PDA

View Full Version : John Kerry: Unfit to Command, Again (Like We Needed More)


PittsburghAfterDark
06-14-2006, 10:16 AM
I have to give it to Senator Kerry.??Never before has an ex-nominee for higher office that lost continued to demonstrate so ably that my vote against him was so right.

It seems Mr. Ketchup can't acknowledge one fact when he says "No matter how brave our soldiers are, no matter how valiant, no matter what their caring ... our soldiers cannot bring democracy to Iraq at the barrel of a gun,".??Senator???Democracy already happened.??It's happened 4 times in the past three years.??The government in place now after last weekend's appointment of an Iraqi Interior and Defence Minster is complete.??It wasn't done at the barrel of a gun.

It was done at the ballot box.

The irony of this is that his comments were made almost the same moment President Bush was in Baghdad meeting with that elected government in a surprise visit. Stupid indeed.

Of course though this speech was given at the ultra-left wing extremeist "Take Back??America" conference.??I have to ask, don't these people have jobs???Don't they have families???How is it all these people can get organized to meet on a weekday?

I digress though.??

It seems our Democratic party is completely wallowing in unreality.??They're operating on talking points 2 1/2 years old; Iraq is a quagmire, we should never have gone, we're losing, Democracy will never work in an Arab society, we're forcing our values on them at the point of a gun BLAH BLAH BLAH.

Apparently headlines aren't enough to shake the Politburo D's awake.??It's like the old Soviet school exit exams.??How well can you cite the falsehoods of Soviet history and dogma???If you're very good at it, you advance.??It took Gorbachev to say "There was no point in giving these tests anymore, they were all based on lies.".

Apparently no one told the Democrats their spin points are stuck in the mud, inoperative and false.

You're going to be hard pressed to tell an educated swing electorate that the killing of this war's Ho Chi Mihn isn't a victory.??Follow that up with a permanent government in Iraq and a voter approved Constitution.??Doesn't matter, the spin continues.

Pull out, leave, forget these milestones and turning points.??Bush must look bad.??Fuck our country!??Screw our image in the world, IED's have brought the most powerful nation in the history of the planet to it's knees!

I'm never at a loss anymore when it comes to the abject stupidity of Democrats proclaiming defeat in the face of victory.??It seems that stupid is all they know anymore.

rodeojones903
06-14-2006, 10:27 AM
It's because Democrats are more worried about being in power, than doing the right thing. There needs to be term limits to get rid of these career politicians that worry about themsevles more than what needs to be done.

AlonzoMourning23
06-14-2006, 07:33 PM
Yes PAD, iraq is a stable country. The government exercises full, unaided authority throughout the country.

A democracy is often the most unstable form of government. Getting one established isn't the hard part, it's keeping it in place.

Newscaster
07-11-2006, 11:18 AM
Unfit to command?????

A man who was too busy playing politics with daddy to complete even one enlistment in a cushy National Guard unit that would never see combat...he is fit for command?

A man who claimed he was too busy to serve in the military and got one deferment after another.......he is fit to command?

A secretary of defense who did serve but flew planes only over US soil and never saw combat.....he is fit to command?

Or a man who enlisted in the Navy, volunteered for swiftboat duty because duty on a destroyer escoret was not enough, and get wounded twice.

I suggest you guy go check out the Chickenhawk list and reacquaint yourself with who served and who did not.

Lets not forget one thing......John Kerry did NOT lose the 2004 election. It was stolen from him and this has been proven over and over again. It was stolen in almost the exact same way the 2000 election was stolen from Senator Al Gore.

Drocket
07-11-2006, 11:21 AM
A man who was too busy playing politics with daddy to complete even one enlistment in a cushy National Guard unit that would never see combat...he is fit for command?

This one is just completely untrue: Bush was WAY too busy snorting coke back then to have time to play politics.

PittsburghAfterDark
07-11-2006, 11:31 AM
Lets not forget one thing......John Kerry did NOT lose the 2004 election. It was stolen from him and this has been proven over and over again. It was stolen in almost the exact same way the 2000 election was stolen from Senator Al Gore.

http://static.flickr.com/6/69250266_8c1f5c979c.jpg?v=0

What cereal box did you get your Journalism B.A. from?

BoogyMan
07-11-2006, 11:45 AM
Lets not forget one thing......John Kerry did NOT lose the 2004 election. It was stolen from him and this has been proven over and over again. It was stolen in almost the exact same way the 2000 election was stolen from Senator Al Gore.

If this is the standard democrat line I cannot wait until the next election.??Please, please, please keep this idiotic line of conspiracy theory going as your platform.??Oh, BTW, you left out the one about Bush and Cheney eating kittens and kicking puppies.

Newscaster
07-11-2006, 11:53 AM
Yeah, its thew standard Democratic line because when its the truth, you cant change it.
Now I know exactly how desparate the Repubs are to deny they stole anything and you can protest til you are all blue in the face but your protests change nothing.

Your shananigans in Florida in 2000 and Ohio and 2004 have been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. To just blindly go along denying what everyone else knows, achieves nothing exceopt to make you guys look foolish.

Oh, by the way, my journalism degrees come from two major Universities,
American University (BA) and Columbia University(MA).

PittsburghAfterDark
07-11-2006, 12:21 PM
Protest?

Hell, I'm just laughing at you.

Newscaster
07-11-2006, 01:01 PM
I know what kind of poster I am dealing with. I am dealing with "The Poster Child" for those who think its cool to be deaf, dumb and blind.
Check a mirror if you are not sure who I am talking about.


And yes, I am also laughing at you.

PittsburghAfterDark
07-11-2006, 01:03 PM
Do you want to cite any kind of proof for your "facts" or are you just going to go Art Bell on us with your "expert" guests.

Nathan Brazil
07-11-2006, 02:18 PM
Or a man who enlisted in the Navy, volunteered for swiftboat duty because duty on a destroyer escoret was not enough, and get wounded twice.

Actually, he got three Purple Hearts, a couple for self-inflicted scratches, so yeah, the guy's totally unfit.

You're comments about Bush aren't relevent to this discussion, no matter how accurate they may or may not be.

I suggest you guy go check out the Chickenhawk list and reacquaint yourself with who served and who did not.

Is that a list compiled by former Clinton supporters?

Oh, and naturally, it's not a question of who served or not, it's a matter of if their avoidance of service conformed to existing law or not.

And if you're going to cite Bush's hanging out in the ANG, you need to cite Gore's babysitter in Saigon.

Lets not forget one thing......John Kerry did NOT lose the 2004 election.

Reality Check:??John Kerry didn't win the election, he not only failed to get enough electoral votes (the only part that matters), but he lost by millions of votes in the popular count (the part that doesn't matter).

Sour grapes allegations about cheating are just totally hillarious when a Democrats utters them, aren't they???If it was stolen from Kerry the same way it was "stolen" from Gore, then it wasn't stolen at all.

Remember the Alagore!

It doesn't really matter, though. Kerry's a loser, and it's clear that he's no match for the wife a real draft dodger who'll be coming up to play in 2008.

Newscaster
07-11-2006, 06:58 PM
Failed to get enough votes? I guess you forot the bruhaha in Ohio over tampering with voting machines. Of course he didnt get enough votes because the machines were tampered with and thats why there are several calls continuing for a full scale investigation. But tell me....when was the last time the Bush administration okayed an probe of something THEY did? And dont say they never did anything wrong, because if that were the case, they would not be in such trouble today.

Nathan Brazil
07-11-2006, 07:35 PM
Yeah, "failed to get enough votes" is the technical term used when fewer people voted for your team than the other.??It's also a synonym??for "losing the election".

Yeah, there was the usual Democrat whines about cheating in Ohio. It like the Democrats can't figure out that maybe real people don't like them any more, or maybe it's because the Democrats are so dependent on cheating to win they figure only cheaters can win.??Look what they tried to pull in Floriduh.

Whatever.Nothing came of it because there was nothing to it.?? Given the left-wing bias in the media we'd still be hearing about it if there was any remote chance it was possibly even only a myth.??But we don't hear about it because it's not true at all.

CheesyMuslim
07-11-2006, 07:39 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But my *a$$ got kicked alarm* just went off again.
2. PAD has Newscaster on the ropes.
3. This rope a dope ain't gonna fly here.
4. Face it Gore lost, and the Supreme Court Stopped him in his dead mans tracks.
4.a) He's a shell of a man he once was.
4.b) Hope he runs again this next time.
4. Some people get stronger when they get knocked down, Gore just went fruitcake.
5. Kerry just plain lost, even with the help of the Liberal Media, *Rathergate.*
6. Funny how each party interpret's reality, ofcourse you guys have flipped out, took a bad acid trip.
7. I see it as we will keep whooping a$$, you guys are optimistic that you have a chance.
8. I lol at the lot of you Liberals.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas