PDA

View Full Version : Thank you house republicans


Alonzo
09-08-2006, 04:52 AM
The American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act (H.R. 503), a bipartisan bill to end the slaughter of horses for human consumption, has just passed the U.S. House of Representatives with a final vote of 263 to 146. It now moves on to the Senate, where Senator and veterinarian John Ensign (R-NV) and Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) have reintroduced an identical measure (S. 1915).

"I applaud every U.S. Representative who voted in favor of H.R. 503. Thank you for standing up for America, for our ideals, and for our horses," said T. Boone Pickens, legendary oilman and philanthropist, who along with his wife, Madeleine, is an outspoken opponent of horse slaughter. "I urge the Senate to pass the Senate version of this bill quickly, and with no amendments."

Life-long animal lovers, T. Boone and Madeleine Pickens have joined forces with key horse organizations, including The National Horse Protection Coalition, in a campaign to support The American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act. Together, they have run a series of full-page ads in newspapers across the country, asking the public to contact their lawmaker and urge them to vote "Yes" on H.R. 503. The Pickens plan on continuing the campaign through the Senate vote.

"We are well on our way towards ending this despicable practice," said Pickens. "But the fight is not over. We will continue our efforts through the Senate vote, until every American horse is safe from the threat of being served as 'Sunday's Special' in a French restaurant."

A recent national poll conducted by Public Opinion Strategies shows that nearly 70% of Americans strongly oppose killing horses for people to eat. Republican and Democrat, young and old, east coast to west coast, poll findings show that Americans overwhelmingly oppose horse slaughter.

The American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act has the support of 202 co- sponsors and is championed by more than 500 organizations, including such industry groups as the National Thoroughbred Racing Association and Churchill Downs.

Background

Although the slaughter of horses for human consumption is illegal in many states, foreign-owned companies who process horsemeat here are using federal loopholes to continue killing horses, sending 39.5 million pounds of horsemeat to France, Belgium and Japan in 2005.

Every day three horse slaughterhouses in the U.S., - Dallas Crown in Kaufman, Texas, Beltex Corporation in Fort Worth, Texas and Cavel International in DeKalb, Illinois, ship out thousands of pounds of fresh horsemeat abroad. Bragging, "from the stable to table in four days," these foreign-owned plants slaughtered nearly 100,000 American horses last year alone.

The process begins when owners across the country take their horses to a legitimate sale, never suspecting that within days their horse could end up on a plate in a high-end restaurant overseas. Three years ago, 1986 Kentucky Derby winner Ferdinand ended up in a slaughterhouse in Japan. And because of the quick kill and export, these slaughter plants have become a convenient dumping ground for stolen horses. In fact, horse theft in California dropped 34 percent after that state instituted a ban on horse slaughter in 1998.

Horse slaughterhouses receive USDA oversight that costs taxpayers millions of dollars - all for horsemeat that is sold and consumed as a delicacy in high-dollar markets and restaurants in France, Italy and Japan. Moreover, these slaughterhouses use accounting loopholes to pay little or no taxes - shipping 100% of the horsemeat and the profits abroad.

The American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act, a bill to end the slaughter of horses for human consumption in the United States and the export of live horses for the same purpose, was reintroduced in the House of Representatives by Congressional Horse Caucus Co-Chair John Sweeney (R-NY), Representative John Spratt (D-SC), Representative Ed Whitfield (R-KY) and Representative Nick Rahall (D-WV).

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060907/dath045.html?.v=44

Democrats favored this bill by a wider margin (5-1 as opposed to a split among republicans), but many opposed scheduling the debate since they felt there were other isses to discuss.

But thank you house republicans, and Rep. John Sweeney, for introducing this bill.

PittsburghAfterDark
09-08-2006, 05:37 AM
I remember reading somewhere how some of the remaining herds of wild horses in the west were subject to this a couple of times and how insanely stupid I thought it was. Considering I never heard of it again, I thought it had been stopped.

Guess not.

This is just one of those things you NEVER stop to think about.

I find it incredible that a Kentucky Derby winner would turn up though. Can you imagine how much more that horse was worth put out to stud? We're talking $100,000's of thousands per breeding for an animal like that.

Drocket
09-08-2006, 06:55 AM
I find it incredible that a Kentucky Derby winner would turn up though. Can you imagine how much more that horse was worth put out to stud? We're talking $100,000's of thousands per breeding for an animal like that.

Well, it WAS the 1986 Derby winner - quite possibly it was well past the point where even horse-strength Viagra wouldn't work. Then there's also the question of whether it was sold as generic horse meat, or as a specialized item. There are people who pay absolutely ungodly amounts of money for the opportunity to eat really rare things - elephants, tigers, lions, species of birds on the verge of extinction... Who knows how much a Kentucky Derby winner would go for with that crowd?

Labrocca
09-08-2006, 08:39 AM
Awe man...no more tasty horse for my BBQ.

dsanthony
09-08-2006, 01:41 PM
I'm always amused by americans who joke about muslim restrictions on eating pigs, or the "sacred" status of cows in India.

In America, our views give us largely the same views toward horses, dogs and cats. The difference between eating a horse or eating a cow is merely the emotional attachment humans hold toward one, and the utilitarian attachment we hold toward the other.

I'm not overly concerned either way with this bill, or the humane slaughtering of horses.

Labrocca
09-08-2006, 10:26 PM
I would eat Horse no problem..I think it's a silly law to protect any animal if it's not endangered or poisonous from consumption. The theft of horses is a different matter and shouldn't be fixed by outlawing eating them.

dsanthony
09-08-2006, 10:47 PM
I've never eaten horse... I have tried Buffalo burgers though. When I was in the Air FOrce, they warn all GIs traveling to Korea that the Korean words for chicken and dog are very similar, and if you mispeak in certain restaurants you'll likely be having rover for dinner.

Technocrat
09-09-2006, 04:20 AM
I'm not overly concerned either way with this bill, or the humane slaughtering of horses.


So you don't care if something is killed humanely? Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying? Can you elaborate? Are you saying would have no concern if someone abused the animals unnecessarily before killing them?

Fascinating.

dsanthony
09-09-2006, 03:21 PM
Tech, that dog won't hunt. If you want to argue pointlessly, go try to convince Americans to vote for your Stalinist policies. This is a light hearted thread.

Churchel
09-10-2006, 07:59 AM
I'm not overly concerned either way with this bill, or the humane slaughtering of horses.


So you don't care if something is killed humanely? Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying? Can you elaborate? Are you saying would have no concern if someone abused the animals unnecessarily before killing them?

Fascinating.


As far as I can see any humane killing is fine. I can see all sides to this. Wild horses should be federally protected and managed.

Legislation that gives a better chance for some peoples pets and companions to quit being stolen is also a help. I worked on a horse farm when I was young, they are their own creatures.

Technocrat
09-10-2006, 06:32 PM
I'm not overly concerned either way with this bill, or the humane slaughtering of horses.


So you don't care if something is killed humanely? Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying? Can you elaborate? Are you saying would have no concern if someone abused the animals unnecessarily before killing them?

Fascinating.


As far as I can see any humane killing is fine. I can see all sides to this. Wild horses should be federally protected and managed.

Legislation that gives a better chance for some peoples pets and companions to quit being stolen is also a help. I worked on a horse farm when I was young, they are their own creatures.


Ahh, I misread your post's syntax. That's all.