PDA

View Full Version : Congress Destroyed: September 11th Alternative History


PittsburghAfterDark
09-11-2006, 07:36 AM
For many avid readers of Tom Clancy books ?Debt of Honor? had a shocking conclusion and the follow up ?Executive Orders? was, in many ways, a sobering what if. Let it be said, I?m a big fan debating alternative history and this essay is only meant to be taken in that vein. This is not a political commentary.

For those of you not familiar with either book you may be familiar with the main protagonist in Tom Clancy?s writings from books translated to the big screen, John Patrick Ryan, or Jack Ryan. Ryan has been portrayed in films by Alec Baldwin (Hunt For Red October), Harrison Ford (Clear and Present Danger & Patriot Games) and Ben Affleck (Sum of All Fears). The movies are a mix of spy, techno thriller and terrorist threats. Most were terribly inferior compared to their literary namesakes.

?Sum of All Fears? was so bastardized from the book version as to be laughable. In the book Islamic terrorists blew up the Super Bowl in Denver. In the movie it was European Nazi holdovers and descendents that blew up an NFL game in Baltimore. The film can only be described as a literary and cinematic PC abomination unparalleled in book to screen adaptation. Especially given the more probable of the two scenarios meeting reality head on.

At the conclusion of ?Debt of Honor? a disgruntled JAL pilot at the conclusion of a brief Japanese war with America flies a 747 into a joint session of Congress celebrating the end of hostilities. The prime time address is, of course, stuffed to the gills with a political who?s who. Now, prior to this session Jack Ryan is sworn in as a caretaker VP who is supposed to serve no more than two years of office and has no political aspirations beyond serving out a previously vacated office. After the terrorist strike wipes out several hundred members of Congress, kills the President and vacates the Supreme Court Ryan is sworn in as President.

That?s where the book ends.

The follow up book ?Executive Orders? is an interesting look at how America is suddenly reshaped after a decapitation of political leadership. No, the country is not thrown into chaos. Surprisingly, and I think realistically, President Ryan calls on governors to hold numerous special elections and not to appoint political cronies to fill vacated seats. He puts out the call to teachers, business owners, farmers, housewives and normal Americans to run for office in the spirit of the original intent of the Constitution.

Surprisingly, he gets what he wants.

This throws the Washington establishment into a tizzy. There are representatives and senators that refuse to meet with any lobbyist. Others refuse to meet with lobbyists without a business or office in their district. The most creative, in this writers opinion, is a guy who sets a 5 minute egg timer on his desk at the beginning of a meeting and the meeting concludes when the timer goes **DING**! If the point isn?t made or he hasn?t been convinced the lobbyist is shown the door.

The press corps is no longer invited to the White House for gala balls and parties. Foreign dignitaries are welcomed during the day without state dinners and in a very business like setting. Several political wrongdoings with foreign nations (Covered in history of the Ryan saga.) are covered privately with national ambassadors and the honesty exhibited by a non-political leader is absolutely shocking in comparison to the real world. Last but not least government is turned on its head at the cabinet level. The Secretary of Defense comes from a defense contractor and is told to clean up the purchasing and procurement maze that adds countless tens of billions to appropriations. The Secretary of the Treasury is a self-made Wall Street power broker who saved the world from a financial meltdown in ?Debt of Honor? and given carte blanche to re-establish government/market relations. In short, his role was as back to the drawing board as Alexander Hamilton?s original role was in creating the model that exists to this day.

The summary of this tale? The political game in Washington is destroyed. Lobbyists, attorneys, the press and power brokers are only meeting, partying and having rubber chicken dinners with their own, their influence destroyed. President John Patrick Ryan, whose political affiliation is never disclosed, turns out to be elected by a plurality only exceeded by George Washington in American history (Disclosed in the book ?Red Rabbit?.) for his reinvention of American government.

So, on this day, September 11th 2006, I pose the question; would this nation look like politically had United 93 actually struck the United States capital building and killed 2/3rds to 80% of the Congressional delegation?

Forget the abject horror of your initial reaction. Suppress it. This is not a partisan attack piece. Though I am a Republican, and the majority of the House and Senate on September 11, 2001 were Republicans, I am not being critical of my party or the leadership, as it existed on that day. Nor am I interested in churning out a Democratic hit piece on their current leadership, positions and rhetoric.

Now, got that out of your system? Are you ready to read with an open and objective mind now?

How would America be different today if we had to elect 80 Senators from scratch in one fell swoop? What would have changed with 350+ freshman representatives? How would Washington culture have changed? Would it have changed? Would our nation be better or worse off?

Personally I think we?d be cleansed in a manner that would shock not only ourselves but also the world; friends and enemies alike. Current Washington is a stagnant black blood filled bowel that desperately needs to be expelled. Congress is, to me, a diseased intestinal tract. There are countless examples that both right and left leaning individuals can point to for political corruption, lack of common sense to abject rejection of veto proof polling levels for certain issues. Look no further than public outcry for border security and illegal immigration changes. An issue that 70%+ of Americans feel need to be comprehensively addressed yet Congress does nothing.

So ask yourself the previously unimaginable question. If Congress was left in ruins that day would a reconstituted legislative branch have provided a rebirth of American identity and direction unseen since the end of the Civil War and Reconstruction? Or would we be mired in more of the same, doomed to repeat the mistakes we make district-by-district and state-by-state each and every election cycle.

Given the optimism I have in the American public I think the incredible rebirth from such a disaster would shock each and every American. Furthermore I believe the world, friend and foe alike, would be quaking at a reconstituted American image and self-assuredness on the world stage.

So on a day of remembrance remember those that died, remember who our enemies truly are and ask yourself how would we have been different if the 4th plane did reach the United States Capitol instead of being downed by courageous citizens in a field in my home state of Pennsylvania?

Labrocca
09-11-2006, 09:50 AM
That was powerful reading. Excellent post sir.

Mayberry
09-11-2006, 02:52 PM
I agree, excellent post, and a lot of food for thought. Not that I wish United 93 had made it's mark, but I concur with your thoughts on our current state of government. It has become a circus, and it is down right shameful to watch these buffoons on C-Span. They argue like children, and it seems their only mission is to advance their own agendas, or failing that, blocking someone else's. It's a crying shame the state of affairs today. Just buying something simple requires twice the man-hours due to paperwork. Is it a contract item? Is the vendor in the system? Is it a minority owned business? Are they in good standing? If not, how is the purchase justified? All of these questions have to be answered for each and every item purchased, and it requires hours of research. And heaven forbid you have to buy something unusual, and can't find a contract vendor. Just eliminating the bureaucracy from purchasing would save hundreds of millions a year. Nevermind government actually being able to USE that item once purchased, sheesh, that's a whole new can of worms. Requisition forms, transfer of ownership, assigning responsibility for the item, it's use, and maintenance (if any), use logs, cost analysis, and final disposition when the item is no longer serviceable. The actual cost of the item is probably tripled when it is all said and done. Sure, there needs to be accountability, but let's be reasonable. Businesses don't operate this way, they'd go bankrupt. I think replacing the house and senate with businessmen, accountants, farmers, trades people, real estate agents, managers, etc... would be a HUGE step in the right direction. And holding these people accountable for their actions, just like in the real world, would make a dramatic change for the better in how government operates.

CheesyMuslim
09-11-2006, 03:52 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. But on this day of 9/11/2005 five years after this scenareo could of took place, PAD has posted a most excellent thought!
2. It would of added so much to our grief at the time, but maybe would have added to our Governments resolve??all inconclusively to fight this evil we are staring at, face to face.
3. And perhaps the ilk of J.F. Kerry wouldn't be brave/stupid enough to attack this Nation, as he and blubber mouth ex military senator, whom will remain unnamed, for the pentagon was struck on 911, but I am sure you know who I am leaving out. Sounds like burtha.
4. I for one tend to think that the real power remains in the Liberals camp, even thou we have the numbers, we never seem to prevail when it counts.
5. This is what needs fixing if you asked me.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

BoogyMan
09-11-2006, 04:29 PM
PAD, I have always wondered what things would be like if the country would just toss the bums out of Washington. All of them, both sides of the isle, and start fresh.

AlonzoMourning23
09-11-2006, 05:01 PM
PAD, I have always wondered what things would be like if the country would just toss the bums out of Washington.??All of them, both sides of the isle, and start fresh.



That may be a good thing, but to do so after a major attack would be harmful. You'd have people voting out of emotion more than reason.

BoogyMan
09-11-2006, 05:08 PM
PAD, I have always wondered what things would be like if the country would just toss the bums out of Washington.??All of them, both sides of the isle, and start fresh.



That may be a good thing, but to do so after a major attack would be harmful. You'd have people voting out of emotion more than reason.


That was just the point and I probably could have spelled it out.

My point is it is doable without the catastrophic event.

Mayberry
09-11-2006, 05:31 PM
My point is it is doable without the catastrophic event I don't share your optimism. Too many people have spent too much money to buy the current government to let it go easily. Much as I would like to "vote the bums out", there just isn't enough support from the average Joe. If average Joe would get out and vote, then we may see a change. Joe is plenty pi$$ed right now, so he just might vote this time around, though it is hard to find the time between both jobs and the wife and kids. So many local, immediately pressing issues face Joe everyday that it is hard for him to find the time to learn about the candidates and the issues. Just making the ends meet is all consuming, just the way our government wants it. If Joe had time to really see what's happening in government, then government's days would end on a fine Tuesday in November. I sure hope Joe can find the time this year, I know I will.

firefox
09-12-2006, 01:21 AM
Me too. This is why I vote Libertarian. Their candidates stand for something, don't tend to flip-flop, and at the very least, haven't had the opertunity to screw up yet! My biggest beef w/ 9/11 was the abridgement of our civil liberties as a result. There was on reason, and it hasn't solved anything.

Drocket
09-12-2006, 07:17 AM
I think this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Genl242_ZU8) would be a lot cooler.

BoogyMan
09-12-2006, 12:20 PM
Me too. This is why I vote Libertarian. Their candidates stand for something, don't tend to flip-flop, and at the very least, haven't had the opertunity to screw up yet! My biggest beef w/ 9/11 was the abridgement of our civil liberties as a result. There was on reason, and it hasn't solved anything.


Wow firefox, my biggest beef with 9/11 is the fact that we got attacked, but my view might be a bit radical.

Rider
09-12-2006, 01:49 PM
Mayberry wrote- Much as I would like to "vote the bums out", there just isn't enough support from the average Joe. If average Joe would get out and vote, then we may see a change. Joe is plenty pi$$ed right now, so he just might vote this time around, though it is hard to find the time between both jobs and the wife and kids. So many local, immediately pressing issues face Joe everyday that it is hard for him to find the time to learn about the candidates and the issues.
1.- The "bums" as you call them are giving the people what they want, at least for the most part. People vote them into office year after year.

2.- The "average Joe" is ignorant, apathetic and greedy. He doesn't have enough sense of history to be able to put the present into context. He has only the barest understanding of current events and situations. He wouldn't know an issue if it jumped up and bit him on the butt.

3.- Time is not the problem. Joe doesn't give a crap about "politics". He will cross the street and stick his fingers in his ears to avoid hearing anything related to "politics". This is why campaigning is so pathetically simple and negative. This is why the majority of voters mimic their parent's voting habits. This is why so many are led around by their noses.

Sorry this sounds so negative, but in over a half century of living I have found all of this to be true. What we really need are higher standards for voting, not more voters. It's a damn shame that racists used competency testing to deny blacks their right to vote. Poll testing has been forever tainted by this. This country would be much better served if voters were required to have a basic knowledge of civics and a general awareness of the major issues facing our country.

Mayberry
09-12-2006, 03:08 PM
1.- The "bums" as you call them are giving the people what they want, at least for the most part. People vote them into office year after year.
The bums pander to whichever group of the day they believe they can get the most votes from. The bums vote in favor of their campain contributors. The bums bow to the wishes of the lobbyist. The bums do not act in the best interest of their constituents. At least for the most part.
2.- The "average Joe" is ignorant, apathetic and greedy. He doesn't have enough sense of history to be able to put the present into context. He has only the barest understanding of current events and situations. He wouldn't know an issue if it jumped up and bit him on the butt.
You underestimate the average Joe. Joe is getting wiser. He does care about what is happening nowadays because everything is stacking up against him. Joe isn't greedy, he just wants to make a decent living and take care of his family. And God forbid Joe might want to have some time to spend with his family, to be able to afford to go fishing, camping, whatever once in a while. Joe has a much stronger sense of history than the liberals do, and he knows that history is repeating it's self as we speak. Joe's lack of understanding of current events is entirely due to the fact that he gets his news from slanted network newscasts and CNN. Joe doesn't have time to research everything, he has too many responsibilities to deal with at work and at home every day. Joe is a good man doing the best he can with what he's got. Give him a break.
3.- Time is not the problem. Joe doesn't give a crap about "politics". He will cross the street and stick his fingers in his ears to avoid hearing anything related to "politics". This is why campaigning is so pathetically simple and negative. This is why the majority of voters mimic their parent's voting habits. This is why so many are led around by their noses.
If Joe doesn't give a crap about politics, it is BECAUSE it is simple and negative. Joe has enough to deal with without listening to a bunch of childish politicians slinging mud at each other. Those are the only two candidates, and Joe is tired of voting for the lesser of two evils. He may mimic his parent's voting habits, but most likely because it's what he believes in. Tradition is a powerful thing, but traditions change. The hard line southern Democrats are flocking to the Republican party in droves.
Sorry this sounds so negative, but in over a half century of living I have found all of this to be true. What we really need are higher standards for voting, not more voters. It's a damn shame that racists used competency testing to deny blacks their right to vote. Poll testing has been forever tainted by this. This country would be much better served if voters were required to have a basic knowledge of civics and a general awareness of the major issues facing our country.
You contradict yourself in the same sentence. Competency tests would ENSURE higher standards of voting. A test is blind to race, sex, etc... Blacks are not excluded because they are black. A person's knowledge of civics and issues can only be confirmed with a test. How else do you suggest it be done? Personally I think you should pass a test and present legal identification to be allowed to vote. Voting is only for citizens. How do you prove citizenship without presenting legal identification?