PDA

View Full Version : Skilling Gets 24 Years in Prison For Enron Fraud


false_creeds
10-24-2006, 01:42 AM
link (http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4279719.html)

Former Enron CEO Jeff Skilling was sentenced today to 24 years in prison for his role in the energy company's 2001 collapse in what has become one of the nation's biggest corporate scandals.

U.S. District Judge Sim Lake ordered Skilling to home confinement with an ankle bracelet to monitor his movements. He told the U.S. Bureau of Prisons to recommend when Skilling should report to prison and suggested he be sent to the federal facility in Butner, N.C.

"This is not an easy decision,'' Lake said. "Sentencing is the most difficult and least pleasant part of my job Mr. Skilling has a family who loves him.''

He added, however, "His crimes have imposed on hundreds if not thousands, a life sentence of poverty."

Lake's sentence, more precisely 292 months, also ordered Skilling to participate in alcohol and mental health programs. He also approved the forfeiture of $45 million to be distributed to Enron employees.

That money will be distributed via the civil shareholder case going on before U.S. District Judge Melinda Harmon.

Defense attorney Daniel Petrocelli argued for a 10-month reduction, so that the 52-year-old Skilling could serve at a lower-security prison. Lake refused.

Skilling's sentencing marks vindication for some and a capstone to an era of corporate crime for others.

Victims of the company's downfall hope it will provide a satisfying coda to their search for justice and retribution.

"I want him to see life without parole, for all the lies he told us and others," said Charles Prestwood, a former Enron pipeline employee who lost his pension.

To others, the timing of Skilling's sentencing, after most of the other large corporate scandals such as WorldCom and Adelphia have played out, brings a tidy end to an era of white-collar crime.

"He remains the last man standing in a five-year run of corporate fraud investigations and sentencings," said Robert Mintz, a New Jersey-based former prosecutor who follows the cases. "It reads like a Hollywood script."

Co-defendant Ken Lay died in July, and his indictment and conviction were later thrown out, freeing his estate from the government's claim in criminal court.

Skilling, insisting he was innocent yet remorseful in a two-hour hearing, was the last top former official to be punished for the accounting manuevers and shady business deals that led to the loss of thousands of jobs, more than $60 billion in Enron stock and more than $2 billion in employee pension plans when Enron collapsed.

Skilling's term is the longest received by any Enron defendant; former chief financial officer Andrew Fastow was given a six-year term after cooperating with prosecutors and helping them secure Skilling's conviction.

"The Enron fraud is as large and as serious as any other fraud in the nation's history," said prosecutor Sean Berkowitz in arguing for a lengthy sentence.

"This was not a one-time event where someone made an judgment in error," Berkowitz said.

He said Skilling's philanthropy was worth noting but " ... It is not unusual for someone in his position to give back to the community, in fact it is required."

Berkowitz quoted from a victim's letter: "Mr. Skilling's philanthropy was paid out of my future."

I've always thought him to be the mastermind behind the majority of the Enron fiasco.

I'm glad to see him going away for a long long time.

lily
10-24-2006, 01:58 AM
I'll wait to see if it actually happens before I get excited.

ECW
10-24-2006, 06:59 AM
I say let him go back to work as a CEO. Confiscate all his pay and use it to pay back all the people he defrauded. Let him keep what would amount to the minimum wage. If he quits, send him to jail for the rest of his life.

Labrocca
10-24-2006, 09:50 AM
He deserves the sentence. Still it's sad and it is a death sentence.

As for making him CEO...he can't run a company otherwise he wouldn't have lied and committed so much fraud. He is a loser...

sbannon
10-24-2006, 03:47 PM
He deserves the sentence. Still it's sad and it is a death sentence.
What's sad is the number of lives these people destroyed with their deliberate actions. It's the epitome of home-grown terrorism in my opinion. You don't have to kill someone to destroy their life, and when you deliberately act to do that to mass numbers of Americans like they did you are nothing short of a corporate terrorist. An actual death penalty would have been appropriate in my opinion.

Mayberry
10-25-2006, 01:37 AM
An actual death penalty would have been appropriate in my opinion. Quick! Quick! Someone send an ambulance to Sbannon's house! He's hallucinating! Seriously, with your liberal views, I'd never have thought in a million years that you'd advocate the death penalty. And I agree! He should get death for screwing over thousands of people. I know I'd want to kill him if I lost my life savings.

sbannon
10-25-2006, 02:06 AM
No need to panic, many of my positions are more traditionally conservative than liberal and I've always supported the death penalty. As do most of the liberal Democrats that I know as well.

That's a key trait with liberals, we don't all march in lockstep together and often disagree amongst ourselves on where practical, common sense should trump our utopian ideology. For me, it's people who intentionally destroy the lives of others--regardless of their means in doing it.

Some (many in-fact) people simply need to be gone from this world. In a perfect world we'd all be fine and there'd be no need for a death penalty. I'd like that world, but we don't live there... so some folks just have to go.

Mayberry
10-25-2006, 02:09 AM
No need to panic Whew! I was worried for a minute:D

Anti-Racism
10-25-2006, 03:19 AM
He deserves the sentence. Still it's sad and it is a death sentence.
What's sad is the number of lives these people destroyed with their deliberate actions. It's the epitome of home-grown terrorism in my opinion. You don't have to kill someone to destroy their life, and when you deliberately act to do that to mass numbers of Americans like they did you are nothing short of a corporate terrorist. An actual death penalty would have been appropriate in my opinion.


This is why I oppose capitalism: it turns us against each other for shiny bits of metal.

sbannon
10-25-2006, 03:30 AM
He deserves the sentence. Still it's sad and it is a death sentence.
What's sad is the number of lives these people destroyed with their deliberate actions. It's the epitome of home-grown terrorism in my opinion. You don't have to kill someone to destroy their life, and when you deliberately act to do that to mass numbers of Americans like they did you are nothing short of a corporate terrorist. An actual death penalty would have been appropriate in my opinion.


This is why I oppose capitalism: it turns us against each other for shiny bits of metal.

Not to go too far off-topic, but you're kind of putting the cart before the horse here aren't you? You're blaming the venue for how the people act within it. Capitalism is the least oppressive economic system there is, what would you prefer?

The poor behavior that some bring to the table is on the individuals themselves, not the system. Capitalism doesn't force corruption and greed, human nature harbors it.

And when an individual goes too far, off with his (or her) head! :cool:

Labrocca
10-25-2006, 04:11 AM
It's the epitome of home-grown terrorism in my opinion. You don't have to kill someone to destroy their life, and when you deliberately act to do that to mass numbers of Americans like they did you are nothing short of a corporate terrorist.

Terrorism isn't about destroying..it's about terrorizing people into living their lives differently and gaining attention. There is no relation of this act to terrorism in any sense. What he did was inspired only be greed.

lily
10-25-2006, 04:15 AM
Terrorism isn't about destroying..it's about terrorizing people into living their lives differently and gaining attention.

Republicans are terrorists?!?

sbannon
10-25-2006, 05:46 AM
It's the epitome of home-grown terrorism in my opinion. You don't have to kill someone to destroy their life, and when you deliberately act to do that to mass numbers of Americans like they did you are nothing short of a corporate terrorist.

Terrorism isn't about destroying..it's about terrorizing people into living their lives differently and gaining attention. There is no relation of this act to terrorism in any sense. What he did was inspired only be greed.


If terrorism is strictly about "terrorizing people into living their lives differently" and "gaining attention" then let's look at this rationally:

Gaining attention goes hand in hand with vanity and greed. What were these jagoffs stealing the money for? To buy crap and out-do one another in the who has the most crap contest they play. It's all about the attention.

And as for "terrorizing people into living their lives differently", I'd say the Worldcom and Enron scandals did this quite well. Everyone I know with investments has altered the way they distribute their money in the market now to avoid losing everything (some for the second time) in the next scandal that comes along.

So, I guess you were correct to expand on my definition Labrocca, they didn't just destroy lives they also changed the way many people live and plan their lives and futures. It's home-grown corporate terrorism.

firefox
10-25-2006, 07:07 AM
No one was scared per se, just really pissed off as a result of being cheated.

Professor
10-31-2006, 02:15 PM
No one was scared per se, just really pissed off as a result of being cheated.


I disagree. When someone's money, life saving's and security is gone I'd say they were scared.

I like the idea of his sentence having to rewrite all the wrongs he did. Unfortunately, that might fall under the heading of "unusual punishment" as it certainly is unconventional.