*CBS,ABC,NBC, CALL FOR NEW ZARQAWI*

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. American Networks, the free tv ones are calling for a replacement for the recent terrorist Zarqawi, may he burn in hell.
2. Seems the media may have to send one of their own to replace him.
3. I hear Dan Rather is not to busy.
4. They really want a New Bad Guy in Iraq, and will post the job opening on their Media Stage.
5. The pay is open for discussion. All the Media exposure you can handle is free.
6. The American Media has to die off.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[PittsburghAfterDark]

The media is furious that they can no longer point to an abject failure of George Bush being able to reign in a terrorist leader.

They're furious that the Iraqi government is complete now that the Interior and Defence Ministers were appointed the same day this scum died.

It was a horrible week to be a liberal and an even worse week to be a media member.

[AlonzoMourning23]

2 bs posts and there isn't even evidence or a link presented to attack.

Neither one of you can present evidence to suggest that the media or liberals are angry that zarwaqi is dead, that the media or liberals wants a new terrorist leader, or that either one is angry because they can't blame bush.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But it isn't bs. Its facts.
2. I listen to the media and not always when they broadcast on tv or radio, do they even have a link.
3. Heres a link I found from NBC foamenting a new terror leader to come forth.
http://www.nbc4i.com/news/9351294/detail.html

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[AlonzoMourning23]

A witness say they started beating zarqawi but, once they realized he was actually alive, they stopped and tried to get medical attention to him. Then supporters of his state that they're going to continue to fight. Where do you get any of the accusation you made against cbs, abc and nbc from that article?

I listen to the media to, and I haven't run across anything remotely resembling what you suggest.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. Sometimes its in how the Network News is phrased, that makes it beg a question from the audience who's watching or listening to a News being delivered, its ever so subtle.
2. Just listen.
3. It has to Die too.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. Seems the story itself conflicts itself.
2. Clever and subtle, seems an unknown person says the US Military was on the scene first, but our men say they arrived after others had found Zarqawi on a stretcher, on which he tried to roll off of, which they say he died soon after.
3. This story is to foment others to take his place, no other reason this fabrication was ever written.
4. I can hear some stupid Arab saying, "Damn them US Military, Zarqawi was hit by a bomb and lived, they shouldn't of beaten him, while he was dizzy from the blast, that's not fair, I'm gonna take his place, just for that!"
5. You have to see whats behind the story line to understand.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[AlonzoMourning23]

Conservatives complain about this and so do liberals. Sure there is some bias here and there, but when you get into the "they want a new terrorist leader" or "they're the mouthpiece for the fascist bush government" then you're reading into it much more than is there. The most I can read into that article, and anything else I've read or heard about this, is they don't think it will make a significant difference. But I've heard similar things coming from bush. I see nothing indicating support for the insurgency, terrorist or not.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. It doesn't take much to set off an angry crowd of muslims.
2. Wasn't long ago, a fabricated story about stupid korans being flushed down a toilet in Gitmo.
3. Riots all over the muslim world claimed the lives of no less than 300 people, over it.
4. American Embassies were torched.
5. So you see its the liberal media painting a horrific picture to inspire muslims to react to unreal stories.
6. Which in so doing they have sunken to a dishonorable level, and need to Die Off.
7. An unknown reporter reports from an unknown person that Zarqawi was beaten before he expired. What hog wash. Never happened.
8. They want to provoke another to take his place, plain and simple.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[AlonzoMourning23]

There were many issues, the koran issue was just the straw that broke the camels back. And it wasn't a fabricated story, it was a poorly corroborated one.

7. An unknown reporter reports from an unknown person that Zarqawi was beaten before he expired. What hog wash. Never happened.

Was reported by a witness. They didn't say it definately occured. They also stated they stopped when they realized he was alive.

8. They want to provoke another to take his place, plain and simple.

Baseless claim.

[CheesyMuslim]

There were many issues, the koran issue was just the straw that broke the camels back. And it wasn't a fabricated story, it was a poorly corroborated one.


Sorry bout that,Â*Â*


1. It was an outright lie to foment disdain for the Gitmo prison, from USA and muslims as a whole, it worked in both circumstances, for the Democrats seemed to run with it along with the Liberal Media's., all unknown reporters I might add.

7. An unknown reporter reports from an unknown person that Zarqawi was beaten before he expired. What hog wash. Never happened.

2. I stand by this statement, the beating is fabricated, only a Liberal or a muslim would take it seriously.

Was reported by a witness. They didn't say it definately occured. They also stated they stopped when they realized he was alive.


3. What witness? What Reporter? They want to make it seem that our Military Men would strike a man on his death bed, while he is out of sorts laying on a stretcher. To try to add some realism they claim the fictitious act was halted when they realized he was still alive, and had a moment of conscience, trying to give the story realism or legs.

8. They want to provoke another to take his place, plain and simple.

Baseless claim.



4. Not baseless, in regards to the fabrications, this is the over all response they are trying to foment from the reader, and give justification to the readers, even those who are non muslims.
(Its really bad what the USA Military did, so I sympathize with the next Zarqawi to do what he has to do to stop this kind of treatment from our Military)
5. This whole fabrication or propaganda is Anti American, and is why the Liberal Media has to Die, along with the Democratic Party.

SirJamesofTexas

[AlonzoMourning23]

1. It was an outright lie to foment disdain for the Gitmo prison, from USA and muslims as a whole, it worked in both circumstances, for the Democrats seemed to run with it along with the Liberal Media's., all unknown reporters I might add.

"Isikoff knew that military investigators at Southern Command [which runs the Guantanamo prison] were looking into the allegations," the article said.

"So he called a longtime reliable source, a senior U.S. government official who was knowledgeable about the matter.

"The source told Isikoff that the [investigators'] report would include new details that were not in the FBI e-mails, including mention of flushing the Quran down a toilet.".....

day later, Isikoff reached his source again, who said that although he remembered reading investigative reports about desecration of the Quran, including a toilet incident, "he could no longer be sure that these concerns had surfaced in the [Southern Command] report."

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/05/15/newsweek.quran/index.html/

Newsweek did not fabricate the report, they lacked corroboration.


3. What witness? What Reporter? They want to make it seem that our Military Men would strike a man on his death bed, while he is out of sorts laying on a stretcher. To try to add some realism they claim the fictitious act was halted when they realized he was still alive, and had a moment of conscience, trying to give the story realism or legs.

An Iraqi man who was one of the first people on the scene after an airstrike that led to the death of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi told Associated Press Television News that he saw American troops beating a man who had a beard like the al-Qaida leader.

The witness said he saw the man lying on the ground, badly wounded but still alive. He said U.S. troops arriving on the scene wrapped the man's head in an Arab robe and began beating him. His account cannot be independently verified.

The spokesman for the U.S.-led forces in Iraq says troops tried to provide medical attention after they saw that al-Zarqawi was alive

That's from the article you linked. You can claim you don't believe it happened, but to suggest that they fabricated it would require evidence. It's not hard to believe that people would kick around the body of a dead globally known terrorist.


4. Not baseless, in regards to the fabrications, this is the over all response they are trying to foment from the reader, and give justification to the readers, even those who are non muslims.
(Its really bad what the USA Military did, so I sympathize with the next Zarqawi to do what he has to do to stop this kind of treatment from our Military)


Well, I don't see this and neither do the vast majority of readers.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But its the nature of the charge that is not easy to disprove, when few would even come forth to tell it if this fabrication helped Zarqawi.
2. Why would anyone there even want to disprove it, the story slams the USA Military, they want us to leave already.
3. I like all those here reading this were not there after the bombs dropped.
4. And this story is very typical of the Liberal Media, they post a outlandish story of lies, and see if it can get some legs.
5. Dan Rather.
6. There's tons of comparable stories put out by the Liberal Media's.

[AlonzoMourning23]

Sorry bout that,

1. But its the nature of the charge that is not easy to disprove, when few would even come forth to tell it if this fabrication helped Zarqawi.
2. Why would anyone there even want to disprove it, the story slams the USA Military, they want us to leave already.
3. I like all those here reading this were not there after the bombs dropped.
4. And this story is very typical of the Liberal Media, they post a outlandish story of lies, and see if it can get some legs.
5. Dan Rather.
6. There's tons of comparable stories put out by the Liberal Media's.


Your making guesses that cannot be substantiated, and do not have evidence. The job of the media is to report, not to cast anyone in a good or bad light.

[PittsburghAfterDark]

Your making guesses that cannot be substantiated, and do not have evidence. The job of the media is to report, not to cast anyone in a good or bad light.

Oh that's rich.

So, just exactly how incompetent must the Western media be considering that's all they do?

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. Seems a replacement has been anointed, some Abu Immigrant dude.
2. As far as USA is concerned he's got a target on his back, guess he has a death wish, works for me.
3. The liberal media has a new villain to root for.
4. Bush's nemesis.
5. Some one for to project their hatred of President Bush with.
6. This Liberal Media has to Die Off Now!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Old Corps Gunny]

The "unknown witness" now has a name: Muhammed (wonder what the percentage of Muslim males named Muhammed or Mohammed is) who supposedly lived next door to the house the al-Zarqawi was in. Since the closest house was 300 yards away, and the strike took place at night, one wonders how much this so-called witness actually saw, if he is not fabricating the whole story. Further, so-called witnesses also stated that al-Zarqawi was shot by US forces when they discovered he was still alive. Autopsies performed by forensic pathologists showed no gunshot wounds or injuries consistent with a beating. On a different note, is the media clamoring for someone to take over al-Zarqawi's position? I don't think so; from what I've seen and read, the media is just stating the obvious -- the death of one terrorist leader will not stop the terrorism; there is always someone else to step up and take over.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. Sorry but when you purposely inflame the reporting of a story, you are asking for those readers to have a gut reaction.
2. For the Arabs, this action spells, Lets kick ass!
3. It foments them to keep fighting.
4. When there is no need to continue it.
5. The Liberal Media is at fault, and should be sued, BIG TIME, like 2 Billion Dollars worth, just to stop them from doing this again.
6. That would shut them up.
7. Either they prove this story as fact, or pay!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[AlonzoMourning23]

7. Either they prove this story as fact, or pay!

So they prove that a supposed witness made a claim that cannot be corroborated by others? That's all your asking.

Though I also ask that, if we take that route, that we sue conservatives for making claims such as innocent people did not die at haditha (a claim disputed by the defense and the military) unless they can prove it.

5. The Liberal Media is at fault, and should be sued, BIG TIME, like 2 Billion Dollars worth, just to stop them from doing this again.

Is that going to be the republican slogan in 08, do what we say or we'll sue?

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. Well these two stories have alot in common.
2. One is a complete fabrication, the other is hearsay with fabrication added.
3. Both are fabricated by the Liberal Media.
4. Both are stories about "Whats Bad In Iraq" that we Americans are paying for.
5. Typically from a Liberal, *Stop The War View*.
7. The Liberal Media has drank the cool aid for to long, they don't even know they have died yet.
8. Its sad that they are still listened to, but it is free tv.
9. The Republicans need to figure out how to launch some free tv stations.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Churchel]

I find it hard to respond here, it seems to me a waste of time.

Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media

You dont get it. Hopefully in a few years you will review your posts here and see how stupid it sounds to continually blame the people on TV for the problems of the world.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. Oh yeah I get it.
2. The Liberal Media is poisoned.
3. There is no cure.
4. It is a arm of the Democratic Liberals.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[rastaman]

Sorry bout that,

1. Oh yeah I get it.
2. The Liberal Media is poisoned.
3. There is no cure.
4. It is a arm of the Democratic Liberals.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


SORRY BOUT THAT!!! :rolleyes:
SORRY BOUT THAT!!!:(
SORRY BOUT THAT!!!:D
SORRY BOUT THAT!!!:shy:
SORRY BOUT THAT!!!
SORRY BOUT THAT!!!
SORRY BOUT THAT!!!