PDA

View Full Version : Ads spur eating disorders, premature drinking, docs say


Professor
12-15-2006, 01:49 PM
Source: http://www.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/12/04....ap/index.html

Ads spur eating disorders, premature drinking, docs say

CHICAGO, Illinois (AP) -- Inappropriate advertising contributes to many kids' ills, from obesity to anorexia, to drinking booze and having sex too soon, and Congress should crack down on it, the American Academy of Pediatrics says.

The influential doctors' group issued a new policy statement in response to what it calls a rising tide of advertising aimed at children. The policy appears in December's Pediatrics, published Monday.

"Young people view more than 40,000 ads per year on television alone and increasingly are being exposed to advertising on the Internet, in magazines, and in schools," the policy says.

Advertising examples cited in the statement include TV commercials for sugary breakfast cereals and high-calorie snacks shown during children's programs and ads for Viagra and other erectile dysfunction drugs shown during televised sports games.

The statement also is critical of alcohol ads that feature cartoonish animal characters; fast-food ads on educational TV shown in schools; magazine ads with stick-thin models and toy and other product "tie-ins" between popular movie characters and fast-food restaurants.

These pervasive ads influence kids to demand poor food choices, and to think drinking is cool, sex is a recreational activity and anorexia is fashionable, the academy says.

Interactive digital TV, expected to arrive in a few years, will spread the problem, allowing kids to click on-screen links to Web-based promotions, the new policy says.

Call for crackdown
In response, the academy says doctors should ask Congress and federal agencies to:

• ban junk-food ads during shows geared toward young children;

• limit commercial advertising to no more than 6 minutes per hour, a decrease of 50 percent;

• restrict alcohol ads to showing only the product, not cartoon characters or attractive young women;

• prohibit interactive advertising to children on digital TV.

The academy also says TV ads for erectile dysfunction drugs should be shown only after 10 p.m.

Jeff Becker, president of the Beer Institute, an industry group for breweries, said parents have more influence than advertising on teens' decisions to drink. He also said brewers work to ensure that beer ads appear in adult-oriented media. For much of the sports programming where beer ads appear, most viewers are at least 21, Becker said.

"The American Academy of Pediatrics is wrong to blame alcohol advertising for the actions of underage teens who willingly break the law to drink illegally," he said.

Limiting free speech?
Critics of advertising restrictions say it is a free-speech issue. But the academy notes that several Western countries, including Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Belgium and Greece, limit ads directed at children.

"What kind of society exploits its children and teenagers for money? This is an example of where public health really has to trump capitalism," said Dr. Victor Strasburger, lead author of the policy statement and an adolescent medicine specialist at the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque.

Advertising aimed at children has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years, particularly because of data showing that growing numbers of U.S. children -- now about 17 percent -- are obese.

Spokespeople for Viacom, whose holdings include TV's Nickelodeon network and MTV, declined to offer immediate comment on the report. Viacom has urged its marketing partners to advertise healthier products, and is among media companies that have been involved in discussions with federal agencies and advocacy groups about advertisers marketing to children.

While hard scientific data linking advertising with children's health ills is lacking, Strasburger said there's compelling circumstantial evidence suggesting there's a connection.

Last year, the Institute of Medicine agreed that evidence suggesting that TV ads contribute to childhood obesity is compelling and said industry should market healthy foods to kids.

And in September, the Federal Communications Commission said it will study potential links between TV ads and rising rates of obesity in U.S. children.

The food industry has started to respond.

Two weeks ago, McDonald's joined nine major food and drink companies in vowing to promote more healthy foods and exercise in their child-oriented advertising. And last year Kraft Foods said it would curb ads to young children for snack foods including Oreos and Kool-Aid.

Harvard psychologist Susan Linn, a co-founder of the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood, praised the academy's policy and said it doesn't overstate the effects of advertising on children.

"I'm hopeful that policy-makers will listen," Linn said. Self-regulation in the food industry, without a nudge from government, won't work, she said.

Elrathin
12-15-2006, 02:07 PM
Sorry but yet again, this is a situation that if parents were doing their jobs, this would be a non-issue.

I'm glad these organizations are voluntarily changing the way they advertise, and applaud them for that, but the fault IMO lies mostly with the parents.

AlonzoMourning23
12-15-2006, 08:05 PM
Well, I'm not sure what you want parents to do. You can't make them watch sesame street all day.

But, when I was a kid, the tv ads were loaded with sugar coated cereal and candy. Unless my parents said "no tv for you", there wasn't anything they could do.

Thogh I don't get the erectile dysfunction issue.

Elrathin
12-15-2006, 09:25 PM
Well, I'm not sure what you want parents to do. You can't make them watch sesame street all day.

It's called educating their kids on good eating habits. Mcdonalds and all the really bad fast foods were available when I was a kid too. Guess what, at age 5 I knew they were not supposed to be eaten at every day, only special occations.


But, when I was a kid, the tv ads were loaded with sugar coated cereal and candy. Unless my parents said "no tv for you", there wasn't anything they could do.

Again it's called education of nutrition. And yes, my parents did exactly that.

Professor
12-15-2006, 10:34 PM
This is a hard one for me because I have seen first hand the devastation that an eating disorder can bring. And I wouldn't want anyone to experience it.

That said; I still don't see a connection. What about all the kids who also see the ads and live addiction free lives? Or the ones that see the ads and become obese for other reasons? There is no statistic in the article; we are simply told that something has happened.

I do think corporations should still be allowed to advertise. There is technology for parents to choose what they want their kids to see, limit TV time, ect.

I also think no amount of technology can replace good parenting. It can't guarantee that someone will turn out okay, but it will help.

micfranklin
12-20-2006, 06:36 PM
Congress, nor anyone else, has no place is "cracking down" on issues like this. It's the parents who should be talking to their kids about this and encouraging them not to have sex too soon, ads have nothing to do with this.

Buck Laser
12-20-2006, 07:00 PM
Congress, nor anyone else, has no place is "cracking down" on issues like this. It's the parents who should be talking to their kids about this and encouraging them not to have sex too soon, ads have nothing to do with this.


So does that mean that you believe advertisers should be able to say whatever they want to, whenever they want to? I could show you some tobacco ads where "doctors" endorse nicotine as being good for you. Much as I'd like to believe that everyone shows the same self restraint I do, but some people will do anything to sell their product.[/b]

Elrathin
12-20-2006, 11:48 PM
So does that mean that you believe advertisers should be able to say whatever they want to, whenever they want to? I could show you some tobacco ads where "doctors" endorse nicotine as being good for you.


That's called false advertisement and yes, there are already laws for that. So now what?