great job

[operator kos]

Interesting that WTC7 is taboo for rational discussion and automatically gets tagged with the "conspiracy theory" smear. I'm glad this site has such reasonable administrators. :rolleyes:

[BoogyMan]

Smear?? Bwahahahahahahah.

Thanks for the great giggle kos. The rational world has rejected the "we did it ourselves" hogwash.

Read the excellent Popular Mechanics work on your "theory."

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

[operator kos]

ho hum... the popular mechanics article is a yawn a minute. I'm quite familiar with it, and skimmed it again now just for a laugh. I have to roll my eyes every time someone brings up their "proofs" which debunk the 9/11 Truth Movement. Their main tactic is to address ridiculous claims that have been promoted by a few loonies and act as if these represent the movement as a whole. Regarding WTC7 they claim massive damage to the south face of the building for which there is absolutely no corroborating evidence. They conveniently forget to mention the two most damning facts about WTC7, even though both are heavily documented and admitted to: 1) streams of yellow-hot molten metal in the wreckage, and 2) widespread chemical traces consistent with the incendiary thermate.

[BoogyMan]

You have another thread started on this topic already. I am closing this thread and will continue to answer any discussion you post in the other.