PDA

View Full Version : Nato admits mistakenly supplying arms and food to Taliban


PatrickHenry
04-19-2008, 05:16 AM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/18/nato.afghanistan
Nato forces mistakenly supplied food, water and arms to Taliban forces in southern Afghanistan, officials today admitted.

Containers destined for local police forces were dropped from a helicopter into a Taliban-controlled area of Zabul province.

The coalition helicopter had intended to deliver pallets of supplies to a police checkpoint in Ghazni, a remote section of Zabul late last month.

By mistake they were dropped some distance from the checkpoint where it was taken by the Taliban, the Internal Security Affairs Commission of the Wolesi Jirga - the Afghan parliament's lower house - was told.

Hamidullah Tukhi, a local politician from Zabul, told the parliamentary commission that the consignment had been taken by a local Taliban commander.

A NATO spokesman said the pallets were carrying rocket propelled grenades, ammunition, water and food.

Afghan politicians have said they do not believe the drop was an accident.

NATO's General Carlos Branco blamed it on "human error" when the navigator confused two very similar grid references.

A spokesman at NATO headquarters in Brussels denied the suggestion the alliance had deliberately armed the Taliban. "We are aware of it but we are not fired up about it. It sounds like someone made a mistake. It was a cock-up rather than a conspiracy.

"The forces on the ground are working to get the message across that we do not deliberately supply the Taliban with arms."

Ooops!

Drocket
04-19-2008, 05:26 AM
I'm sure it was a mistake, but that's a MASSIVE mistake. Somebody better get into serious trouble for that.

Pookie
04-19-2008, 06:16 AM
That is ONE monster mistake. That is really awful.
Somebody does NOT need to be flying over some areas, for sure.
Idiot!
Purrs,
Pookie

jafar00
04-19-2008, 09:20 AM
It's not going to make much difference. The Taliban pretty much control everything outside of Kabul anyway.

apdst
04-21-2008, 04:28 AM
Somebody better get into serious trouble for that.

A mistake, for sure, but nothing to get court martialed over. It sure as hell ain't the first time it's happened.

December
04-21-2008, 05:16 PM
Containers destined for local police forces were dropped from a helicopter into a Taliban-controlled area of Zabul province.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/18/nato.afghanistan


So Americans are so afraid to go into the Taliban-controlled territories that they just drop supplies from a helicopter ASSUMING that the local police forces will get it. :)

What sort of war is that?

December
04-21-2008, 05:51 PM
It seems like without Warsaw Pact the NATO dudes are just getting fat and lazy....

:)

The Warsaw Pact

The Warsaw Pact is the name commonly given to the treaty between Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and the Soviet Union, which was signed in Poland in 1955 and was officially called ‘The Treaty of Friendship, Co-operation and Mutual Assistance’. Although this rather cute title sounds more like the agreement which you and your friend have about sending cards to each other on Valentine’s Day, it was actually a military treaty, which bound its signatories to come to the aid of the others, should any one of them be the victim of foreign aggression.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_Pact

apdst
04-22-2008, 12:36 AM
The Taliban pretty much control everything outside of Kabul anyway.

Anything to support that statement?

micfranklin
04-22-2008, 12:38 AM
I was ready to shout traitors at this, but then I thought better of it. Oh well, the Taliban probably have enough supplies now.

Trish
04-22-2008, 01:49 AM
I'm confused. The Pentagon mistakenly sends equipment to Taiwan where there are no Americans fighting and dying and the general reaction here was dismay, consternation, and condemnation. NATO mistakenly sends arms and food supplies to Taliban in Afghanistan where there are Americans fighting and dying and it's calmly accepted as a mistake.

So a "cock-up" by some which may well result in Americans being killed is no big deal, but a similar "cock-up" that is quite inconsequential is a real big deal. Doesn't anyone else find that type of priority skewing at the very least odd?

apdst
04-22-2008, 02:27 AM
Don't worry, Trish. The article could be BS. I don't know of any NATO units in Afghanistan that use rocket propelled grenades. The Taliban uses weapons of a Soviet pattern. To my knowledge, there are no NATO countries that use weapons of a Soviet pattern.

DamnYankee
04-23-2008, 02:37 PM
Nato admits mistakenly supplying arms and food to Taliban

Probably not an American helicopter or crew. The leftists would be screeching about it all year if it were.

NATO is a worthless organization.

PatrickHenry
04-23-2008, 05:19 PM
Nato admits mistakenly supplying arms and food to Taliban

Probably not an American helicopter or crew. The leftists would be screeching about it all year if it were.

NATO is a worthless organization.
Do you welcome NATO's assistance in subduing Afghanistan?

Or is the US engaged in a fruitless enterprise there?

DamnYankee
04-24-2008, 08:16 AM
Do you welcome NATO's assistance in subduing Afghanistan?

Or is the US engaged in a fruitless enterprise there?

What assistance?

David
04-24-2008, 12:13 PM
What assistance?

This. NATO and for that matter, the UN are jokes.

DamnYankee
04-24-2008, 04:22 PM
This. NATO and for that matter, the UN are jokes.

I agree with you on that. We ought to get out of NATO and the UN. It's a waste of money and time.

PatrickHenry
04-24-2008, 05:30 PM
What assistance?

Did you think that the USA was occupying Afghanistan by itself?

Maybe this will help: http://www.nato.int/issues/afghanistan/040628-factsheet.htm

http://www.nato.int/issues/afghanistan/index.html