, involved in some way.

lily
07-30-2007, 04:21 AM
Total agreement stoner.........just too many unanswered questions.

Chess, there was alos proof that shots were fired from the grassy knoll.

Nitrus
07-30-2007, 08:25 AM
Total agreement stoner.........just too many unanswered questions.

Chess, there was alos proof that shots were fired from the grassy knoll.


There is no proof, just speculation.

Stoner
07-30-2007, 08:41 AM
There is no proof, just speculation.


There's overwhelming proof there was more than one shooter.

Nitrus
07-30-2007, 08:47 AM
Yes, but not from the Grassy Knoll, thats my point.

CheesyMuslim
07-30-2007, 01:40 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. There is no proof of a second shooter.
2. And all the evidence says that Oswald was able to fire the two or three shots that were fired that day.
3. The car was moving so slow, anyone could of cocked that weapon and fired the three shots or whatever shots that were fired that day.
4. Oswald knew the location, knew where to perch, to get off his shots.
5. Also that same day, he was asked by a fellow employee, about a package he took to work that day, his comment was, "Its curtain rods I bought for the wife."
6. Oswald didn't own a car, and he road the bus, others saw him carrying this package, which was a brown paper article long as a rifle, rectangle shape.
7. This case reminds me of the OJ Simpson case, overwhelming evidence pointed at OJ, but many people refused to believe he did it, he did.
8. And when Jack Ruby shot this bag-o-cr@p, everyone was a bit satisfied and relieved, that he did it, because for sure Oswald deserved it.
9. Both the President and Oswald were buried on the same day, Oswald had news reporters as pallbearers, while JFK had the Nation crying over his death.
10. I was about 6 years old at the time, and remember it very clearly.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Saigio
07-30-2007, 03:58 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. He had motive.

So did many other people and groups.


2. The gun he bought was left at the scene, and was proven to be the weapon used to kill JFK.

It was a bolt action rifle. How many shots was it in how many seconds again?

3. He was seen leaving the scene right after the shooting.

And how is that unique?

4. He tried to disappear, but was seen, he killed a cop who he saw approaching him on a Dallas street.
5. As the cop was coming down the street he spun around and started walking the other direction.
6. Cop approached, and was shot.

Not how it really happened. The cop was shot after he "recognized" Lee
as the "shooter" and Lee supoosedly was trying to get away

7. He was pretty much insane.

Evidnece? Hard factual evidence?

8. He had a Russian wife.

Relevence? Beyond the fact that it was used to cast more suspicion on him?

9. He was a real loser.

Um.... So?

10. His fingerprints were on the gun, and was a trained sharp shooter, when he was in USA Military.

Yeah. His finger prints showed up on the gun. Agter it was found. Well after. And as for the sharpshooter, I'm gonna have to check that out.
It's irrelevent however, because the tests showed it would take more then twice as long as the seven seconds to fire the supposed 3 shots in seven seconds with the gun used

Not to mention the fact that the Cacrino used is considered the safest gun because of it's horrendous aim. And the scope used was incorrectly set. And the magic bullet. And the back and to the left head motion.

ViolaLee
07-30-2007, 04:19 PM
Yeah the Russian wife I'm having trouble with, like how does that relate to anything?

Stoner
07-30-2007, 05:52 PM
1. There is no proof of a second shooter.

Watch the Zapruder film. At 17 seconds you see the fatal shot. If you think the shot at 17 seconds came from the rear you are a moron. His head clearly is rocked backwards.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozx4_4DZp38[/quote]


2. And all the evidence says that Oswald was able to fire the two or three shots that were fired that day.

Not according to Carlos Hathcock, the greatest Marine Corps sniper this country has ever seen.

Craig Roberts, and Gunnery Sergeant Carlos Hathcock, (who was the senior instructor for the US Marine Corps Sniper Instructor School at Quantico, Virginia) both said it could not be done as described by the FBI investigators.
“Let me tell you what we did at Quantico,” Hathcock said. “We reconstructed the whole thing: the angle, the range, the moving target, the time limit, the obstacles, everything. I don’t know how many times we tried it, but we couldn’t duplicate what the Warren Commission said Oswald did. Now if I can’t do it, how in the world could a guy who was a non-qual on the rifle range and later only qualified 'marksman' do it?”

Mayberry
07-30-2007, 06:18 PM
There's a new book out by a man who spent the last 20 years researching it. Can't remember the name or the author, but he's supposedly debunked all the conspiracy theories beyond a doubt and confirmed the Warren Commission's findings.

Saigio
07-30-2007, 06:41 PM
There's a new book out by a man who spent the last 20 years researching it. Can't remember the name or the author, but he's supposedly debunked all the conspiracy theories beyond a doubt and confirmed the Warren Commission's findings.


I'd love to read it.
I take it it's in the humour section of bookstores?

Mayberry
07-30-2007, 06:47 PM
I take it it's in the humour section of bookstores?
What good does it do you to dismiss it out-of-hand? Read it first before you trash it. But you're probably afraid to, it might just alter your pre-conceived notions.

lawless168
07-30-2007, 08:02 PM
Bush strikes again!

Mayberry
07-30-2007, 08:40 PM
Bush strikes again!
Huh?

Saigio
07-30-2007, 09:51 PM
I take it it's in the humour section of bookstores?
What good does it do you to dismiss it out-of-hand? Read it first before you trash it. But you're probably afraid to, it might just alter your pre-conceived notions.


Right. Because all the facts really do point to Lee fireing the Cacrino (a bolt action rifle) three times in seven seconds from all that distance, as JFK is leaving after turning from coming toward Lee, and JFK's head went back and to the right because of a shot from behind him. And let's not forget the convient photo of Lee holding all the stuff that would incriminate him and prove that he is a shapeshifter and comfortable standing at odd angles.

What did I forget...

Oh yeah. The magic bullet! Amazing little thing it is. Making all those mid air turns, pauses, going through two people, one of thme getting hit by the same one three times, and remaining perfect.

Stoner
07-30-2007, 09:58 PM
What did I forget...



You forgot the corruption surrounding the Warren Commision report.

preservanation
07-30-2007, 10:01 PM
I admire him for not wallowing in his brother's shadow...

Unlike Teddy, who stood on the shoulders of his brother's shadow...

Saigio
07-30-2007, 10:03 PM
What did I forget...



You forgot the corruption surrounding the Warren Commision report.


Ah, yes. Thank you.

Stoner
07-30-2007, 10:08 PM
Unlike Teddy, who stood on the shoulders of his brother's shadow...


Was that before or after he drove his car off a bridge and killed an innocent person?

http://www.politicaldogs.org/blogphotos/ted-kennedy-abu-ghraib-prison.jpg

preservanation
07-30-2007, 10:18 PM
Unlike Teddy, who stood on the shoulders of his brother's shadow...


Was that before or after he drove his car off a bridge and killed an innocent person?

http://www.politicaldogs.org/blogphotos/ted-kennedy-abu-ghraib-prison.jpg
During.

lily
07-30-2007, 11:03 PM
Total agreement stoner.........just too many unanswered questions.

Chess, there was alos proof that shots were fired from the grassy knoll.


There is no proof, just speculation.


Nitrus, not according to the House Assassinations Committee (http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/JFK/bbcgrassy.htm)

The one thing that really bothers me though, is Ruby getting in to shoot Oswald, then Ruby dying before his trial. To me that screams cover up.

CheesyMuslim
07-30-2007, 11:25 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. This is child's play, sure he could shoot three times in 7-8 seconds.
2. Like metal doesn't melt eh due to fire???
3. Some people have the Rosie syndrome me thinks.
4. Here's how it went down.
5. Oswald was sitting up there in the window, watching through the trees that were on that corner as JFK made the turn down that the express way, which I have been on myself.
6. He already had the gun cocked in the ready, and just aimed it and shot JFK through the neck with the first shot.
7. Cocked the gun again and missed, this bullet was unaccounted for.
8. Cocked it again, which the second cock only took 4 seconds between the first shot and the third and final shot that blew JFK's head open.
9. The second bullet hit the street, and Oswald didn't think the first bullet found its target, and was mad, and took dead aim on the third to make sure he hit JFK.
10. After the blast he knew he had killed the President, and laid down his weapon and walked away calmly, all done in a smooth 7-8 seconds.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Mayberry
07-31-2007, 12:21 AM
Because all the facts really do point to Lee fireing the Cacrino (a bolt action rifle) three times in seven seconds from all that distance, Well, I have a bolt action .22, and I can get 3 shots off in 7 seconds. I also have a bolt action pellet gun, and I can get 3 shots off in 7 seconds pumping twice between rounds (kittys beware :P). Distance really has no bearing. Once you're sighted in, it's all down hill from there.[/quote]

CheesyMuslim
07-31-2007, 01:59 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But I got to thinking about that second bullet.
2. I think the first bullet went through JFK and stuck Johnson.
2. The second bullet was aimed at Johnson and hit him.
3. Third bullet was aimed at JFK again.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Saigio
07-31-2007, 02:08 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But I got to thinking about that second bullet.
2. I think the first bullet went through JFK and stuck Johnson.
2. The second bullet was aimed at Johnson and hit him.
3. Third bullet was aimed at JFK again.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Doesn't explain the magic bullet.
And just out of curiosity, what about about the fourth gunshot?

CheesyMuslim
07-31-2007, 02:18 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. Sure it explains it.
2. There was no magic bullet.
3. One bullet went through JFK's neck and struck LBJ's wrist.
4. The second bullet hit LBJ's shoulder, and or reversed, where the first bullet hit LBJ's shoulder after going through JFK's neck, and the second hit his wrist.
5. Third back at JFK.
6. No fourth.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Saigio
07-31-2007, 02:23 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. Sure it explains it.
2. There was no magic bullet.
3. One bullet went through JFK's neck and stuck LBJ's wrist.
4. The second bullet hit LBJ's shoulder, and or reversed, where the first bullet hit LBJ's shoulder after going through JFK's neck, and the second hit his wrist.
5. Third back at JFK.
6. No fourth.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Okay. Explain the thigh shot. And wasn't it the hoverner of the state they where in? And explain the sound of four gunshots being fired.

I'll go see if I can round up some pictures of the scene and other stuff.

CheesyMuslim
07-31-2007, 02:33 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But LBJ should of been able to explain what happened to him.
2. He being hit by the bullets, could easily tell when and how the holes he ended up with happened.
3. I tend to believe that the first bullet clipped his shoulder, after it went through JFK.
4. The second bullet was meant for him, and perhaps hit his wrist then clipped his leg.
5. Then the third hit JFK's head.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Saigio
07-31-2007, 02:36 PM
http://www.oorei.com/imagenes/mugshot.lee.harvey.oswald.jpg
Okay. Here is Lee's mugshot pay attention to his facial features. Most importently, the chin.

http://www.canf.org/2006/images/kennedy/Lee%20Harvey%20Oswald%20am%2022%20nov%201963.jpg
Here is a photo released by the government as proof against Lee. Note the change in his chin. And the awkward stance he is standing at.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/bogus3.gif
Here's the magic bullet trajectory.

http://www.crimelibrary.com/graphics/photos/terrorists_spies/assassins/jfk/11-7-The-Magic-Bullet-(150).jpg
And here it is. After going through two people.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKmapS.jpg
Here is the path of the streets. Supposedly, the shot was fired from the texbook building. The convoy approached first, then turned and went away from the building. The shots where fired after the pass was made.

lily
07-31-2007, 11:52 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. Sure it explains it.
2. There was no magic bullet.
3. One bullet went through JFK's neck and struck LBJ's wrist.
4. The second bullet hit LBJ's shoulder, and or reversed, where the first bullet hit LBJ's shoulder after going through JFK's neck, and the second hit his wrist.
5. Third back at JFK.
6. No fourth.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


I don't want to state the obvious...........but that's one hell of a magic bullet if it's hitting LBJ![hr]


http://www.canf.org/2006/images/kennedy/Lee%20Harvey%20Oswald%20am%2022%20nov%201963.jpg
Here is a photo released by the government as proof against Lee. Note the change in his chin. And the awkward stance he is standing at.

This is the picture I've always had a problem with. It looks so fake.

Saigio
07-31-2007, 11:57 PM
http://www.canf.org/2006/images/kennedy/Lee%20Harvey%20Oswald%20am%2022%20nov%201963.jpg
Here is a photo released by the government as proof against Lee. Note the change in his chin. And the awkward stance he is standing at.

This is the picture I've always had a problem with. It looks so fake.


Probly cause it is. As I said, compare the facial structure to that of Lee's mugshot, and the stance. I also doubt that he would just conviently have a picture lying around with him holding the gun tha supposedly killed JFK and the revolver he supposedly killed the cop with as well as the pamphlet (which, if I remember is Cuban propoganda)

Anti-Racism
08-01-2007, 12:15 AM
I think that there are too many un-answered questions and just too many circumstances..........right up to Ruby killing Oswald and then dying before his trial.


I agree, I don't necessarily believe in the conspiracies but too much is unresolved and unexplained...

CheesyMuslim
08-01-2007, 01:17 AM
Sorry bout that,

1. There couldn't been more than one shooter.
2. Oswald was the shooter.
3. The grassy knoll area was to wide open, and people milling about would of seen a car, or some one running.
4. Connally didn't seem that effected by the shots till the end of the film clip that was provided.
5. So like I said, it was the last shots that got him, the last two perhaps only.
6. He was looking around back towards JFK, when he heard the first shots.
7. Then towards the end of JFK, he seemed to scrunch down a little, as if he had been hit.
8. So I would have to day, that the first shot didn't even come near Connally, or else he was in shock he didn't realize he was hit.
9. But you pretty much know when your hit, me thinks.
10. So I would have to conclude he didn't get hit till the 2nd and third shots.
11. He was hit after JFK got the first hit, then the second hit him in the shoulder then traversed on into his leg.
12. The third shot took out JFK's head, and then hit Connally in the wrist.
13. Case closed.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Saigio
08-01-2007, 11:34 AM
Sorry bout that,

1. There couldn't been more than one shooter.
2. Oswald was the shooter.
3. The grassy knoll area was to wide open, and people milling about would of seen a car, or some one running.
4. Connally didn't seem that effected by the shots till the end of the film clip that was provided.
5. So like I said, it was the last shots that got him, the last two perhaps only.
6. He was looking around back towards JFK, when he heard the first shots.
7. Then towards the end of JFK, he seemed to scrunch down a little, as if he had been hit.
8. So I would have to day, that the first shot didn't even come near Connally, or else he was in shock he didn't realize he was hit.
9. But you pretty much know when your hit, me thinks.
10. So I would have to conclude he didn't get hit till the 2nd and third shots.
11. He was hit after JFK got the first hit, then the second hit him in the shoulder then traversed on into his leg.
12. The third shot took out JFK's head, and then hit Connally in the wrist.
13. Case closed.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


1. Bullshit there wasn't. I'd ask you to prove it, but I know you won't.
2. One of them. At the very most.
3. Except for the fenced in area where (if I'm remembering right) there is a grave. No one was allowed there after the shots were fired.
4 & 6. Watch the film. When he drops the hat, he's been shot in the wrist. He also got wounds in his chest and thigh. If he only got hit once, and the bullet they claim hit him was intact, it's still one hell of a magic bullet.
7. The first shot hit JFK in the throat. That's why he is holding his throst during all the shooting, except for after he gets his brains blown out.
8. Still doesn' explain the fact he had threee seperate wounds in him.
9. Not really. Most people don't untill they see it, unless they know they're going to be shot.
10-13. Then explain JFK's head rocking back violently. That doesn't happen when shot from behind.

CheesyMuslim
08-01-2007, 12:45 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But my last post dealt with Connally, mostly.
2. Nope Connally was looking around like a gaukler of some sort.
3. He wasn't hit till the 2nd shot, and it was meant for him, which is when he was kinda pulled down by his wife, who was sitting next to him.
4. If JFK's wife would of thought as fast, JFK may have lived.
5. Mrs Kennedy, reached over to JFK's arm to see what he was doing.
6. She should of instinctively knew he was being fired upon, but she paused.
7. She had to hear the shot, and the second shot either went through the same hole in his neck, or was directed at Connally.
8. Third shot directed back at his head, and splintered off and got Connally's wrist.
9. Mrs. Kennedy failed miserably, in every aspect of this shooting, if you asked me.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas[hr]Sorry bout that,

1. But as far as his head rocking towards the back of the car when he was shot the final shot, here's why this happened.
2. Due to the force of a traveling car moving forward, and his head being struck with a high powered rifle, it looked as if his head mover backwards, when we would expect a forward moving skull.
3. The entry wound was in the back of his head, I saw the pictures, and a flap of skin was peeled back in a triangle shape that went over towards the top and right side of his skull.
4. That whole area had blown out when the bullet exited his head.
5. But the entry wound was there, under this flap of skin, I saw it in a movie about his corpse.
6. All forensic doctors know what a entry and exit wound look like.
7. They even can estimate which angle the bullet traversed from, and they did, from up and back to the right side of the vehicle.
8. Which points right at the window where Oswald was.
9. Connally knew something was going on, because he spun around looking for something, but I don't think he was hit till bullets two and three.
10. His wife dragged him down when she knew for sure she heard gun shot, and before JFK got the final shot.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Saigio
08-01-2007, 02:33 PM
Chess. Word of advice. Watch the Zapprudur film before you make yourself look like a bigger fool. Stoner provided it one the third page.
The car was moving at a crawl. He was obviously shot from the front.

CheesyMuslim
08-01-2007, 02:54 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But its on the second page, please refer to it and what page its on before you start making foolish statements about other people being fools.
2. And how did they that clever bullet entry hole get in the back of his head?
3. Amazing how I can figure out the simple???
4. While some think they with there 20 years of education can't figure out what ( I ) *The Great CWN* can in a minute.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Saigio
08-01-2007, 11:17 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But its on the second page, please refer to it and what page its on before you start making foolish statements about other people being fools.
2. And how did they that clever bullet entry hole get in the back of his head?
3. Amazing how I can figure out the simple???
4. While some think they with there 20 years of education can't figure out what ( I ) *The Great CWN* can in a minute.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


So I made a mistake. At least I can own up to it.
Sure chess. Now you need to prove all that stuff.
And please, for the sake of sanity, post coherently.

Mayberry
08-01-2007, 11:27 PM
Why is it that some people [/i]must[/i] have a conspiracy? It's over. It's done. It was many, many moons ago. Let it go. Move on. Most of those who were involved are dead, or will be soon. Those who know the truth are dead. Why stew over it?

CheesyMuslim
08-02-2007, 02:05 AM
Sorry bout that,

1. I did a little reading folks, alert the media!
2. Check this out, from the Warren Report:

"
Summary

Based on the above observations it is our opinion that the deceased
died as a result of two perforating gunshot wounds inflicted by high
velocity projectiles fired by a person or persons unknown. The
projectiles were fired from a point behind and somewhat above the
level of the deceased. The observations and available information do
not permit a satisfactory estimate as to the sequence of the two
wounds.

The fatal missile entered the skull above and to the right of the
external occipital protuberance. A portion of the projectile traversed
the cranial cavity in a posterior-anterior direction (see lateral skull
roentgenograms) depositing minute particles along its path. A portion
of the projectile made its exit through the parietal bone on the right
carrying with it portions of cerebrum, skull and scalp. The two
wounds of the skull combined with the force of the missile produced
extensive fragmentation of the skull, laceration of the superior
saggital sinus, and of the right cerebral hemisphere.

The other missile entered the right superior posterior thorax above
the scapula and traversed the soft tissues of the supra-scapular and
the supra-clavicular portions of the base of the right side of the neck.
This missile produced contusions of the right apical parietal pleura
and of the apical portion of the right upper lobe of the lung. The
missile contused the strap muscles of the right side of the neck,
damaged the trachea and made its exit through the anterior surface of
the neck. As far as can be ascertained this missile struck no bony
structures in its path through the body.

In addition, it is our opinion that the wound of the skull produced
such extensive damage to the brain as to preclude the possibility of
the deceased surviving this injury.

A supplementary report will be submitted following more detailed
examination of the brain and of microscopic sections. However, it is
not anticipated that these examinations will materially alter the
findings.


"

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Mayberry
08-02-2007, 02:11 AM
Well Chess, I'm sure you realize that all of that was fabricated as part of the cover up. :rolleyes:

CheesyMuslim
08-02-2007, 01:20 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But the Warren Report made it clear, the bullets came from behind, and one went from the back of JFK's neck to the front.
2. One bullet plowed into the back of the top of his head and ripped up a portion of the top of his skull, then exited on to strike Connally.
3. Connally had to be hit by the First Bullet, seeing this bullet didn't hit any bone in JFK, so it had to go somewhere, Connally was the only place it could go.
4. Why he didn't react to it is a mystery to me.
5. I would think he would of felt something, and ducked down after that, but he was just duffing looking around, like where's the building thats falling on me?
6. Then Oswald tried to turn him around with a shot to him, with the second bullet, still didn't work, finally when Oswald shot JFK the final time, Connally like a dumb moving target was pulled down by his wife, in her lap, as she figured out there was shooting going on.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Saigio
08-02-2007, 04:04 PM
Chess. How does a persons head rock back after being struck from behind? The car was going at a crawl. And how does a bullet enter and rip something off and the stuff goes flying back?

The magic bullet diagram I showed shows how the bullet would have to move if it were to hit Connely. Look at it. The Warren Commission falls apart in the face of basic physics.

CheesyMuslim
08-02-2007, 10:39 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But I don't think his head rocked backwards, but down and to the left towards Mrs. Kennedy.
2. Which would make sense seeing he was hit from above, and on his right side.
3. As the explosion of his brain matter came out, it propelled his head down and to the left.
4. Its common sense dude-a-rooney.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Saigio
08-07-2007, 02:36 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But I don't think his head rocked backwards, but down and to the left towards Mrs. Kennedy.
2. Which would make sense seeing he was hit from above, and on his right side.
3. As the explosion of his brain matter came out, it propelled his head down and to the left.
4. Its common sense dude-a-rooney.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Only to sheep (specific to 4).
Chess, your story keeps changing. I did not see his head rock forewards. I saw it jolt back. Then a chunk of scalp went whirling backwards. Explain how Less bullets seem to be able to change the laws of physics.
Kennedys head obviously rocks back. Anyone that denies that is either ignorant of the facts or in denial of them.

CheesyMuslim
08-07-2007, 02:51 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. Key word, *Entry Wound*.
2. His head showed an *Entry Wound*, in the back upper portion.
3. Also if he was shot from the front, that person would have to have been in plain site, standing on the grass near the street, or in a closed building, which was to the right of the car.
4. Maybe there's a new gun that can shoot through glass without breaking the glass that never surfaced in 60's???
5. So Oswald had to be the one and only shooter.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Saigio
08-07-2007, 05:59 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. Key word, *Entry Wound*.
2. His head showed an *Entry Wound*, in the back upper portion.
3. Also if he was shot from the front, that person would have to have been in plain site, standing on the grass near the street, or in a closed building, which was to the right of the car.
4. Maybe there's a new gun that can shoot through glass without breaking the glass that never surfaced in 60's???
5. So Oswald had to be the one and only shooter.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


I saw some crime scene photos.
The windsheild had a hole in it.
And the car was open topped. Easy enough to hit a person in it, regardless of glass.
There was a fenced in area that was in a good line of fire to where the car was, and federal agents kept people searching for a shooter from the area, saying it was clear and already searched.

CheesyMuslim
08-08-2007, 01:52 AM
Sorry bout that,

1. I was referring to the windows of the building.
2. There would have been a opened one if some one was shooting from that building, otherwise you need a special gun that shoots through glass without breaking it.
3. The grassy knoll is out, there were people up there that never saw a shooter, no where to hide there.
4. So you saw pics of an entry wound in the front of JFK's head?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

CheesyMuslim
08-08-2007, 02:22 AM
Sorry bout that,

1. I love these loaded questions,..Hehehehe,...
2. There were other people behind the fence, that had no gun.
3. Who claimed to see nothing.
4. Also the grassy knoll area is to low, couldn't shoot over the windshield from there.
5. Also there were 6 people in the car, and the bullet would have to go past the first four to get to JFK.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Saigio
08-08-2007, 03:26 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. I love these loaded questions,..Hehehehe,...
2. There were other people behind the fence, that had no gun.
3. Who claimed to see nothing.
4. Also the grassy knoll area is to low, couldn't shoot over the windshield from there.
5. Also there were 6 people in the car, and the bullet would have to go past the first four to get to JFK.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Um... Are we talking about the same thing here? Or are you just dodging?