PDA

View Full Version : Al Qaeda TV


BoogyMan
01-04-2007, 04:14 AM
SOURCE: Link Here (http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/127nftww.asp?pg=2)

AL QAEDA and its allies now have their own 24-hour television station. Based at a secret studio in Syria, its signal is broadcast to the entire Arab world from a satellite owned by the Egyptian government. This development highlights al Qaeda's increasingly sophisticated propaganda efforts.

Al Qaeda placed great emphasis on communicating its message effectively throughout 2006. Osama bin Laden and deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri issued more tapes in 2006 than in any year since the 9/11 attacks. In the past, al Qaeda tapes were generally released to Al Jazeera, but 2006 saw more Internet releases: the terrorist group's message was thus more quickly disseminated. Al-Zawraa TV, the 24-hour insurgent station, is an extension of this trend.

Al-Zawraa hit the airwaves on November 14. According to Middle East-based media monitor Marwan Soliman and military analyst Bill Roggio, it was set up by the Islamic Army of Iraq, an insurgent group comprised of former Baathists who were loyal to Saddam Hussein and now profess their conversion to a bin Laden-like ideology.

The Islamic Army of Iraq is subordinate to the Mujahideen Shura Council, an umbrella organization of Sunni insurgent groups, including al Qaeda in Iraq. The Al-Zawraa channel is not only viewed as credible by users of established jihadist Internet forums, but as a strategically important information outlet as well. Moreover, Abu Ayyub al-Masri, the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, is delighted by the station. A U.S. military intelligence officer told us that al-Masri "has long-term and big plans for this thing."

Al Qaeda's previous attempts at setting up propaganda outlets have been limited to satellite radio and the Internet. Al-Zawraa, however, appears to be well financed and may find a much broader audience. The channel is broadcast on Nilesat, a powerful satellite administered by the Egyptian government. Through Nilesat, Al-Zawraa's signal blankets the Middle East and North Africa, thus ensuring that the insurgents' message reaches every corner of the Arab world.

Al-Zawraa's content is heavy with insurgent propaganda, including audio messages from Islamic Army of Iraq spokesman Dr. Ali al-Na'ami and footage of the group's operations. The station calls for violence against both Shia Iraqis and the Iraqi government. According to Marwan Soliman, the station's anchors appear in military fatigues to rail against the Iraqi government while news crawls urge viewers to support the Islamic Army of Iraq and "help liberate Iraq from the occupying U.S. and Iranian forces."

In Fallujah's Government Center, military analyst Bill Roggio, who was embedded with the Military Transition Team, watched Al-Zawraa with a team of Army translators. Roggio reported on his blog that the station broadcast songs mourning Iraqi victims of the "U.S. occupiers," and that images featured on Al-Zawraa included "destroyed mosques, dead women and children, women weeping of the death of their family, bloodstained floors, the destruction of U.S. humvees and armored vehicles, and insurgents firing mortars, RPGs, rockets and AK-47s."

Roggio told us that the station's strategic role for insurgent and al Qaeda information operations is clear: "Al-Zawraa is designed to recruit for and prolong the insurgency in Iraq. It openly espouses violence, particularly against the Shia, but also against the Iraqi government and security forces and Coalition troops."

Al-Zawraa's value to the enemy is clear. The visual medium is extremely powerful, particularly in a part of the world with high illiteracy rates. This is not simply a station with an anti-American message: it is enemy propaganda, designed to further destabilize Iraq, empower the insurgency, and win support for the insurgency throughout the greater region.

The U.S. government, however, has thus far been unable to remove Al-Zawraa from the airwaves. A State Department official, asked to comment on efforts to combat the channel, told us, "We are strongly supporting the Iraqi efforts to work with the Egyptians to get this off the air."

Yet this statement doesn't accurately encapsulate the situation. Radio Netherlands' media analyst Andy Sennitt said of Al-Zawraa's broadcasts on Nilesat, "Nilesat is mostly Egyptian owned, so it means they will turn down any customer who is thought to produce material against Egypt's national interest. So apparently the Egyptian authorities are happy with al-Zawraa."

The United States provides Egypt with $2 billion a year in aid, more than it sends to any other country save Israel. This should provide the United States with a great deal of influence over Hosni Mubarak's government; however, it remains to be seen if the Bush administration is willing to exploit this leverage.

Removing Al-Zawraa from the airwaves through alternative means, including jamming its signal, may prove difficult since the physical location of the signal's feed would need to be located and, according to Sennitt, it could be anywhere. "All that's needed is a dish pointing at the satellite, and a transmitter on the correct uplink frequency," he said. "The satellite will carry whatever signal it receives." The easiest route to shutting down Al-Zawraa then is to persuade Egypt to remove the station from Nilesat.

In the five years since 9/11, the United States has failed to develop a message capable of winning over Middle Easterners, or turning them against bin Laden's radical worldview. The lack of a message is one thing, but the inability to combat inflammatory enemy propaganda is another. If the administration cannot act decisively to prevent Al-Zawraa from spreading its poisonous message, America will only be seen as the "weak horse" that bin Laden spoke of shortly after he succeeded in toppling the Twin Towers.

lily
01-04-2007, 04:46 AM
Let the government shut them down. Seems they have no problem doing it and it's not like they have other things to do. (http://www.aina.org/news/20070101153746.htm)

BAGHDAD (Reuters) -- The Iraqi government ordered the closure of a popular
independent television channel on Monday for inciting sectarianism, two days
after the hanging of Saddam Hussein sparked anger among his fellow Sunni
Arabs.

Sharkiya is owned by a London-based Iraqi businessman and says it takes an
independent editorial line, though many viewers see it as leaning toward the
minority Sunni Arab viewpoint.

The channel was still showing programming on Monday, as it broadcasts from
Dubai, and it was not immediately clear what impact the government's order
would have.

Interior Ministry spokesman Brigadier Abdul Karim Khalaf said the government
had ordered the channel to close indefinitely.

"We have warned them many times not to broadcast any false news that would
increase tension in Iraq," Khalaf told Reuters, declining to specify which
particular reports were false.

The order comes two days after Saddam's execution for crimes against
humanity over the killing of Shi'ite Muslims.

The execution, which was rushed through by Iraq's Shi'ite-led government at
the start of a religious holiday, and video of the hanging that showed
Shi'ite officials taunting Saddam before his death, have raised fears of a
backlash.

Asked if the move was prompted by Sharkiya's coverage of the execution,
Khalaf said: "In the last three days if you watch their channel you can see
they are leading people to violence and increasing the sectarian tension."

A well-known news reader on the channel has been wearing black mourning
clothes for the past two days.

An employee of Sharkiya in Baghdad who declined to be identified said the
channel had very few staff left in Baghdad and nearly all programming was
done from Dubai.

CLAMPED DOWN

It is not the first time the government has clamped down on the media. The
Interior Ministry ordered two television stations off the air in November
when Saddam was convicted on the grounds they were inciting violence.

One of those channels was controlled by a prominent Sunni Arab politician
and the other is based in Saddam's Sunni home region. The government already
bans pan-Arab news station Al Jazeera and forced its main rival, Al-Arabiya,
to shut its Baghdad bureau for a month in September.

Al Jazeera's new English-language service has started reporting from
Baghdad.

Iraq's Sunni Arab minority, which enjoyed political power and patronage
under Saddam, has lost power since his overthrow by U.S. troops, with
Shi'ites and ethnic Kurds dominating the U.S.-backed political process.

Sharkiya has been seen by many as one of the more independent channels among
an array of local and national outlets, most of which are overtly controlled
by political parties and factions. It is owned by businessman Saad al-Bazaz,
who also owns a widely read daily newspaper, Azzaman.

Bazaz is a former Baath party member and senior media official who left Iraq
in the 1990s.

As with other media, several journalists and employees of Sharkiya have been
killed, including one of Iraq's best known satirists, Waleed Hassan, who was
shot dead in November.

Thirdparty
01-04-2007, 05:59 AM
Seems like VOA should be ramping up over there and we should be pumping FOX direct into all those countries.

ECW
01-04-2007, 06:50 AM
With as much money as we feed into Egypt, there has to be a bit of arm-twisting to shut the station down. After all, they are still dealing with the Egyptian Brotherhood bunch and they could very easily feed off each other. It's a dangerous precedent they are setting for themselves.

Stoner
01-04-2007, 12:04 PM
Al Qaeda TV


Great news for libs.

BoogyMan
01-04-2007, 12:09 PM
Let the government shut them down. Seems they have no problem doing it and it's not like they have other things to do. (http://www.aina.org/news/20070101153746.htm)

So you want Iraq to go into Syria???? I am hoping you are being sarcastic.

lily
01-04-2007, 10:59 PM
Seems like VOA should be ramping up over there and we should be pumping FOX direct into all those countries.



Lord yes! If there's anything that the Iraqis need it's O'reilly talking about himself and whining about how unfair everyone treats him.:D

BoogyMan -


So you want Iraq to go into Syria????Â*Â*I am hoping you are being sarcastic.

Read the article. It seems the Iraqi government has no trouble shutting down other TV stations, so what's the problem here? In fact, one of them was from Dubai, you know that place where Bush didn't know, but still approved of taking over our ports. If they don't like the one in Syria, they know how to shut down the station.

Cobra
01-04-2007, 11:09 PM
WHat about freedom of press and all that. Why should they be shut down.

Waffletush
01-04-2007, 11:12 PM
Freedom of the press is in the UNITED STATES Constitution, not Syria's, Egypt's, Iraq's etc.

Cobra
01-04-2007, 11:14 PM
Freedom of the press is in the UNITED STATES Constitution, not Syria's, Egypt's, Iraq's etc.

So, aren't we the one who uphold that value and isn't it us who want to shut it down.

If those countries did it would already have been shut down.

BoogyMan
01-05-2007, 02:07 AM
Read the article. It seems the Iraqi government has no trouble shutting down other TV stations, so what's the problem here? In fact, one of them was from Dubai, you know that place where Bush didn't know, but still approved of taking over our ports. If they don't like the one in Syria, they know how to shut down the station.

Yeah Lily, I read it. It said the station was still broadcasting as of Monday BECAUSE it broadcasts from Dubai. This makes me wonder if the station to be closed is a station in Iraq rebroadcasting the signal from Dubai, its not clear from this article and I certainly don't believe that they can shutdown a station in the UAE.

If a channel is being broadcast into Iraq for the purposes of stirring up violence it SHOULD be stopped.

As for the Al Queda TV station, if it just happened to get vaporized some dark night I wouldn't lose one wink of sleep.

Waffletush
01-05-2007, 01:34 PM
Freedom of the press is in the UNITED STATES Constitution, not Syria's, Egypt's, Iraq's etc.

So, aren't we the one who uphold that value and isn't it us who want to shut it down.

If those countries did it would already have been shut down.


Are you advocating we grant US Constitutional rights to everyone in the world?

Cobra
01-05-2007, 03:56 PM
Isn't that what we're supposed to be doing, spreading democracy and freedom throughout the world with this war on terror/Iraq to defeat terror.

Waffletush
01-05-2007, 04:07 PM
So endorsing a television station that promotes terrorism, killing of civilians, beheadings, mass homicide, no women's rights (which as a lady, you should be happy to hear) and the lot is your idea of spreading democracy and freedom throughout the wold?

Nice try with that red herring.

(BTW - Democracy and freedom have little to do with the US Constitution as you are applying it in this discussion. The US is not the only free country that is a democracy, or derivation of democracy, on this planet.)