View Full Version : Evita Clinton's Court Scenario
ClayBarham
05-28-2007, 02:49 PM
Here is what the Supreme Court will look like after Evita’s (Hillary’s) election in 2008. She will want to raise the number of Justices from nine to thirteen, to reflect the number of original colonies. That is a very patriotic approach. She will nominate two illegal aliens from Mexico and two from the Middle East in order to better balance the sentiments of the Court. Once in their robes, they will declare the Constitution un-Constitutional, particularly as it applies to the Electoral College. After all, only the popular vote should count. Then, only a handful of coastal cities will decide who sits in the White House. The two-term rule will be set aside and Evita will rule until passing the throne to Chelsea. Won’t that be a real hoot? Nancy P and Harry will be supportive as their positions will be permanent, by edict of Evita. Republicans who do not conform will be housed in the camps set aside in Mexico for dissidents. Can you picture this scenario? I can.
ViolaLee
05-28-2007, 03:41 PM
I've always wondered why people hate Hillary so much. I see it's really just the delusional and unbalanced that hate for no good reason.
ClayBarham
05-28-2007, 03:49 PM
All those who oppose Hillary are unbalanced mentally? Is that why most dictatorships either euthanize or send their opponents to mental hospitals? So, there must never be opposition to Evita, as was the case in Argentina as well.
ViolaLee
05-28-2007, 03:58 PM
All those who oppose Hillary are unbalanced mentally? Is that why most dictatorships either euthanize or send their opponents to mental hospitals? So, there must never be opposition to Evita, as was the case in Argentina as well.
That's some scary movie you've got going on in your mind.
Try this.
WAKE UP and look around at reality.
BoogyMan
05-28-2007, 04:31 PM
All those who oppose Hillary are unbalanced mentally? Is that why most dictatorships either euthanize or send their opponents to mental hospitals? So, there must never be opposition to Evita, as was the case in Argentina as well.
Excellent retort Clay, many on the left think that they are the only ones who are allowed an opinion and such narcissism doesn't serve them well.
ClayBarham
05-28-2007, 04:43 PM
They follow the pattern of every dictatorship, that their opposition must be neutralized and defamed by any means, so that their power is never challenged, but alas, that's just history and liberals rewrite history to suit their own needs. I'm sure Evita Clinton will do the same things, and judging from her followers, and I do mean followers, she will get away with it.
Buck Laser
05-28-2007, 04:58 PM
Seems to me that anyone who has to resort to something like "Evita" or "Hitlery" in discussing Senator Clinton has prima facie got a very weak case.:P
ClayBarham
05-28-2007, 05:36 PM
Why? Even Hillary is an admitted admirer of Evita. Evita was the Argentinian people's Goddess, and Hillary would certainly appreciate that same kind of adoration from Americans, and if not, "Off with their heads!".
Drocket
05-28-2007, 05:41 PM
Excellent retort Clay, many on the left think that they are the only ones who are allowed an opinion and such narcissism doesn't serve them well.
So you're saying that you don't think his scenario involving Hillary appointing illegal immigrants to the Supreme Court and declaring herself dictator for life isn't totally nuts?
BoogyMan
05-28-2007, 05:45 PM
Excellent retort Clay, many on the left think that they are the only ones who are allowed an opinion and such narcissism doesn't serve them well.
So you're saying that you don't think his scenario involving Hillary appointing illegal immigrants to the Supreme Court and declaring herself dictator for life isn't totally nuts?
I think it is a scenario that he is playing out Drocket. A scenario is just someone thinking out loud about what a possible outcome to a presently fictional event COULD be.
Drocket
05-28-2007, 05:53 PM
I think it is a scenario that he is playing out Drocket. A scenario is just someone thinking out loud about what a possible outcome to a presently fictional event COULD be.
Yet it's a ridiculously unlikely scenario, and completely paranoid. One may as well speculate about God himself coming down from the heavens and crowning Hillary as Emperor of the World - neither one has a chance of happening.
This is paranoid fear-mongering, nothing more.
BoogyMan
05-28-2007, 06:19 PM
I think it is a scenario that he is playing out Drocket. A scenario is just someone thinking out loud about what a possible outcome to a presently fictional event COULD be.
Yet it's a ridiculously unlikely scenario, and completely paranoid. One may as well speculate about God himself coming down from the heavens and crowning Hillary as Emperor of the World - neither one has a chance of happening.
This is paranoid fear-mongering, nothing more.
An opinion that you have a right to express, just as Clay has the right to ponder over scenarios like the one upon which this thread is formed.
ClayBarham
05-29-2007, 08:09 PM
And, Drocket, if we don't stop driving our cars and breathing out (in is OK), then the sea water will rise 20 feet and drown 80% of Americans who live on the coasts, right?
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.