PDA

View Full Version : Maybe cancer can still become part of our national discussion


Leslie
09-04-2008, 12:48 AM
NEW YORK (AP) — Katie Couric, Charles Gibson and Brian Williams have something in common besides their jobs: Each has lost loved ones to cancer — which gives them something in common with nearly everybody.

The evening news anchors are planning to join dozens of A-list entertainers and sports figures on "Stand Up to Cancer," a live, one-hour special being simulcast at 8 p.m. EDT Friday on ABC, CBS and NBC, as well as cable's E! Entertainment channel.

Besides seeking contributions to finance cancer research, the program will attempt to make the subject of cancer "not fun," said Couric, "but maybe a little bit entertaining — as well as educational and informative."

CBS' Couric and her news comrades will handle the information part, with each providing a 2 1/2-minute progress report on research efforts.

"We're on the cusp of many exciting breakthroughs," Couric said. "We'll have three examples of that."

Her segment will highlight new treatment for medulloblastoma, a malignant brain tumor that commonly targets children.

ABC News' Gibson will report on breast cancer, he said, "because my wife has gone through a bout of it." (She is now in recovery.) He added that cancer claimed the lives of his parents and sister.

"Cancer is a universal health threat," Gibson said, "something you need to keep in the public consciousness."

NBC News' Williams said his mother and sister died of cancer, which has put him on notice: "Given my family history, it's not a question of will I have cancer, but in what form and when."

As he looked ahead to Friday's special, Williams noted that networks had joined hands before for public-service simulcasts, but they were in response to disasters like Hurricane Katrina and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

"This is no less of an emergency," Williams declared.

The three anchors will be seen on "Stand Up to Cancer" not only in their taped segments, but also live from Los Angeles, where the program will originate with its throng of celebrities.

"We have an opportunity to galvanize people and make them care about an issue that affects so many, and is so devastating to families like mine," said Couric, whose husband and sister both died of cancer.

One of the driving forces of "Stand Up to Cancer," Couric has been an active fundraiser for cancer treatment and research since her husband, Jay Monahan, died of colon cancer in 1998.

The special, airing on the heels of back-to-back political conventions, could serve as a reminder that, so far, the presidential race has spurred little if any talk about fighting cancer.

Is it too late to bring that issue into the campaign?

"I'm not in a position to criticize other spending priorities," Williams replied, "but in an election, Americans get a say. Maybe cancer can still become part of our national discussion."

ABC is owned by The Walt Disney Co. CBS is owned by CBS Corp. E! Entertainment is owned by Comcast. NBC is a unit of the General Electric Co.


Link (http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jpeIyFCw6w4Eaf4xaL-pURLXJViwD92VEGB00)

This is the parent site: standup2cancer.org (http://su2c.standup2cancer.org/)

xLIBREx
09-04-2008, 01:00 AM
I wasn't aware it was the government's job to fight cancer along with the 10K other things the poor dependent slobs of this nation think our government should do for them.

ScareCrow
09-04-2008, 01:02 AM
I wasn't aware it was the government's job to fight cancer along with the 10K other things the poor dependent slobs of this nation think our government should do for them.

http://img157.imageshack.us/img157/981/big811366jpgwr1.gif

McCain is a cancer survivor, wonder why he hasn't brought this issue up?

Sirk
09-04-2008, 01:13 AM
A worthy cause, I myself have had cancer 3 times, but I always wonder with these big bloated things how much of the money actually goes to people who need it. I'd rather donate to an established charity with a record that some flash in the pan thing the celebs will forget about by tomorrow.

xLIBREx
09-04-2008, 01:34 AM
A worthy cause, I myself have had cancer 3 times, but I always wonder with these big bloated things how much of the money actually goes to people who need it. I'd rather donate to an established charity with a record that some flash in the pan thing the celebs will forget about by tomorrow.

Keep fighting the good fight. I lost my dad to cancer in '94. He was 53 years old.

How anyone could think it is good or fair to force you to pay for teen mothers (or any other socialist bullshit) and not the obvious issue near and dear to your heart is beyond me. In fact, it makes me quite angry.

Why would anyone think an entity which can simply take your money by force would do a better job than one which must compete for and earn your money through results and following the wishes of the donors is beyond me?

Good luck man.

Sirk
09-04-2008, 01:55 AM
Good luck man.
...


One time the cancer was in my boob. :D


As a libertarian, I'm quite alright with the government not funding this. The governement fucks everything up, I want them to stay out. :madlaugh:

I watched the video on their front page and they have it right. The goverment isn't giving enough money to research to get the job done, so let's take the matter into our own hands. Power to the people. Private organizations and donations will do more.

But I still don't know if I'll give anything to them. charitynavigator.org has nothing on them, which makes sense if they're new. I read their link on who gets the money and how much, but they're NOT putting in a percentage for operating costs so I don't think it's an honest figure.

xLIBREx
09-04-2008, 02:26 AM
...


One time the cancer was in my boob. :D


As a libertarian, I'm quite alright with the government not funding this. The governement fucks everything up, I want them to stay out. :madlaugh:

I watched the video on their front page and they have it right. The government isn't giving enough money to research to get the job done, so let's take the matter into our own hands. Power to the people. Private organizations and donations will do more.

But I still don't know if I'll give anything to them. charitynavigator.org has nothing on them, which makes sense if they're new. I read their link on who gets the money and how much, but they're putting in a percentage for operating costs so I don't think it's an honest figure.

Hey, men get breast cancer too! (I took out the man though!)

Us libertarians have to stick together. All it took was 10% of the colonials to see things our way during the first revolution and there's no reason to believe the next paradigm shift will be any different. 20M self reliant individuals > 180M government teet sucklers.

Sirk
09-06-2008, 03:11 AM
Wait... was it really only an hour long? That's all the celebs could fit into their schedule to save lives? :confused:

xLIBREx
09-06-2008, 03:22 AM
Wait... was it really only an hour long? That's all the celebs could fit into their schedule to save lives? :confused:

You gotta leave plenty of time to go to the club with the 2 bottle $600 a bottle minimum.

Celebrities love to try and rid themselves of insane left-wing guilt by pretending to help others. Hell, Oprah is so guilty about having billions of dollars she wants to take half my (paltry in comparison) money so she can sleep at night! Oprah built a school in Africa, I spent 14 months of my life in Tanzania fresh out of college. What Oprah did compared to her wealth would be like me giving a bum $5 on the street. Yet I then don't go seeking international media attention for doing so.

And then there is Bono...... LOL, don't get me started there. I actually saw Bono get up in a room full of African leaders, educated serious men, and tell them they have "music and rhythm in their DNA" and that is how they are going to solve their problems! These leaders were rolling their eyes at how patronizing and racist this was, but Bono was fucking clueless. Maybe that explains why U2 hasn't produced a decent album since the Joshua Tree?

Sirk
09-06-2008, 03:36 AM
I really thought it was going to be some all night telethon or something.
They did make me cry a few times, though. They're good for that.


I got money donated to another forum's member who's going through chemo without insurance. I guess I'll skip the guilt for not donating to this.

AnnEsthesia
09-06-2008, 03:38 AM
I think the point was more to raise awareness and the money is a side benefit. But I could be wrong.

xLIBREx
09-06-2008, 03:49 AM
I think the point was more to raise awareness and the money is a side benefit. But I could be wrong.

My wife sits on the board of a major charity and I have done a lot of work for St. Jude. I can tell you first hand 90% of these celebs are full of shit and strictly in it for themselves, PR, and plain ol' guilt. You should see some of the list of demands my wife has had to deal with from a celeb just to get them to show up at an event. Some of these people are real pieces of work, and not in a good way.