PDA

View Full Version : Congressman Paul on The Federal Reserve


firefox
02-18-2007, 01:23 AM
URL: http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul370.html


Statement at Hearing of the House Financial Services Committee, February 15, 2007
Transparency in monetary policy is a goal we should all support. I've often wondered why Congress so willingly has given up its prerogative over monetary policy. Astonishingly, Congress in essence has ceded total control over the value of our money to a secretive central bank.
Congress created the Federal Reserve, yet it had no constitutional authority to do so. We forget that those powers not explicitly granted to Congress by the Constitution are inherently denied to Congress – and thus the authority to establish a central bank never was given. Of course Jefferson and Hamilton had that debate early on, a debate seemingly settled in 1913.
But transparency and oversight are something else, and they're worth considering. Congress, although not by law, essentially has given up all its oversight responsibility over the Federal Reserve. There are no true audits, and Congress knows nothing of the conversations, plans, and actions taken in concert with other central banks. We get less and less information regarding the money supply each year, especially now that M3 is no longer reported.
The role the Fed plays in the President's secretive Working Group on Financial Markets goes unnoticed by members of Congress. The Federal Reserve shows no willingness to inform Congress voluntarily about how often the Working Group meets, what actions it takes that affect the financial markets, or why it takes those actions.
But these actions, directed by the Federal Reserve, alter the purchasing power of our money. And that purchasing power is always reduced. The dollar today is worth only four cents compared to the dollar in 1913, when the Federal Reserve started. This has profound consequences for our economy and our political stability. All paper currencies are vulnerable to collapse, and history is replete with examples of great suffering caused by such collapses, especially to a nation's poor and middle class. This leads to political turmoil.
Even before a currency collapse occurs, the damage done by a fiat system is significant. Our monetary system insidiously transfers wealth from the poor and middle class to the privileged rich. Wages never keep up with the profits of Wall Street and the banks, thus sowing the seeds of class discontent. When economic trouble hits, free markets and free trade often are blamed, while the harmful effects of a fiat monetary system are ignored. We deceive ourselves that all is well with the economy, and ignore the fundamental flaws that are a source of growing discontent among those who have not shared in the abundance of recent years....

I'm glad that at least one person in Congress gets it. This government/government buddy controlled banking system needs to end. This is your "mixed" economy right here, socialists, I'm sorry to say.

Elrathin
02-18-2007, 02:01 AM
This government/government buddy controlled banking system needs to end.


Just curious Firefox, if not for the government who do you think needs to control it, the corporate Tycoons? If not them who?

potter
02-18-2007, 01:53 PM
http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/frcourt.html

Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (1982)
John L. Lewis, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
United States of America, Defendant/Appellee.
No. 80-5905
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 2, 1982.
Decided April 19, 1982.
As Amended June 24, 1982.

Plaintiff, who was injured by vehicle owned and operated by a federal reserve bank, brought action alleging jurisdiction under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The United States District Court for the Central District of California, David W. Williams, J., dismissed holding that federal reserve bank was not a federal agency within meaning of Act and that the court therefore lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. Appeal was taken. The Court of Appeals, Poole, Circuit Judge, held that federal reserve banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the Act, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.

Affirmed

Drocket
02-18-2007, 07:55 PM
Just curious Firefox, if not for the government who do you think needs to control it, the corporate Tycoons? If not them who?

Exactly. I can't wait to go back to the days where money was issued by individual banks, meaning that there was 500 different types of currencies making it pretty much impossible to detect counterfeiting. I'd love to go on vacation to Florida and discover that they don't accept the money I have because its from a bank that's too far away. Fun for the whole family!

firefox
02-19-2007, 02:19 AM
Let's think about some things logically:

1. If all money is a finite, relatively difficult to obtain commodity (let's say silver and gold for the sake of argumentation and history), then the only legitimate unit of exchange is either the commodity itself (pure coinage), or warehouse certificates that are payable on demand in that particular commodity.

2. Government IS a monopoly, and a very dangerous one at that. History has shown that it has a 100% failure rate in maintaining the value of the monetary unit, especially since the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the accompanying Federal Income Tax.

3. A free market banking system based on competition ensures that only the good honest banks survive. This is the historical norm over the last several thousand years. Believe it or not, our current corrupt system isn't the way it has always been. A fractional reserve banking cartel backed by the force of the federal government is the only thing keeping nearly useless Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) as the de facto currency in use in this country and around the world. If given a choice, people tend to go for the best product (ie, the one that maintains or grows its value over time).

4. Many alternative currencies exist today, most notably eGold (http://www.egold.com) and the Liberty Dollar (http://www.libertydollar.org/). In order to gain a profit, these "money companies" must please their customers, not greedy special interests, as the Fed/Treasury do. As a result, their holdings are fully ensured and frequently audited to ensure that no fraud is taking place. Upon request, information about business operations can be had- try getting a FOIA request from Bernanke! Hint: You can't do it, and the M3 # isn't even being disclosed anymore.

5. Economies of scale, better products, and improved tech often lead to the dominance of a few large players and a few small niche providers in any given industry. To maximize customer satisfaction, and thus profits, a successful "money company" must provide exchange services for currency holders. That means that they would need to provide the ability to trade a $20 Silver Liberty (1oz silver) for X units of eGold, and vice versa. This would probably require a small fee, but more users=lower costs, and you won't be having 90% of your savings loaned out on a regular basis without your permission! In other words, this means that $20 Liberty Dollars will always buy you approximately the same amount of goods, as opposed to the US Dollar which is only worth 4 CENTS of its original value right now!

6. A big part of the reason why Fed affiliated banks like their cushy deal is because they get to loan out up to 90% of YOUR hard earned money deposited with them at their whim. This means HUGE profits for them, and the theft of YOUR buying power as an expense. In a free and honest banking system where this could not be tolerated by customers, banks would instead have to ASK their clients for permission to loan out their money. This means that they would have to offer competitive CD rates. How would you like to get more than the 5-6% you get on your CD today, PLUS not have your buying power stolen from you without your knowledge or permission? Today, if inflation is at 5% (which is much more likely than the claimed 2-3%), and your CD is only 5.3%, you're only gaining 3/10 of 1% return, not 5.3! No inflation would mean that you would get that full 5.3% in added buying power, and there's nothing to say that real rates couldn't be higher than that depending on how desperate banks are for loan capital at the time.

Any questions? 8-)

BTW, corporations are government created fictitious "legal entities". They are not natural, and should not be confused with a company or firm. I know because I'm involved with creating such entities on a regular basis.