PDA

View Full Version : Conference ponders how U.S. might be different if Lincoln survived


Professor
05-18-2007, 02:42 PM
Source: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-ap-il-lincolnsurvived,1,5490525.story?coll=chi-news-hed

Conference ponders how U.S. might be different if Lincoln survived

By ALEX DOMINGUEZ
Associated Press Writer
Published May 18, 2007, 9:30 AM CDT

BALTIMORE -- Abraham Lincoln might have survived being shot if today's medical technology had existed in 1865.

Given that scenario, the question is whether Lincoln would have recovered well enough to return to office, says a doctor and historian who planned to speak Friday at an annual University of Maryland School of Medicine conference on the deaths of historic figures.

While the conference has traditionally re-examined the deaths of historic figures to determine if the diagnosis of the time was correct, this year's event asks if Lincoln could have been saved and what impact that would have had.

Dr. Thomas Scalea, the physician in chief at the University of Maryland's Shock Trauma Center, said brain injuries are unpredictable but Lincoln would have stood a good chance of surviving.

"It's a little hard to know, but I think it's a fair statement to say this is not necessarily a fatal injury, he doesn't have to die," said Scalea, who will explain how Lincoln would have been treated at his center, the world's first dedicated trauma center.

Lincoln died within 10 hours of being shot in the head at Ford's Theatre on April 14, 1865. If modern methods could have saved the 16th president, he may have also retained his cognitive abilities because the fatal shot did not damage the frontal lobes of Lincoln's brain, which are responsible for language, emotion and problem solving, Scalea said.

However, Lincoln would have faced months of recovery before he could have returned to office, and whether he would have been able to communicate is unclear, the surgeon said.

U.S. presidential historian Steven Lee Carson said Lincoln's secretary of war, Edwin Stanton, who made a number of important decisions the day after the assassination, would likely have played a greater role if Lincoln had survived.

Vice President Andrew Johnson would not automatically have taken charge had Lincoln lived because the 25th Amendment, which deals with the transfer of power when a president is incapacitated, was not in place until after the Kennedy assassination. The decision as to who took charge was handled on a case-by-case basis until then, Carson said.

For example, Woodrow Wilson's wife essentially took over when her husband fell ill, Carson said.

Johnson, who took office after Lincoln's death, was the only Southern senator not to leave office upon secession. Lincoln had put him on the presidential ticket as a symbol of unity, but Johnson was a southern Democrat who was not sympathetic to Lincoln's Republican party or to helping the newly freed slaves, said Carson, who will also speak at the conference.

If Stanton had continued in Lincoln's place, the country "would have been a better and more just nation, especially on race matters, in a far quicker fashion," Carson said.

Johnson eventually tried to replace Stanton, an abolitionist and a close friend of Lincoln, which led to the attempt by Republicans to remove Johnson from office by impeachment.

Previous conferences have examined the deaths of Alexander the Great, Mozart, Beethoven, Edgar Allan Poe and others. This year's event is part of the School of Medicine's bicentennial celebration and the annual reunion of its Medical Alumni Association.

davo
04-16-2008, 12:32 PM
Its a good question. One thing for sure is everyone would've had alot more money, because Lincoln was about to revoke the National Bank Act of 1864 had he survived.

It might be ironic, but I disagree with Stanton about race relations - America would probably have ended up much more racist had Lincoln not been assassinated. The reason is because Lincoln favored a lenient policy toward the South in reconstruction, whereas others in his administration did not. The harsh reconstruction policies led to the growth of the Klan etc - such groups were viewed as hostile to the union from the north, and thus there was a strong effort from the federal government and its supporters to stop racial discrimination. This simply wouldn't have occurred if Lincoln survived. Lincoln also received support from the newly formed Northwest states (who didn't have slaves) on the condition that no Negroes could move in. There were also plans for the colonization of Africa using freed slaves, that were put on hold because of the civil war.

It is also likely that Britain and France would've then pursued a naval blockade or direct invasion of the United States (due to banking interests) had Lincoln survived.

Truth_and_Power
04-16-2008, 02:00 PM
Throw in JFK and MLK while you're at it. Then assasinate Reagan and GWB.

apdst
04-18-2008, 08:54 PM
how U.S. might be different if Lincoln survived

Alot fewer colored folks.