PDA

View Full Version : Blagojevich is willing to bet on Olympics


Professor
04-12-2007, 03:44 PM
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chi-0704110992apr12,1,4688403.story?coll=chi-news-hed

Blagojevich is willing to bet on Olympics
Governor pledges $150 million hedge

By Alexa Aguilar (aaguilar@tribune.com), Tribune staff reporter.
Tribune staff reporter John Chase contributed to this report

Chicago's final pitch Saturday to host the 2016 Olympic Games will include a pledge from Gov. Rod Blagojevich that the state will kick in $150 million if the Games end up losing money.

In a letter forwarded to the U.S. Olympic Committee, Blagojevich wrote that if Chicago beats out Los Angeles for the national bid, the governor will use all his efforts to pass legislation to guarantee the money.

The City of Chicago has already promised that it would back the Olympic bid with a $500 million guarantee.

"The fact is the Olympics is a big deal for the city of Chicago and the state of Illinois. And why wouldn't the state back the city and private investors for the Olympics?" Blagojevich said Wednesday following a speech at Northwestern University in Evanston.

"You gotta think big, man," the governor said. "California's doing it. And that's who we're competing against."

Blagojevich and Mayor Richard Daley say that it is unlikely the funds will ever be tapped because of anticipated profits of $525 million if Chicago ultimately hosts the Games.

But after national committee members made a visit and said that local government must have "skin in the game" to be successful, the City Council approved a $500 million package.

The state's $150 million Olympic guarantee is appropriate, said Daley, who compared it to "an insurance agreement."

Olympic officials "want to know if the state is for it," he said. "Who's for it? The city is for it. Is anybody else for it?"

The United States is the only country in the world that does not provide a national Olympic guarantee, requiring other levels of government to step up, Daley said.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed legislation this week to provide $250 million in state money to underwrite the 2016 Olympics if Los Angeles is picked as the U.S. city to move into the international round of the selection process.

Because the 2016 Olympics are years away, it is impossible to predict where the state would get the funds if the money was needed, said Blagojevich spokesman Andrew Ross.

A spokesman for House Speaker Michael Madigan said Madigan hadn't been told about Blagojevich's pledge. Senate President Emil Jones is supportive and would help to pass the bill, a spokeswoman said.

Professor
04-12-2007, 03:45 PM
$150 million?! As a tax payer I'm a bit uneasy about this.

speedracer
04-12-2007, 03:57 PM
The economics of hosting the games really depends on the infrastructure in place before the bid. If the sites, transportation, and housing facilities are there, it's a winner. Also, if the location is one that stands to benefit from the world exposure, it's great marketing.

But that's a lot of ifs.

Los Angeles has almost everything in place already. Their total costs would probably come in around a half bil, which is about what is expected in revenues and economic benefits. They would also have significant gains through tourists that visited other outlets (beach, Disneyland, Hollywood, etc.). Chicago would definitely benefit economically from the exposure, but the infrastructure costs worry me. I wonder whether their total costs would outweigh the total benefits.

Also, in the drive to be one of the uber-cities of the world that have hosted games, Chicago can certainly absorb those costs... but can the rest of Illinois? California is such a juggernaut that they could do it with relative triviality. I hope Illinois remembers that cost triviality in California is not cost triviality elsewhere..

Professor
04-16-2007, 02:49 AM
I agree. Chicago is definatly the wealthiest part of the state. I'm not sure those in Kario are convinced that they should pay higher taxes so Chicago can host the Olypics.

Buck Laser
04-16-2007, 02:57 AM
I think Chicago should be an excellent host. I might be prejudiced, having lived 31 years in the area, but it's a good sports city, truly civic minded, and would probably give the rest of the world a better view of what our country is like than LA would have. And to my knowledge Chicago has never hosted an Olympics.

Professor
04-16-2007, 01:08 PM
I think Chicago should be an excellent host.Â*Â*I might be prejudiced, having lived 31 years in the area, but it's a good sports city, truly civic minded, and would probably give the rest of the world a better view of what our country is like than LA would have.Â*Â*And to my knowledge Chicago has never hosted an Olympics.


It never has. We got a World's Fair but that was it.

I also think we have a better slice of the country than LA, I think we are more down to earth than LA. At the same point, I don't like the idea of gambling on such huge amounts of money.