Naders letter to the House Judiciary Chairman

[NoMoreDems-Reps]

http://www.huliq.com/64770/nader-releases-letter-conyers-impeachment-hearing

If the law has been broken Bush/Cheney Should be impeached !!!!
Go Nader !

[Osborn F. Enready]

Wow, that website got restricted after it popped up....

That was a first....

[Buck Laser]

Os, how was it restricted? I didn't see anything on the site indicating that access was restricted in any way. Maybe you should take another look.

[preservanation]

During our 2004 Nader/Camejo independent campaign for the Presidency, we invited the American people to sign on in support of our demand for the impeachment of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. Many thousands of citizens signed.Yeah!!!!
Go Nader.

He is the real anti-war, anti-Bush and anti-corp candidate.
Nader in '08!

[Osborn F. Enready]

Buck said:
Os, how was it restricted? I didn't see anything on the site indicating that access was restricted in any way. Maybe you should take another look.

Thanks Buck, you are right as it did work for me the second time.

The first time a grey information box popped up and told me that site was restricted, and then the (internet explorer can't display this webpage) message popped up.

[NortheastCynic]

So he wrote a letter to Conyers bitching about being left off of the committee.

Quite self-important for someone who isn't very...important.

-NC

[NoMoreDems-Reps]

I figured out why they let Barr be a withness but not Nader. After watching (On youtube,
because the Mainstream media did not cover it) the hearings, it seemed that the Dems
wanted to get as much Rep involvement (Barr was a Repubican) to show that is was not
just a Bi-partisan attach. But they did not want to give Nader a chance at looking good
or upstaging/scolding the DEMS for not doing this sooner.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDAFozFn4kU&feature=related

[AlanC]

Well even when you put together a large bag of nuts, its hard to include all the nuts on the table. And this isn't a very big bag at all. :lmao:

[NoMoreDems-Reps]

Well even when you put together a large bag of nuts, its hard to include all the nuts on the table. And this isn't a very big bag at all. :lmao:

Wow you are so good at calling names !
So tell me do you think the evidence brought forth is good on not? That's the
question you should be addressing, not wether you like these people or not, that's
irrelevant.

[Milton Bradley]

Wow you are so good at calling names !
So tell me do you think the evidence brought forth is good on not? That's the
question you should be addressing, not wether you like these people or not, that's
irrelevant.


Oh wait, that could destroy bipartisan politcs.


:rolleyes:

[NoMoreDems-Reps]

12345

[NoMoreDems-Reps]

Oh wait, that could destroy bipartisan politcs.


:rolleyes:

God I hope it does!