PDA

View Full Version : Boy can't join girls gym class


askates
12-01-2006, 01:28 PM
Court: Boy can't join girls' gym team

By RYAN J. FOLEY, Associated Press Writer Thu Nov 30, 11:55 AM ET

MADISON, Wis. - A state appeals court on Thursday rejected a lawsuit by a boy who wanted to compete on his high school's girls' gymnastics team.

The District 4 Court of Appeals upheld a judge's dismissal of Keith Michael Bukowski's lawsuit against the Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association, which has a rule prohibiting boys from competing in girls' sports.

Bukowski filed the lawsuit as a junior at Stevens Point Area High School in 2004. He argued the WIAA rule preventing him from trying out for and competing on the girl's gymnastics team discriminated against him because his school did not have a boys' team.

Bukowski argued that the rule violated the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution as well as a federal law known as Title IX, which was meant to prohibit sex discrimination in sports.

In a 3-0 ruling, the court said Bukowski failed to show that WIAA, a nonprofit organization of public and private high schools that sets rules for sports competition, could be sued under either argument.

Bukowski didn't prove WIAA was an arm of the state that could be sued for the constitutional violation or that it received federal funding as required in a Title IX claim, the court said. The ruling backed a Portage County judge who came to a similar conclusion.

Courts have previously ruled that letting boys compete on girls' teams jeopardizes opportunities for girls. But Bukowski, who had competed in gymnastics at a local YMCA, argued the case was similar to recent examples of girls who were allowed to compete on boys' teams in football and wrestling.

Hundreds of students at his high school signed a petition backing his efforts in 2004 but courts rejected his attempts for a faster ruling that would have allowed him to compete.

Bukowski graduated earlier this year.

Principal Mike Devine said the school does not have a boys' team because of lack of interest and it was following the WIAA rule in refusing to allow Bukowski on the girls' team. He said the school recently hired Bukowski as an assistant coach for the girls' gymnastics team.

"We're glad to have Keith working with our kids right now. He does have some talent in gymnastics," he said. "Even though he couldn't compete with us, he's teaching our kids. That's a somewhat positive outcome for this."

Bukowski's lawyer, Jared Redfield, did not immediately return a phone message. There was no phone listing for Bukowski or his mother, Janine Olszewski, in the Stevens Point area.


More:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061130/ap_on_sp_ot/gym_gymnastics_gender


This is kind of a double standard, but tricky because of debated physical strength difference between boys and girls,I think that if they allowed those girls to play football, they don't really have a choice, but i guess they do, what does everyone else think?

firefox
12-03-2006, 05:24 AM
I think it is something that should be left to the organization, if it is indeed private. It's not a slam-dunk though, since some of the member schools are government run, but still.

Professor
12-03-2006, 01:41 PM
In a 3-0 ruling, the court said Bukowski failed to show that WIAA, a nonprofit organization of public and private high schools that sets rules for sports competition, could be sued under either argument.


Private schools are a lot harder to sue than public, as they can have their own rules since they have their own funds.



Courts have previously ruled that letting boys compete on girls' teams jeopardizes opportunities for girls.


I could see this for the strength difference. I could also see a problem in the sex difference, he's a boy they are girls. Parents and coaches might worry about rape, sex and other big bad uglies.



He said the school recently hired Bukowski as an assistant coach for the girls' gymnastics team.

"We're glad to have Keith working with our kids right now. He does have some talent in gymnastics," he said. "Even though he couldn't compete with us, he's teaching our kids. That's a somewhat positive outcome for this."


At least this is a somewhat good outcome for it. I do the school tried to do the best thing within the framework of the rules.

micfranklin
12-20-2006, 03:14 AM
As usual, this was something not worth making a lawsuit over. But what about Title 9?[/font]

J316
02-17-2007, 04:22 PM
HELLO?? A GIRL GYM CLASS?? WHAT MAKES SCINCE??!!

Red Dragon
02-17-2007, 04:32 PM
Well seeing as there was no boys gymnastics team, he should be able to join the team. Though I do see why people may have a problem with it because of rape and sex like the Professor said. But I really don't see any other problem, then that. If he is a bit stronger then the other people on the team, just means he's a good athlete. And besides last time I checked gymnastics it's based on pure strength but is also a combination of speed, strength, coordination, and balance.

underdawg
02-17-2007, 06:21 PM
Well since they don't have a boy's gymnastic team, perhaps they should reclassify the gymnastic team as co-ed.

micfranklin
03-05-2007, 09:10 PM
Courts have previously ruled that letting boys compete on girls' teams jeopardizes opportunities for girls.

Oh cry me a river and build me a bridge. Any other place they let boys and girls play on the same team, everything turns out fine and no one goes home crying.