PDA

View Full Version : 'Smoking gun' report to say global warming here


Elrathin
01-23-2007, 05:15 PM
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Human-caused global warming is here -- visible in the air, water and melting ice -- and is destined to get much worse in the future, an authoritative global scientific report will warn next week.

"The smoking gun is definitely lying on the table as we speak," said top U.S. climate scientist Jerry Mahlman, who reviewed all 1,600 pages of the first segment of a giant four-part report. "The evidence ... is compelling."

Andrew Weaver, a Canadian climate scientist and study co-author, went even further: "This isn't a smoking gun; climate is a batallion of intergalactic smoking missiles."

The first phase of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is being released in Paris next week.

This segment, written by more than 600 scientists and reviewed by another 600 experts and edited by bureaucrats from 154 countries, includes "a significantly expanded discussion of observation on the climate," said co-chair Susan Solomon a senior scientist for the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

She and other scientists held a telephone briefing on the report Monday.

That report will feature an "explosion of new data" on observations of current global warming, Solomon said.

Solomon and others wouldn't go into specifics about what the report says.

They said that the 12-page summary for policymakers will be edited in secret word-by-word by governments officials for several days next week and released to the public on February 2. The rest of that first report from scientists will come out months later.

The full report will be issued in four phases over the year, as was the case with the last IPCC report, issued in 2001.

Global warming is "happening now, it's very obvious," said Mahlman, a former director of NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Lab. "When you look at the temperature of the Earth, it's pretty much a no-brainer."

Look for an "iconic statement" -- a simple but strong and unequivocal summary -- on how global warming is now occurring, said one of the authors, Kevin Trenberth, director of climate analysis at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, also in Boulder.

The February report will have "much stronger evidence now of human actions on the change in climate that's taken place," Rajendra K. Pachauri told the AP in November. Pachauri, an Indian climatologist, is the head of the international climate change panel.

An early version of the ever-changing draft report said "observations of coherent warming in the global atmosphere, in the ocean, and in snow and ice now provide stronger joint evidence of warming."

And the early draft adds: "An increasing body of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on other aspects of climate including sea ice, heat waves and other extremes, circulation, storm tracks and precipitation."

The world's global average temperature has risen about 1.2 degrees Fahrenheit from 1901 to 2005. The two warmest years on record for the world were 2005 and 1998. Last year was the hottest year on record for the United States.

The report will draw on already published peer-review science. Some recent scientific studies show that temperatures are the hottest in thousands of years, especially during the last 30 years; ice sheets in Greenland in the past couple years have shown a dramatic melting; and sea levels are rising and doing so at a faster rate in the past decade.

Also, the second part of the international climate panel's report -- to be released in April -- will for the first time feature a blockbuster chapter on how global warming is already changing health, species, engineering and food production, said NASA scientist Cynthia Rosenzweig, author of that chapter.

As confident as scientists are about the global warming effects that they've already documented, they are as gloomy about the future and even hotter weather and higher sea level rises.

Predictions for the future of global warming in the report are based on 19 computer models, about twice as many as in the past, Solomon said.

In 2001, the panel said the world's average temperature would increase somewhere between 2.5 and 10.4 degrees Fahrenheit and the sea level would rise between 4 inches and 35 inches by the year 2100. The 2007 report will likely have a smaller range of numbers for both predictions, Pachauri and other scientists said.

The future is bleak, scientists said.

"We have barely started down this path," said chapter co-author Richard Alley of Penn State University.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/01/23/climate.report.ap/index.html

I'll be curious to read the report, and see if it validates what many people have been saying all along. I'll hold judgment until then.

Stoner
01-23-2007, 05:31 PM
*I'll hold judgment until then.


From every post I've seen of you on this topic it appears your mind has already been made up.

You should be more weary where you get your "facts" from. Moveon.org and Al Gore are not reliable sources.

Use more discretion.

AlonzoMourning23
01-23-2007, 05:33 PM
Well, there seems to be virtually no more scientific debate of whether there is global warming. There is some on the cause, but those arguing its not humans are far outnumbered.

Stoner
01-23-2007, 05:36 PM
those arguing its not humans are far outnumbered.


Where on earth do you get your information? There are only a minute percentage of scientists who think man is causing GW.

AlonzoMourning23
01-23-2007, 05:47 PM
Pretty much every report from a scientific organization, scientist, or major academic institution (where much of the research is done), seems to state the same thing:

The earth is growing warmer, thanks to elevated concentrations of greenhouse gases, and the vast majority of scientists now believe that human activity, especially the burning of fossil fuels, is primarily responsible. In June, the National Research Council concluded with a “high level of confidence” that the earth is warmer now than at any time since 1600 and, quite possibly, since 900, and this global rise in temperature is expected to accelerate if the emission of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide is not curtailed. The consequences of unchecked global warming, even within the limited timeframe of the next 100 years, are potentially disastrous. Higher temperatures will erode the polar icecaps — Greenland’s ice is melting three times faster than it was only five years ago — and lead to significantly higher sea levels, inundating low-lying areas; evaporation and precipitation will intensify, increasing the severity of hurricanes and the likelihood of flood and drought; ecosystems will be disrupted and food production jeopardized; and tropical diseases will spread to higher latitudes.


http://www.princeton.edu/president/pages/20061025/index.xml

I've failed to run across anything remotely supporting the statement that "only a minute percentage of scientists" think man plays a role in GW, outside of clearly far right organizations, like frontpagemag.com

Stoner
01-23-2007, 05:59 PM
the earth is warmer now than at any time since 1600 and, quite possibly, since 900

What methods did they use in the 900s to accurately record the earth's temperature?

Waffletush
01-23-2007, 07:31 PM
Hopefully the smoke from this gun doesn't contribute to the warming.

Elrathin
01-23-2007, 08:11 PM
From every post I've seen of you on this topic it appears your mind has already been made up.

You should be more weary where you get your "facts" from. Moveon.org and Al Gore are not reliable sources.

Use more discretion.


First of all show me where I said anytime that it was man made. I have said there is a change going on and nothing further. I'll be awaiting your apology for lying again.

piratemonkey
01-23-2007, 08:38 PM
What methods did they use in the 900s to accurately record the earth's temperature?


Umm... there are other ways of measuring historic weather than going back in time with a thermometer.:rolleyes:

That fact that you seem to be ignorant of these methods should give you pause before you start asking ridiculous questions like the one above.

piratemonkey
01-23-2007, 08:43 PM
First of all show me where I said anytime that it was man made.**I have said there is a change going on and nothing further.**I'll be awaiting your apology for lying again.


Don't hold your breath.

Fortunately, there is more than one quote from the above article supporting the idea of anthropogenic global warming:
The February report will have "much stronger evidence now of human actions on the change in climate that's taken place,"
and
"An increasing body of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on other aspects of climate including sea ice, heat waves and other extremes, circulation, storm tracks and precipitation."


Sucks when almost all the scientists are against you, eh?**

We're usually right.

Waffletush
01-23-2007, 08:56 PM
Sucks when almost all the scientists are against you, eh?**

We're usually right.

No kidding. It is nice to see scientists such as ourselves banding together.

bobbylien
01-23-2007, 09:02 PM
Don't bother debating stoner, I've yet to see him make a post thats over 5 or 6 sentences unless its in the off-topic lounge. Not only are his posts short but they never have any kind of evidence to support his claims.

Stoner
01-23-2007, 09:36 PM
Umm... there are other ways of measuring historic weather than going back in time with a thermometer

Great! List 3 for me.

Buck Laser
01-23-2007, 11:20 PM
Umm... there are other ways of measuring historic weather than going back in time with a thermometer

Great! List 3 for me.

1. Sedimentary deposits in snow, lakes, soil and sedimentary rocks all provide pretty direct clues to temperature trends.
2. Tree rings also provide a reliable look a climate history, in some cases, for periods of thousands of years.
3. Archeological excavations, where precise measurements of pollen and foodstuff remains tell the climatological tale.

Sorry Stoner, but you're gonna have to sober up a bit to be a real player here. When you think of some relevant questions, come back and ask again. We'll be glad to help!

Elrathin
01-23-2007, 11:31 PM
After Buck's post, I can think of 3 Reasons why Stoner should lay off the pot :D

Stoner
01-24-2007, 02:17 AM
1. Sedimentary deposits in snow, lakes, soil and sedimentary rocks all provide pretty direct clues to temperature trends.
2. Tree rings also provide a reliable look a climate history, in some cases, for periods of thousands of years.
3. Archeological excavations, where precise measurements of pollen and foodstuff remains tell the climatological tale.



It's too bad none of those are accurate in telling what the temperature was back in 900 or 1600 for that matter.

Those you listed will give you a broad estimate (except #2 which is abdolutely ridiculous) and broad is being generous. Nevertheless it's still far from being accurate.

Care to try again? Here, I'll make it easier for you. This time just list 2. That's all. 2 measly methods.

AlonzoMourning23
01-24-2007, 02:29 AM
How about you show why they're not accurate. The info was presented as you requested, now debunk it.

Labrocca
01-24-2007, 03:20 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendrochronology

I don't see anything in that article about accuracy of temperatures.**I don't even see temperature being measured.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record_of_the_past_1000_years

It's basically guesswork.**I am sure it's not accurate to within 5 degrees.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendroclimatology
Tree ring information can be used to reconstruct climatology at the growing site for certain seasons back thousands of years. It's possible to reconstruct records much older than the oldest living trees, either by using dead trees that are still in place (such as for old bristlecone pines), or even from trees that were cut and used for building long ago, provided one can correlate between rings from living and dead specimens.

In more recent times, the established connection between tree rings and climate appears to be breaking down. Briffa et al report in Nature, 1998:

There ya go...DEBUNKED.

I see a lot of fluctuation in temperatures over the years. Doesn't prove too much.

Anti-Racism
01-24-2007, 08:10 AM
Well, there seems to be virtually no more scientific debate of whether there is global warming. There is some on the cause, but those arguing its not humans are far outnumbered.


And: very rarely does life give you a big red lighted sign that says GLOBAL WARMING NOW.

And: does it matter what caused it? It's here and we have to deal with it, isntead of driving around in our SUVs debating whether or not it's real.

Heh.

piratemonkey
01-24-2007, 02:24 PM
Sure, we don't know anything about historic weather.**Scientists who spend their lives studying this stuff are just delusional, right?

Because, of course, the Earth is only 6000 year old.

An ice core from the right site can be used to reconstruct an uninterrupted and detailed climate record extending over hundreds of thousands of years, providing information on a wide variety of aspects of climate at each point in time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_cores

Yeah, you're right... we can't get any global warming data from ice core samples.**That's why NASA put out this report:
Recovery of a new ice core in Antarctica that extends back 740,000 years — nearly twice as long as any other ice core record — is extremely important and will help scientists better understand the Earth’s climate and issues related to global warming, according to a University of Colorado at Boulder professor.

The new ice core, announced June 9 by the European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica, or EPICA, reaches far enough back in time to give scientists “a first shot at looking at climate and greenhouse gases during interglacial periods when humans had nothing to do with climate change,” said geological sciences Professor James White.

“This has the potential to separate the human-caused impacts from the natural and place it in a much clearer context,” he said.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/MediaAlerts/2004/2004060917108.html

Ice cores can tell scientists about concentrations of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane, dust levels in the atmosphere, volcanic eruptions and estimates of temperatures and precipitation.

Stoner, next time give us a link when you claim the Earth is flat, ok?

Waffletush
01-24-2007, 03:30 PM
Sure, we don't know anything about historic weather.**Scientists who spend their lives studying this stuff are just delusional, right

No, scientists like you and I are never wrong.

piratemonkey
01-24-2007, 03:43 PM
No, scientists like you and I are never wrong.


Do you have anything whatsoever to say about the topic of this thread or the evidence I provided, or are you just here to make puerile personal attacks?

Hello, ignore list! (I know I'm not the only one.)

Waffletush
01-24-2007, 05:55 PM
Do you have anything whatsoever to say about the topic of this thread or the evidence I provided, or are you just here to make puerile personal attacks?

Just taking a page out of your book. Tit for tat on your non-productive comment about me over in the Obama thread.

Hello, ignore list!**(I know I'm not the only one.)

Oh no, Piratemonkey is ignoring me on the Internet!**Whatever will i do!?!?!?

piratemonkey
01-24-2007, 08:46 PM
The difference being that on the Obama thread, I was commenting on the substance of your posting, not making a personal crack at who you are.***shrug*

It seems the easiest way to be attacked personally by a conservative is to present factual evidence that they don't know how to deal with.

Anyone else want to claim that ice core data can't be used for a good estimation of historic climate data?

Does anyone have evidence that contradicts mine?**Stoner?**Labrocca?

Waffletush
01-25-2007, 03:32 AM
The difference being that on the Obama thread, I was commenting on the substance of your posting, not making a personal crack at who you are.***shrug*

So now you are taking a crack at me becasue I too am a scientist?

It seems the easiest way to be attacked personally by a conservative is to present factual evidence that they don't know how to deal with.

Anyone else want to claim that ice core data can't be used for a good estimation of historic climate data?

Does anyone have evidence that contradicts mine?**Stoner?**Labrocca?

Labrocca provided evidence against global warming, you ignored it. If ignoring facts is how liberals debate, then please, add me to your ignore list.

Anti-Racism
01-25-2007, 03:56 AM
Labrocca provided evidence against global warming, you ignored it.**If ignoring facts is how liberals debate, then please, add me to your ignore list.


Why is it liberal to believe in global warming?

piratemonkey
01-25-2007, 02:16 PM
Why is it liberal to believe in global warming?


Excellent question.**Facts are facts.**They know no party.


Speaking of which:
There ya go...DEBUNKED.

I see a lot of fluctuation in temperatures over the years.**Doesn't prove too much.

HARDLY.

You seem to be claiming that accurate estimations of historic surface temperatures can't be made.

For that to be true, all of these studies on the US government NOAA website must all be wrong:


Global and Hemispheric Temperature, NAO, and SOI (Review), 2000 Years, Jones 2004.
Global Temperature (PCA: Tree-rings, Ice Cores, Corals, Sediments, Historical), 1000 Years, Jones et al. 1998
Global Temperature (PCA: Tree-rings, Ice Cores, Corals) and Spatial Distribution, 600 Years, Mann et al. 2000.
Global Temperature (PCA: Tree-rings, Ice Cores, Corals, Historical), 600 Years, Mann et al. 1998.
Global Temperature (Glacier Length), 400 Years, Oerlemans 2005
Global Temperature (Geothermal Heat Flow Analysis: Boreholes), 500 Years, Pollack et al. 1998.
Vostok Temperature, (Isotopes: Ice Core) 414,000 Years, Petit et al. 1999.
Northern Hemisphere & Regional Temperature (Age Band Decomp.: Tree-rings), 600 Years, Briffa et al. 2001.
Northern Hemisphere Temperature (Regression: Tree-rings), 600 Years, Briffa et al. 1998.
Northern Hemisphere Temperature (Tree-rings, Ice Cores, Historical), 1000 Years, Crowley & Lowery 2000.
Northern Hemisphere Temperature (RCS and STD: Tree-rings), 1300 Years, D'Arrigo et al. 2006.
Northern Hemisphere Temperature (RCS: Tree-rings), 1000 Years, Esper et al. 2002.
Northern Hemisphere Temperature (Boreholes, Tree-ring, Ice Cores, Corals), 500 Years, Huang 2004.
Hemispheric Temperature, NAO, and SOI (Review), 1000 Years, Jones et al. 2001.
Northern Hemisphere Temperature (PCA: Tree-rings, Ice Cores, Corals), 1000 Years, Mann et al. 1999.
Hemispheric Temperature (Historical, Tree-rings, Ice Cores, Sediment), 2000 Years, Mann and Jones 2003.
Northern Hemisphere Temperature (Wavelet: Sediments, Tree-rings), 2000 Years, Moberg et al. 2005.
Northern Hemisphere Temperature, Warm/Cold Spatial Extent, 1,200 Years, Osborn and Briffa 2006.
Northern Hemisphere Temperature (Review/Comparison), 600 Years, Rutherford et al. 2005.
Northern Hemisphere Temperature (Speleothem Layer Thickness), 500 Years, Smith et al. 2006.
Greenland Temperature, 49,000 Years, Alley 2000
Arctic Temperature, 400 Years, Overpeck et al. 1997
Africa
Lake Malawi, East Africa Surface Temperature, 25,000 Years, Powers et al. 2005.
China Temperature, 2000 Years, Yang et al. 2002.
East China Winter Temperature, 2000 Years, Ge et al. 2003.
Beijing, China Temperature, 2650 Years, Tan et al. 2003.
Taymir, northern Siberia, Summer Temperature, 400 Years, Jacoby et al. 2000.
Yamal Peninsula, western Siberia, Summer Temperature, 4000 Years, Hantemirov and Shiyatov 2002.
Kathmandu, Nepal, Pre- and Post- Monsoon Temperature, 550 Years, Cook et al. 2003.
Hokkaido, Japan Warm Season Temperature, 440 Years, Davi et al. 2001.
Lake Suigetsu, Japan Temperature, 15,700 - 10,200 YrBP, Nakagawa et al. 2006, Text or Excel format.
New Zealand Temperature, 270 Years, Xiong and Palmer 2000.
Tasmania Temperature, 3600 Years,Cook et al. 2000
European Gridded and Regional Summer Temperature and Data Visualization, 225 Years, Briffa 1988.
European Seasonal Temperature, with Data Visualization, 500 Years, Xoplaki et al. 2005, Luterbacher et al. 2004.
European Alps Temperature and Precipitation Reconstructions, 500 Years, Casty et al. 2005.
Central Alps Temperature, 2,000 Years, Mangini et al. 2005.
Burgundy Spring-Summer Temperature, 630 Years, Chuine et al. 2004.
Northern Coastal Norway Temperature, 650 Years, Kirchhefer 2001
Abisko Valley, Northern Sweden Temperature, 10,000 Years, Larocque and Hall 2004, Text or Excel.
Baffin Island Summer Temperature, 500 Years, Hughen et al. 2000.
Baffin Island Summer Temperature, 1200 Years, Moore et al. 2001.
Northwest Canada Temperature, 350 Years, Szeicz et al. 1995.
Canadian Rockies Summer Temperature, 1050 Years, Luckman and Wilson 2005.
Gulf of Alaska March-May, March-Sept., and April-Sept. Temperature, 400 Years, Wiles et al. 1998.
Wrangell Mountains, Alaska Warm Season Temperature, 400 Years, Davi et al. 2003.
USA Pacific Northwest Temperature, 250 Years, Wiles et al. 1996.
East-central Idaho July Temperature Reconstruction, 850 Years, Biondi et al. 1999.
Southern Colorado Plateau Temperature Reconstruction, 2,262 Years, Salzer and Kipfmueller 2005.
West N.America Gridded & Regional Summer Temperature and Data Visualization, 400 Years, Briffa et al. 1992.
Large Scale N.American Temp. and Precip., Description, and Data Visualization, 400 Years, Fritts 1991.
North American and Regional July Temperature Reconstructions, 14,000 Years, Viau et al. 2006, Text or Excel.
South America
Southern Andes Temperature, Text or Excel format, 350 Years, Villalba et al. 2003.
East Africa Drought, 1100 Years, Verschuren et al. 2000.
North America
NOAA/NESDIS North American Drought Variability project
(includes Tree-ring reconstructed PDSI).
A Paleo Perspective on North American Drought
North American PDSI, 2000 Years, Cook et al. 2004.
North American Great Plains Drought, 2300 Years, Laird et al. 1996.
North American Great Plains Drought, 11,000 Years, Laird et al. 1996.
Upper Mississippi Basin Aridity, 10,000 Years, Dean et al. 1997.
U.S. Drought Area Index, 270 Years, Cook et al. 1997.
U.S. PDSI, text or Microsoft Excel, and Data Visualization, 280 Years, Zhang et al. 2004.
Western U.S. Drought Area Index, 1200 Years, Cook et al. 2004.
Southwest US Drought Index, 570 Years, Cook unpublished data.
Southwestern US Drought Maps from Pinyon Tree-Ring δ13C, 400 Years, Leavitt et al. 2007.
Eastern Colorado PDSI, 440 Years, Woodhouse et al. 2001.
Texas PDSI, 280 Years, Stahle and Cleaveland 1988.
Northeastern Utah PDSI, 600 Years, Gray et al. 2003.
Northern California and Nevada Multicentennial Droughts, 7600 Years, Benson et al. 2002.
East USA Lost Colony/Jamestown Droughts, 800 Years, Stahle et al. 1998.
Central American Drought and the Classic Maya Civilization, 9700 Years, Hodell et al. 1995.
East African Precipitation 40,000 Years, Bonnefille and Chalié 2000.
Zimbabwe Summer Precipitation, 200 Years, Therrell et al. 2006, Text or Excel format.
Huashuan, China Precipitation, 400 Years, Hughes et al. 1994.
Mongolia Riverflow and Precipitation Reconstructions, 350 Years, Pederson et al. 2001.
Lake Suigetsu, Japan Precipitation, 15,700 - 10,200 YrBP, Nakagawa et al. 2006, Text or Excel format.**
Scotland Precipitation, 3600 Years, Proctor et al. 2002.
Scotland Precipitation, 1000 Years, Proctor et al. 2000.
Lyngen Peninsula, Norway, Winter Precipitation, Text or Excel, 20,000 Years, Bakke et al. 2005.
Bavarian Forest Spring-Summer Precipitation, 500 Years, Wilson et al. 2005.
Turkey Precipitation 350 Years, D'Arrigo and Cullen 2001.
Southwest Turkey Precipitation 660 Years, Touchan et al. 2003.
Large Scale North American Temperature and Precipitation ,Description, and Data Visualization, 400 Years, Fritts 1991.
Southern Manitoba precipitation reconstruction, 595 Years, St. George and Nielsen 2002.
Northeast USA Little Ice Age Precipitation, 2000 Years, Gajewski 1988.
Montpelier Plantation, Virginia Precipitation, 180 Years, Druckenbrod et al. 2003.
Southeast USA Precipitation and PDSI reconstructions, 1000 Years, Stahle and Cleaveland 1992.
Iowa Precipitation and PDSI reconstructions, 340 Years, Cleaveland and Duvick 1992.
Missouri Precipitation and PDSI reconstructions, 400 Years, Cleaveland and Stahle 1996.
Eastern Oregon Precipitation and PDSI, 300 Years, Garfin and Hughes 1997.
Glacier National Park Mean Summer Deficit, 460 Years, Pederson et al. 2006.
Bighorn Basin Wyoming/Montana Precipitation, 739 Years, Gray et al. 2004.
Uinta Basin, Utah Precipitation, 775 Years, Gray et al. 2004.
El Malpais, New Mexico Precipitation, 2129 Years, Grissino 1996.
Arizona and New Mexico Climate Division Precipitation, 1000 Years, Ni et al. 2002.
Southern Colorado Plateau Precipitation Reconstruction, 1,425 Years, Salzer and Kipfmueller 2005.
Nevada Precipitation, 8000 Years, Hughes and Graumlich 1996.
Durango, Mexico precipitation reconstruction, 610 Years, Cleaveland et al. 2003.
Chihuahua, Mexico precipitation reconstruction, 350 Years, D*az et al. 2002.
Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico, precipitation reconstruction, 220 Years, Pohl et al. 2003.
Selenge River, Mongolia Streamflow, 360 Years, Davi et al. 2006.
Australia, New Zealand
Burdekin River, Australia Streamflow, 350 Years, Isdale et al. 1998.
North America
Colorado River and tributaries flow, Text or Microsoft Excel format, 500 Years, Stockton and Jacoby 1976.
Upper Colorado River and tributaries flow, Text or Microsoft Excel format, 500 Years, Woodhouse et al. 2006.
California TreeFlow - Tree Ring Reconstructions of Streamflow for California
Feather River, California flow reconstruction, 1076 Years, Meko 2001.
Sacramento River, California flow reconstruction (JAWRA), 1109 Years, Meko et al. 2001.
Sacramento River, California flow reconstruction (CDWR), 1076 Years, Meko 2001.
Salinas River, California flow reconstruction, 595 Years, Griffin 2005.
TreeFlow Project - Tree Ring Reconstructions of Streamflow for Colorado
Clear Creek Colorado Annual Flow Reconstruction, 300 Years, Woodhouse 2000.
Middle Boulder Creek Colorado Flow Reconstruction, 280 Years, Woodhouse 2001.
Yellowstone River, Montana flow reconstruction, 270 Years, Graumlich et al. 2003.
White River, Arkansas flow reconstruction, 963 Years, Cleaveland 2000.
White River, Arkansas flow reconstruction, 280 Years, Cleaveland and Stahle 1989.
Northern England Peatland Water Table, 4800 Years, Charman 2000.
Northern Britain Stacked Water Table Record, 4400 Years, Charman et al. 2006.
Folgefonna Glacier, Norway, Equilibrium-Line Altitude, Text or Excel, 6,000 Years, Bakke et al. 2005.
Lyngen Peninsula, Norway, Glacier Equilibrium-Line Altitude, Text or Excel, 4,000 Years, Bakke et al. 2005.
North America
Chesapeake Bay Salinity reconstructions, text or Excel format, 550 Years, Cronin et al. 2000.
Michigan Water Table Depth Reconstruction, 3,500 Years, Booth and Jackson 2003.
Gunnison River Basin Snow Water Equivalent Reconstruction, 430 Years, Woodhouse 2003.
Central Mexico Maize Yield Reconstruction, 525 Years, Therrell et al. 2006.
San Francisco Bay Salinity reconstructions, 390 Years, Stahle et al. 2001.
Caribbean Sea Salinity reconstructions, 130,000 Years, Schmidt et al. 2004.
Arctic Oscillation Warm Season SAT and SLP Indices, 325 Years, D'Arrigo et al. 2003.
Increase in the Asian SW Monsoon During the Past Four Centuries, 400 Years, Anderson et al. 2002.
Pacific Decadal Oscillation, 330 Years, Biondi et al. 2001.
Pacific Decadal Oscillation, 420 Years, D'Arrigo and Wilson 2006, Text or Excel
Pacific Decadal Oscillation, 300 Years, D'Arrigo et al. 2001.
Pacific Decadal Oscillation, 1,000 Years, MacDonald and Case 2005.
Pacific Decadal Oscillation, 530 Years, Shen et al. 2006.
Niño 3 Index, 575 Years, Cook unpublished.
Niño 3 Index and Description, 330 Years, Mann et al. 2000.
El Niño Events, 500 Years, Quinn and Neal 1983.
Southern Oscillation Index, 270 Years, Stahle et al. 1998.
Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation Index, 420 Years, Gray et al. 2004.
North Atlantic Oscillation Index, 600 Years, Cook et al. 2002.
North Atlantic Oscillation Index, 280 Years, Cook et al. 1998.
North Atlantic Oscillation Index, 550 Years, Glueck and Stockton 2001.
North Atlantic Oscillation Index, 500 Years, Luterbacher et al. 2002.
North Atlantic Oscillation Index, 275 Years, Timm et al. 2004, Text or Excel format.
North Atlantic Oscillation Index, Southern Oscillation Index, 1000 Years, Jones et al. 2001.
Eastern North Atlantic-European Sea Level Pressure Reconstruction, and Data Visualization, 500 Years, Luterbacher et al. 2002.
Global LGM SST and Description, 18,000 YBP, Mix et al. 1999.
Global Sea Surface Temperature, Holocene/Modern, Bollmann et al. 2002.
Global Gridded LGM Sea Surface Temperature and Salinity, Description, and Data Visualization, 18,000 Years Before Present, Paul and Schäfer-Neth 2003.
Global Gridded LGM Sea Surface Temperature, Description, and Data Visualization, 18,000 YBP, Hostetler and Mix 1999.
Global CLIMAP LGM Sea Surface Temperature, 18,000 Years Before Present, CLIMAP Members 1981.
Southern Ocean Sea Surface Temperature, 200,000 Years, Brathauer et al. 1999.
Southern Ocean Sea Surface Temperature, 290,000 Years, Mashiotta et al. 1999.
Southern Ocean Miocene Sea Surface Temperature, 17 - 11 MYrBP, Shevenell et al. 2004, Text or Excel.
Atlantic/Pacific Bottom Water Temperature, 331,000 years, Martin et al. 2002, Text or Excel.
Tropical Sea Surface Temperature, 250 Years, Wilson et al. 2006.
Pacific
Pacific SST Reconstructions and Description, 400 Years, Evans et al. 2002.
Eastern Tropical Pacific Sea Surface Temperature, 1,830,000 Years, Liu and Herbert 2004.
Eastern Equatorial Pacific Sea Surface Temperature, 5,089,000 Years, Lawrence et al. 2006, Text or Excel.
Galápagos Sea Surface Temperature, 135,000 Years, Lea et al. 2006, Text or Excel.
Southwest Pacific Sea Surface Temperature, 340,000 Years, Pahnke et al. 2003.
Southwest Pacific LGM Sea Surface Temperature and Description, 18,000 YBP, Barrows et al. 2000.
Equatorial Pacific Sea Surface Temperature, 470,000 Years, Lea et al. 2000.
Equatorial Pacific Sea Surface Temperature, 1.5 - 0.5 MMYrBP, McClymont and Rosell-Melé 2006.
Western Tropical Pacific Sea Surface Temperature, 1,750,000 Years, de Garidal-Thoron et al. 2005
Western Tropical Pacific SST and Salinity, text or Excel format, 15,000 Years, Stott et al. 2004.
Western Tropical Pacific SST, text or Excel format, 1,340,000 Years, Medina-Elizalde and Lea 2005.
Coral Sea SST, text or Excel format, 815,000 Years, Lawrence and Herbert 2005.
Sea of Okhotsk alkenone SST, text or Excel format, 120,000 Years, Harada et al. 2006.
Okinawa Trough SST, 18,000 Years, Sun et al. 2005
South China Sea Alkenone Deglacial SST Estimates, 3,000-16,000 Years Before Present, Kienast et al. 2001
South China Sea Coral Sr Data and SST Reconstruction, 100 Years, Sun et al. 2004
California Current Collapse, LGM, 18,000 Years Before Present, Herbert et al. 2001
Strait of Juan de Fuca SST, 155 Years, Strom et al. 2004
Rarotonga Sea Surface Temperature Reconstruction, 270 Years, Linsley et al. 2000.
Southern Peru-Chile Current Sea Surface Temperature Reconstruction, 8,000 Years, Lamy et al. 2002.
Southeast Pacific Sea Surface Temperature Reconstruction, 70,000 years, Kaiser et al. 2005.
Southern Peru-Chile Current Sea Surface Temperature Reconstruction, 50 KyrBP-8 KYr BP, Lamy et al. 2004.
Bay of Plenty, New Zealand, SST, 16,000 Years, Samson et al. 2005, Text or Excel format.
Great Barrier Reef Sea Surface Temperature Reconstruction, 440 Years, Wörheide 1998.
Vanuatu Sea Surface Temperature, 4200 Years Before Present, Correge et al. 2000.
Atlantic
Subtropical Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature, 23,000 Years, deMenocal et al. 2000.
Tropical Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature, 29,000 Years, Rühlemann et al. 1999.
Southeast Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature, 41 - 10 KYrBP, Sachs et al. 2001, Text or Excel.
South-east Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature, 1.5 - 0.5 MMYrBP, McClymont et al. 2005.
Cariaco Basin Sea Surface Temperature, 25,000 Years, Lea et al. 2003.
North Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature, 107,000 Years, Bard 2002.
North Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature and Salinity, 59,000 - 45,000 Years Before Present, Schmidt et al. 2006.
North Atlantic 8200BP Event Summer and Winter SST, Text or Excel, 9,200 - 7,200 YrBP, Ellison et al. 2006.
Northeast North Atlantic Younger Dryas SST/SSS, Text or Excel, ~13 - 10 KYrBP, Ebbesen and Hald 2004.
Subtropical North Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature, 60 - 30 KYrBP, Sachs and Lehman 1999, Text or Excel.
Alboran Sea, Western Mediterranean Sea Surface Temperature, 52 KYrBP, Cacho et al. 1999, Text or Excel.
Western Mediterranean Sea Surface Temperature, 52 KYrBP, Cacho et al. 2001, Text or Excel.
Equatorial Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature and Description, 30,000 Years, Sikes and Keigwin 1994.
Equatorial and North Atlantic SST and Description, 125,000 Years, Waelbroeck et al. 1998.
Chesapeake Bay Spring Temperature, 2,200 Years, Cronin et al. 2003.
Orca Basin, Gulf of Mexico, 44 - 28 KYrBP, Hill et al. 2006, Text or Excel.
Orca Basin, Gulf of Mexico, 10.5 - 7 KYrBP SST, LoDico et al. 2006, Text or Excel.
Northeast Caribbean Sea Surface Temperature, 1,950 Years, Nyberg et al. 2002.
Northeast Caribbean Sea Surface Temperature, 300 Years, Winter et al. 2000.
Western Caribbean Sea Surface Temperature, 475,000 Years, Schmidt et al. 2006.
Arabian Sea Surface Temperature Patterns, 20,000 Years, Dahl and Oppo 2006, Text or Excel format.
Indian Ocean Sea Surface Temperature, 171,000 Years, Bard et al. 1997.
Global Ice Topography, 21,000 Years, Peltier 1994.
Global Ice Coverage, 21,000 Years, Peltier 1994.
Global Relative Sea Level Histories, 21,000 Years, Peltier and Tushingham 1992.
North American Vegetation, 18,000 Years Before Present, Overpeck et al. 1992.
European Vegetation (BIOME6000), 6000 Years Before Present, Prentice et al. 1996.
Tahiti Relative Sea Level History, 13,000 Years, Bard et al. 1996.
Red Sea Sea Level, Text or Excel format, 380,000 Years, Siddall et al. 2003.
Southwest Pacific pH, 300 Years, Pelejero et al. 2005.
"Climate Since AD 1500" Collected reconstructions, 500 Years, Bradley and Jones 1992.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/recons.html

Do you really think that's true?

Waffletush
01-25-2007, 03:24 PM
Labrocca provided evidence against global warming, you ignored it.**If ignoring facts is how liberals debate, then please, add me to your ignore list.


Why is it liberal to believe in global warming?


It is only in the same notion piratemonkey believes it is 'conservative' to make personal attacks when presented with facts.

It seems the easiest way to be attacked personally by a conservative is to present factual evidence that they don't know how to deal with.