PDA

View Full Version : DEPLETED URANIUM AND HEALTHE OF U.S. SOLDIERS


rastaman
06-12-2006, 03:13 PM
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0330-02.htm

Although the potential human cost of the war with Iraq is obvious, not many people are aware of a hidden risk that may haunt us for years.

Of the 504,047 eligible veterans of the 1991 Persian Gulf War, about 29% are now considered disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs, the highest rate of disability for any modern war. And most are not disabled because of wounds.

These guys were rough, tough, buff 20-year-olds a decade ago. The vast majority are ill because of a complex of debilities known as the Gulf War syndrome.

These vets were exposed to toxic material from both sides, including numerous chemicals, fumes and weird experimental vaccines. But the largest number of the more than half a million troops eligible for VA benefits -- 436,000 -- lived for months in areas of the Middle Eastern desert that had been contaminated with depleted uranium.

Depleted uranium, or DU, is a highly toxic heavy metal that continues to emit low levels of alpha radiation. It is a byproduct of nuclear power plants and various military activities.

The United States has hundreds of thousands of tons of DU lying around, and for the Gulf War it developed a new use for the stuff: load it into warheads.

Though not technically "nuclear," because the material is not really fissionable, uranium is a heavy metal ideal for lethally effective "warhead penetrators" that can pierce through armored tanks and fortified positions. When the munitions explode, the area is bathed in a fine dust of DU that can be easily inhaled. These aerosols also taint soil and water and pollute ground water.

If the penetrators do not explode, their casings gradually oxidize, releasing DU into the environment.

DU warheads are essentially dirty bombs -- not very radioactive, but poisonous, and this is why there is an increasing global outcry against using DU in combat as tips for armor-piercing rounds as well as in artillery shells and Tomahawk missiles, among others.

Such warheads were used very successfully by the U.S. in the Gulf War, when more than 350 tons of depleted uranium were dropped on Iraq, and later in Kosovo when about 13 tons of DU were exploded in the conflict there.

The "Balkan syndrome" that emerged among the military and civilians after the U.S. bombing there bears a similarity to the Gulf War syndrome.

Though the findings are controversial, many scientists now see these afflictions as the result of heavy metal poisoning and possibly exposure to very low levels radiation.

DU is implicated in respiratory and kidney problems, rashes and, longer-term, bone cancer, as well as damaged reproductive and neurological systems.

Iraqi civilians -- many more than the 100,000 who died in the conflict or as a result of the war -- also suffer from a range of similar health problems.

Families of soldiers should be very worried.

A huge amount of ordnance has already been unleashed in Iraq, and there is no way of knowing how many thousands of tons of depleted uranium will find "permanent storage" in the rubble of Iraq, its soil and the bodies of its people and U.S. occupying forces.

It is certain, however, that the legacy of contamination will add billions to the cost of reconstruction -- and our lack of generosity in Afghanistan is instructive about the sincerity of our pledges in this area. The stingy benefit package the Gulf vets got, even during boom times, is yet another cautionary tale.

The rosy fantasies of a democratized Arab world might make for good sound bites. But the reality of widespread DU use brings to mind the epitaph for the Punic Wars: "They made a desolation and called it Peace."

Susanna Hecht is a professor in the School of Public Policy and Social Research at UCLA. She is head of the environmental analysis and policy program.

PittsburghAfterDark
06-12-2006, 03:28 PM
I went across Iraq in 1991 and held at the Kuwaiti border when the 100 hour ground war ended.

I have no known side effects from crossing terrain where DU rounds were used by A-10 aircraft, AH-64 hellicopters, Bradley's or M1A1/2 MBT's and no ill effects from handling DU rounds as an Abrams tank commander and platoon for the better part of 8 years.

This has been a contentous issue of debate amongst military veterans from conflicts since Desert Shield/Storm.

The biggest problem I see with the methodology in determining the source of Gulf War Syndrome is that DU rounds have been in the U.S. inventory for decades prior to their use in combat in the first Gulf War. DU is also one of the layers of composite armor in the M1A1 and M1A2 MBT's. Crews will spend hundreds of hours surrounded by this material over a 2-4 year span. You have more direct contact and exposure from handling it and being protected by it than you do crossing terrain where targets were destroyed by it.

That is the puzzling thing. No one of the approximately 78 men still on our unit's contact list have developed any such problems and combined we have thousands of hours in MBT's with DU layered armor and direct or indirect exposure to DU SABOT rounds.

I'm in no means to make a definitive medical causality effect but something tells me DU rounds and DU itself are not the sole problem. I suspect that it's either in conjunction with another agent or there is a binary reaction involved where you put two, as of yet undsiclosed, subtances or conditions together that result in the disablity rates some groups cite.

rastaman
06-12-2006, 04:35 PM
I went across Iraq in 1991 and held at the Kuwaiti border when the 100 hour ground war ended.

I have no known side effects from crossing terrain where DU rounds were used by A-10 aircraft, AH-64 hellicopters, Bradley's or M1A1/2 MBT's and no ill effects from handling DU rounds as an Abrams tank commander and platoon for the better part of 8 years.

This has been a contentous issue of debate amongst military veterans from conflicts since Desert Shield/Storm.

The biggest problem I see with the methodology in determining the source of Gulf War Syndrome is that DU rounds have been in the U.S. inventory for decades prior to their use in combat in the first Gulf War.Â*Â*DU is also one of the layers of composite armor in the M1A1 and M1A2 MBT's.Â*Â*Crews will spend hundreds of hours surrounded by this material over a 2-4 year span.Â*Â*You have more direct contact and exposure from handling it and being protected by it than you do crossing terrain where targets were destroyed by it.

That is the puzzling thing.Â*Â*No one of the approximately 78 men still on our unit's contact list have developed any such problems and combined we have thousands of hours in MBT's with DU layered armor and direct or indirect exposure to DU SABOT rounds.

I'm in no means to make a definitive medical causality effect but something tells me DU rounds and DU itself are not the sole problem.Â*Â*I suspect that it's either in conjunction with another agent or there is a binary reaction involved where you put two, as of yet undsiclosed, subtances or conditions together that result in the disablity rates some groups cite.


It's good to hear you still have your health from one vet to another. I lost two buddies from cancer who served in Gulf War I, both were in Artillery and were handling DU Shells and were constantly exposed to sand storms--where they feel the storms kicked up the DU residue left from expended shell casings. My third friend who was in Artillery in the Gulf War I is 100% disabled today and although he's only 46 he looks and acts 20 years older. All three of these were physical specimens prior to going to the Gulf. Several times they had to deploy out to the oil fields while the fires were trying to be put out.

I watched all 3 just whitle away---very sad thing to go thru and see.
It still pisses me off to this day that they survied the war but later subcumed to what many of us feel of what they contracted/exposed to in the Gulf.

Once again I'm happy to hear you have your health.

PittsburghAfterDark
06-12-2006, 05:17 PM
That's one of the main considerations.

I don't think those oil fires were just oil fires. You ask me, this is as tin hat as I'll get, there were nerve and chemical agents used by the Iraqi's in their scorched Earth policy. My guesstimate is that NBC detectors were FUBAR'd by the amount of shit in the air and were producing more warnings than were believed or even detected.

Our NBC detection of the era sucked. Too much was simple Ph type reaction paper. The Germans sent a number of Fox NBC units (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuchs_(APC)) to in theater troops which was the world class vehicle for this type of work at the time. However there were fewer than 50 in theater and you can't cover Kuwait and SW Iraq with 50 vehicles.

Despite no standing orders our overpressure units were operating nearly 24/7 and we were buttoned up the overwhelming majority of the time per my personal fears and instructions.

I think there was so much environmental crap in the air and deserts from that incident(s) that was sourced from factors other than oil fires.

There's just no way that GWS is tied to DU expendatures alone or oil fires alone or a combination of both.

The symptoms are too analagous to nerve agents.

The radiation factors from DU are not enough to cause the degree and severity of illness represented in GWS.

Like I said, Chobam armor was developed in the 1970's and tank crews had over a decade of service in the U.S. (Abrams) and British (Challenger) tanks. These symptoms did not rear themselves even though DU is a layer in Chobam armor and the tank crews had repeated exposure to DU SABOT rounds. The same is true of A-10 pilots and ground crew that had tons of exposure to 30mm DU rounds. Take it further and the same type of ammo is present in the Apache and Bradley chain gun anti-armor rounds.

There was something else present IMHO. I'm also willing to bet that part of my theory is correct but the PR and troop morale that would result in an admission from less than perfect detection equipment would be disasterous.

However I don't think it's a coverup. The issue is too big and too many people would have to be sitting on information. That just doesn't happen in the real world.

Old Corps Gunny
06-13-2006, 11:01 AM
The depleted uranium rounds fired by tanks and the A10 chain guns are "kinetic energy" rounds, not explosive rounds, i.e., because of the tremendous velocity and high density of uranium, a very high release of energy in the form of heat is released upon impact. Currently, no bombs with DU casings are being made; the increase in weight would significantly reduce the quantity of ordnance the aircraft could carry with no appreciable gain in effectiveness.