PDA

View Full Version : 9/11 Mysteries. Video


December
05-25-2007, 01:22 AM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003

All time views: 2,463,892

Labrocca
05-30-2007, 10:14 PM
Are you ever going to add anything to the discussion here besides spam?

AlonzoMourning23
05-30-2007, 10:32 PM
These pointless conspiracy threads are annoying. Glad I'm not the only one who thinks so.

preservanation
06-01-2007, 02:36 PM
Unfortuately, this sort of stuff, and there is a myriad of it out there, (2.5 mil views on google for this alone), is quickly becoming mainstream in the Democrat party and in the media. Hello, Rosie.

A lot of lefties don't agree with this nonsense, but avoid condemning it as well. Why? What are they afraid of? Losing money from Soros, MoveOn, Media Matters, etc, that's what they are afraid of!

preservanation
06-01-2007, 02:51 PM
Before I get in trouble...I've spoke to lots of Dems who think these theories are NUTS, and I appreiciate that. But where are the prominant ellected officals? You know, the ones who rely on internet and Soros money?
They might condemn conspiracy theories in private, but I've never heard it publicly, so it propagates and continues unabated.
It must be easier for some to believe that Bush blew up buildings on 911, than it is to believe Islamic terorrist did it with planes. Must be.

lily
06-01-2007, 04:32 PM
Before I get in trouble...I've spoke to lots of Dems who think these theories are NUTS, and I appreiciate that. But where are the prominant ellected officals? You know, the ones who rely on internet and Soros money?




Wouldn't speaking up about them give them even more publicity? In other words give them some sort of "credibility"?

preservanation
06-01-2007, 05:10 PM
Before I get in trouble...I've spoke to lots of Dems who think these theories are NUTS, and I appreiciate that. But where are the prominant ellected officals? You know, the ones who rely on internet and Soros money?




Wouldn't speaking up about them give them even more publicity? In other words give them some sort of "credibility"?



Maybe, yes, but it seems to be getting to such a fevered pitch, that I think it behooves politicians and the public to have this sort of stuff strongly denounced and debunked.
To my knowledge, no Dems are doing that. In some way it hurts Bush and that's enough in most cases for libs to support something.
The silence maybe their tacit approval.

Nitrus
06-01-2007, 08:16 PM
I am a conspiracy theorist with regard to 9/11. But You should add more to your posts.

preservanation
06-02-2007, 05:04 AM
I am a conspiracy theorist with regard to 9/11. But You should add more to your posts.

Thank you, Nitrus:)
Personally, I find the 911 conspiracy theories difficult to believe.
You may find this interesting...
I hope you have not seen this already, but you probably have.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

jafar00
06-02-2007, 08:02 AM
Popular Mechanics have been debunked a million times over.

Here's just the first link from a google search

http://www.freedomisforeverybody.org/debunkPopMech.php

preservanation
06-02-2007, 12:48 PM
Popular Mechanics have been debunked a million times over.

Here's just the first link from a google search

http://www.freedomisforeverybody.org/debunkPopMech.php

Grassroots:“Theorists claim it proves the U.S. government instigated the assault” Grassroots InfoMedia makes no claim of proof, although we may claim that others claim things, and we advocate investigation due to the mountain of strange, unexplained phenomenon surrounding the events of 9/11. For example, the PROMIS discovered criminal insider trading that took place on and prior to 9/11, that conclusively indicates prior knowledge, and possible links to government insiders. There is a mountainous pile of evidence, prima facie, whistle blowers, clues, and eye witnesses, reams of information that any reasonable individual would conclude are extremely suspicious, at the very least.

Thank you. Interesting.

This doesn't even come close to changing my mind, nor should it convince you that the Bush admin willfully slaughtered 3000 Americans on 911.

Why are some so eager t believe the worst of this Nation and our Pres? I feel it is fueled by hate and an extreem left wing agenda.

If one is intrigued by conspiracies and cover-ups, the Clintons admin holds much more promise for such things. With them, the questions are actually real.

I'm more inclined to believe that Nessie exists, over this nonsense.

Achilles
06-03-2007, 12:38 AM
Are you ever going to add anything to the discussion here besides spam?


Whats wrong with starting the topic off, Labrocca? This is the spark of debate, is it not? I love how you accuse December here of adding nothing to debate while you support CWN in "keeping the debate lively." How is December doing anything different than CWN??

preservanation
06-03-2007, 12:57 AM
I am a conspiracy theorist with regard to 9/11. But You should add more to your posts.


Just a point of observation...You are the first Conservative I have encountered who gives any credence to the 911 conspiracy theories.
Maybe I should get out more.