911 hijack 'suspects' alive and well

[December]

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1555000/images/_1559151_pilot300mav.jpg

"A man called Waleed Al Shehri says he left the US a year ago

Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.

The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.

Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.

His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.

Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco. :D

He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi press reports.

He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.

But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco.

Mistaken identity


Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight 11 hijack suspects, has also been quoted in Arab news reports.

He says he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost his passport while studying in Denver.

Another man with exactly the same name surfaced on the pages of the English-language Arab News.

The second Abdulaziz Al Omari is a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines, the report says.

Meanwhile, Asharq Al Awsat newspaper, a London-based Arabic daily, says it has interviewed Saeed Alghamdi.


Khalid Al-Midhar may also be alive

He was listed by the FBI as a hijacker in the United flight that crashed in Pennsylvania.

And there are suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar, may also be alive.

FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt".

________________

Source -

http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/banners/ifs_banner.gif

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

[Labrocca]

Interesting but I don't see the point?

[AlonzoMourning23]

It's just part of a conspiracy theory. It's actually a 6 year old article and even the BBC pointed out there was confusion due to the name being relatively common. In short, the guy wasn't the same guy and his name was just slightly different.

[December]

So, if these 9/11 hijack 'suspects' are alive and well than why media does not say about it over and over again?
For all these years we have been told that hijack 'suspects' actually DIED...

What's going on?...

[jafar00]

So, if these 9/11 hijack 'suspects' are alive and well than why media does not say about it over and over again?
For all these years we have been told that hijack 'suspects' actually DIED...

What's going on?...


The media has "touched" on the subject, but it hasn't been repeated and repeated to "Catapault the propaganda" - (GW Bush 2005)
I guess it's not newsworthy enough or it doesn't fit with the regime's version of the events of the day.

[AlonzoMourning23]

Jafar, the bbc even said the story was innacurate:

A five-year-old story from our archive has been the subject of some recent editorial discussion here. The story, written in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, was about confusion at the time surrounding the names and identities of some of the hijackers. This confusion was widely reported and was also acknowledged by the FBI.

The story has been cited ever since by some as evidence that the 9/11 attacks were part of a US government conspiracy.

We later reported on the list of hijackers, thereby superseding the earlier report. In the intervening years we have also reported in detail on the investigation into the attacks, the 9/11 commission and its report.

We’ve carried the full report, executive summary and main findings and, as part of the recent fifth anniversary coverage, a detailed guide to what’s known about what happened on the day. But conspiracy theories have persisted. The confusion over names and identities we reported back in 2001 may have arisen because these were common Arabic and Islamic names.

In an effort to make this clearer, we have made one small change to the original story. Under the FBI picture of Waleed al Shehri we have added the words "A man called Waleed Al Shehri..." to make it as clear as possible that there was confusion over the identity. The rest of the story remains as it was in the archive as a record of the situation at the time.

We recently asked the FBI for a statement, and this is, as things stand, the closest thing we have to a definitive view: The FBI is confident that it has positively identified the nineteen hijackers responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Also, the 9/11 investigation was thoroughly reviewed by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States and the House and Senate Joint Inquiry. Neither of these reviews ever raised the issue of doubt about the identity of the nineteen hijackers.

Steve Herrmann is editor of the BBC News website


http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/10/27/index.html

[jafar00]

Jafar, the bbc even said the story was innacurate:


Thanks Zo. It still doesn't give any more cred to the US Intelligence and their list of people. When at least seven of the people in photographs are still alive, who were named as the terrorists, it puts the rest of the list and most of the other official intelligence surrounding 9/11 in doubt.

The FBI even has doubts about Osama Bin Laden's involvement in 9/11. They have no hard evidence to convict him of it. Even his "wanted poster" has no mention of 9/11 involvement! Perhaps that's why the Taliban didn't hand him over to the US all those years ago. They asked for evidence of his guilt before handing him over, but the US had none.

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm

With all this disinformation going on, how can you believe anything the mainstream media is regurgitating any more?

[Labrocca]

http://english.aljazeera.net/English/archive/archive?ArchiveId=35762

How about Al-Jazeera reporting it? What about the words of Osama himself taking credit for the attacks? Who cares what the FBI page says...

Also NAMES are commonplace. How many muslims are named Mohammed? In America I know tons of Johns, Petes, or whatever...having the same name as another person does not make them that person. Also being these people were terrorists in a plot. One doesn't have to stretch the imagination to think their identities were false to begin with.

I always go back to the simplicity of 9/11 as an attack. If you believe the theorists...then there would have to be hundreds of people in on it. HUNDREDS..yet not one single insider has talked or leaked that they know something. Bill Clinton can't get a Blow Job behind a closed door but BUSH...supposedly the most incompetent president ever has masterminded the biggest conspiracy in history? Yeah...right. If you believe that then Bush is the most intelligent President ever. Do you believe that?

[jafar00]

http://english.aljazeera.net/English/archive/archive?ArchiveId=35762

How about Al-Jazeera reporting it? What about the words of Osama himself taking credit for the attacks? Who cares what the FBI page says...


Al Jazeera is not the independent organisation it was when it was conceived. It's an MSNBC affiliate these days so it can be used to "catapault the propaganda".
The Osama video was a fake. It's been debunked many times over. Besides. the fat (Osama has a kidney disorder and is skinny), right handed (Osama is left handed), gold ring wearing (Gold jewellery is forbidden for men in Islam) Osama in the video doesn't fit the profile.
http://infowars.net/articles/february2007/190207Osama_tape.htm

Besides, if Osama did claim responsibility, would that allow the FBI to declare they actually do have some evidence of his involvement? It's obvious even the FBI doesn't believe in the "confession" tape.

[Labrocca]

You can't use a conspiracy theory site to claim it's been debunked.

"Professor Bruce Lawrence"...that's the guy that every single conspiracy page uses as proof that it's fake. Bullcrap.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpAB8vn5VXo

I guess the other guys are fake too?

[jafar00]

Sorry Labrocca. That's not Osama. It looks nothing like him and the aforementioned discrepancies, "conspiracy" site or not cannot be denied. The tape is propaganda.

[Labrocca]

Repeating yourself doesn't make it true.

[jafar00]

Repeating yourself doesn't make it true.


It works for Bush :P