PDA

View Full Version : "If you can't do elections you might as well do erections." Says Liberal Loser


PittsburghAfterDark
05-21-2006, 04:27 AM
And liberals wonder why we just think they're plain stupid.....

No, no stereotypes of being out of touch loons just for the sake of being out of touch loons going on here.

The White House is no doubt shaking in their boots.??I know I feel oh so threatened by this claptrap.??

'Shortbus' sex bonanza a slap to Bush, Cannes director says
May 20 4:24 PM US/Eastern

A US film featuring actors performing real sex is a "call to arms" against President George W. Bush, the director told journalists at the Cannes film festival.

"Shortbus," an explicit, largely improvised arthouse flick that includes a rendition of the American national anthem during a gay sex scene, is a direct provocation, director John Cameron Mitchell admitted.

"It's a little bit of a cri de coeur to us, a little bit of a call to arms" against the prevailing conservatism, he told a media conference, adding that his country was living in "the era of Bush, which is about clamping down, being scared."

The 43-year-old, whose previous work was "Hedwig and the Angry Inch," about a transsexual rock singer, said the film was his own small act of defiance against Bush.

"If you can't do elections you might as well do erections," he said.

Although the first half of the film is filled with sex, including orgies and masturbation, the act itself is not meant to be erotic but rather to challenge the audience and make it confront issues such as loneliness, the illusion of self-sufficiency and other seemingly unrelated problems, Mitchell said.

One scene likely to create controversy in the United States and some other countries shows a gay threesome in which one participant joyfully bellows "The Star Spangled Banner."

The actor with the singing voice, PJ Deboy, said he did the scene to show that he was as American as anyone, despite resistance to gays in parts of the country, including Washington.

"I thought to myself: 'Can I do it...?' And I decided I could, because it is a patriotic act.... There's nothing un-American about gay sex and there's nothing unpatriotic about it," he said.

He also joked that "I am now touring and singing every country's national anthem," and called for volunteers to assist.

Mitchell pointed out that the movie, filmed in New York City, also made pointed references to the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States.

Near the end of the movie, the lights flicker out as they did during a blackout that briefly occurred in 2003, provoking fears of a terrorist attack -- and then relief and a sense of togetherness that is likened to an orgasm.

"This film is in the shadow of 9/11, but it shows we're still alive, y'know?" the director said.

"Sex is not that interesting unless it's put into an artistic context, or you're having it yourself," Mitchell said.

"And sometimes not even then," added a cross-dressing actor called Justin Bond who played himself in the movie.
Link (http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/05/20/060520202355.b51639uz.html)

Well, since liberals can't and don't win elections let them gay fuck away all they want.??I'd rather have that than election results.

Oooooh, what a political statement.??The world quakes in its collective boots at volunteers producing gay sex national anthem videos.

HOW REBELOUS!

I just have to add I love the title of this guy's movie, "Shortbus". He must have ridden one every day to school wearing his hockey helmet to think anyone gives a shit about his art house gay porn.

AlonzoMourning23
05-27-2006, 11:15 PM
This reminds me of how the republicans couldn't beat clinton at the polls, so they decided to impeach him over a blowjob.

PittsburghAfterDark
05-28-2006, 04:56 AM
Does that lie ever get tired to you?

Tell you what, I'll give creedence to your half baked political thought when you can come back and show us where Bill Clinton ever won a majority of the popular vote.

AlonzoMourning23
05-28-2006, 03:29 PM
Does that lie ever get tired to you?

Tell you what, I'll give creedence to your half baked political thought when you can come back and show us where Bill Clinton ever won a majority of the popular vote.


So your point is that because clinton can't get 50% of the vote and the republican party still lost, that somehow made them less of a loser?

PittsburghAfterDark
05-28-2006, 04:02 PM
Try 43% in his first term.

57% of the country voted against Clinton.

That's as big a non-mandate as any President in American history.

AlonzoMourning23
05-28-2006, 04:54 PM
Try 43% in his first term.

57% of the country voted against Clinton.[quote]

43% to bush's 37%. Meaning 63% votes against bush.

That's as big a non-mandate as any President in American history.


The percentage of clintons victories is wider than the giant mandate you claimed bush #2 recieved. Besides, Lincoln and Wilson both recieved a lower percentage of the popular vote than clinton. Lincoln didn't even break 40% in 1860. And W. Bush was one of the few to win without any popular majority, that's a mandate against if anything.

Either way, again, it's republicans can't beat him at the polls so we'll impeach him over a blowjob.

PittsburghAfterDark
05-28-2006, 09:33 PM
You really are beyond stupid 'zo.

I know you don't belive the blowjob thing but you keep persisting that was the reason. If you want to look like a horses ass I'm not going to argue with you. I'll just get out of your way and continue to let a whole new group of people learn that you have no grasp on reality as I have known now for years.

RLN
05-28-2006, 09:52 PM
Tell you what, I'll give creedence to your half baked political thought when you can come back and show us where Bill Clinton ever won a majority of the popular vote.

Clinton Wins Popular Vote (http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/november/6/newsid_3686000/3686728.stm)

He is the first Democratic President in US history to be re-elected since Franklin D Roosevelt, taking 49.2% of the popular vote to Mr Dole's 40.8%.:P

PittsburghAfterDark
05-28-2006, 10:08 PM
Is that a majorty?

Uh, no.

So your point is that because clinton can't get 50% of the vote and the republican party still lost, that somehow made them less of a loser?

Reading comprehension, it's your friend.

Welcome, child that was left behind.

RLN
05-28-2006, 10:25 PM
Aw come on! You're going to hold me to .8%?:rolleyes::D Awfully darn close. And yes, I would call it a majority of the popular vote.

PittsburghAfterDark
05-28-2006, 11:15 PM
Congratulations! You can't count!

RLN
05-29-2006, 07:46 AM
:D:D:D:D

AlonzoMourning23
05-29-2006, 11:43 PM
Reading comprehension, it's your friend.

Welcome, child that was left behind.


Someone with good reading comprehension wouldn't ask me to prove a point I never argued. You're question was irrelevant.

Clintons impeachment was a way for his opponents to attempt to beat him without winning an election (which, obviously, they couldn't do). The drawn out description of clintons sex acts, such as using a cigar, is evidence that the moral issue played a major role. An equivalent situation, where a moral violation was not present (but the legal aspect remained the same), likely would never have gotten off the ground.

A non partisan group would never have impeached clinton.

PittsburghAfterDark
05-30-2006, 12:14 AM
BS.

Anyone that lies to a special prosecutor and grand jury should go down for the count.

He lost his law license over this. Somehow I think the Arkansas State Bar had it right and the Republican Congress got it wrong.

You'll never convince me that a guy was disqualified to defend a check kiters, drunk drivers and shoplifters is qualified to be leader of the Free World.