PDA

View Full Version : 'West Wing' Actors Confirm Account of McCain Vote


AlonzoMourning23
05-10-2008, 04:01 AM
Two Hollywood actors who dined with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) in early 2001 at actress Candice Bergen's home confirmed Thursday that he told the assembled group he did not vote for George W. Bush in the 2000 election.

In separate phone interviews, Bradley Whitford and Richard Schiff -- both of whom starred in the television political drama "The West Wing" -- said the senator made the remarks after he spoke at length about his reservations about Bush becoming president. Liberal blogger Arianna Huffington first wrote about the incident Monday, asserting neither McCain nor his wife Cindy backed Bush in his first presidential bid, and the Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday that a woman who was also at the dinner confirmed Huffington's account, though she declined to give her name.

McCain's aides, who could not be reached last night, denied the allegations Tuesday.

Whitford and Schiff said they did not hear Cindy McCain describe her vote, but both recalled how McCain had conveyed his opposition to Bush just a few days before Bush was inaugurated.

"He was going on and on about how horribly unqualified and untested Bush was, how the campaign had attacked his family," said Whitford, a registered Democrat. "Someone said, 'If he's so terrible, why did you support him?'"

McCain replied that as a member of the GOP, Whitford added, he always intended to back the party's nominee. Then, the actor said, someone asked McCain whether he had cast a vote in favor of Bush.

"He put his finger up to his lips, shook his head and mouthed, 'No way,'" Whitford said.

Schiff remembered the conversation the same way. "My memory was he said pretty clearly, no, he did not vote for him," he said. "I discussed it with others afterwards. It was clear to everyone he said no. Did he shout it from the rooftops? No."

Schiff, a registered independent, said he was only discussing the exchange because Huffington had made it public.

"I've thought about that dinner often since then," he said. "In my mind it was private and off the record. That doesn't mean it's permissible to say anything but the truth under those circumstances."

Both men said they were struck by McCain's openness at the dinner, which was -- in Whitford's words -- "deep in the belly of the Hollywood liberal beast." But they added they were disappointed at his subsequent embrace of President Bush.

"It's clear what he's doing; he needs the Republican Party in order to get elected," Whitford said. "The only thing is, that's just being a politician, not being a straight talker."

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/05/09/west_wing_actors_confirm_accou.html

O'Reilly asked him directly the other day if he voted for Bush in 2000. McCain dodged it multiple times before, unconvincingly, saying he did vote for bush in 2000 and 2004.

Drocket
05-10-2008, 04:30 AM
So he's a liar. This is supposed to be good, or... ?

BoogyMan
05-10-2008, 04:33 AM
Hmm, a couple of actors on a decidedly left leaning treatment of the whitehouse claim something they know cannot be proven right or wrong? Wow, that cinches it for me. What a revelation.

Pookie
05-10-2008, 09:44 AM
Gaaahhh! I don't know what to make of this. Facts will probably fall out later, so let's see.
He's got the Republican nomination, I am sure. So let's get all our info together, go search stuff, educate ourselves and vote accordingly.
Make sense?
Purrs,
Pookie

PostmodernProphet
05-10-2008, 09:48 AM
O'Reilly asked him directly the other day if he voted for Bush in 2000. McCain dodged it multiple times before, unconvincingly, saying he did vote for bush in 2000 and 2004.

lol, "unconvincingly"?......"of course I voted for him, I campaigned for him".....I guess he didn't convince YOU, but he did everyone else.....

AlonzoMourning23
05-10-2008, 02:46 PM
lol, "unconvincingly"?......"of course I voted for him, I campaigned for him".....I guess he didn't convince YOU, but he did everyone else.....

That's why o'reilly asked him about 3 or 4 times before he said it.

lily
05-10-2008, 04:51 PM
Oh shoot......if he did admit he didn't vote for Bush, my respect for him would have risen a few points.

Buck Laser
05-10-2008, 06:46 PM
Oh shoot......if he did admit he didn't vote for Bush, my respect for him would have risen a few points.
I think mine would to, but I'd have felt conflicted about it. The Bush machine did a real job on him in 2000, and got a pass from the media. I believe in forgiving and forgetting, but I'd have a real hard time forgiving Bush.

suedanim
05-10-2008, 06:48 PM
Can't prove he did or didn't. And he could hardly admit he didn't vote for Bush now, not when he is running as a Bush surrogate. Just ask Joe Lieberman who coddles, coaches and runs inteference for McCain. He's acting like a Manchurian candidate, as if he's been programmed to the dark side. HUGE disappointment to watch his deterioration.

John McCain USED to be the maverick and the candidate LIBERALS were looking positively toward. Not anymore. He sold out on torture, continues to sellout on war and now... he is officially under the thumb of Dick Cheney, AIPAC and the Bush Doctrine, that wacky, bizarro world excuse for imperialism.

suedanim
05-10-2008, 06:52 PM
I think mine would to, but I'd have felt conflicted about it. The Bush machine did a real job on him in 2000, and got a pass from the media. I believe in forgiving and forgetting, but I'd have a real hard time forgiving Bush.

Exactly. How does he manage to embrace the man responsible (and lied about that too) who smeared him relentlessly during the Republican primaries. Truth be told, John McCain should have been the nominee that year. But... the PNAC had a different plan. They needed a puppet and at that time, John McCain wouldn't have played the game obediently. For some reason... he's willing to now.

lily
05-10-2008, 10:39 PM
Just ask Joe Lieberman who coddles, coaches and runs inteference for McCain.


Rather off topic, but I think Lieberman actually thinks he might have a shot at VP.

PostmodernProphet
05-11-2008, 02:26 AM
That's why o'reilly asked him about 3 or 4 times before he said it.
oh bullshit....I saw the interview, and have seen reruns of it a half dozen times......there wasn't any hesitation in his answer at all.....

BoogyMan
05-11-2008, 02:28 AM
From what I saw McCain was laughing off the silliness of the question.

AlonzoMourning23
05-11-2008, 02:32 AM
176RAqennIc (o'reilly clip starts at 20 seconds)

He didn't answer the first time, said "of course not" the second, and said "of course" the third. Seems like forced laughter.

PostmodernProphet
05-11-2008, 02:57 AM
Seems like forced laughter.

not nearly as "forced" as your take on his answer, lol......