PDA

View Full Version : Palin has a mark on her ear...it's quite large, actually...


Mouth Full Of Teeth
09-02-2008, 04:08 PM
Palin's Small Alaska Town Secured Big Federal Funds

ST. PAUL, Minn., Sept. 1 -- Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin employed a lobbying firm to secure almost $27 million in federal earmarks for a town of 6,700 residents while she was its mayor, according to an analysis by an independent government watchdog group.

There was $500,000 for a youth shelter, $1.9 million for a transportation hub, $900,000 for sewer repairs, and $15 million for a rail project -- all intended to benefit Palin's town, Wasilla, located about 45 miles north of Anchorage.

In introducing Palin as his running mate on Friday, Sen. John McCain cast her as a compatriot in his battle against wasteful federal spending. McCain, the Republican presidential candidate, hailed Palin as a politician "with an outstanding reputation for standing up to special interests and entrenched bureaucracies -- someone who has fought against corruption and the failed policies of the past, someone who's stopped government from wasting taxpayers' money."

McCain's crusade against earmarks -- federal spending sought by members of Congress to benefit specific projects -- has been a hallmark of his campaign. He has said earmarks are wasteful and are often inserted into bills with little oversight, sometimes by a single powerful lawmaker.

Palin has also railed against earmarks, touting her opposition to a $223 million bridge in the state as a prime credential for the vice presidential nomination. "As governor, I've stood up to the old politics-as-usual, to the special interests, to the lobbyists, the big oil companies, and the good-ol'-boy network," she said Friday.

As mayor of Wasilla, however, Palin oversaw the hiring of Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh, an Anchorage-based law firm with close ties to Alaska's most senior Republicans: Rep. Don Young and Sen. Ted Stevens, who was indicted in July on charges of accepting illegal gifts. The Wasilla account was handled by the former chief of staff to Stevens, Steven W. Silver, who is a partner in the firm.

Palin was elected mayor of Wasilla in 1996 on a campaign theme of "a time for change." According to a review of congressional spending by Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog group in Washington, Wasilla did not receive any federal earmarks in the first few years of Palin's tenure.

Senate records show that Silver's firm began working for Palin in early 2000, just as federal money began flowing.

In fiscal 2000, Wasilla received a $1 million earmark, tucked into a transportation appropriations bill, for a rail and bus project in the town. And in the winter of 2000, Palin appeared before congressional appropriations committees to seek earmarks, according to a report in the Anchorage Daily News.

Palin and the Wasilla City Council increased Silver's fee from $24,000 to $36,000 a year by 2001, Senate records show.

Soon after, the city benefited from additional earmarks: $500,000 for a mental health center, $500,000 for the purchase of federal land and $450,000 to rehabilitate an agricultural processing facility. Then there was the $15 million rail project, intended to connect Wasilla with the town of Girdwood, where Stevens has a house.

The Washington trip is now an annual event for Wasilla officials.

In fiscal year 2002, Wasilla took in $6.1 million in earmarks -- about $1,000 in federal money for every resident. By contrast, Boise, Idaho -- which has more than 190,000 residents -- received $6.9 million in earmarks in fiscal 2008.

All told, Wasilla benefited from $26.9 million in earmarks in Palin's final four years in office.

"She certainly wasn't shy about putting the old-boy network to use to bring home millions of dollars," said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense. "She's a little more savvy to the ways of Washington than she's let on."

Silver, reached by phone at his Vienna home, declined to comment. Wasilla's town offices were closed Monday for the Labor Day holiday.

Maria Comella, Palin's campaign spokeswoman, said Palin sought the Wasilla earmarks because she was "working in the best interests of Alaska, working within the confines of the current system."

Palin became a staunch reform advocate after her 2003 appointment to the state's Oil and Gas Commission. She accused another commissioner -- Alaska Republican Party Chairman Randy Ruedrich -- of raising campaign contributions from industries he was regulating. "She realized that the environment around her was no longer what it once was, and elected officials were abusing their power," Comella said.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/01/AR2008090103148.html?sub=new&sid=ST2008090103340&s_pos=

Looks like more of the same from the Republican party...

Wndrtch
09-02-2008, 04:13 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/01/AR2008090103148.html?sub=new&sid=ST2008090103340&s_pos=

Looks like more of the same from the Republican party...

Some would say, that Palin was doing her job for her constituents. Nobody seemed to complain when Tip O'Neil and Ted Kennedy grabbed $12Bln for MA's $2Bln leaky tunnel project.

Thank you all, for your contributions, BTW! It only leaks 1Mln gallons a month now.:dork:

Trish
09-02-2008, 05:31 PM
Nor do I see them complaining about Obama's $98 million in earmarks for Illinois - including his wife's employer!

BTW - there's already a thread on this in the Obama forum.

Wndrtch
09-02-2008, 05:33 PM
Nor do I see them complaining about Obama's $98 million in earmarks for Illinois - including his wife's employer!

Maybe that's the "experience" the dems have been talking about! :ponder:

piratemonkey
09-02-2008, 05:41 PM
Again Trish,

This isn't about the earmarks.

It's about hypocrisy.

She's against earmarks... unless they are for her own hometown.

Trish
09-02-2008, 06:07 PM
Again Trish,

This isn't about the earmarks.

It's about hypocrisy.

She's against earmarks... unless they are for her own hometown.

No, it's about being "selective" as to what people call hypocrisy and who they call hypocrites.

piratemonkey
09-02-2008, 06:09 PM
One question, Trish:

What do you call someone who says they are against earmarks and then lobbies for 10's of millions of dollars in earmarks?

Leslie
09-02-2008, 06:38 PM
One question, Trish:

What do you call someone who says they are against earmarks and then lobbies for 10's of millions of dollars in earmarks?

Sarah Palin.

Wndrtch
09-02-2008, 06:41 PM
One question, Trish:

What do you call someone who says they are against earmarks and then lobbies for 10's of millions of dollars in earmarks?

"Senator"

:nana:

Trish
09-02-2008, 07:03 PM
One question, Trish:

What do you call someone who says they are against earmarks and then lobbies for 10's of millions of dollars in earmarks?

Senator Obama.

preservanation
09-03-2008, 02:22 AM
If the media spent 1/100th of the time on BHO in the last 19 months as they have on Palin in the last 19 minutes, we might know what the hell a community organizer is.
We also might know what his relationship with Ayes was and hiss association with ACORN while "community organizing" in Chicago....among a lot of other things.

I say it again....Backfire.
Palin threw the left into a deep hole and the only thing they've all agreed on to remedy the situation is to grab the biggest shovel they can find.
Fun to watch actually.

lily
09-03-2008, 02:41 AM
Actually pres....there has been plenty of discussion about Ayers and just about everyhting in Obama's life, including some half brother that he never knew existed......it's not the Democrat's fault that McCain's camp didn't do their job and properly vet Palin.

I also see nobody has a response to pirate's question, nor the OP......but then that seems par for the course.

Hey just last week McCain was complaining he didn't get as much press as Obama and they were ignroring him.......well, it seems they're paying attention now. I also notice last week during the Democratic convention the same people that were having a field day blasting Obama......still can't seem to come to the defense of their chosen candidate John McCain......oh and the BHO was a cute flashback.

So how about those earmarks?

xLIBREx
09-03-2008, 03:05 AM
Saying a politician is at fault for trying to get money back for their constituents (money they paid) is like saying it's morally wrong for an individual to attempt to get a tax refund.

The immorality comes from taking the money in the first place and Obama has already shown he is the one who wants to reach deepest into the cookie jar. Case closed.