Tragedy and Hope....have you read it, do you want to?

[Osborn F. Enready]

For those who want a video tease:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVodI85NLMQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRkCvubUGCM

For those who prefer to read at their computer:
http://www.alexanderhamiltoninstitute.org/lp/Hancock/CD-ROMS/GlobalFederation%5CWorld%20Trade%20Federation%20-%2098%20-%20Tragedy%20and%20Hope.html


For those who want to buy a hardcover: (make sure you get 1st Edition)
http://cgi.ebay.com/Tragedy-Hope-by-Quigley-1st-Edition-Printing-1966-NR_W0QQitemZ190215155995QQihZ009QQcategoryZ29223QQ cmdZViewItem


If you have not read this book yet, I sincerely suggest you do if you wish to see the way the worlds societies are unfolding, and why. It can, and must be stopped.

This book has a well known history, and here is a bit about the Author: Carroll Quigley;

http://www.cooperativeindividualism.org/quigleybio.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/yates/yates14.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carroll_Quigley


For those who have read it, or own it and read it, what are your thoughts?


Why Ron Paul, and all non-CFR third party candidates are so important in the 2008 election:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo5CZvD3-QM

Dick Cheney ex-director of CFR talks to David Rockefeller:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbnpN07J_zg&feature=related

David Rockefeller Fears Ron Paul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jTpQSLCq_Q&feature=related

Ron Paul answers question if he is a member of the CFR:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NV_AML16tC8

Mike Gravel & Ron Paul: Project for the New American Century:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QZY6xiTtUM&feature=related

Ron Paul and Mike Gravel KO the Media:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbIPQFs45lE&feature=related



Are you TRULY informed enough to vote in 2008?
If so, I look forward to hearing your thoughts.

If not, I suggest you view all the above information OBJECTIVELY, and study the facts presented in the videos, the book "Tragedy and Hope" which I have linked, and the voting history and political history of all candidates, and rebutt accordingly using sources, facts and known information.

Yes. This is a challenge to YOUR knowledge, YOUR integrity, YOUR ability to discern truth from lies, fact from fiction, reality from faith.

Being American is not about being partisan, its not about being a blind faith loyalist to party, its about self-government and holding objective facts above subjective emotion.

I welcome you to take this challenge...... with all sincerity and due respect.

[Osborn F. Enready]

Has nobody read the book?
Does nobody feel up to the challenge?
Is this issue too sensitive to you?

[PostmodernProphet]

1311 pages?.......described as
The above professor describes the network I have just described in elaborate detail—far too elaborate for most people. That is why I am truly surprised that it was ever published.

{your third link above}

with a tease like that, I can hardly wait......

[Osborn F. Enready]

Nothing worthwhile is easy, but most things that are truly rewarding take time and effort.

;)

I guarantee it will give you a lot more perspective of the functional decision making for the last 200 years in all nations, and it exposes a lot of things that have been distorted through all nations forms of "nationalist/patriotic" historical distortions. Quigley also had access to a lot of data many historians then or since, have not had, and he compiles it all quite well.

If you have any political intrest, I assure you most will find it very valuable.

[Buck Laser]

Given the results of NAFTA and the growing influence of the multinational corporations, I am pretty much disabused of any enthusiasm I had for "free markets." Governments are necessary to regulate and restrict the power of multinational entities, as we've seen in the years since NAFTA took effect.

[Osborn F. Enready]

Buck said:
Given the results of NAFTA and the growing influence of the multinational corporations, I am pretty much disabused of any enthusiasm I had for "free markets."

I don't understand Buck. Are you under the impression the book is about free-markets?
Do you think NAFTA, CAFTA, in any way resembles "free-markets"?

Buck said:
Governments are necessary to regulate and restrict the power of multinational entities, as we've seen in the years since NAFTA took effect.

While I don't entirely disagree here, I would like to know exactly how you draw this supposed cause and effect conclusion here.

[Osborn F. Enready]

Has NOBODY read this book?!?