* Double Hypocrisy, Gay GOP & Gay Evangelical Outing: Planned By Gay LiberalsÂ*Â**

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But it is a known fact now, that the *Democratic Homosexual Liberals* do eat their own for political gain.
2. Foley was outed, right before the election this time in the 2006 Mid-Term Elections.
3. Then of-course an Evangelical Minister: Ted Haggard, from a prominent Colorado Church was brought to light for his Homosexual acts of indecency with another man, days before the election.
4. He is a homosexual, while being against homosexual's.
5. Foley was as much, being one and being against homosexual's.
6. This is where the *Double Hypocrisy*, comes in, where we are seeing a concerted attacked by other homosexual's in the *Democratic Liberal Party* exposing those same homosexual's as themselves, as being very bad, and immoral, while they themselves do the same very thing, with acts of immoral activities of homosexuality.
7. Everyday, and in many ways we are seeing more homosexual's decrying their own lives, to further their own sinful immoral lives.
8. SirEltonofEngland being the latest to come forward, to attack all Religion, over his own homosexuality.
9. Which only shows the moral depravity of being homosexual in the first place, by trying to rid the world of the good Gawd has implanted into it, in order to cover their sinful activities, when they lay down with the same sex, in homosexual acts.
10. This * Double Hypocrisy * What happened to those *Two Conservatives * and what SirEltonofEngland, brought forth do show the evil nature of some men, who would prefer that all men were just like them, immoral, and without the knowledge of Gawd, in order to further their own sinful homo sexualities.
11. Welcome to Sodom and Gomorrah Reality again, seems we are at that door again. *Send out those guest's so we can have our way with them or we break your door down and force them*

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[sbannon]

Chess, I'm not sure the outings of either Foley or Haggart were a liberal against conservative thing. Foley wasn't even exposed for being gay, he was exposed for chasing children around Washington D. C.--do you think his actions should have been kept secret?

I agree there's a hypocrisy, it's with homosexuals who want to play in the private gay yard while publicly acting to ban the same yard and condemn others who play there.

It's not hypocritical to expose these people, it's a public service. Foley's constituents and all of America for that matter entrusted him with the care of children, all the while he was dipping into their cookie jars.

The same with Haggart, many people trusted him to be their moral compass and all the while he was doing the same things he told those people would land them in his invented Hell.

[ECW]

GOP gays: in the closet and bashing their own.
Democratic gays: out of the closet and supporting their own.

Who is the hypocrite again?

[lily]

Chess, you have made some outlandish excuses for loosing this election, but this one takes the cake!

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But if the Gay Liberals will cannibalize other Gays, when they are in the Republican Party, for Political advantage, then its double hypocrisy as I said.
2. It strikes at the base of Homosexuality.
3. And reveals that they are one of the lowest life forms, to turn on their own, for Political gains in one Party.
4. It worked, so expect to see more of it.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[ECW]

You mean there are more homosexual predators hidden away in the GOP waiting to prey upon our youth? I thought so.

[Buck Laser]

The more I think about it, the more fun I think CWN is. I'm about two-thirds convinced that he's a very sophisticated liberal troll who's learned how to mask parody with just enough "sincerity" that he dupes the unwary. I have the websites of a few similar trolls bookmarked--including one guy who claims to hold a Ph.D from the University of Chicago.

The trouble is that I know a few people who think like CWN, so I can't pigeonhole him with certainty.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But Buck, that was well done.
2. I don't even feel like that was an attack, way to go!
3. Fact is its out right freakadelic that Homosexuals will attack each other outside of each others Party, but I'm for it how ever it goes.
4. To scare them back into some kind of closet.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[lily]

Chess, I think what Buck was trying to say is that you're an enigma!

[dgridley]

People like CWN scare me more than amuse me, because, like you, I know people who "do" think like him..many of my neighbors for one. And alot of this stuff is coming out of the churches.. another scary thought.

I don't see him as thought-provoking as much as thread-provoking..

Sorry 'bout that...





The trouble is that I know a few people who think like CWN, so I can't pigeonhole him with certainty.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But this isn't the * What Do You Think Of CWN * thread, now is it?
2. This topic reads * How Gays are evil intent on themselves if it involves cross Party lines.
3. Showing just how hypocritical they are, in every way.
4. I am the thought provoker, and,Â*Â**Reality Provoker *, never try to diminish this, the facts are what they are.
5. Most people can not even think on the deep level that , I, The Highly Trained, Conservative Republican Political/Biblical Adviser, can, and do on a daily bases.
6. I pull ideas and thoughts, with ease, together like no other, of those who are here now, or ever will be on any Debate site.
7. I am one of a kind, never doubt me or try to diminish me.
8. I have knowledge on, * Loan From Gawd *.
9. I'm a hard hitter, who can take it as well as give it, I'm like a * Stainless Steel Sh!t House,Â*Â** Built to last with, authority, and and always looks good. *
10. Homosexuals, are basically opportunists, with an agenda to diminish the Gawdly Peoples, want to have sexual relations on the alters of Gawd, and force everyone to peer in, this sickness of the soul of Homosexuals has to be forced backwards, other wise we Gawdly Folks will see more of their forced homosexual agenda.
11. Making Us accept their sinful lives as normal and upstanding and as moral.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[dgridley]

They have medication for this kind of talk, LordJamesofTexas..

Sorry 'bout that..

1. but you can't be serious.
2. look up megalomania.
3. see 1 above.



Sorry bout that,

1. But this isn't the * What Do You Think Of CWN * thread, now is it?
2. This topic reads * How Gays are evil intent on themselves if it involves cross Party lines.
3. Showing just how hypocritical they are, in every way.
4. I am the thought provoker, and,Â*Â**Reality Provoker *, never try to diminish this, the facts are what they are.
5. Most people can not even think on the deep level that , I, The Highly Trained, Conservative Republican Political/Biblical Adviser, can, and do on a daily bases.
6. I pull ideas and thoughts, with ease, together like no other, of those who are here now, or ever will be on any Debate site.
7. I am one of a kind, never doubt me or try to diminish me.
8. I have knowledge on, * Loan From Gawd *.
9. I'm a hard hitter, who can take it as well as give it, I'm like a * Stainless Steel Sh!t House,Â*Â** Built to last with, authority, and and always looks good. *
10. Homosexuals, are basically opportunists, with an agenda to diminish the Gawdly Peoples, want to have sexual relations on the alters of Gawd, and force everyone to peer in, this sickness of the soul of Homosexuals has to be forced backwards, other wise we Gawdly Folks will see more of their forced homosexual agenda.
11. Making Us accept their sinful lives as normal and upstanding and as moral.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[lily]

Sorry bout that,

1. But this isn't the * What Do You Think Of CWN * thread, now is it?
2. This topic reads * How Gays are evil intent on themselves if it involves cross Party lines.
3. Showing just how hypocritical they are, in every way.
4. I am the thought provoker, and,Â*Â**Reality Provoker *, never try to diminish this, the facts are what they are.
5. Most people can not even think on the deep level that , I, The Highly Trained, Conservative Republican Political/Biblical Adviser, can, and do on a daily bases.
6. I pull ideas and thoughts, with ease, together like no other, of those who are here now, or ever will be on any Debate site.
7. I am one of a kind, never doubt me or try to diminish me.
8. I have knowledge on, * Loan From Gawd *.
9. I'm a hard hitter, who can take it as well as give it, I'm like a * Stainless Steel Sh!t House,Â*Â** Built to last with, authority, and and always looks good. *
10. Homosexuals, are basically opportunists, with an agenda to diminish the Gawdly Peoples, want to have sexual relations on the alters of Gawd, and force everyone to peer in, this sickness of the soul of Homosexuals has to be forced backwards, other wise we Gawdly Folks will see more of their forced homosexual agenda.
11. Making Us accept their sinful lives as normal and upstanding and as moral.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Excuse me Chess......but when you make post like this, it does turn it into a "* What Do You Think Of CWN * thread, ", as we are disussing your opinions and not something that you are backing up.

[Elrathin]

4. I am the thought provoker, and,Â*Â**Reality Provoker *, never try to diminish this, the facts are what they are.
5. Most people can not even think on the deep level that , I, The Highly Trained, Conservative Republican Political/Biblical Adviser, can, and do on a daily bases.
6. I pull ideas and thoughts, with ease, together like no other, of those who are here now, or ever will be on any Debate site.
7. I am one of a kind, never doubt me or try to diminish me.
8. I have knowledge on, * Loan From Gawd *.
9. I'm a hard hitter, who can take it as well as give it, I'm like a * Stainless Steel Sh!t House,Â*Â** Built to last with, authority, and and always looks good. *


So out of your list, 6 things are nothing but your ego and have nothing to do with this thread whatsoever.

The rest is just rhetoric without any evidence to back it up.

Yep, typical CWN post.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But lily, If I wanted a, *What Do You Think Of CWN * I would make one.
2. This is what I do, provoke debate, now debate!
3. Just kidding. hehehehe,.......
4. Look, its fun to be able to start a hot fired up debate, knock-em sock-em!
5. Don't go lily liver on me girl!!!!!!!
6. Anyway, the Homosexuals will back stab other lesser homosexuals, its a fact now, I am just trying to drill this into your head now, even thou it seems of no effect.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Buck Laser]

Chesswars said " Anyway, the Homosexuals will back stab other lesser homosexuals, its a fact now, I am just trying to drill this into your head now, even thou it seems of no effect."

And this is different from typical political behavior exactly how?Â*Â*That's the part I'm not getting.Â*Â*I'm sure your highly-trained beartrap mind can wrap it up nicely with an "I told you so" and a reference to "Gawd." :shy:

[underdawg]

There seems to be two types of gays that belong to the Republican party. There are those who are openly gay and have joined because they thought that the Republican party stood for fiscal responsiblity. Some would call themselves the Log Cabin Republicans. They other type pretend to be straight, perhaps have wives and children. They lie and deceive to keep their secret hidden. I don't totally blame them, but they are the product of an intolerant society. Most of these gay men have sex outside their marriage with other men. What they do with their lives is their business, but when they use their power and influence to make legislation that would harm other gays, then at that point, I see nothing wrong in outing these people and shining a light upon the hypocrisy of their actions.

[dgridley]

I agree, but "any" hypocrisy should be exposed for what it is, not just gay issues.

And, of course, there are gays in both parties and, in fact, in all walks of life.



but when they use their power and influence to make legislation that would harm other gays, then at that point, I see nothing wrong in outing these people and shining a light upon the hypocrisy of their actions.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But you folks must be A-Moral.
2. You just don't get it.
3. And perhaps even when I spell it out, you still won't get it.
4. This is kinda like why some never hear the * Voice * of Gawd.
5. The simple fact that these Homosexuals use their own sinful nature as a weapon on others is hideous.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Elrathin]

5. The simple fact that these Homosexuals use their own sinful nature as a weapon on others is hideous.


No, what is hideous is those heterosexuals who feel the need to use their self-procalimed self-righteousness against homosexuals.

[Elrathin]

1. But you folks must be A-Moral.


On some things yes, we are. Morality is for the self-righteous and fools who think they are some how better because they believe in an old book that was written in regards to events that happened over 2000 years ago, and then continually fail to try and apply it to today's time just to make them feel better.

Morality and immorality are subjective to the person and the religion. Morality changes throughout the years and so does immorality.

[dgridley]

Like I've said before.. they have medication for those that hear Voices.

Maybe if you'd come down to our level and stop treading the clouds of Delusion, the rest of us Earthlings would be willing to listen. As it is, without factual proof, your so-called "debates" are baseless and pretty much just "creep me out".

At first, I found myself intrigued by your presentations, now I just find them mostly hollow and predictably "more of the same".


Sorry bout that,

4. This is kinda like why some never hear the * Voice * of Gawd.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But a fool says there's no Gawd.
2. If the shoe fits.
3. I won't get into the details of when I have heard Gawd's voice, but Gawd does speak to some of us at times.
4. I have been one of the blessed ones, to hear his voice, and have profited greatly from them.
5. Its *Your Bad* that you never heard his voice.
6. I do feel for you.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Professor]

Like I've said before.. they have medication for those that hear Voices.

Maybe if you'd come down to our level and stop treading the clouds of Delusion, the rest of us Earthlings would be willing to listen. As it is, without factual proof, your so-called "debates" are baseless and pretty much just "creep me out".


CWN has the right to make claims, despite what we might think of them. Inferring that he hears voices is a rather low blow and very inappropriate.

chesswarsnow I've read your arguments. Now I'd like to see sources, links, and facts, things that back up your opinion.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But to hear Gawd, at some time or another isn't such a big deal, at least to a real believer.
2. It can sound strange to those outsiders.
3. Making a claim to have heard isn't out of line.
4. Just take it with a grain of salt.
5. No one can prove that he heard from Gawd, as if he was tape recording him.
6. But I can tell you if you ever hear from Gawd, you will hear some details that only Gawd could know, you will be getting some instructions, very detailed, with specific details that will take place, during whatever he has instructed you for.
7. You may not sense the details at the time, just happened, but will ponder them afterwards, and then be able to recognize what Gawd said would happen did happen.
8. And more than likely you respond correctly to whatever you were being asked to do or perform.
9. Then there's the *Gawd Dream*.
10. Those seem to take place at very odd times in your life.
11. And can resemble a Motion Picture, taking place at the time when they occur.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Elrathin]

Those that believe in hearing god need to seek professional help. Really. You do. If the shoe fits and all.

[MAP2010.wireless]

I am happy that Foley was kick out, you should be happy he is gone as well. Foley is a lier and its good we kick him out.

I don't look at Foley as a Republican, he lied and now he is gone.
If there is other Republicans who share his point of view they should be kick out as well.

We don't need people like Foley in our party...


Mark Pendergraft

[dgridley]

Anyone who continually says he has heard the Voice of Gawd, I begin to worry about.. I don't consider it a low blow or inappropriate.. as far as I'm concerned, he walked into it.

My point was that instead of continually inferring his info comes from "on High", back it up a bit and I might start to pay attention. Otherwise, I view it with healthy suspicion.

Believe me, I've heard from God, not Gawd, and "my" God is compassionate and caring for all his Creation, including gays. 'Nuff said!



Like I've said before.. they have medication for those that hear Voices.

Maybe if you'd come down to our level and stop treading the clouds of Delusion, the rest of us Earthlings would be willing to listen. As it is, without factual proof, your so-called "debates" are baseless and pretty much just "creep me out".


CWN has the right to make claims, despite what we might think of them.Â*Â*Inferring that he hears voices is a rather low blow and very inappropriate.

[bobbylien]

Sorry bout that,

1. But to hear Gawd, at some time or another isn't such a big deal, at least to a real believer.
2. It can sound strange to those outsiders.
3. Making a claim to have heard isn't out of line.
4. Just take it with a grain of salt.
5. No one can prove that he heard from Gawd, as if he was tape recording him.
6. But I can tell you if you ever hear from Gawd, you will hear some details that only Gawd could know, you will be getting some instructions, very detailed, with specific details that will take place, during whatever he has instructed you for.
7. You may not sense the details at the time, just happened, but will ponder them afterwards, and then be able to recognize what Gawd said would happen did happen.
8. And more than likely you respond correctly to whatever you were being asked to do or perform.
9. Then there's the *Gawd Dream*.
10. Those seem to take place at very odd times in your life.
11. And can resemble a Motion Picture, taking place at the time when they occur.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I am now entirely convinced that you are absolutely insane CWN. ;)
But then again, we will all start to lose our sanity once we get old.
What have you done to help others that makes you better in gods eyes than the rest of us? What makes you a better believer than the rest of us?

[ECW]

What have you done to help others that makes you better in gods eyes than the rest of us? What makes you a better believer than the rest of us?


Don't forget he is the... Highly Trained, Conservative Republican Political/Biblical Adviser, so all knowledge goes thru him.

Yeah.

Right.

[ECW]

chesswarsnow I've read your arguments.Â*Â*Now I'd like to see sources, links, and facts, things that back up your opinion.


Don't hold your breath, sister. He's got opinions. He doesn't have the facts.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I can't help you sceptics.
2. You are on your own buds.
3. And I won't explain in details how* and, what* my little conversation with Gawd went.
4. You can shrivel back into your comfort zone, and make claims about who's insane, and who isn't.
5. But the facts are what they are.
6. I have a place being made ready on high, which is a wonderful thing.
7. While the larger part here, know not what or where and kind of place that is all ready made ready.
8 I am blessed enough to already have an assurance, *A Blessed Assurance*.
9. Promised by Gawd, himself.
10. And seeing we have spoken, I feel no animosity about how the ending of this life here on Earth whenever that may come.
11. But being on the Earth for another 40 years is better for you, and those whom I'm a blessing, so I expect to be around a very long time.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[wonder cow]

Double Hypocrisy

Uhmm. Excuse me, but wouldn’t "double" Hypocrisy result in consistency?

[ECW]

1. But I can't help you sceptics.


I'm not a skeptic of God.

I'm just a skeptic of you.

[wonder cow]

I'm not a skeptic of God.

I'm just a skeptic of you.

Yes, but my understanding from the last conversation I had with God, is that He is skeptical of chesswarsnow.

I asked Him about any impending ‘somtin’, but He changed the subject to His Son. He’s always bragging about His Son. Can't say that I blame Him.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. This thread has gotten off track here.
2. Seems like you buds keep shifting my threads to *all about me * topics.
3. Sure I am the most outspoken truth detector we got here on DF.
4. And have knowledge on loan from Gawd.
5. But lets try to keep on topic shall we?
6. The homosexuals, are using their own Homosexuals as fuel for the fires of politics.
7. They throw their own into the flames of disgrace, making themselves *Double Hypocrites*.
8. If it wasn't true, I wouldn't had brought this up.
9. But seeing I am always way ahead of the curve, on just about everything, it may take a couple of years for you people to see this.
10. The drive by media's hasn't told you this yet.
11. When they do then you will be able to see it, and bring links to support your new found reasoning.
12. And you will disregard my thread as lack of real world support, hehehehehe,...

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Elrathin]

1. This thread has gotten off track here.
2. Seems like you buds keep shifting my threads to *all about me * topics.


Each time you put in your "highly trained" crap, you bring it off topic. Leave that out and stick to the topic yourself.


3. Sure I am the most outspoken truth detector we got here on DF.
4. And have knowledge on loan from Gawd.


Your offtopic, leave your ego at the door. You are the one going offtopic with this ego crap and making the thread about you for people to comment on.



5. But lets try to keep on topic shall we?

I don't know, can YOU stay on topic without posting offtopic?


6. The homosexuals, are using their own Homosexuals as fuel for the fires of politics.

No, they aren't. They are acting as politicians.


7. They throw their own into the flames of disgrace, making themselves *Double Hypocrites*.

Chess, just because someone they are homosexuals that doesn't mean it transcends politics or beliefs. So if two black politiicians (republican and democrat) are attacking each other are you going to call them hypocrits too?


8. If it wasn't true, I wouldn't had brought this up.

Sure you would. You bring up a lot of stuff that isn't true. You slander other people every day.


9. But seeing I am always way ahead of the curve, on just about everything, it may take a couple of years for you people to see this.
10. The drive by media's hasn't told you this yet.
11. When they do then you will be able to see it, and bring links to support your new found reasoning.
12. And you will disregard my thread as lack of real world support, hehehehehe,...

More offtopic ego crap. I guess you couldn't stay on topic afterall eh Chess?

[ECW]

6. The homosexuals, are using their own Homosexuals as fuel for the fires of politics.


It's more like the straights are using homosexuals for THEIR own politics. I'm surprised you can't see that. But then again, I'm not surprised. You couldn't see that Democrats were going to take over Congress so why should this be any different?

[askates]

if chess really faithfully believed in what he says then he would not be trying to gain everyones approval on here, every post is a cry for approval or agreement-no one agrees with a bigot but bigots- fear is their motivation

[CheesyMuslim]

if chess really faithfully believed in what he says then he would not be trying to gain everyones approval on here, every post is a cry for approval or agreement-no one agrees with a bigot but bigots- fear is their motivation



Sorry bout that,

1. But anyone with half a brain would notice I couldn't care less about anyone's approval.
2. That is freakin hilarious!
3. My very style reveals that.
4. You have to be lost in the clouds askates.
5. That is just about the stupidest thing I have ever heard you say.
6. But I am sure you can top it.
7. I am not a bigot, I just tell it like it is, you can't handle the truth.
8. I can't help that, you have to learn to understand others, or live in the clouds of some far flung dream.
9. That's why I'm here, to bring those who are up in the clouds, back to earth.
10. When homosexuals are discovered doing something wrong, just ask yourself , *why is it all headline news*?
11. And why does it seem to be showing the Republican Party as being in a bad light, and not the Democrats?
12. That's the *Double Hypocracy* I have been pointing out in this thread.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[askates]

i think its kinda funny that responses 1-6 are you defending your disinterest in approval
And by the way hollywood socialite cat-womans new plastic surgery was headline news last night

[lily]

10. When homosexuals are discovered doing something wrong, just ask yourself , *why is it all headline news*?

It's only high ranking news when some one in power abuses their power for they hypocracy that you are claiming chess.

Foley was a pedohile, who gave homosexuals a bad name. Haggard spoke loud and clear against homosexuality AND gave council to the Whitehouse. If those two aren't hypocrites, I don't know who is.

11. And why does it seem to be showing the Republican Party as being in a bad light, and not the Democrats?

Because it was Republicans that were doing it! You can try and blame this on the Democrats all you want.........but even Republicans found this repugnant.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. Buts whats really funny I got some kinda freak trying to get in my head.
2. If you ever got into my head, you wouldn't like it, or be able to stand it.
3. You would expire from the shear weigh of knowledge I have.
4. Being, The Highly Trained Conservative Republican Political/Biblical Adviser, and all, it would spoil your style.
4. a) Not to mention your like a knat to me, I hardly even bother to swoosh you away.
5. I am sure you can understand that.
6. You keep posting more you do tend to reveal that your a rather shallow poster.
7. Who really doesn't appreciate a Master like myself.
8. Perhaps you can't handle what I'm saying about homosexuals.
9. I am correct you know.
10. Don't take it personally, I am not directing any of what I am saying, its generalizations.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Elrathin]

1. Buts whats really funny I got some kinda freak trying to get in my head.


4. a) Not to mention your like a knat to me, I hardly even bother to swoosh you away.


6. You keep posting more you do tend to reveal that your a rather shallow poster.


10. Don't take it personally, I am not directing any of what I am saying, its generalizations.

Sorry Chess, but BS, you were making personal attacks, not generalizations.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But part of what I said was a proper slap down, and could be considered a personal attack.
2. But when I hear anti Gawd freaks telling me how I'm insane, then you should expect a slap down.
3. You must be insane to think otherwise.
4. Don't be a cry baby.
5. If you want to attack me, that's cool, I can deal with it like a rock in a hurricane.
6. But just remember that I have the tools to launch pre-emptive attacks as well.
7. And I got no problem launching them.
8. So you can sit back and stop personal attacks, which doesn't matter to me, and or expect more attacks by me.
9. Its really very simple.
10. You have to learn to take a punch bud.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[dgridley]

1. Buts whats really funny I got some kinda freak trying to get in my head.
2. If you ever got into my head, you wouldn't like it, or be able to stand it.

Two statements from CWN I find downright unsettling...

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But how unsettling is it?
2. And why are you unsettled?
3. Do you understand my meaning?
4. Is it clear for you?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[lily]

Sorry bout that,

1. Buts whats really funny I got some kinda freak trying to get in my head.
2. If you ever got into my head, you wouldn't like it, or be able to stand it.
3. You would expire from the shear weigh of knowledge I have.
4. Being, The Highly Trained Conservative Republican Political/Biblical Adviser, and all, it would spoil your style.
4. a) Not to mention your like a knat to me, I hardly even bother to swoosh you away.
5. I am sure you can understand that.
6. You keep posting more you do tend to reveal that your a rather shallow poster.
7. Who really doesn't appreciate a Master like myself.
8. Perhaps you can't handle what I'm saying about homosexuals.
9. I am correct you know.
10. Don't take it personally, I am not directing any of what I am saying, its generalizations.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Hey.......no problem Chess. I really will miss discussing with you, but I know that you're a busy man and according to you, my posts are shallow and I am like a knat. I won't waste "The Master's" or my time anymore.

[dgridley]

What I find unsettling is that if you are even remotely serious about half of your posts, you're not someone I would care to know very well or at all.

And to be honest, I hope I don't understand you.. that would be, in my estimation, a terrible thing if you're serious about your statements.

You might be just a Troll.. and if that's the case, be aware that what you say can open wounds that may never heal for some.




Sorry bout that,

1. But how unsettling is it?
2. And why are you unsettled?
3. Do you understand my meaning?
4. Is it clear for you?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[ECW]

Chess,

Your just pissed that the homosexuals who were outed in the media for their misdeeds were Republicans. Democrats have had their own scandal in that regard but I somehow think you expect it from Democrats. It burns your "Highly Trained Conservative Republican Political/Biblical Adviser" ass that they were from your own party and you didn't see it coming.

ECW

[CheesyMuslim]

Hey.......no problem Chess. I really will miss discussing with you, but I know that you're a busy man and according to you, my posts are shallow and I am like a knat. I won't waste "The Master's"Â*Â*or my time anymore.


Sorry bout that,

1. But lily, I wasn't slapping you down sweetie, don't go lily liver on me.
2. Not every post on DF is about you, and or directed at you, I think you should know that.
3. I usually don't start attacking others here, but I had no other choice this time, and those who feel its time to rock and roll and want that, I'm good with it.
4. I can take it, as well as give, so be ready if you start something!
5. For those who were offended by my blatant attacks, I apologise to you, but not to those who I directed my slap down at.
6 This was a rather mild slap down, and can do far far better.
7. dgridley, I am not sure I would want to know you personally either bud, but I bet you already knew that, and why would that be important that I knew how you felt about me personally?
8. As far as opening wounds here with my words, nope I don't think so, I am opening eyes not wounds, people who cage their words to protect others from themselves, are not really being truthful, and in my Highly Trained Conservative Republican Political/Biblical Adviser World, I would then become a common liar, which would in-turn, make everything I said, rather shallow.
9. ECW, well that could be, from how some folks interpret what I'm saying, but its more of how conveniently, we saw two crash and burns to hell of two prominent Republicans this political voting season.
10. Which wasn't just a funny thing that happened on the way to the *Voting Booth*.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[dgridley]

8. As far as opening wounds here with my words, nope I don't think so, I am opening eyes not wounds, people who cage their words to protect others from themselves, are not really being truthful, and in my Highly Trained Conservative Republican Political/Biblical Adviser World, I would then become a common liar, which would in-turn, make everything I said, rather shallow.

The wounds I spoke of were your own as well.. your behavior is self-destructive. Eventually you'll burn your bridges everywhere.

I'll be ignoring your posts from now on..

[ECW]

Chess,

You're just pissed that the homosexuals who were outed in the media for their misdeeds were Republicans. Democrats have had their own scandal in that regard but I somehow think you expect it from Democrats. It burns your "Highly Trained Conservative Republican Political/Biblical Adviser" ass that they were from your own party and you didn't see it coming.

ECW
9. ECW, well that could be, from how some folks interpret what I'm saying, but its more of how conveniently, we saw two crash and burns to hell of two prominent Republicans this political voting season.

That was in addition to a mistress mauler being voted out, a crook being jailed and other GOP follies that made the American people wake up to the disaster of a Republican Congress that us Liberals knew about all along. Whine all you want about hypocrisy in the media and everywhere else but you know that it began (and ended) with the self-righteous, holier-than-thou, fundamentalist Christian Republican congressmen who took great delight in bashing everyone else with their Bibles for so long. This isn't a Christian saying but here goes:

What goes around, comes around.

That's what you are mad about. No more, no less.

[lily]

Sorry bout that,

1. But lily, I wasn't slapping you down sweetie, don't go lily liver on me.
2. Not every post on DF is about you, and or directed at you, I think you should know that.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Well, since the post in question was the next post after me replying to you, what am I suppose to think?

Either way........it's over and done with.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But what's about to take place, is an, *Exodus*.
2. Homosexuals Exodus of the Republican Party.
3. Many Senators, and Congressmen, up north are about to switch Party's.
4. Where its okay to be a homosexual.
5. Because they don't want to be caught in the Republican Party, being outed, while they get shamed faced.
6. We Republicans want them out.
7. And we never wanted them in our Party.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[ECW]

Well, they wanted to be in your party because they believed in smaller government, a balanced budget and all the other conservative ideology. But when your party latched onto the Religious Right and all of their exclusionary beliefs, those people got left out as did the moderate and liberal Republicans. The ascendency of the neo-cons broke the deal for good and now more and more members of your party are bailing out and becoming Democrats because we are the party of the big tent. Republicans claim to have a big tent but it's filled up with white, hetero, ultra-conservatives. No one else need apply. We'll take the overflow. Gladly.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But the real reason they wanted to be Republicans is to subvert our Party.
2. With liberal voting in our Party, ie. Rino voters.
3. They are doing that for this purpose only.
4. To eat away at our power from within.
5. False People.
6. Spy's.
7. Workers of evil.
8. This is what the Liberals are all about.
9. I blame them.
10. Its been going on for years.
11. But now some are getting their heads cut off by other liberal homosexuals.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[ECW]

1. But the real reason they wanted to be Republicans is to subvert our Party.

Your corrupt leaders did that all on your own. You didn't anyone else's help.

2. With liberal voting in our Party, ie. Rino voters.

Like Guiliani? Schartzenegger? Lincoln Chafee? Without people like that in your party, you're just a bunch of neo-cons without principles.

3. They are doing that for this purpose only.

see answer to #1

4. To eat away at our power from within.
5. False People.
6. Spy's.
7. Workers of evil.
8. This is what the Liberals are all about.
9. I blame them.

You have only yourselves to blame but none of you are man enough to do it. You haven't had a true Liberal in your party since Nelson Rockefeller. They have all been chased away by rightwing religious zealots, fanatic treasury robbers and short-sighted neo-cons.

10. Its been going on for years.

see answer #9

11. But now some are getting their heads cut off by other liberal homosexuals.

Coming out as a Republican is never easy and the frightened neo-cons who can't stand the thought that a homosexual might actually believe the same as they do scares the crap out of them. Serves you all right. You had it coming.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But no we got many Rino's in our ranks.
2. We need a Republican Constitutional Treaty.
3. All in the Republican Party should sign it, and be able to abide by its standards.
4. If caught not abiding they should be cast aways.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[askates]

Republican Constitutional Treaty
You have to be white.
You have to have a reported income of 80,000+
You have to be aÂ*Â*blatant over-consumer.
You have to, or atleast pretend that you go to church once a month/year.
You have to,like a major in college, pick and know which group of people you hate, before you join.
You know someone personally thats a child molester.
You have to have had atleast 2 divorces, and beat your kids semi-regularly.
You have to protest things that you are completely uneducated in, or at least make disgusting signs that show your general artistic capabilities.
You have to be male.
You have to be a misogynist.
You have to be male and pretend like you could possibly entertain the right to tell a woman what she can and can't do with her body.
You have to have had at least one secret homosexual fantasy.
You have to use the word terrorist. when you feel like you can not intelligently retort in a political conversation.
You are not allowed to believe in scientific evidence.
You must condemn some one to hell once a day, if you miss a day because of sickness-you may condemn multiple people the next day to make up for your absense
You have to know less than 20%, about your religion

[BoogyMan]

Republican Constitutional Treaty
You have to be white.
You have to have a reported income of 80,000+
You have to be aÂ*Â*blatant over-consumer.
You have to, or atleast pretend that you go to church once a month/year.
You have to,like a major in college, pick and know which group of people you hate, before you join.
You know someone personally thats a child molester.
You have to have had atleast 2 divorces, and beat your kids semi-regularly.
You have to protest things that you are completely uneducated in, or at least make disgusting signs that show your general artistic capabilities.
You have to be male.
You have to be a misogynist.
You have to be male and pretend like you could possibly entertain the right to tell a woman what she can and can't do with her body.
You have to have had at least one secret homosexual fantasy.
You have to use the word terrorist. when you feel like you can not intelligently retort in a political conversation.
You are not allowed to believe in scientific evidence.
You must condemn some one to hell once a day, if you miss a day because of sickness-you may condemn multiple people the next day to make up for your absense
You have to know less than 20%, about your religion


I see you are interested in a rational and civil debate! LOL

Seriously askates, this kind of garbage makes a mockery of your ideology and it certainly doesn't further the debate.

[askates]

I see you are interested in a rational and civil debate! LOL

Seriously askates, this kind of garbage makes a mockery of your ideology and it certainly doesn't further the debate.


UHHHH have you read any of the posts on this thread, or do you not think that what has been said prior doesnt make a mockery of your political affiliation, or do you just respond to democrats, the fact that the idea
of a Republican Treaty to exclude Rhino,or gay republicans is elitist and ridiculous, so it got a ridiculous response. sorry if it hit kinda close to home:-)

[Elrathin]

Don't bother, Chess gets a free ride from most conservatives here. Especially when Chess starts talking about gays.

[Elrathin]

Seriously askates, this kind of garbage makes a mockery of your ideology and it certainly doesn't further the debate.


Funny how you don't ever mention Chess posts on liberals and gay bashing.

[ECW]

I think the Treaty is a great idea. It will mean more Democrats and permanent minority party status for Republicans. Askates hit a homer with his response. It was sarcastic, funny and it had an element of truth to what Chess is proposing. I wouldn't be surprised if someone didn't come up with just such a contract and emailed it to all his neo-con buddies.

[BoogyMan]

I think the Treaty is a great idea. It will mean more Democrats and permanent minority party status for Republicans. Askates hit a homer with his response. It was sarcastic, funny and it had an element of truth to what Chess is proposing. I wouldn't be surprised if someone didn't come up with just such a contract and emailed it to all his neo-con buddies.


That stereotypical skreed is definately not representative of my views as a republican, nor any of the republicans that I know.

[ECW]

Geez, I would hope not since askates meant it as a sarcastic jibe. There is an element of truth there given the history of the party over the last six years and the abandonment of conservative principles in favor of the neo-con "principles" of the Chimpster.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But the * Republican Anti - Homosexual Treaty * goes like this.
2. a) No Homosexuals Need Apply.
2. b) If you ever thought you might like to try being a Homosexual, do not apply.
2. c) If you have a Homosexual in your Family do not apply.
2. d) If you have sympathy for Homosexuals, do not apply.
3. Unless we have these bench marks to go by, the Republicans will suffer for having Homosexuals in their ranks.
3. a) And so will the country, with subversive votes.
4. While the Democrats will put Homosexuals on a Homosexual Pedestal, and pile awards on them.
5. This is *The Double Hypocrisy* of the Democratic Party.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[bobbylien]

Sorry bout that,

1. But the * Republican Anti - Homosexual Treaty * goes like this.
2. a) No Homosexuals Need Apply.
2. b) If you ever thought you might like to try being a Homosexual, do not apply.
2. c) If you have a Homosexual in your Family do not apply.
2. d) If you have sympathy for Homosexuals, do not apply.
3. Unless we have these bench marks to go by, the Republicans will suffer for having Homosexuals in their ranks.
3. a) And so will the country, with subversive votes.
4. While the Democrats will put Homosexuals on a Homosexual Pedestal, and pile awards on them.
5. This is *The Double Hypocrisy* of the Democratic Party.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Well thank god you have no power in the republican party and your words mean absolutely nothing.

[Alonzo]

You must condemn some one to hell once a day, if you miss a day because of sickness-you may condemn multiple people the next day to make up for your absense

:D

You have to know less than 20%, about your religion

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP3w1KZl0NA

Does 30% still count?

[lily]

Sorry bout that,

1. But the * Republican Anti - Homosexual Treaty * goes like this.
2. a) No Homosexuals Need Apply.
2. b) If you ever thought you might like to try being a Homosexual, do not apply.
2. c) If you have a Homosexual in your Family do not apply.
2. d) If you have sympathy for Homosexuals, do not apply.
3. Unless we have these bench marks to go by, the Republicans will suffer for having Homosexuals in their ranks.
3. a) And so will the country, with subversive votes.
4. While the Democrats will put Homosexuals on a Homosexual Pedestal, and pile awards on them.
5. This is *The Double Hypocrisy* of the Democratic Party.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Well......I'm curious to know if any other Republican on this forum agrees with these rules.

[bobbylien]

You must condemn some one to hell once a day, if you miss a day because of sickness-you may condemn multiple people the next day to make up for your absense

:D

You have to know less than 20%, about your religion

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP3w1KZl0NA

Does 30% still count?


That video was great.. I hope people are able to see past these scum bags hiding behind their religious beliefs to cover up the fact that they haven't done what they promised to do. Reagan must be turning over in his grave seeing what has become of the conservative movement he helped start.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I am sure he was caught off guard.
2. And afterwards, when the cameras stopped rolling was able to remember them all.
3. That was an unfair trap for this man.
4. And everyone knows it.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[underdawg]

It is only 10 commandments for gods sake. And someone who was all for promoting them in public places should have no problem remembering them themselves, unless he needed it posted for himself to remember.

[askates]

dont kill, dont steal, dont learn to speak proper....dang wat else is there

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But one mans lack of memory isn't going to kill this thread Zo.
2. I love it when he does that.
3. The Liberals are throwing other homosexuals onto political bonfires, while they support homosexuals in their own Party, Double Hypocrisy is what it is.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[underdawg]

The reason the homosexuals in the Republican Party are being thrown on, "the political bonfire," so to speak is not because they are gay, but because they are hypocrits and liars. They are gay pretending to be straight and making policies against other gay people, while they are secretly acting upon their own sexuality themselves.

Also other homosexuals are no more "our kind", than other heterosexuals are "your kind". When Clinton had his sexual trouble with Monica, Republican heterosexuals had no trouble going against a fellow heterosexual in the Democratic party.

[Alonzo]

Well, to be fair underdawg, one republican has since decided to label him a homosexual, therefore avoiding the whole issue of heterosexual immorality.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. So Zo, Clinton's a homosexual eh?
2. That's news to me, but I guess it could happen.
3. Wheres the link?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Alonzo]

http://www.nbc4.com/politics/9577408/detail.html

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. I give it a big MAYBE.
2. He reminds me of a homosexual.
3. Could be she nailed him!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Churchel]

Sorry bout that,

3. Could be she nailed him!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Mabye you are on to something. My guess is she nailed him at cornell when she was a student there, probably a few times.

As far as all of this outing goes, this topic being started by a republican strategist hahasuprises me.Â*Â*It seems the faction of your side that you represent were bummed out by bad news.Â*Â*If things were opposite I am sure there would be an equal opposite reaction from you talking up the successful victory.

I get enjoyment out of ironic shamings.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But women get nailed, not do the nailing.
2. Also I see how the Double Hypocrisy, this over all disclosure of homosexuals being homosexuals adds fuel to why homosexuals should be marginalized, and forced back into the closets.
3. What they will do for political gain is in itself an abomination.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[lily]

1. But women get nailed, not do the nailing.

Well........I guess we know how things are done in the chess household.

[CheesyMuslim]

Sorry bout that,

1. But lily you should watch David Letterman, he talks about it often.
2. That's where I heard of it.
3. I thought everyone has seen Letterman?
4. Oh and don't try to make this thread about me, okay sweetie?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas