PDA

View Full Version : CIA Fires Leaker: Donated $2,000 to Kerry, $5,000 to Ohio Democrats


PittsburghAfterDark
04-21-2006, 08:25 PM
CIA Fires Employee for Alleged Leak

By KATHERINE SHRADER, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 24 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - In a highly unusual move, the CIA has fired an employee for leaking classified information to the news media, including details about secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe that resulted in a Pulitzer Prize-winning story, officials said Friday.

The Associated Press has learned the officer was a CIA veteran nearing retirement, Mary McCarthy. Reached Friday evening at home, her husband would not confirm her firing.

In McCarthy's final position at the CIA, she was assigned to its Office of Inspector General, looking into allegations the CIA was involved in torture at Iraqi prisons, according to a former colleague who spoke on condition of anonymity because the case is under investigation.

Without identifying McCarthy by name, CIA Director Porter Goss announced the firing in a short message to agency employees circulated Thursday. Such firings are rare. And it is the first time since Goss took over in September 2004, vowing to clamp down on leaks, that he has dismissed an intelligence officer for speaking with reporters.

Agency spokesman Paul Gimigliano confirmed an officer had been fired for having unauthorized contacts with the media and disclosing classified information to reporters, including details about intelligence operations.

"The officer has acknowledged unauthorized discussions with the media and the unauthorized sharing of classified information," Gimigliano said. "That is a violation of the secrecy agreement that everyone signs as a condition of employment with the CIA."

Citing the Privacy Act, the CIA would not disclose any details about the officer's identity or what she might have told the news media. However, a law enforcement official confirmed there was a criminal leaks investigation under way, but it did not involve the fired CIA officer.

The official said the CIA officer had provided information that contributed to a Washington Post story last year disclosing secret U.S. prisons in Eastern Europe. The law enforcement official spoke only on condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the matter.

The Post's Dana Priest won a Pulitzer Prize this week for her reporting on a covert prison system set up by the CIA after Sept. 11, 2001, that at various times included sites in eight countries. The story caused an international uproar, and government officials have said it did significant damage to relationships between the U.S. and allied intelligence agencies.

Post Executive Editor Leonard Downie Jr. said on the newspaper's Web site, "We don't know the details of why (the CIA employee) was fired, so I can't comment on that. But as a general principle, obviously I am opposed to criminalizing the dissemination of government information to the press."

It was unclear if Priest or any other reporters who spoke to McCarthy would be brought into an investigation. Post spokesman Eric Grant said no reporter at the paper had been subpoenaed or had spoken to investigators about the matter.

Goss has pressed for aggressive probes about leaked information.

"The damage has been very severe to our capabilities to carry out our mission," Goss told Congress in February, adding that a federal grand jury should be impaneled to determine "who is leaking this information."

On Friday, another government official, also speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information, said the fired officer had failed a lie-detector test.

It was not clear if the person was taking a routine polygraph examination, as is required periodically of employees with access to classified information, or if the lie-detector test was among those ordered by Goss to find leakers inside the agency.

Justice Department officials declined to comment publicly on the firing and whether the matter had been referred to federal prosecutors for possible criminal charges. One law enforcement official said there were dozens of leak investigations under way. Another said there had been no referral from the CIA involving the fired employee, normally a precursor to a criminal investigation.

Both spoke on condition of anonymity because the matter is under investigation.
Link (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060421/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/cia_leak_15)

MCCARTHY, MARY O
BETHESDA,MD 20817

CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & INTERNATIONA

10/5/2004 $5,000 Democratic Party of Ohio

MCCARTHY, MARY O
BETHESDA,MD 20817

U.S. GOVERNMENT/ANALYST

3/14/2004 $2,000 Kerry, John
Opensecrets.com (http://opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?NumOfThou=0&txtName=mccarthy%2C+mary+o.&txtState=%28all+states%29&txtZip=&txtEmploy=&txtCand=&txt2006=Y&txt2004=Y&Order=N)

Who says Democrats aren't treasonous rat bastards?

Oh that's right.

Democrats.

These actions speak volumes as to why you cannot trust the disloyal opposition with the defense of this country.??I couldn't have made this up if I tried yet I'm not at all shocked by this disclosure. Once she was named by MSNBC freerepublic.com users found this tidbit within one hour of her name being released.

Alonzo
04-21-2006, 09:27 PM
So the actions of one individual are enough to judge the intentions of the entire population that makes up a political party?

Labrocca
04-21-2006, 10:01 PM
Yeah these leaks gotta start turning into treason charges imho. Too often lately political agendas are getting in the way of national security interests. This can be true of both parties.

At the time of Dana Priests story on the secret prisons I spoke out about the treason of whomever exposed this info. Now we know who it is ...I would be happy as can be if she was tried.

PittsburghAfterDark
04-22-2006, 12:08 AM
So the actions of one individual are enough to judge the intentions of the entire population that makes up a political party?


No, this just goes along with the rest of the treasonous leadership on the Democratic Senate and House sides. They have so brainwashed their own followers that anything that hurts Bush helps them.

This is damn representative of what is wrong with Democrats and it's easy for Americans to understand.

Here's the contrast 'zo.

- Freerepublic.com wants this woman charged and tried. As well as the reporter.

- Democraticunderground.com wants to send this woman flowers and set up a legal defense fund.

Yes, she most certainly is symptomatic of a very, very un-American movement in the far left which has become the voice of the Democratic party.

Alonzo
04-22-2006, 02:29 AM
Well, what is treason? It really has two definitions, the legal definition, and the meaning that undelies that definition. Legally it is an action that undermines the government. But what it really refers to is undermining the nation, which is in many respects distinct from the government. For example, I despise our current government, but I have no problem with the country itself. To many having secret prisons in various parts of the world is very troubling, and undermines the principles of our great nation. Indeed, many would find challenging such government practices to be more patriotic than treasonous.

Is this treasonous? That depends on which definition you prefer. Is legality or morality more important?

I can think of many great heroes who have fought the government, and I would consider them patriots. Who's the greater hero, General Custer or John Brown? I know personally I would not have paid a nickel to spare Custer from death's cold embrace.

PittsburghAfterDark
04-22-2006, 11:36 AM
What is treason?

Leaking state secrets for the benefit of the enemy.

Easy definition.

This is the modern Democratic party. The epicenter of anti-Americanism in this country is any Clinton appointee (Which this one was, hired by Sandy "I Steal Classified Documents In My Pants" Berger.) who can damage a sitting president who doesn't have a (D) next to their affiliation. The press is absolutely no different and just as complicit in their behavior. The press is so far gone that they award Pulitzer Prizes to treasonous reporters.

Fry the bitch. That's me being charitable. I'd as soon hand her over to terrorists themselves for a video taped beheading on Al Jazeera.

If you really think that this issue won't resonate, you're kidding yourself. In Washington terms the Friday afternoon leak was meant for this news to die over the weekend. Talk radio will be all over this like stink on manure and will never let the link between a Democratic appointee, contributor and the MSM and treason go by the wayside.

The best part about this is going to see what the liberal talking points are in her defense.

Alonzo
04-22-2006, 11:50 AM
What is treason?

Leaking state secrets for the benefit of the enemy.

Easy definition.

Do you honestly think it was leaked because they wanted to aid the enemy? Or was it leaked because the man thought a wrong was being committed and he wanted to expose it?

Hypothetically, if america were torturing accused terrorist detainees and then executing 100% of them (those they knew were wrongly accused along with those who actually were terrorists), that would cause significant harm to america's image if that were exposed. But it is something you would to stop, and something that should be exposed.

It's not anti-american to want to expose that. But liberals tend to focus more on the principals and the nation in the abstract, with the government being something distinct, while conservatives seem to assume that the government and the nation are much more closely tied together.

If you really think that this issue won't resonate, you're kidding yourself.??In Washington terms the Friday afternoon leak was meant for this news to die over the weekend.??Talk radio will be all over this like stink on manure and will never let the link between a Democratic appointee, contributor and the MSM and treason go by the wayside.

The best part about this is going to see what the liberal talking points are in her defense.??


No one ever said it won't resonate. Talk radio is powerful, any fool can see that. But this isn't an issue that will resonate outside of the conservative base. Liberals will favor the guy exposing what, in their minds anyway, is illegal and immoral activity by the government. I don't think most moderates will be overly concerned. More than likely it will simply be a rallying cry for the troops, but won't be winning any converts.

E-Z-B
04-24-2006, 01:02 PM
She should be tried for leaking classified info that "benefitted the enemy" right after Dubya is tried for leaking classified info that "benefitted the enemy" -- for political gain, no less.

Old Corps Gunny
04-24-2006, 02:46 PM
Perhaps I am too "balck and white" in my viewpoint on this partucular subject, but the article said that Mrs. McCarthy was a CIA veteran nearing retirement who had been dismissed for "violation of a secrecy agreement" all CIA employees are required to sign. As a long-term employee, Mrs. McCarthy surely knew the disclosure of classified information is illegal and chose to break the law. The so-called "secrecy agreement" in reality is a document stating the disclosure of classified information is a violation of Title 18, United States Code and carries some very stiff penalties which everyone granted access to highly classified information is required to sign so they cannot claim ignorance. Trust me, if a military member had done the same, he or she wouold not have been merely discharged; first they would have been court-martialed, reduced in rank to the lowest pay grade with loss of all pay and privileges, sentenced to a long term in a federal prison, and then given a dishonorable discharge. What I find interesting is why didn't Mrs. McCarthy share information about some of the operations that took place during the Clinton administration that (hopefully) would have been just as shocking to rank and file Democrats? In the final analysis, she violated her oath as a CIA officer, did cause harm to the national security and seriously disrupted our intelligence coordination with allied intelligence organizations. She should be held to the same standards as any other government employee or service member, tried and, if found guilty of violating Title 18, USC, sent to prison.

penmyst
04-24-2006, 05:13 PM
The best part about this is going to see what the liberal talking points are in her defense.

One of them would appear to be "whistleblower". Heard it used several times in regards to this woman already. Guess that's supposed to make us feel like she was fighting the good fight against evil Dubya and his corrupt administration.