PDA

View Full Version : Candidates@Google: Ron Paul


qwerty
07-17-2007, 03:50 PM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=yCM_wQy4YVg

Allready, 45,589 views....

:cool:

exigent
07-17-2007, 03:57 PM
ok we get the point.

http://www.imagehosting.com/out.php/i916820_whoa.JPG

qwerty
07-18-2007, 03:55 AM
Ron Paul @Google Video Most Viewed Ever


Of all the videos of talks at Google to date, Ron Paul's is by far the most popular - after being on the net for only three (3) days!. The next closest is Hillary's talk, after being up for over four months, followed by John McCain (two months). That, ladies and gentlemen is wide appeal.


http://www.dailypaul.com/node/764

qwerty
07-18-2007, 01:04 PM
VIDEO IS HERE, http://youtube.com/watch?v=yCM_wQy4YVg

Views: 56,484

Honors for This Video:

#15 - Most Viewed (This Week) - News & Politics
#1 - Top Rated (This Week)
#1 - Top Rated (This Week) - News & Politics
#12 - Top Rated (This Month)
#3 - Top Rated (This Month) - News & Politics
#23 - Top Rated (All Time) - News & Politics
#8 - Top Favorites (This Week)
#1 - Top Favorites (This Week) - News & Politics
#6 - Top Favorites (This Month) - News & Politics
#63 - Most Linked (This Week) - News & Politics

preservanation
07-18-2007, 01:17 PM
I have no personal truck with Paul.
He will not receive the GOP nomination, IMO.
I just hope he has enough sense not to act as a spoiler in 08.

qwerty
07-25-2007, 06:03 AM
Views: 109,858

Honors for This Video:
#60 - Most Viewed (This Month) - News & Politics
#2 - Top Rated (This Month)
#1 - Top Rated (This Month) - News & Politics
#10 - Top Rated (All Time) - News & Politics
#74 - Top Favorites (This Month)
#4 - Top Favorites (This Month) - News & Politics

http://youtube.com/watch?v=yCM_wQy4YVg

lily
07-26-2007, 11:45 PM
Qwerty.....a while ago we had a thread going about charges of rasicm against Ron Paul. I can't seem to find it. Can you explain this away?

micfranklin
07-27-2007, 12:24 AM
You know something I might do a YouTube video for the Republican debates in September.

qwerty
07-27-2007, 05:13 AM
Qwerty.....a while ago we had a thread going about charges of rasicm against Ron Paul. I can't seem to find it. Can you explain this away?


http://democracyforums.com/showthread.php?tid=6337&page=2

http://democracyforums.com/showthread.php?tid=5609&page=3

It has been discussed here...

An article in a 1992 edition of Paul's Ron Paul Survival Report (a newsletter that he had published from 1985) made several disparaging comments.[34] The article accused President Bill Clinton of fathering illegitimate children and using cocaine, and called Representative Barbara Jordan a "fraud" and a "half-educated victimologist."[35] The newsletter article stated that government should lower the legal age for prosecuting youths as adults, saying:

"We don't think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. That's true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such."

"Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty and the end of welfare and affirmative action." And, "Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the 'criminal justice system', I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal." ... [although] "we are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers."

In a 2001 interview with Texas Monthly magazine, Paul acknowledged that the comments were printed in his newsletter under his name, but said that they did not represent his views and that they were written by a ghostwriter. He further stated that he felt some moral responsibility to stand by the words that had been attributed to him, despite the fact that they did not represent his way of thinking:

"They were never my words, but I had some moral responsibility for them...I actually really wanted to try to explain that it doesn't come from me directly, but they [campaign aides] said that's too confusing. 'It appeared in your letter and your name was on that letter and therefore you have to live with it.'"

He further stated:

"I could never say this in the campaign, but those words weren't really written by me. It wasn't my language at all. Other people help me with my newsletter as I travel around. I think the one on Barbara Jordan was the saddest thing, because Barbara and I served together and actually she was a delightful lady... we wanted to do something on affirmative action, and it ended up in the newsletter and became personalized. I never personalize anything."[22]

Texas Monthly wrote at the time they printed the denial, "What made the statements in the publication even more puzzling was that, in four terms as a U. S. congressman and one presidential race, Paul had never uttered anything remotely like this." They state that it would have been easier for him to deny the accusations at the time, because the controversy would have destroyed most politicians.[22] Paul has separately criticized racism as a form of collectivism.[36][/quote]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul

That man ain´t racist, i just wonder how many blacks he have helped as a doctor...