View Full Version : This is for you who say that Ron Paul has no support.
qwerty
07-17-2007, 04:24 PM
First few examples,
100 Days, 100 Signs - Mauston, WI
http://www.dailypaul.com/files/images/one-hundred-1.jpg
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/721
Ron Paul Revolution , Memphis Style
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFSCXIffv1s
If you still don´t believe check out the Ron Paul meetup videos from this link, it takes long to watch those all. ;)
http://rpmuv.wordpress.com/
Now i ask, is there another candidate who has this kind of supporters(volunteer)...
:cool:[/b]
bobbylien
07-17-2007, 04:28 PM
Do you even know what the population of Mauston, Wisconsin is? 100 signs to promote his presidency to 100 people is more like it. I'm not saying that Ron Paul doesn't have a lot of support but the media isn't giving him any coverage.
qwerty
07-17-2007, 04:37 PM
Do you even know what the population of Mauston, Wisconsin is? 100 signs to promote his presidency to 100 people is more like it. I'm not saying that Ron Paul doesn't have a lot of support but the media isn't giving him any coverage.
You really UNDERESTIMATE the power of the signs, take a look at the MEMPHIS video on my first post.
Take a look at the video and you see how Ron gets much more coverage, cause of the signs. Everybody who sees those signs and don´t know who´s Ron, will ask who he is and then media MUST give him coverage.
And if you have 100 signs you can pretty easily get thousands of spectators, you just have to put them on the right places.
Ron Paul has something what you can´t buy with the money!
:cool:
bobbylien
07-17-2007, 04:40 PM
Mauston, WI has no media.. its a hick town.
qwerty
07-17-2007, 04:58 PM
Mauston, WI has no media.. its a hick town.
Every people is important.
As you see when you look where Ron was at the start and where he is now.
And gets interested about these signs everytime, cause there have never been such a volunteer grass-root activism for a candidate as far as i know!
:cool:
Kansas City Billboard
http://www.ronpaulkc.com/wp/?p=36
This is an amazing effort by private citizens. Hey everyone - you can do it, too! Thank you, Kansas City!
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/729
Ps. Mauston, WI is not the only place which have been decorated with the signs.
micfranklin
07-17-2007, 05:12 PM
As glad as I am that Ron Paul has support in this town, it's only one town out of thousands in this whole country.
qwerty
07-17-2007, 05:22 PM
As glad as I am that Ron Paul has support in this town, it's only one town out of thousands in this whole country.
Take a look at the Ron Paul MeetUp group videos and you see that there are support everywhere!
http://rpmuv.wordpress.com/
qwerty
07-18-2007, 03:29 PM
And how about 23,505 members on the Ron Paul - meetup groups...
http://ronpaul.meetup.com/about/
Feel free to see how many people other candidates have... :P
preservanation
07-18-2007, 03:32 PM
Mauston, WI has no media.. its a hick town.
Mauston?????
Jeeze, I can't even get away from the libs in my state on the www.[hr]I worked a guy from Mauston.
He was gay and a drunk, (not that there is anything wrong with that) other than that he was quite unpleasant.
He got fired.
Labrocca
07-18-2007, 06:45 PM
If they send me one of those signs I will put it up in my yard for everyone to see. :)
preservanation
07-18-2007, 06:51 PM
Mauston, WI has no media.. its a hick town.
I'm sure it's a very nice place.
But one sign a day for a hundred days?
If a factory operated with that kind of productivity, they be closed the first day.
qwerty
07-24-2007, 06:40 PM
Ron Pauls meetup groups have
25,841
Members
http://ronpaul.meetup.com/about/
:cool:
AlonzoMourning23
07-24-2007, 08:04 PM
Wow, 25k people. Mostly young people who either can't or won't vote. Besides, what would a comparable hillary, obama or giuliani setup have? And he still fails to even do repestably in the few national polls he's be included in.
qedtanya
07-24-2007, 10:32 PM
Wow, 25k people. Mostly young people who either can't or won't vote. Besides, what would a comparable hillary, obama or giuliani setup have? And he still fails to even do repestably in the few national polls he's be included in.
You obviously don't know what you're talking about. EVERYONE that I know personally, people in their 20's through their 60's are for Dr. Paul. Every single one of them can and have consistently voted in elections. The reasons that he "fails to even do respectably (I'm assuming that's what you meant) in the few national polls he's be(en) included in" is because those few polls only target a handful of people in a certain area - they are NOT national polls because they are not representative of the entire population. And the only reason that he is being left out of them is because he's not in the MSM's or whoever's conducting the poll's back pocket. He can't be bought. He's not racist either....don't attribute that stupid quote that you have as part of your signature to him.
AlonzoMourning23
07-24-2007, 10:57 PM
You obviously don't know what you're talking about. EVERYONE that I know personally, people in their 20's through their 60's are for Dr. Paul. Every single one of them can and have consistently voted in elections.
And I can think of maybe 2 or 3 people I know who want him to win. Where does that leave us?
The reasons that he "fails to even do respectably (I'm assuming that's what you meant) in the few national polls he's be(en) included in" is because those few polls only target a handful of people in a certain area - they are NOT national polls because they are not representative of the entire population.
http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08rep.htm
Fox, Gallup, Zogby, American Research, CNN, Cook, Newsweek, Wall Street Journal, Quinnipiac, ABC, McLaughlin and Diageo. If he was performing well he'd show a pulse in at least one of those polls. Instead he consistently scores 1-2 percent. He's an internet phenomenon.
He's not racist either....don't attribute that stupid quote that you have as part of your signature to him.
Who wrote it then?
NortheastCynic
07-24-2007, 10:57 PM
A staffer, Zo...A staffer. Much like every federal politician, Dr. Paul's material was written by a staffer.
-NC
qedtanya
07-25-2007, 03:26 AM
You obviously don't know what you're talking about. EVERYONE that I know personally, people in their 20's through their 60's are for Dr. Paul. Every single one of them can and have consistently voted in elections.
And I can think of maybe 2 or 3 people I know who want him to win. Where does that leave us?
Leaves us where it always does, people with differing viewpoints
The reasons that he "fails to even do respectably (I'm assuming that's what you meant) in the few national polls he's be(en) included in" is because those few polls only target a handful of people in a certain area - they are NOT national polls because they are not representative of the entire population.
http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08rep.htm
Fox, Gallup, Zogby, American Research, CNN, Cook, Newsweek, Wall Street Journal, Quinnipiac, ABC, McLaughlin and Diageo. If he was performing well he'd show a pulse in at least one of those polls. Instead he consistently scores 1-2 percent. He's an internet phenomenon.
You've quoted polls that are mostly biased and you have to PAY to be members of. Or polls that are controlled by the MSM - I don't trust any MSM at all.
He's not racist either....don't attribute that stupid quote that you have as part of your signature to him.
Who wrote it then?
A staffer just like NC said. As will all politicans who print newsletters. They are printed by staffers who don't get approval from the person who's names are on the newsletters, just like Clinton, Obama, Romney, McCain, Giuliani, etc.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.