2008 Presidential Ticket Quiz - What Ticket are You?

[EireDuck]

http://bluepyramid.org/2008

There are a whopping 768 possibilities, including Reps, Dems, & Independents!

[firefox]

It said I was Ventura/Nader. A bit inaccurate! ;)

[EireDuck]

I got Camejo-Buchanan.

What a matchup!

[Cameron Mineral]

this poll paired me with someone I detest: the moralizing second-rate, Joe Lieberman. What a silly questionaire.

[firefox]

Yeah it sucks. Ever tried The World's Smallest Political Quiz (http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz)? About 20% of respondents score libertarian. We are small but mighty!

[NortheastCynic]

Giuliani/Gingrich...Warm, but not really what I'm looking for.Â*Â*I'm a Giuliani fan, but Gingrich is just your typical socially conservative, small but powerful government kind of guy. I come out as: Personal: 100%
Economic 80%
Libertarian, in the WSPQ.

-NC

[Cameron Mineral]

World's smallest political quizz tags me as a left liberal. I may not be conservative on the social issues (far from all republicans are), but I have nothing to do with with that festering cauldron of social, economic and intellectual envy: the left!!!!

[Sherri]

Edwards/Obama; a good combination of the South and the North, and both men are very, very bright. What also aids them are the "plum" committees they serve, and have served on.

[Oedipus Rex]

Edwards/Obama; a good combination of the South and the North, and both men are very, very bright. What also aids them are the "plum" committees they serve, and have served on.




I just don't see it. Edwards didn't help Kerry's ticket one bit.

[Sherri]

Edwards/Obama; a good combination of the South and the North, and both men are very, very bright.Â*Â*What also aids them are the "plum" committees they serve, and have served on.




I just don't see it. Edwards didn't help Kerry's ticket one bit.

The Veep is never the "deciding factor" when you have a presidential election.Â*Â*No one votes for the Veep, they vote for the #1 on the ticket.Â*Â*I find it humourous that Conservatives are making so much of a big deal of Senator Clinton and Senator Obama, but they are awfully silent about about mentioning John Edwards on the top of the ticket.

[Sherri]

If the GOPers wanted to give the Dems "a run for their money" in the 2008 election, this is someone they should consider. I know Senator Hagel thru his affiliation with "No Greater Love", and he "Talks the Talk" and "Walks the Walk".

http://hagel.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Biography.Home

[Oedipus Rex]

Edwards/Obama; a good combination of the South and the North, and both men are very, very bright. What also aids them are the "plum" committees they serve, and have served on.




I just don't see it. Edwards didn't help Kerry's ticket one bit.

The Veep is never the "deciding factor" when you have a presidential election. No one votes for the Veep, they vote for the #1 on the ticket. I find it humourous that Conservatives are making so much of a big deal of Senator Clinton and Senator Obama, but they are awfully silent about about mentioning John Edwards on the top of the ticket.


That's because I don't see why the Left would want to throw away their best chance at taking back the Office of the President on some lame candidates such as Edwards, Clinton and Obama. Its a real head scatcher. I'm puzzled.

[Oedipus Rex]

If the GOPers wanted to give the Dems "a run for their money" in the 2008 election, this is someone they should consider. I know Senator Hagel thru his affiliation with "No Greater Love", and he "Talks the Talk" and "Walks the Walk".

http://hagel.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Biography.Home



The Pubs are not putting forth anyone I can vote for. But the Dems are putting forth many that I can vote against. Just like in 2000 and 2004. This is not an election the Pubs can win as much as its an election the Dems can lose. I'm still puzzled.

[Sherri]

If the GOPers wanted to give the Dems "a run for their money" in the 2008 election, this is someone they should consider.Â*Â*I know Senator Hagel thru his affiliation with "No Greater Love", and he "Talks the Talk" and "Walks the Walk".

http://hagel.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Biography.Home



The Pubs are not putting forth anyone I can vote for. But the Dems are putting forth many that I can vote against. Just like in 2000 and 2004. This is not an election the Pubs can win as much as its an election the Dems can lose. I'm still puzzled.

It's still early in the game. I do foresee Senator Hagel jumping into the fray, and if he were to serve as my next president, I would have no qualms about him becoming the the next C-i-C; and I would sleep better, than I do now. He knows better than to fudge intel, and take young people into war. He's "been there, and done that".;)

[Nemo]

McCain-Feingold. A "split ticket" might, ironically, have the effect of unifying the country.